Open Access
Research Article
Issue
Parasite
Volume 27, 2020
Article Number 42
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2020039
Published online 08 June 2020

© L. Paronyan et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2020

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

The Republic of Armenia is a landlocked country in the Caucasus region of Eurasia. The territory is mostly mountainous with fast flowing rivers and few forests. The climate is highland continental, i.e. hot summers and cold winters. The country is characterised by a large variety of natural environments. Several distinct landscape zones are described: deserts, semi-deserts, dry steppes, steppes, woodlands, sub-alpine, and alpine lands. The conditions of these various natural landscape zones from the lowland plains to high mountains rely primarily on altitude, and shape the diversity of both flora and fauna, including insects. The country is divided into 11 provinces, of which 10 are regions (marzes) – Aragatsotn, Ararat, Armavir, Gegharkunik, Kotayk, Lori, Shirak, Syunik, Tavush, and Vayots Dzor – and the last one is Yerevan, the capital city.

The only mosquito-borne disease historically registered in Armenia is malaria. This disease was known to be highly endemic in the country from ancient times. It had persisted in Armenia throughout the centuries but was absent for 31 years, during the period of 1963–1993 [6, 24, 25, 28]. From 1994 to 2005, 4013 (1722 autochthonous) Plasmodium vivax malaria cases were registered [4, 7, 13] with the highest number in 1998 (1156) of which 542 were autochthonous; 31.3 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. No autochthonous cases have been reported since 2005 and the country was certified malaria-free by the WHO in 2011 [8].

Mosquito-borne arboviruses circulate in Armenia, without significantly threatening public and animal health. A large entomological survey conducted from 2003 to 2006 by the Armenian Institute of Epidemiology, Virology, and Medical Parasitology, identified 125 distinct strains of arboviruses isolated from 64,567 field-caught mosquitoes, including West Nile virus and others viruses like the Batai, Sindbis, Tahyna and Gheta viruses, without registered human or animal cases [19, 20].

In response to the P. vivax malaria outbreak, a national network of entomologists was established during the 1990s, and continues to operate today. Medical entomologists are active in all regions and Yerevan territorial branches of the National Center of Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC), with leadership at the National level – Reference Laboratory Center of NCDC at the Ministry of Health. Most entomological surveillance in Armenia focuses on anopheline mosquitoes, with registration of all stagnant water bodies throughout Armenia by routine investigation of stagnant water bodies for larvae and barns for adults every 10 days. Sampling techniques include dipping for larvae and adult resting catches with tubes from the walls of barns. Routine vector control activities rely mainly on the use of mosquito-larvivorous fish Gambusia affinis, and more rarely on insecticide spraying and the reduction of mosquito larval breeding sites [7].

The anopheline species, locally named “malaria mosquitoes”, are the most studied mosquitoes in Armenia. The Anopheles maculipennis complex is represented locally by two species. The first, An. sacharovi Favre, was the main malaria vector, with a marked anthropophilic biting behaviour. It is present in regions where rice is cultivated, in the central part of the Ararat Valley. The second, An. maculipennis s.s. Meigen, is widely distributed in the whole country. It is more zoophilic than An. sacharovi and therefore considered only a secondary malaria vector. In the late 1950s and the early 1960s, the An. maculipennis complex was thought to be eliminated from most of Armenia, but the use of insecticide was discontinued in the late 1960s and the numbers of An. maculipennis s.s. were restored, whereas An. sacharovi was not detected before the late 1990s. Several surveys of this complex were performed in the 1990s and 2000s using molecular methods for species differentiation [17, 23, 31].

VectorNet is a joint project of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) supporting the collection of distribution data on vectors of pathogens, related to both human and animal health. An international VectorNet field mission reported the presence of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) in Georgia at 20 km north of the Georgia-Armenia border in September 2015 [1]. Here, we report results of another VectorNet field mission conducted in 2016 in Armenia with the aim of improving knowledge of the under-studied mosquito fauna (i.e. culicines) and assessing the presence and distribution of invasive mosquitoes, with special focus on the main arbovirus vectors present in the south Caucasus and Middle East, Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictus (Skuse), Culex perexiguus Theobald and Cx. tritaeniorhynchus Giles [12]. This field study was conducted as a snapshot survey (inspection of a maximum of sites within a short period of time in June–July 2016). To confirm and complete the observations, the survey was prolonged in August–October 2016. Finally, we report results of longitudinal surveys targeting West Nile vector species performed in 2017 and 2018 as part of the ECDC project “Development of a Tool to Appraise and Compare Vector Control Strategies against West Nile Fever in Europe” with the specific aim of evaluating mosquito population dynamics and relative abundance.

