Issue
Parasite
Volume 28, 2021
Special Issue – One Health: A social science discussion of a global agenda. Invited Editors: Jean Estebanez & Pascal Boireau
Article Number 35
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2021032
Published online 09 April 2021
  1. Baudel H, De Nys H, Ngole EM, Peeters M, Desclaux A. 2019. Understanding Ebola virus and other zoonotic transmission risks through human–bat contacts: Exploratory study on knowledge, attitudes and practices in Southern Cameroon. Zoonoses and Public Health, 66(3), 288–295. [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger SA. 2016. Infectious diseases of Mongolia. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Gideon Informatics Inc. https://www.overdrive.com/media/2630405/infectious-diseases-of-mongolia. [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanc M, Oriol C, Devienne S. 2013. Un siècle d’évolution du système pastoral de la steppe désertique de Mongolie: diminution de la mobilité des troupeaux, dérégulation de l’accès aux parcours et crise de surpâturage. Études Mongoles & Sibériennes, Centrasiatiques & Tibétaines, 43–44. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolortsetseg S, Enkhtuvshin Sh, Nyamsuren D, Weisman W, Fine A, Yang A, Joly DO. 2012. Serosurveillance for foot-and-mouth disease in Mongolian gazelles (Procapra Gutturosa) and livestock on the Eastern steppe of Mongolia. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 48(1), 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown H, Kelly AH. 2014. Material proximities and hotspots: toward an anthropology of viral hemorrhagic fevers. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 28(2), 280–303. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chagdarsürüng Ts. 1980. L’art vétérinaire des Mongols nomades. Studia Mongolica, Permanent Committee, International Congress of Mongolists, VIII(16–9), 125–137. [Google Scholar]
  7. Churchill SK, Helman PM. 1990. Distribution of the ghost bat, Macroderma gigas, (Chiroptera: Megadermatidae) in central and south Australia. Australian Mammalogy, 13, 149–156. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cleaveland S, Laurenson MK, Taylor LH. 2001. Diseases of humans and their domestic mammals: pathogen characteristics, host range and the risk of emergence. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society London B, 356, 991–999. [Google Scholar]
  9. Collier S, Lakoff A, Editors. 2008. Biosecurity interventions global health and security in questions. Columbia University Press-SSRC: New York. [Google Scholar]
  10. Deem SL, Linn M, Karesh W, Schaller G, Lhagvasuren B, Nyamsuren B, Olson K, Dierenfeld E. 2002. Health evaluation of Mongolian gazelles Procapra gutturosa on the eastern steppes of Mongolia. Gnusletter, 21(1), 23–24. [Google Scholar]
  11. Descola P. 2005. Par delà nature et culture. Gallimard: Paris. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ebright JR, Altantsetseg T, Oyungerel R. 2003. Emerging infectious diseases in Mongolia. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 9(12), 1509–1515. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fijn N. 2011. Living with herds. Human-animal coexistence in Mongolia. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  14. Glowczewski B. 2015. Totemic becomings. Cosmopolitics of the dreaming/Devires totêmicos. Cosmopolítica do sonho [Bilingual Edition: English, Portuguese], translated by Pinheiro J, de O Santos A. n-1 Publications: Helsinki, Saõ Paulo. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gortazar C, Reperant LA, Kuiken T, de la Fuente J, Boadella M, Martínez-Lopez B, Ruiz-Fons F, Estrada-Peña A, Drosten C, Medley G, Ostfeld R, Peterson T, VerCauteren KC, Menge C, Artois M, Schultsz C, Delahay R, Serra-Cobo J, Poulin R, Keck F, Aguirre AA, Henttonen H, Dobson AP, Kutz S, Lubroth J, Mysterud A. 2014. Crossing the interspecies barrier: Opening the door to zoonotic pathogens. PLoS Pathogens, 10(7), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004129. [Google Scholar]
  16. Haraway D. 2007. When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis. [Google Scholar]
