EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 32 (2025) Parasite, 32 (2025) 71 Full HTML
Open Access
Issue
Parasite
Volume 32, 2025
Article Number 71
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2025066
Published online 24 November 2025

© Y-J. Wang et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2025

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Acanthamoeba sp. is a pathogenic protozoan that exists as a free-living amoeba (FLA) in diverse environments, including lakes, swimming pools, soil, and airborne dust [5, 10]. Acanthamoeba are classified into 23 genotypes, ranging from T1 to T23, based on subgenus classification and taxonomy. This classification is determined by the nucleotide sequence of 18S ribosomal RNA, with a sequence divergence of at least 5% between different genotypes [36, 39]. Among these, several genotypes, including T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T11, and T15, have been identified as pathogenic, with T4 being the most commonly isolated genotype from both human and environmental samples [28]. Homologous analysis of 18S rRNA from 34 Acanthamoeba isolates collected from rivers and drinking water in southern Taiwan revealed the presence of seven genotypes: T4, T5, T6, T7/T8, T11, T12, and T15. Notably, all these genotypes, except T7/T8 and T12, have been linked to Acanthamoeba-related diseases [20]. The widespread presence of Acanthamoeba in such environments poses a continuous risk of infection, particularly among contact lens (CL) users.

Acanthamoeba is responsible for severe infections such as granulomatous amoebic encephalitis and Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) [1, 3, 5, 6, 29, 41]. Infected patients may experience symptoms such as lid edema, photophobia, epithelial defects, and characteristic ring-shaped stromal infiltrates, often triggered by corneal injuries [24, 26]. Acanthamoeba colonization primarily occurs in the homes of patients with infectious keratitis, as evidenced by the frequent isolation of the organism from domestic tap water. In Busan, Korea, FLA were detected in 47% (97/207) of domestic tap water samples, with Acanthamoeba specifically identified in 6% (16/207) of these samples [16]. Additionally, Acanthamoeba has been reported as a common contaminant in CL storage cases in the Philippines [37]. This indicates that domestic tap water is a significant reservoir for this microorganism and a potential common source of infection.

The adhesion of Acanthamoeba to CL surfaces is a critical initial step in AK pathogenesis. Studies have shown that trophozoites adhere to CL materials at a significantly higher rate than cysts [21, 23]. Remarkably, even brief exposure to a minimally contaminated solution or environment is sufficient for trophozoites to rapidly attach to CL [12, 18]. The infection process begins with the interaction between the mannose-binding protein (MBP) on the surface of Acanthamoeba and mannosylated proteins present on host cells [11]. In addition, Acanthamoeba can adhere to laminin in the Bowman’s membrane and the extracellular matrix through its laminin-binding protein (AhLBP), a crucial factor that facilitates invasion of the corneal stroma during AK [13]. Following adhesion, Acanthamoeba secretes a range of proteolytic enzymes that degrade host tissues, leading to inflammation, tissue edema, and necrosis [33]. Among these enzymes, serine proteases and cysteine proteases play a predominant role in tissue hydrolysis and pathogenesis [22, 32].

The treatment of AK remains a considerable challenge. Although trophozoites are generally susceptible to antibiotics, cysts exhibit remarkable resistance [14]. Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), a polymeric biocide, is widely used as a disinfectant and antiseptic agent for AK treatment. Recent studies suggest that PHMB 0.08% monotherapy may be as effective as a combination of PHMB 0.02% with propamidine [8]. PHMB exhibits antimicrobial activity against a broad range of pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus brasiliensis [2, 19, 30, 43, 46]. Its mechanism of action involves the binding of highly charged positive molecules to the negatively charged phospholipid bilayer of microbial cell membranes, leading to membrane penetration, structural damage, cell lysis, and ultimately pathogen death [25]. The combination of PHMB with propamidine and neomycin has been shown to improve AK symptoms in all treated patients, with pain reduction observed within two to four weeks [40]. Moreover, PHMB is incorporated into CL cleaning solutions, often in combination with hydrogen peroxide, to prevent corneal infections [34]. In cases where topical treatments fail, corneal transplantation may be considered; however, this approach carries the risk of incomplete removal of all trophozoites or cysts from the transplanted cornea [9]. Consequently, no standardized therapeutic strategy has yet been established for routine clinical practice.