Materials and methods

In 2016, a snapshot field sampling campaign was performed from June 20 to July 12, 2016, in all 11 administrative units of Armenia, namely the 10 regions (Aragatsotn, Ararat, Armavir, Gegharkunik, Kotayk, Lori, Shirak, Syunik, Tavush, Vayotz Dzor) and the capital city of Yerevan (Fig. 1). A longitudinal survey focusing on a selected number of sites was performed in August–October 2016 as well as in March–November 2017 and April–October 2018, in almost all Armenian regions (except Shirak and Gegharkunik) and in Yerevan.

thumbnail Figure 1

Location of the sampling sites in Armenia, June 20 to July 10, 2016.

Classical entomological methods were used, based on protocols defined for VectorNet field studies [11]. We mainly collected immature aquatic stages by dipping/netting. Occasionally, adults were collected with baited traps: All-Weather LED EVS traps (BioQuip, USA) baited with CO2 as dry ice, CDC Light Traps (CDCLT: Model 512, John W. Hock Company, USA), and BG Sentinel II™ traps (BGS: Biogents, Germany) baited with BG-Lure™ (Biogents, Germany) and CO2 as dry ice. Also, simple ovitraps were used to collect eggs from container breeding Aedes species [11]. In addition, resting adult mosquitoes were caught in animal shelters using aspirators and tubes. CDCLT, EVS and BGS traps were operated during the night, from at least 2 h before sunset up to 2 h after sunrise. They were placed in safe areas, avoiding the traps being damaged by animals or stolen. EVS and CDCLT were hung with the trap entrance at 1.5 m high and BGS placed on the ground. Finally, human landing catches was performed at daytime in Bagratashen (targeting Ae. albopictus). The collections were performed at varying frequency detailed in Tables S1–S4. Field data were reported using the VECMAP® system (Avia-GIS, Belgium), in particular its mobile telephone application.

Entomological observations were analysed per sampling unit, defined as a collection of mosquitoes using the same collecting method at the same site. For instance, larval sampling was performed at several points of a large marsh within the same sampling unit. A sampling unit could be positive or negative for mosquitoes. Thus, sampling units can be multiple at one site, using for instance both resting adult collection and ovitrapping. Some localities also had several sites (village, city, etc.).

The larvae and adult specimens were identified based on standard morphological keys [5, 15, 26]. Molecular identification by DNA isolation and amplification of part of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene (mt COI) was performed for a single specimen, as described elsewhere [27]. Pupae were reared to obtain adults.

Results

Our survey in 2016–2018 increased the number of mosquito species recorded in Armenia from 18 to 28. The presence of the invasive species Ae. albopictus was recorded at a single locality at a border point with Georgia, on the main road Tbilisi-Yerevan. Anopheles sacharovi, the main malaria vector in Armenia, was only found in the Ararat Valley.

Historical records

Table 1 summarises published mosquito records (reference sources are given in the table). Up to 2013, 18 species were known to occur in Armenia. Five mosquito species of the Anophelinae subfamily were listed: An. maculipennis s.l./s.s., An. sacharovi, An. hyrcanus (Pallas), An. superpictus Grassi and An. claviger (Meigen). As for the Culicinae subfamily, four genera were listed, namely Aedes, Culex, Culiseta and Uranotaenia. Four Aedes species were recorded: Ae. caspius Pallas which was found in many lowlands, Ae. vexans (Meigen) reported to be more widely distributed in various landscapes, Ae. dorsalis (Meigen) and Ae. geniculatus (Olivier) of which larvae were found in small natural reservoirs in the forest and forest-steppe zones where they were reported as aggressive biters. With six species, the genus Culex was highly represented, with Cx. pipiens Linnaeus and Cx. theileri Theobald as the most widely distributed species, Cx. hortensis Ficalbi and Cx. modestus Ficalbi only noted in the Ararat Valley, and Cx. mimeticus Noè and Cx. territans Walker only recorded in one study [18]. Two species of the genus Culiseta were listed, i.e. Cs. longiareolata (Macquart) found in the Ararat Valley only, and Cs. annulata (Schrank) more widely distributed. Finally, from the genus Uranotaenia, the species Ur. unguiculata Edward was reported from the Ararat Valley to occur in temporary pools and small ponds.