  17. Haraway D. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press: Durham. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hill R, Grant C, George M, Robinson C, Jackson S, Abel N. 2012. A typology of indigenous engagement in Australian environmental management: implications for knowledge integration and social ecological system sustainability. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 23. [Google Scholar]
  19. Holbraad M, Pedersen MA. 2017. The ontological turn: an anthropological exposition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  20. Humphrey C. 1984. A fragmentary text of curative magic. Journal of the Anglo-Mongolian Society, 9(1–2), 27–33. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ingold T. 1986. The appropriation of nature. Essays on human ecology and social relations. Manchester University Press: Manchester. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman JL, Daszak P. 2008. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature, 451, 990–993. [Google Scholar]
  23. Keck F, Lakoff A. 2013. Sentinel devices. Limn, 3. http://limn.it/preface-sentinel-devices-2/, consulted 2015/06/06. [Google Scholar]
  24. Keck F. 2020. Avian reservoirs. Virus hunters and birdwatchers in Chinese sentinel posts. Duke University Press: Durham. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kessler M, Becker D, Peel A, Justice N, Lunn T, Crowley D. 2018. Changing resource landscapes and spillover of henipaviruses. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1429(1), 78–99. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lainé N. 2018. Elephant tuberculosis as a reverse zoonosis. Postcolonial scenes of compassion, conservation and public health in Laos and France. Medicine Anthropology Theory, 5(3), 157–176. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lainé N. 2020. Living and working with giants: a multispecies ethnography of the Khamti and elephants in Northeast India. Paris, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (Natures en Sociétés), 2, 272. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lainé N, Mahavongsananh K. 2016. Ethics, or a dialogue of knowledge. The case of Tuberculosis surveillance in elephants in Laos, in The Paths of Ethics in Research in Laos and the Mekong Countries – Health, Environment, Societies. Ethical Research Committee of the University of Health Sciences of Laos, IRD Advisory Committee on Deontology and Ethics, Moulin A-M, Oupathana B, Souphanthong M, Taverne B, Editors. Marseille et Dakar/Éditions de l’IRD et L’Harmattan: Sénégal. p. 147–153. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lainé N, Morand S. 2020. Linking humans, their animals, and the environment again: a decolonized and more-than human approach to “One Health”. Parasite, 27, 55. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lakoff A, Collier S (dir.). 2008. Biosecurity interventions. Global health and security in question. SSRC-University of Columbia Press: New York. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lassaussaie J, Mikota SK, Theoret C, Buisson Y, Bouchard B. 2014. Tuberculosis in Laos, who is at risk: the mahouts or their elephants? Epidemiology and Infection, 143, 922–931. [Google Scholar]
  32. Latour B. 1999. Politiques de la nature. Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie ?. La découverte: Paris. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lynteris C, Keck F. 2018. Zoonosis: Prospects and challenges for medical anthropology. Medicine Anthropology Theory, 5(3), 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  34. Marcus G, Meyers F. 1995. The traffic in culture. Refiguring art and anthropology. University of California Press: Berkeley. [Google Scholar]
  35. Maslow M, Mikota SK. 2015. Tuberculosis in elephants. A reemergent disease: diagnostic dilemmas, the natural history of infection, and new immunological tools. Veterinary Pathology, 52(3), 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  36. McConnel U. 1931. A moon legend from the Bloomfield River, North Queensland. Oceania, 2(1), 9–25. [Google Scholar]
  37. Morand S, Owers K, Bordes S. 2014. Biodiversity and emerging zoonoses, in Confronting emerging zoonoses: The One Health paradigm, Yamada A, Kahn LH, Kaplan B, Monath TP, Woodall J, Conti LA, Editors. Springer: Tokyo. p. 27–41. [Google Scholar]
  38. Morton J. 1987. The effectiveness of totemism: “increase ritual” and resource control in Central Australia. Man, New Series, 22(3), 453–474. [Google Scholar]