In this study, we explored how the adhesion ability of Acanthamoeba may be enhanced upon its exposure to domestic tap water, facilitating its attachment to CLs or corneal surfaces. Furthermore, we suggest that Acanthamoeba may utilize proteases to degrade the extracellular matrix (ECM) of corneal cells after adhesion, ultimately increasing its ability to establish an infection. Understanding these mechanisms provides valuable insights into the pathogenicity of Acanthamoeba and highlights the potential risks associated with contaminated water sources, emphasizing the need for improved disinfection strategies for CL care.

Materials and methods

Acanthamoeba castellanii cultivation

Trophozoites of A. castellanii (Neff strain, ATCC No. 30010, Pacific Grove, CA, USA) were axenically cultured at 28 °C in peptone-yeast extract-glucose (PYG) medium (20 g/L proteose peptone, 2 g/L yeast extract, 0.1 M glucose, 4 mM MgSO4, 3.4 mM sodium citrate, 0.9 mM Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2, 1.3 mM Na2HPO4, and 2 mM K2HPO4, pH 6.5) in cell culture flasks [15].

Amoeba adhesion assay

Acanthamoeba adhesion was assessed by incubating 2 × 106/mL trophozoites under different treatment conditions, including PYG medium, Page’s Amoeba Saline (PAS) (containing 120 mg NaCl, 4 mg MgSO4 × 7H2O, 3 mg mM CaCl2, 142 mg Na2HPO4, and 136 mg KH2PO4, domestic water, 50 mM calcium chloride (CaCl2), or double-deionized water (DDW) for 1 h at 28 °C. Following incubation, non-adherent cells were removed by washing three times with PAS. The adhesion percentage was quantified by counting the number of attached Acanthamoeba cells under a phase-contrast microscope.

Cell culture

Statens Serum Institut Rabbit Cornea (SIRC) cells were purchased from the Bioresource Collection and Research Center and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. The cells were maintained as monolayers at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in an incubator. To prepare for cytopathic assays, cells were cultured overnight to form monolayers, and the following day the culture medium was replaced with serum- or antibiotic-free DMEM.

Cytopathic effect

SIRC cells were seeded into 24-well plates and maintained as confluent monolayers. Before infection, the culture medium was replaced with fresh DMEM. For the infection assay, SIRC monolayers were incubated with an equal volume of serum-free DMEM (control) or Acanthamoeba trophozoites (2 × 105 cells/well) that had been pretreated under different conditions, such as PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, 50 mM CaCl2, or DDW for 1 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After incubation, non-adherent Acanthamoeba cells were removed by washing the wells three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The SIRC monolayers with adherent amoebae were then maintained in serum-free DMEM for an additional 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Following the 24-hour infection period, the cell layers were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde. Cell imaging was performed using a ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Total RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

A Direct-zol RNA kit (Cat. No. R2052, Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) was used to extract RNA. The concentration and A260/A280 ratio of the mRNA were determined using a NanoDrop One (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (MMLV) reverse transcription kit (Protech Technology Enterprise, Taipei, Taiwan) was used for cDNA synthesis. Reverse transcription was conducted in a 20 μL reaction volume, under the following conditions: 25 °C for 10 min, 42 °C for 60 min, and 70 °C for 10 min.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

The Acanthamoeba actin related protein 2 (ARP2) forward primer sequence was 5′–GCT GTC TTG ACC CTC TAC GC–3′, paired with a reverse primer sequence of 5′–AGC GAG AAG CCC TCG TAC AC–3′, resulting in a 101 bp PCR product [33]. The MBP forward primer sequence was 5′–AGG GCG AGA CCT ACG ATA GC–3′, with a reverse primer sequence of 5′–CCT CGT AGA CGA AGG TGA GG–3′, yielding a 165 bp amplification product [33]. The forward primer sequence for the AhLBP was 5′–CCA ACA CCG ACT CTC CTC TC–3′, paired with a reverse primer sequence of 5′–CTC CTC AGG GTC ACG GTA GA–3′, generating a 183 bp amplification product [33]. For cysteine protease 3 (CP3), the forward primer sequence was 5′–CGA TGC CTC GCA CAA CTC CTT C–3′, and the reverse primer sequence was 5′–CCA CGA GTT CTT GAC GAG CCA–3′, resulting in a 148 bp PCR product [45]. The serine endopeptidase (SEP) forward primer sequence was 5′–GAA GGC GCT CAC CGA ATA CAT–3′, paired with a reverse primer sequence of 5′–GGT TCG TCA TCT GCT GAT AGC C–3′, resulting in a 104 bp amplification product [31]. The PCR products were separated on a ClearVision DNA Stain (Protech) gel using agarose gel electrophoresis. All experiments were performed independently in triplicate. Image analysis and quantification were performed using Bio-1000F (Microtek, International, Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan) and ImageJ software, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test, with a p-value < 0.05 deemed statistically significant.