Table 1

Mosquito species/taxa reported to occur in Armenia in the literature, prior to 2016 (1 = presence record).

Field mission June 20–July 10, 2016

A total number of 117 sites were visited (in all Armenian regions) and 197 sampling units were assessed, showing 143 to be positive for larvae and/or adults and 54 remaining negative (Tables 2 and 3, and Table S1). The positive sampling units harboured 1–6 mosquito species, with 37% (n = 53) showing monospecific mosquito fauna (Fig. 2). A total number of 4157 mosquito specimens were observed (3152 larvae and 1005 adults – caught or emerged from pupae), belonging to 24 species/taxa. Ten species are new records for Armenia: Ae. albopictus, Ae. annulipes (Meigen), Ae. cataphylla Dyar, Ae. cinereus/geminus Meigen/Peus, Ae. flavescens (Müller), An. plumbeus Stephens, Coquillettidia richiardii (Ficalbi), Cx. martinii Medschid, Cx. torrentium Martini and Cs. subochrea (Edwards).

thumbnail Figure 2

Number of sampling units that were found to be positive for mosquitoes (total = 143), according to the number of mosquito species observed in each sampling, June 20 to July 10, 2016. Anopheles maculipennis s.l. is considered a “species” when no precise species from the complex is listed.

Table 2

Number of positive sites per mosquito species recorded in Armenia in 2016, according to regions. Asterisk indicates a first record for Armenia.

Table 3

Sampling effort of the surveys, according to period and sampling method.

Two adult Ae. albopictus females were collected for the first time in Armenia on July 7, 2016, by netting around humans, 100 m from a bridge over the Debeb River (in Bagratashen, Lori Province, Fig. 3), which is the border point on the main Tbilisi-Yerevan road.

thumbnail Figure 3

Location of the sites where Aedes albopictus was recorded in 2016–2018, north Armenia.

A unique and poorly preserved specimen of Aedes sp. (collected in Gegharkunik on June 24, 2016) morphologically identified as “cataphylla/leucomelas/punctor”, revealed a COI sequence (GenBank sequence submission number MT457072, Specimen 16-116ARM) showing 100 to 98.7% similarities with Ae. leucomelas (Meigen), 99.5–97.7% similarities with Ae. cataphylla, and 90.6% similarity with Ae. punctor (Kirby). Because Ae. cataphylla was recorded in Gegharkunik province (Table 2 and Table S1) and Ae. leucomelas was never recorded in Armenia, we assign this specimen to Ae. cataphylla until additional and better preserved specimens can be clearly assigned to Ae. leucomelas.

Among the Anophelinae, An. maculipennis s.s. and An. claviger were the most prevalent species and were distributed in most of the regions. Anopheles sacharovi was observed in the Ararat Valley, and An. plumbeus was observed as larval stages in tyres in Syunik Province.

Among the Culicinae, the most common and numerous Aedes species was Ae. caspius, found in many regions except the highlands of the Sevan basin and Syunik; Ae. vexans was observed in all climatic zones and in various landscape conditions, at all places with temporary and subpermanent reservoirs. Larvae of Ae. geniculatus were found in small reservoirs temporarily filled with water, and in the forest and forest-steppe zones where adults are aggressive biters. Concerning the genus Culiseta, Cs. longiareolata was found in the Ararat, Aragatsotn, Kotayk and Gegharkunik regions, and in the city of Yerevan, and Cs. annulata was distributed in all types of landscapes in Armenia. Within the genus Culex, the most widely distributed species were Cx. hortensis, Cx. theileri and Cx. pipiens; these three species were found in the lowland and foothill parts of the semi-desert area, as well as in forest and forest-steppe areas. Culex martinii, Cx. territans and Cx. torrentium presented lower abundances. Uranotaenia unguiculata was found in the Armavir, Kotayk, Ararat and Vayots-Dzor regions, in temporary pools or small ponds.