  39. Morvan A. 2020. Totem, in L’identité. Dictionnaire encyclopédique, Gayon J (dir.). Gallimard: Paris. p. 772–775. [Google Scholar]
  40. Morvan A. 2021. Ethnographie des relations inter-espèces dans le contexte biosécuritaire australien. Anthropologie et Santé, 22. [Google Scholar]
  41. Narat V, Alcayna-Stevens L, Rupp S, Giles-Vernick V. 2017. Rethinking human-nonhuman primate contact and pathogenic disease spillover. Ecohealth, 14(4), 840–850. [Google Scholar]
  42. Nyamsuren D, Joly DO, Enkhtuvshin S, Odonkhuu D, Olson KA, Draisma M, Karesh WB. 2006. Exposure of Mongolian gazelles (Procapra gutturosa) to foot and mouth disease virus. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 42(1), 154–158. [Google Scholar]
  43. Plowright RK, Foley P, Field HE, Dobson AP, Foley JE, Eby P, Daszak P. 2011. Urban habituation, ecological connectivity and epidemic dampening: the emergence of Hendra virus from flying foxes (Pteropus spp.). Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278(1725), 3703–3712. [Google Scholar]
  44. Riccucci M. 2012. Bats as materia medica: An ethnomedical review and implications for conservation. Vespertilio, 16, 249–270. [Google Scholar]
  45. Rose DB. 2011. Flying fox: Kin, keystone, kontaminant. Australian Humanities Review, 50, 119–136. [Google Scholar]
  46. Roth F. 2006. The development of brucellosis control in Mongolia. Public health PhD. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine: London. [Google Scholar]
  47. Roth W. 1901. Food: Its search, capture, and preparation. North Queensland Ethnography, 3. Government Printer: Brisbane. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ruhlmann S. 2015. Des éleveurs sentinelles. Les politiques contemporaines de surveillance des maladies animales en Mongolie. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, 9(2), 237–264. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ruhlmann S. 2018. Dealing with highly contagious animal diseases under neoliberal governmentality in mongolia. Medicine Anthropology Theory, 5(3), 99–129. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ruhlmann S. 2019. Inviting happiness: Food sharing in post-communist Mongolia. Leiden & Boston/Brill (Inner Asia Book Series 11). [Google Scholar]
  51. Smith I, Broos A, de Jong C, Zeddeman A, Smith C, Smith G, Moore F, Barr J, Crameri G, Marsh G, Tachedjian M, Yu M, Kung YH, Wang L-F, Field H. 2011. Identifying Hendra virus diversity in pteropid bats. PLOS One, 6(9). [Google Scholar]
  52. Spencer B, Gillen FJ. 1899. The native tribes of Central Australia. Macmillan: London. [Google Scholar]
  53. Stépanoff Ch. 2012. Entre piétin et loup. Menace interne et menace externe dans l’élevage de rennes des Tožu. Cahiers d’Anthropologie Sociale, 8, 137–151. [Google Scholar]
  54. Tambiah SJ. 1969. Animals are good to think and good to prohibit. Ethnology, 8(4), 423–459. [Google Scholar]
  55. Thomson MS. 2007. Placing the wild in the city: “Thinking with” Melbourne’s bats. Society and Animals, 15, 79–95. [Google Scholar]
  56. Von Brandenstein CG. 1982. Names and substance of the Australian subsection system. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang LF, Cowled C, Editors. 2015. Bats and viruses: A new frontier of emerging infectious diseases. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken. [Google Scholar]
  58. Webb S. 1995. Palaeopathology of Aboriginal Australians: Health and disease across a hunter-gatherer continent. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  59. Weir I, Editor. 2003. Story place: Indigenous art of Cape York and the rainforest. Queensland Art Gallery: Brisbane. [Google Scholar]
  60. Woolgar S, Lezaun J. 2015. Missing the (question) mark? What is a turn to ontology? Social Studies of Science, 45(3), 462–467. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Roth F, Bonfoh B, de Savigny D, Tanner M. 2007. Human benefits of animal interventions for zoonosis control. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 13(4), 527–531. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zinsstag J, Utzinger J, Probst-Hensch N, Shan L, Zhou XN. 2020. Toward integrative surveillance-response systems for the prevention of future pandemics. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 9, 140. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.