Results

Adhesion percentage of Acanthamoeba after treatment with different water conditions

Acanthamoeba colonization primarily occurs in the homes of patients with infectious keratitis, as evidenced by the frequent isolation of the organism from domestic tap water. To determine whether Acanthamoeba exhibits enhanced adhesion in domestic tap water, we compared its adhesion ability in plates after incubation in PYG medium, PAS, and domestic tap water. The results showed no significant differences in the adhesion percentage of Acanthamoeba treated with domestic tap water, PYG medium, or PAS (Figs. 1A and 1B). Because domestic tap water contains various ions, including calcium chloride, we further investigated the effect of ions on Acanthamoeba adhesion using 50 mM CaCl2 and DDW. The results revealed that Acanthamoeba treated with DDW exhibited a significantly reduced adhesion percentage; approximately 20% of that seen following treatment with PYG medium, PAS, and domestic tap water. However, when CaCl2 was added to DDW, the adhesion percentage increased to over 100%, showing no significant difference from the adhesion percentage observed in PYG medium, PAS, and domestic tap water (Figs. 1A and 1B). These findings suggest that the ions present in domestic tap water may influence Acanthamoeba adhesion, potentially increasing the risk of infection.

thumbnail Figure 1

Adhesion percentage of Acanthamoeba after treatment with different water conditions. (A) Acanthamoeba was incubated with PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, 50 mM CaCl2, or DDW for one hour and observed through microscopy. (B) The adhesion percentage of Acanthamoeba incubated with PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, CaCl2 and DDW were examined. Bar graphs depict the mean ± SD (*p ≤ 0.05).

Adhesion of Acanthamoeba to SIRC cells after pretreatment in different water conditions

To investigate whether Acanthamoeba treated with domestic water exhibits enhanced adhesion to corneal cells, potentially increasing the risk of AK, we pretreated Acanthamoeba with different water conditions, followed by calcein AM staining, and incubation with SIRC cells for one hour. After incubation, non-adherent amoebae were removed by washing. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that Acanthamoeba pretreated with domestic water exhibited greater adhesion to SIRC cells than those pretreated with DDW. Notably, when CaCl2 was added to DDW, Acanthamoeba adhesion increased compared with DDW alone (Fig. 2A). Quantitative analysis showed no significant differences in adhesion percentage among the domestic tap water-, PAS-, and CaCl2-treated groups compared to the PYG medium group. However, the adhesion percentage of the DDW-treated group was significantly lower than those of the domestic tap water- and CaCl2- treated groups (Fig. 2B). To further determine whether the Acanthamoeba adhesion percentage affects corneal cell damage, amoebae pretreated with different water conditions were incubated with SIRC cells for one hour, followed by the removal of non-adherent cells. The cultures were then incubated for 24 h to assess cytopathic effects. The results indicated that SIRC cells in the domestic water, PAS, CaCl2, and PYG treatment groups exhibited significant cellular damage compared to the control group. In contrast, the DDW-treated group showed no significant damage to SIRC cells compared to the control group (Fig. 3). These findings suggest that Acanthamoeba present in domestic water exhibits enhanced adhesion to corneal cells, facilitating its proliferation after attachment, and potentially increasing the likelihood of AK.

thumbnail Figure 2

Adhesion of Acanthamoeba to SIRC cells after pretreatment with different water conditions. (A) Acanthamoeba trophozoites were incubated with PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, CaCl2, or DDW, followed by staining with calcein AM (green) for one hour. The stained amoebae were then co-cultured with SIRC cells. After incubation, fluorescence microscopy was performed to assess adhesion. The upper panel shows bright-field images, while the lower panel displays dark-field fluorescence images, where green fluorescence indicates Acanthamoeba. (B) The adhesion percentage of Acanthamoeba were examined after pretreatment with PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, CaCl2, or DDW subsequent incubation with SIRC cells. Bar graphs depict the mean ± SD (*p ≤ 0.05).

thumbnail Figure 3

The cytopathic effect on SIRC cells of Acanthamoeba pretreated with different water conditions. SIRC monolayers with adherent Acanthamoeba pretreated with PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, CaCl2, or DDW were incubated for 24 h. Following the 24 hour-infection period, the cell layers were analyzed using a ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (Bio-Rad).