Field mission August 3–October 30, 2016

A total number of 19 sites were visited (in all regions except Aragatsotn, Ararat, Armavir and Syunik), and 29 sampling units were evaluated with 24 proving to be positive for mosquitoes and 5 negative (Table S2). The positive sampling units harboured 1–4 mosquito species and a total number of 166 mosquitoes (119 larvae and 47 adults) from 9 species/taxa. Aedes albopictus was again observed at the border point on the main road Tbilisi-Yerevan close to Bagratashen village (Fig. 3), with 14 and 6 adults caught by human landing catch on August 14 and September 28, respectively (30 min to 1 h catch during the day time).

Field mission March 6–December 12, 2017

A total number of 107 sites were visited (in all regions except Gegharkunik and Shirak), and 1393 sampling units were evaluated with 1379 proving to be positive for mosquitoes and 14 negative (Table S3). The positive sampling units harboured 1–8 mosquito species. A total number of 19,911 mosquitoes (16,305 larvae and 3606 adults) from 18 species were collected. Aedes albopictus was observed at the same location as in 2016 as biting adults (6, 5, and 7 females on June 12, August 15, and September 20, respectively, during the day time) (Fig. 3).

Field mission April 3–October 31, 2018

In 2018, the same sites were visited as in 2017, and 2085 sampling units were evaluated with 1212 found to be positive and 873 negative (Table S4). Positive sampling units included 1 to 5 mosquito species. A total number of 12,116 mosquitoes (7290 larvae and 4826 adults) were collected. Aedes albopictus was confirmed established at Bagratashen village by adult catches (29 females from August 22 to 24 during the day time) and for the first time also in Ayrum village (Tavush Province, Fig. 3), 10 km away from Bagratashen along the road to Yerevan, as larval and adult stages (3 larvae and 2 adults observed on August 23).

Discussion

Our results are important in terms of biodiversity but also in terms of public health. The most abundant mosquito species in our study in Armenia were found to be Ae. caspius, Cx. pipiens and An. maculipennis, consistent with previous studies [1821, 23]. Ten mosquito species are new records for Armenia. This is a notable increase with regard to the total number of 28 species now reported (see full list in Appendix). The number of anopheline species has changed little from 5 to 6, with the addition of An. plumbeus; this contrasts with the 9 species of Culicinae and confirms that the Culicinae had been neglected in Armenia prior to our studies. Our results also demonstrate the value of a snapshot field study, when performed at a suitable period and over a wide range of environments.

Interestingly, the field mission in 2016 was organised with the knowledge of the presence of Ae. aegypti at the border point with Georgia, where it had been recorded in 2015, 20 km away in a direct line towards the north [1]. Interestingly, no Ae. aegypti were observed, but instead Ae. albopictus. This unexpected observation means that we should expand some results geographically only with extreme caution.

The observation of one female only for Aedes cinereus/geminus is unfortunate because only males allow for a reliable differentiation between these two sibling species. Considering the distribution of the two species, the most probable to occur in Armenia is Ae. cinereus, since this species is present in Turkey and Georgia, in contrast to Ae. geminus ([22] and Table S5).

Although our sampling effort was limited, the absence of records for some mosquito species is surprising. However, future inventories will probably add new species. Table S5 lists mosquito species recorded in all surrounding countries (Georgia, Azerbaijan, north-western Iran, and eastern Turkey/Anatolia), which leads us to pay special attention to certain vector species: Ae. aegypti (recorded in Georgia and Turkey/Anatolia), Cx. perexiguus (recorded in north-western Iran) and Cx. tritaeniorhynchus (recorded in Georgia, Azerbaijan and Turkey/Anatolia).

Aedes dorsalis was previously observed in Armenia [18], but not in our 2016–2018 surveys, which is puzzling. It is highly possible that, in the previous studies, Ae. dorsalis had been misidentified and confused with white morphotypes of Ae. caspius, as proposed by Günay et al. [14] for specimens from the Ararat Valley in Turkey [3].

Aedes albopictus is an important potential vector of many arboviruses. A recent introduction into Armenia with Georgian geographic origin is most probable but not demonstrated. We collected evidence of the establishment of this invasive species with consecutive records made at the border point along the Tbilisi-Yerevan road in 2016 (from August 11 to September 28), in 2017 (June 13), and in 2018 (August 23). The potential of dispersion within Armenia along this main road axis must not be underestimated. In fact, we recorded the species in 2018 in Ayrum village, 10 km away from the border point. Close follow-up of the current dispersion in Armenia will be much needed during the coming years. This requires an adjustment of entomological surveillance activities in Armenia. Medical entomologists are active only in the NCDC. Routine entomological surveillance is carried out all over the country with the following objectives: entomological monitoring, implementation of vector control activities with special measures at points of entry, prevention of endemic vector-borne infectious diseases, scientific and applied research on vectors, and communication to raise awareness of vector control measures among the population. Up to 2016, entomological surveillance in Armenia focused on anophelines only (“malaria mosquitoes” versus “non-malaria mosquitoes”). Methodological tools for entomological surveillance were updated, and new sampling protocols and reporting forms were adopted; this allows us now to also efficiently survey culicine mosquitoes. All these improvements show the added value for public health in terms of knowledge improvement and capacity building for an up-to-date mosquito surveillance system. This will help to prevent and mitigate mosquito-borne diseases in Armenia.

Conclusion

Knowledge of the mosquito fauna of Armenia is progressing. It now encompasses 28 species, with 10 species recorded for the first time in the present study. The presence of Ae. albopictus in the extreme north of Armenia, along an important access road (Tbilisi-Yerevan) is a major finding and holds implications for public health in terms of the risk of arbovirus transmission. Following this survey, entomological surveillance was reorganised in Armenia to include invasive mosquitoes in addition to the anopheline malaria vectors.

Acknowledgments

Medical entomologists acting in all regional and Yerevan territorial branches of the NCDC participated in VectorNet training and the field mission, and learned new sampling techniques and identification tools. For the first time, mosquito traps provided by VectorNet were used in Armenia, as well as the VECMAP® software and its mobile telephone application. LP, FS and VR are members of the VectorNet consortium. LP and VR belong to the entomology working group in the MediLabSecure network. We thank Dominique Bicout who coordinated the “Development of a Tool to Appraise and Compare Vector Control Strategies against West Nile Fever in Europe” project, funded by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (Framework Service Contract No ECDC/2016/031) for accepting to share data from field monitoring with us. The MediLabSecure 1 project is supported by the European Commission (DEVCO: IFS/21010/23/_194); the MediLabSecure 2 project is funded by the European Union. The work under the VectorNet project of the ECDC and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was implemented through a Framework Service Contract OC/EFSA/AHAW/2013/02-FWC1 with Avia-GIS.

Conflict of interest

The authors report that they have no competing interests.