Expression of virulence factors after Acanthamoeba treatment with different water conditions

To investigate whether Acanthamoeba exposure to tap water alters its virulence factors, thereby enhancing its adhesion to and destruction of corneal cells, we examined the expression of two adhesion-related proteins (MBP and AhLBP) and two proteases (SEP and CP3) (Fig. 4). This revealed that MBP expression did not differ significantly between groups. For AhLBP, there was no significant difference between the PYG and tap water-treated groups, whereas its expression was significantly lower in the CaCl2 groups than in the PYG group. Regarding protease expression, SEP showed no significant differences among the PYG, tap water, and CaCl2 groups, but its expression was significantly lower in the DDW group than in the PYG group. In contrast, CP3 expression was not significantly different between the PYG and tap water-treated groups, but was significantly decreased in the CaCl2 and DDW groups compared to the PYG group. These findings suggest that Acanthamoeba can maintain its adhesion and virulence capabilities in tap water, meaning that contaminated water supplies can harbor Acanthamoeba capable of infecting corneal cells.

thumbnail Figure 4

Expression of virulence factors in Acanthamoeba pretreated with different water conditions. The relative mRNA expression levels of SEP, MBP, AhLBP, and CP3 in Acanthamoeba pretreated with PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, CaCl2, or DDW for one hour were quantified using ImageJ software. The expression levels of the ARP2 gene served as an internal control. Bar graphs represent the mean ± SD (p ≤ 0.05).

Discussion

The role of ions in enhancing Acanthamoeba adhesion

The adhesive ability of Acanthamoeba is a critical factor in the development of infectious keratitis. Our study demonstrated that domestic tap water did not significantly enhance Acanthamoeba adhesion compared to PYG medium and PAS, suggesting that the basic adhesion properties of the amoebae remain stable under these conditions. However, we observed a significant reduction in adhesion when Acanthamoeba were treated with DDW, which lacks ions. Interestingly, the addition of CaCl2 to DDW restored the adhesion capacity of Acanthamoeba to levels comparable to that in domestic tap water, PYG medium, and PAS. These results indicate that cations may play a crucial role in facilitating Acanthamoeba adhesion to surfaces. In protozoa, calcium regulates various cellular processes and plays a crucial role in the signaling pathways that drive growth and development [38]. Calcium ions are known to mediate cell adhesion by interacting with surface proteins and extracellular matrix components. Previous studies have demonstrated that calcium ions enhance Acanthamoeba adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins in a dose-dependent manner [44]. It has also been reported that calcium ions significantly influence Acanthamoeba adhesion and motility, as 1 mM or 0.5 mM CaCl2 maintained adhesion and locomotion, whereas reducing the concentration to 0.1 mM caused detachment and loss of movement [35]. It is plausible that a similar mechanism enhances Acanthamoeba adhesion in the presence of tap water containing ions. This finding suggests that the presence of these ions in domestic water could contribute to increased infection risk by promoting amoeba adhesion to corneal surfaces and CLs.

Influence of water treatment on Acanthamoeba adhesion to corneal cells and cytopathic effects