Appendix

Annotated checklist of the 28 mosquito species of Armenia

Family Culicidae Meigen, 1818
Subfamily Anophelinae Grassi, 1900
Genus Anopheles Meigen, 1818
Subgenus Anopheles Meigen, 1818
1 – An. (Ano.) claviger (Meigen, 1804) (see Note 1)
2 – An. (Ano.) hyrcanus (Pallas, 1771)
Anopheles maculipennis Meigen, 1818 Species Group (see Note 2)
3 – An. (Ano.) maculipennis s.s. Meigen, 1818
4 – An. (Ano.) sacharovi Favre, 1903
5 – An. (Ano.) plumbeus Stephens, 1828
Subgenus Cellia Theobald, 1902
6 – An. (Cel.) superpictus Grassi, 1899 (see Note 3)
Subfamily Culicinae Meigen, 1818
Tribe Aedini Neveu-Lemaire, 1902
Genus Aedes Meigen, 1818
Subgenus Aedes Meigen, 1818
7 – Ae. (Aed.) cinereus Meigen, 1908 (see Note 4)
Subgenus Aedimorphus Theobald, 1903
8 – Ae. (Adm.) vexans (Meigen, 1830) [Aedimorphus vexans (Meigen)] (see Note 5)
Subgenus Dahliana Reinert, Harbach & Kitching, 2006
9 – Ae. (Dah.) geniculatus (Olivier, 1791) [Dahliana geniculata (Olivier)]
Subgenus Ochlerotatus Lynch Arribálzaga, 1891
10 – Ae. (Och.) annulipes (Meigen, 1830) [Ochlerotatus annulipes (Meigen) s.l.]
11 – Ae. (Och.) caspius (Pallas, 1771) s.l. [Oc. caspius (Pallas) s.l.] (see Note 6)
12 – Ae. (Och.) cataphylla Dyar, 1916 [Oc. cataphylla (Dyar)]
13 – Ae. (Och.) flavescens (Müller, 1764) [Oc. flavescens (Müller)]
14 – Ae. (Och.) dorsalis (Meigen, 1830) [Oc. flavescens (Meigen)] (see Note 7)
Subgenus Stegomyia Theobald, 1901
15 – Ae. (Stg.) albopictus (Skuse, 1895) [Stegomyia albopicta (Skuse)]
Tribe Culicini Meigen, 1818
Genus Culex Linnaeus, 1758
Subgenus Barraudius Edwards, 1921
16 – Cx. (Bar.) modestus Ficalbi, 1889
Subgenus Culex Linnaeus, 1758
17 – Cx. (Cux.) mimeticus Noè, 1899
18 – Cx. (Cux.) pipiens Linnaeus, 1758 (see Note 8)
19 – Cx. (Cux.) theileri Theobald, 1903
20 – Cx. (Cux.) torrentium Martini, 1925
Subgenus Maillotia Theobald, 1907
21 – Cx. (Mai.) hortensis Ficalbi, 1889
Subgenus Neoculex Dyar, 1905
22 – Cx. (Ncx.) martinii Medschid, 1930
23 – Cx. (Ncx.) territans Walker, 1856 (see Note 9)
Tribe Culisetini Belkin, 1962
Genus Culiseta Felt, 1904
Subgenus Allotheobaldia Broelemann, 1919
24 – Cs. (All.) longiareolata (Macquart, 1838)
Subgenus Culiseta Felt, 1904
25 – Cs. (Cus.) annulata (Schrank, 1776)
26 – Cs. (Cus.) subochrea (Edwards, 1921)
Tribe Mansoniini Belkin, 1962
Genus Coquillettidia Dyar, 1905
Subgenus Coquillettidia Dyar, 1905
27 – Cq. (Coq.) richiardii (Ficalbi, 1889)
Tribe Uranotaeniini Lahille, 1904
Genus Uranotaenia Lynch Arribálzaga, 1891
Subgenus Pseudoficalbia Theobald, 1912
28 – Ur. (Pfc.) unguiculata Edwards, 1913
Note 1

Member of the An. claviger complex. Anopheles petragnani is absent from the Caucasus.

Note 2

An. maculipennis complex. Two species only are present: An. maculipennis s.s. and An. sacharovi. Ribosomal RNA gene sequences are available for both species [10]. Anopheles maculipennis s.s. is the most abundant Anopheles species in Armenia, and An. sacharovi is an important malaria vector in the Middle East [29].

Note 3

An. superpictus. Old record [30] at larval stage. Identification likely reliable because this species belongs to the Cellia subgenus. Complex of several species observed in Iran, listed as species A and B by Harbach [16].

Note 4

An. cinereus is more likely in Armenia because it has been found in the region, unlike Ae. geminus.

Note 5

Ae. vexans subspecies. Presence of Ae. vexans vexans.

Note 6

Ae. caspius subspecies. Presence of Ae. caspius caspius. Abundant in lowland plains.

Note 7

Ae. dorsalis. Uncertain for presence; possible misidentification. Previous records in Armenia [18] at densities higher for Ae. dorsalis than for Ae. caspius, which is suspect. Recent records in the Ararat Valley (right bank, Turkey [2]) are now considered to be a “pale form” of Ae. caspius (Alten & Günay, Personal communication). Not observed in our studies.

Note 8

Cx. pipiens complex. Evidence of presence of the anthropophilic Cx. pipiens biotype molestus, the most abundant mosquito species in Armenia. Absence of Cx. quinquefasciatus (present in southern half of Iran [9]).

Note 9

Cx. territans. Recorded as Cx. apicalis Adams, 1903 (a north American species) in [18].