Previous studies have indicated that water storage tanks facilitate the colonization of FLA, including Acanthamoeba, in domestic tap water. [17]. The pathogenesis of AK begins with the adherence of trophozoites to the corneal epithelium. Given the importance of adhesion in Acanthamoeba pathogenicity, we examined whether amoebae pretreated under different water conditions exhibited differential adhesion to SIRC cells. Our findings demonstrate that amoebae pretreated with domestic water exhibit significantly greater adhesion to SIRC cells than those pretreated with DDW. Consistent with our previous results, calcium chloride supplementation restored adhesion in DDW-treated amoebae (Figs. 2A and 2B). A previous study showed that geographical differences in the incidence of AK in the United Kingdom may be influenced by water hardness. Individuals receiving hard water had a three-fold higher risk of developing AK than those receiving soft water.[42]. These results highlight the role of environmental ions in facilitating Acanthamoeba attachment to corneal surfaces. We also assessed the cytopathic effects of Acanthamoeba adhesion on SIRC cells. Our results revealed that amoebae treated with domestic water, PAS, CaCl2, and PYG medium induced significant cellular damage after 24 h of co-incubation. In contrast, DDW-treated Acanthamoeba caused minimal damage, indicating reduced pathogenic potential in the absence of ions (Figs. 3A and 3B). The ability of Acanthamoeba to adhere to corneal cells is a prerequisite for cytopathogenicity, because adhesion facilitates nutrient acquisition and cytotoxic enzyme secretion [27]. The observed reduction in adhesion and cytopathic effects in DDW-treated amoebae suggests that ion depletion diminishes amoeba virulence, possibly by affecting adhesion protein expression and enzymatic activity [35, 44]. These findings reinforce the hypothesis that ions in domestic tap water contribute to the pathogenic potential of Acanthamoeba and may play a role in the transmission of infection.

Virulence factor expression in Acanthamoeba under different water conditions

To further elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed adhesive and cytopathic effects, we examined the expression of adhesion-related proteins (MBP and AhLBP) and proteases (SEP and CP3). The primary Acanthamoeba adhesin is MBP, a lectin-like glycoprotein found on the trophozoite surface that binds to mannose residues on host cell glycoproteins [7]. MBP expression remained unchanged across all treatment groups, suggesting that this protein was not significantly influenced by water composition. AhLBP is a non-integrin laminin receptor and was the first LBP gene to be cloned and characterized from parasitic protozoans [13]. AhLBP expression was significantly reduced in the CaCl2 groups compared to the PYG group, indicating that this adhesion protein is not modulated by ion availability. This finding suggests that AhLBP may contribute to the enhanced adhesion observed in tap water-treated Acanthamoeba due to other environmental factors such as chlorine [4]. Regarding protease activity, SEP expression remained stable across the PYG, tap water, and CaCl2 groups, but was significantly reduced in the DDW group. However, CP3 expression showed no difference between the PYG and tap water groups but was significantly decreased in the CaCl2 and DDW groups. Previous studies have shown that exposure to sublethal concentrations of chlorine increases the cytotoxicity of Acanthamoeba and upregulates the expression of its virulence factor, CP3 [4]. Virulence factor CP3 is unlikely to contribute to the increased virulence of Acanthamoeba through ion-mediated mechanisms. Instead, its upregulation may have been induced by the chlorine present in the tap water. These results suggest that while Acanthamoeba maintains the expression of virulence factors such as SEP and MBP in tap water, its proteolytic activity is diminished in the absence of ions. Because proteases are essential for degrading host tissue and facilitating invasion [27], the observed reduction in SEP and CP3 expression in DDW-treated amoebae could contribute to their decreased cytopathogenicity (Fig. 3). This further supports the hypothesis that ions and chlorine enhance Acanthamoeba virulence by maintaining protease activity. Overall, our findings highlight the role of environmental factors in modulating the virulence and adhesion of Acanthamoeba. The presence of ions in tap water appears to enhance amoebal adhesion to corneal cells, promote protease activity, and maintain virulence factor expression, thereby increasing the risk of AK. These results emphasize the need for improved water hygiene practices, particularly for individuals at risk of infection such as CL wearers. Future studies should investigate the specific molecular mechanisms by which ions regulate Acanthamoeba adhesion and virulence, as well as explore potential strategies to mitigate waterborne transmission risks.

Conclusion

Tap water enhances Acanthamoeba adhesion to corneal cells, potentially increasing their cytopathic effects and contributing to AK pathogenesis. Calcium ions may be a key factor in this process. These findings highlight the need for greater awareness of environmental risk factors and may inform future strategies for AK prevention and intervention.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Professor Wei-Chen Lin (Department of Parasitology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University) for providing Acanthamoeba (ATCC_30010).

Funding

This research was supported by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) to JMH (grant NSTC 114-2320-B-007-009-MY3).

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Data availability statement

Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author contribution statement

Jian-Ming Huang and Yao-Tsung Chang conceived and designed the experiments; Yu-Jen Wang, Tsun-Hsien Hsiao, Chun-Hsien Chen and Chih-Ming Tsai performed the experiments and analyzed the data; and wrote the paper.