References

  1. Akiner MM, Demirci B, Babuadze G, Robert V, Schaffner F. 2016. Spread of the invasive mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in the Black Sea region increases risk of chikungunya, dengue, and Zika outbreak in Europe. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10(4), e0004664. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldemir A, Bedir H, Demirci B, Alten B. 2010. Biting activity of mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Turkey-Armenia border area, Ararat Valley, Turkey. Journal of Medical Entomology, 47(1), 22–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alten B, Bellini R, Caglar SS, Simsek FM, Kaynas S. 2000. Species composition and seasonal dynamics of mosquitoes in the Belek region of Turkey. Journal of Vector Ecology, 25, 145–164. [Google Scholar]
  4. Avetisian LM. 2004. Epidemiological surveillance of parasitic diseases in the republic of Armenia. Meditsinskaia Parazitologiia (Moskow), 2004(1), 21–24 [in Russian]. [Google Scholar]
  5. Becker N, Petric D, Zgomba M, Boase C, Madon M, Dahl C, Kaiser A. 2010. Mosquitoes and their control, 2nd edn. Heidelberg: Springer. 577 p. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chubkova AI, Pirumov KN, Sarkisyan MA, Manukyan LV, Hovsepyan LA. 1973. Malaria prophylactic in USSR. Konf. Lenkoran, Materials of the Lenkoran Conference, p. 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  7. Davidiants V, Mannrikian M, Sayadian G, Parunakian A, Davtian B. 1998. Epidemic malaria transmission – Armenia, 1997. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (CDC, USA), 47(25), 526–528. [Google Scholar]
  8. Davidyants VA, Kondrashin AV, Vanyan AV, Morozova LF, Turbabina NA, Stepanova EV, Maksimova MS, Morozov EN. 2019. Role of malaria partners in malaria elimination in Armenia. Malaria Journal, 18(1), 178. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dehghan H, Sadraei J, Moosa-Kazemi SH, Abolghasemi E, Solimani H, Nodoshan HJ, Najafi MH. 2016. A pictorial key for Culex pipiens Complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran. Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases, 10(3), 291–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Di Luca M, Boccolini D, Marinuccil M, Romi R. 2004. Intrapopulation polymorphism in Anopheles messeae (An. maculipennis complex) inferred by molecular analysis. Journal of Medical Entomology, 41(4), 582–586. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, European Food Safety Authority. 2018. Field sampling methods for mosquitoes, sandflies, biting midges and ticks – VectorNet project 2014–2018. Stockholm and Parma: ECDC and EFSA. https://doi.org/10.2900/416333. [Google Scholar]
  12. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC),European Food Safety Agency (EFSA), VectorNet. 2018. Mosquito maps. Available at http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/healthtopics/vectors/vectormaps/Pages/VBORNET_maps.aspx, accession on 10 May 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Grigorian G, Solkhomonian L. 2001. Armenia: implementation of national program of malaria control. Meditsinskaia Parazitologiia (Moskow), 2001(1), 21–24 [in Russian]. [Google Scholar]
  14. Günay F, Alten B, Simsek F, Aldemir A, Linton YM. 2015. Barcoding Turkish Culex mosquitoes to facilitate arbovirus vector incrimination studies reveals hidden diversity and new potential vectors. Acta Tropica, 143, 112–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Günay F, Picard M, Robert V. 2017. MosKeyTool, an interactive identification key for mosquitoes of Euro-Mediterranean. Version 2.1. Available at http://medilabsecure.com/moskeytool, accessed 10 May 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. Harbach RE. 2013. The phylogeny and classification of Anopheles, in Anopheles mosquitoes – New insights into malaria vectors. Manguin S, Editor. InTech: Rijeka, Croatia. p. 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  17. Keshishyan A, Gordeev MI, Bezzhonova OV, Goriacheva II, Zvantsov AB, Davidiants VA, Ezhov MN. 2009. Genetic analysis of malaria mosquitoes of Anopheles maculipennis (Diptera, Culicidae) complex from Armenia. Meditsinskaia Parazitologiia (Moskow), 2009(3), 24–28 [in Russian]. [Google Scholar]
  18. Manukyan DV, Keshishyan A, Melik-Andreasyan GG, Hovsepyan AA. 2013. Fauna of non-malarian mosquitos of Armenia. Republic of Armenia, Ministry of Health, A.B. Alexsanyana Scientific: Yerevan. p. 145–148 [in Armenian]. [Google Scholar]
  19. Manukyan DV, Oganesian AS, Shakhnazarian SA, Aleksanian IuT. 2006. Role of mosquitoes in the transmission of arboviruses in Armenia. Meditsinskaia Parazitologiia (Moskow), 2006(2), 38–39 [in Russian]. [Google Scholar]
  20. Manukyan DV, Oganesian AS, Shakhnazarian SA, Aleksanian IuT. 2006. The species composition of mosquitoes and ticks in Armenia. Meditsinskaia Parazitologiia (Moskow), 2006(1), 31–33 [in Russian]. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ovsepian LA. 1982. Breeding sites of Culex pipiens L. mosquitoes in the viniculture regions of Armenia. Meditsinskaia Parazitologiia (Moskow), 51(4), 67–70 [in Russian]. [Google Scholar]
  22. Robert V, Günay F, Le Goff G, Boussès P, Sulesco T, Khalin A, Medlock J, Kampen H, Petrić D, Schaffner F. 2019. Distribution chart for Euro-Mediterranean mosquitoes (western Palaearctic region). Journal of the European Mosquito Control Association, 37, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  23. Romi R, Boccolini D, Hovanesyan I, Grigoryan G, Di Luca M, Sabatinelli G. 2002. Anopheles sacharovi (Diptera: Culicidae): a reemerging malaria vector in the Ararat Valley of Armenia. Journal of Medical Entomology, 39(3), 446–450. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sabatinelli G. 1999. Determinants in malaria resurgence in the former USSR. Giornale Italiano di Medicina Tropicale, 4(3–4), 53–62. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sabatinelli G, Jorgensen P. 2001. Malaria in the WHO European Region (1971–1999). Eurosurveillance, 6(4), 61–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schaffner F, Angel G, Geoffroy B, Hervy JP, Rhaiem A, Brunhes J. 2001. Les moustiques d’Europe, Logiciel d’identification et d’enseignement. CR-ROM. Collection Didactiques. Paris, France: IRD Editions. [Google Scholar]
  27. Schönenberger AC, Wagner S, Tuten HC, Schaffner F, Torgerson P, Furrer S, Mathis A, Silaghi C. 2016. Host preferences of host-seeking and blood-fed mosquitoes in Switzerland. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 30(1), 39–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sergiev VP, Baranova AM, Majori G, Ejov MN. 2006. Malaria in the European Region of the World Health Organization, 1970–2000. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sedaghat MM, Linton YM, Nicolescu G, Smith L, Koliopoulos G, Zounos A, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Harbach RE. 2003. Morphological and molecular characterization of Anopheles (Anopheles) sacharovi Favre, a primary vector of malaria in the Middle East. Systematic Entomology, 28(2), 241–256. [Google Scholar]
  30. Terteryan AE, Mirumyan LS. 1989. Pre imaginal stages of mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae) in the Lake Sevan basin (Armenia). Biologicheskiĭ Zhurnal Armenii, 42, 467–470 [in Armenian]. [Google Scholar]
  31. WHO Europe. 2008. Mosquitoes of the genus Anopheles in countries of the WHO European Region having faced a recent resurgence of malaria. Regional research project, 2003–2007. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO. 26 p. [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Paronyan L, Babayan L, Manucharyan A, Manukyan D, Vardanyan H, Melik-Andrasyan G, Schaffner F & Robert V. 2020. The mosquitoes of Armenia: review of knowledge and results of a field survey with first report of Aedes albopictus. Parasite 27, 42.

Supplementary material

Tables S1–S4: Detailed mosquito collection data in Armenia for June to July 2016, August to October 2016, March to November 2017, and April to October 2018, respectively. (EXCEL file) (Access here)

Table S5: Mosquito species recorded in Armenia and in the surrounding countries. (PDF file) (Access here)

All Tables

Table 1

Mosquito species/taxa reported to occur in Armenia in the literature, prior to 2016 (1 = presence record).

Table 2

Number of positive sites per mosquito species recorded in Armenia in 2016, according to regions. Asterisk indicates a first record for Armenia.

Table 3

Sampling effort of the surveys, according to period and sampling method.

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1

Location of the sampling sites in Armenia, June 20 to July 10, 2016.

In the text
thumbnail Figure 2

Number of sampling units that were found to be positive for mosquitoes (total = 143), according to the number of mosquito species observed in each sampling, June 20 to July 10, 2016. Anopheles maculipennis s.l. is considered a “species” when no precise species from the complex is listed.

In the text
thumbnail Figure 3

Location of the sites where Aedes albopictus was recorded in 2016–2018, north Armenia.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.