All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Allen MJ, Morby AP, White GF. 2004. Cooperativity in the binding of the cationic biocide polyhexamethylene biguanide to nucleic acids. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 318(2), 397–404. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen MJ, White GF, Morby AP. 2006. The response of Escherichia coli to exposure to the biocide polyhexamethylene biguanide. Microbiology, 152(4), 989–1000. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Auran JD, Starr MB, Jakobiec FA. 1987. Acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea, 6(1), 2–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bahrami S, Asadi Z, Zarei M, Hamidinejat H, Henriquez FL. 2023. Exposure to sublethal concentrations of chlorine enhances the cytotoxicity of Acanthamoeba castellanii. Parasitology Research, 122(6), 1371–1380. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown T, Cursons R, Keys E. 1982. Amoebae from antarctic soil and water. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 44(2), 491–493. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Broxton P, Woodcock P, Gilbert P. 1983. A study of the antibacterial activity of some polyhexamethylene biguanides towards Escherichia coli ATCC 8739. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 54(3), 345–353. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Corsaro D. 2022. Acanthamoeba mannose and laminin binding proteins variation across species and genotypes. Microorganisms, 10(11), 2162. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dart JK, Papa V, Rama P, Knutsson KA, Ahmad S, Hau S, Sanchez S, Franch A, Birattari F, Leon P. 2024. The Orphan Drug for Acanthamoeba Keratitis (ODAK) Trial: PHMB 0.08%(Polihexanide) and placebo versus PHMB 0.02% and propamidine 0.1%. Ophthalmology, 131(3), 277–287. [Google Scholar]
  9. Di Zazzo A, Varacalli G, De Gregorio C, Coassin M, Bonini S. 2022. Therapeutic corneal transplantation in Acanthamoeba keratitis: penetrating versus lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea, 41(3), 396–401. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dudley R, Alsam S, Khan NA. 2008. The role of proteases in the differentiation of Acanthamoeba castellanii. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 286(1), 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  11. Garate M, Cao Z, Bateman E, Panjwani N. 2004. Cloning and characterization of a novel mannose-binding protein of Acanthamoeba. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(28), 29849–29856. [Google Scholar]
  12. Heidemann DG, Verdier DD, Dunn SP, Stamler JF. 1990. Acanthamoeba keratitis associated with disposable contact lenses. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 110(6), 630–634. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hong Y-C, Lee W-M, Kong H-H, Jeong H-J, Chung D-I. 2004. Molecular cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding a laminin-binding protein (AhLBP) from Acanthamoeba healyi. Experimental Parasitology, 106(3–4), 95–102. [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang F-C, Shih M-H, Chang K-F, Huang J-M, Shin J-W, Lin W-C. 2017. Characterizing clinical isolates of Acanthamoeba castellanii with high resistance to polyhexamethylene biguanide in Taiwan. Journal of Microbiology. Immunology and Infection, 50(5), 570–577. [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang J-M, Ko P-J, Huang C-L, Wen P-W, Chen C-H, Shih M-H, Lin W-C, Huang F-C. 2021. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase of Acanthamoeba castellanii participates in resistance to polyhexamethylene biguanide treatment. Parasite, 28, 77. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jeong HJ, Lee SJ, Kim JH, Xuan YH, Lee KH, Park SK, Choi SH, Chung DI, Kong HH, Ock MS. 2007. Acanthamoeba: keratopathogenicity of isolates from domestic tap water in Korea. Experimental Parasitology, 117(4), 357–367. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jeong HJ, Yu HS. 2005. The role of domestic tap water in Acanthamoeba contamination in contact lens storage cases in Korea. Korean Journal of Parasitology, 43(2), 47. [Google Scholar]
  18. John T, Desai D, Sahm D. 1989. Adherence of Acanthamoeba castellanii cysts and trophozoites to unworn soft contact lenses. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 108(6), 658–664. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kamaruzzaman NF, Chong SQ, Edmondson-Brown KM, Ntow-Boahene W, Bardiau M, Good L. 2017. Bactericidal and anti-biofilm effects of polyhexamethylene biguanide in models of intracellular and biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 1518. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kao P-M, Hsu B-M, Chen N-H, Huang K-H, Huang C-C, Ji D-D, Chen J-S, Lin W-C, Huang S-W, Chiu Y-C. 2012. Molecular detection and comparison of Acanthamoeba genotypes in different functions of watersheds in Taiwan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184, 4335–4344. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kilvington S. 1993. Acanthamoeba trophozoite and cyst adherence to four types of soft contact lens and removal by cleaning agents. Eye, 7(4), 535–538. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim W-T, Kong H-H, Ha Y-R, Hong Y-C, Jeong HJ, Yu HS, Chung D-I. 2006. Comparison of specific activity and cytopathic effects of purified 33 kDa serine proteinase from Acanthamoeba strains with different degree of virulence. Korean Journal of Parasitology, 44(4), 321. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee G-H, Lee J-E, Park M-K, Yu H-S. 2016. Adhesion of Acanthamoeba on silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Cornea, 35(5), 663–668. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li M-L, Shih M-H, Huang F-C, Tseng S-H, Chen C-C. 2012. Treatment of early Acanthamoeba keratitis with alcohol-assisted epithelial debridement. Cornea, 31(4), 442–446. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lim N, Goh D, Bunce C, Xing W, Fraenkel G, Poole TR, Ficker L. 2008. Comparison of polyhexamethylene biguanide and chlorhexidine as monotherapy agents in the treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 145(1), 130–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lorenzo-Morales J, Khan NA, Walochnik J. 2015. An update on Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment, Parasite, 22, 10. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Loufouma-Mbouaka A, Martín-Pérez T, Köhsler MDanisman Z, Schwarz M, Mazumdar R, Samba-Louaka A, Walochnik J. 2024. Characterization of novel extracellular proteases produced by Acanthamoeba castellanii after contact with human corneal epithelial cells and their relevance to pathogenesis. Parasites & Vectors, 17(1), 242. [Google Scholar]
  28. Maciver SK, Asif M, Simmen MW, Lorenzo-Morales J. 2013. A systematic analysis of Acanthamoeba genotype frequency correlated with source and pathogenicity: T4 is confirmed as a pathogen-rich genotype. European Journal of Protistology, 49(2), 217–221. [Google Scholar]
  29. McCulley JP, Alizadeh H, Niederkorn JY. 1995. Acanthamoeba keratitis. Eye & Contact Lens, 21(1), 73–76. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mikić IM, Cigić L, Kero D, Govorko DK, Mehičić GP, Andrašević AT, Simeon P. 2018. Antimicrobial effectiveness of polyhexamethylene biguanide on Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Candida albicans. Medicinski Glasnik, 15(2), 132–138. [Google Scholar]
  31. Moon E-K, Chung D-I, Hong Y-C, Kong H-H. 2008. Characterization of a serine proteinase mediating encystation of Acanthamoeba. Eukaryotic Cell, 7(9), 1513–1517. [Google Scholar]
  32. Moon E-K, Hong Y, Chung D-I, Kong H-H. 2012. Cysteine protease involving in autophagosomal degradation of mitochondria during encystation of Acanthamoeba. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, 185(2), 121–126. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ng S-L, Nordin A, Abd Ghafar N, Suboh Y, Ab Rahim N, Chua K-H. 2017. Acanthamoeba-mediated cytopathic effect correlates with MBP and AhLBP mRNA expression. Parasites & Vectors, 10, 625. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pinna A. 2002. Acanthamoeba and disinfecting contact lens solutions. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 86(12), 1461–1462. [Google Scholar]
  35. Preston T, King C. 1984. Amoeboid locomotion of Acanthamoeba castellanii with special reference to cell-substratum interactions. Microbiology, 130(9), 2317–2323. [Google Scholar]
  36. Putaporntip C, Kuamsab N, Nuprasert W, Rojrung R, Pattanawong U, Tia T, Yanmanee S, Jongwutiwes S. 2021. Analysis of Acanthamoeba genotypes from public freshwater sources in Thailand reveals a new genotype, T23 Acanthamoeba bangkokensis sp. nov. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 17290. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rivera WL, Adao DEV. 2009. 18S ribosomal DNA genotypes of Acanthamoeba species isolated from contact lens cases in the Philippines. Parasitology Research, 105, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rodríguez MA, Martínez-Higuera A, Valle-Solis MI, Hernandes-Alejandro M, Chávez-Munguía B, Figueroa-Gutiérrez AH, Salas-Casas A. 2018. A putative calcium-ATPase of the secretory pathway family may regulate calcium/manganese levels in the Golgi apparatus of Entamoeba histolytica. Parasitology Research, 117, 3381–3389. [Google Scholar]
  39. Stothard DR, Schroeder-Diedrich JM, Awwad MH, Gast RJ, Ledee DR, Rodriguez-Zaragoza S, Dean CL, Fuerst PA, Byers TJ. 1998. The evolutionary history of the genus Acanthamoeba and the identification of eight new 18S rRNA gene sequence types. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 45(1), 45–54. [Google Scholar]
  40. Varga JH, Wolf TC, Jensen HG, Parmley VC, Rowsey JJ. 1993. Combined treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis with propamidine, neomycin, and polyhexamethylene biguanide. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 115(4), 466–470. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Visvesvara GS, Moura H, Schuster FL. 2007. Pathogenic and opportunistic free-living amoebae: Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria fowleri, and Sappinia diploidea. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, 50(1), 1–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Voyatzis G, McElvanney A. 2007. Bilateral Acanthamoeba keratitis in an experienced two-weekly disposable contact lens wearer. Eye & Contact Lens, 33(4), 201–202. [Google Scholar]
  43. Walls G, Noonan L, Wilson E, Holland D, Briggs S. 2013. Successful use of locally applied polyhexamethylene biguanide as an adjunct to the treatment of fungal osteomyelitis. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, 24(2), 109–112. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang L, Asem EK, McLaughlin GL. 1994. Calcium enhances Acanthamoeba polyphaga binding to extracellular matrix proteins. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 35(5), 2421–2426. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang Z, Wu D, Tachibana H, Feng M, X-j Cheng. 2020. Identification and biochemical characterisation of Acanthamoeba castellanii cysteine protease 3. Parasites & Vectors, 13, 592. [Google Scholar]
  46. Werthen M, Davoudi M, Sonesson A, Nitsche D, Mörgelin M, Blom K, Schmidtchen A. 2004. Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced infection and degradation of human wound fluid and skin proteins ex vivo are eradicated by a synthetic cationic polymer. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 54(4), 772–779. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Wang Y-J, Chang Y-T, Hsiao T-H, Chen C-H, Tsai C-M & Huang J-M. 2025. Calcium ions in tap water may increase the adhesion ability of Acanthamoeba, potentially enhancing its cytopathic effects on corneal cells. Parasite 32, 71. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2025066.

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1

Adhesion percentage of Acanthamoeba after treatment with different water conditions. (A) Acanthamoeba was incubated with PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, 50 mM CaCl2, or DDW for one hour and observed through microscopy. (B) The adhesion percentage of Acanthamoeba incubated with PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, CaCl2 and DDW were examined. Bar graphs depict the mean ± SD (*p ≤ 0.05).
In the text
thumbnail Figure 2

Adhesion of Acanthamoeba to SIRC cells after pretreatment with different water conditions. (A) Acanthamoeba trophozoites were incubated with PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, CaCl2, or DDW, followed by staining with calcein AM (green) for one hour. The stained amoebae were then co-cultured with SIRC cells. After incubation, fluorescence microscopy was performed to assess adhesion. The upper panel shows bright-field images, while the lower panel displays dark-field fluorescence images, where green fluorescence indicates Acanthamoeba. (B) The adhesion percentage of Acanthamoeba were examined after pretreatment with PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, CaCl2, or DDW subsequent incubation with SIRC cells. Bar graphs depict the mean ± SD (*p ≤ 0.05).
In the text
thumbnail Figure 3

The cytopathic effect on SIRC cells of Acanthamoeba pretreated with different water conditions. SIRC monolayers with adherent Acanthamoeba pretreated with PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, CaCl2, or DDW were incubated for 24 h. Following the 24 hour-infection period, the cell layers were analyzed using a ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (Bio-Rad).
In the text
thumbnail Figure 4

Expression of virulence factors in Acanthamoeba pretreated with different water conditions. The relative mRNA expression levels of SEP, MBP, AhLBP, and CP3 in Acanthamoeba pretreated with PYG medium, PAS, domestic tap water, CaCl2, or DDW for one hour were quantified using ImageJ software. The expression levels of the ARP2 gene served as an internal control. Bar graphs represent the mean ± SD (p ≤ 0.05).
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.