Open Access
Issue
Parasite
Volume 26, 2019
Article Number 24
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2019021
Published online 01 May 2019

© R. Luo et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2019

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Microsporidia are obligate intracellular eukaryotic pathogens, classified as fungi, which are composed of approximately 1300 species in 160 genera [7]. To date, 17 microsporidia species are known to infect humans, and of these, Enterocytozoon bieneusi is the most prevalent, accounting for over 90% of cases of human microsporidiosis [6]. Since its first detection in an HIV/AIDS patient in 1985, a growing body of literature attests to E. bieneusi expanding its range of hosts [47, 51, 52]. Infection of healthy individuals with E. bieneusi results in self-limiting diarrhea and malabsorption. However, this pathogen can cause life-threatening diarrhea in immunocompromized individuals, such as AIDS patients and transplant recipients [35]. Normally, fecal-oral routes serve as the main infection pathways in humans and animals, while human inhalation of E. bieneusi spores has also been documented [54, 58]. PCR-based molecular techniques may be used to analyze the E. bieneusi genome, and for diagnosis. Based on the nested PCR amplification of internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of small subunits of ribosomal rRNA (SSU rRNA), over 240 E. bieneusi genotypes have been identified globally [5, 56, 59]. Phylogenetic analysis reveals that these genotypes clustered into nine groups. Group 1 is considered zoonotic, and is composed of genotypes from humans and a few animals, while groups 2–9 have particular host associations or are found in wastewater [5, 51]. To better comprehend E. bieneusi genetic diversity and molecular characteristics, high-resolution multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) using three microsatellites (MS1, MS3 and MS7) and one minisatellite (MS4) as markers was used to explore genotype taxonomy and transmission routes [9, 55, 56].

In the southwest of China, Tibetan pigs are widely kept for livelihood and are economically important for farmers, especially on the plateau. Tibetan pigs have firm black hair which differs from that of the common pig, and they are sturdy, outdoor foragers. They may act as reservoirs for E. bieneusi spores and zoonotic transmission of disease. Although much research has been carried out on E. bieneusi [10, 28, 30], few studies have examined its epidemiology or Tibetan pig-associated genomes in China [20, 57]. Tibetan pigs in southwestern China have been entirely unstudied. Therefore, this study aimed to establish the incidence and molecular characteristics of E. bieneusi in Tibetan pigs, to use ITS and MLST to evaluate its genetic diversity, and to assess the potential for zoonotic transmission of microsporidiosis between Tibetan pigs and humans.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Research Ethics Committee and the Animal Ethics Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University. Prior to fecal specimen collection, permission was obtained from the keepers of the animals whenever possible.

Collection of Tibetan pig fecal specimens

Fresh fecal specimens were collected from 266 Tibetan pigs during June–October 2017. Samples were obtained mainly from three cities in Sichuan province, southwestern China, including Yaan (n = 50) (29°98′S, 103 °E), Kangding (n = 201) (30°05′S, 101°4′E), and Qionglai (n = 15) (30°42′S, 103°47′E) (Table 1). Kangding is located in a subtemperate plateau humid climate zone; Yaan and Qionglai have a subtropical humid monsoon climate and these special environments are beneficial to rear Tibetan pigs. Three farms applied intensive feeding conditions and had excellent hygiene conditions. The breeding density of Tibetan pigs in Kangding was higher than in other cities. From each farm, samples were randomly collected from at least 15% of the animals. The ages of Tibetan pigs sampled ranged from 1 to 2 years. Each specimen (approximately 200 mg) was collected using sterile disposable latex gloves immediately after being defecated onto the ground, and transferred into 50 mL plastic containers. Meanwhile, the age, gender, geographic origin, number and date of each sample was also recorded. No experimental Tibetan pigs showed diarrheic or gastrointestinal conditions. Samples were stored at 4 °C in 2.5% (w/v) potassium dichromate.

Table 1.

Factors associated with prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Tibetan pigs in southwestern China.

DNA extraction

Before conducting DNA extraction, potassium dichromate was removed from the fecal samples with distilled water by centrifugation for 10 min at 1500 ×g, three times. Genomic DNA was extracted from 200 mg of washed fecal matter using the EZNA1 Stool DNA kit (Omega Biotek, Norcross, GA, USA). Prior to use in PCR analysis, DNA was stored and frozen at −20 °C.

PCR amplification

Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes were determined using a nested PCR amplification of the entire ITS region, and positive specimens were further detected by MLST analyses using the MS1, MS3, MS4, and MS7 loci. The primers and cycling parameters implemented for these reactions were as previously described [9, 37]. Negative controls were included in all PCR analyses. The secondary PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel and visualized under UV light by staining the gel with GoldView (Solarbio, China).

Nucleotide sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

Secondary PCR amplicons of anticipated size were sequenced in both directions by Life Technologies (Guangzhou, China) with an ABI 3730DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the BigDye® Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit. Sequence accuracy was confirmed by bidirectional sequencing, and new PCR secondary products were re-sequenced, if necessary. To identify the E. bieneusi genotype, the sequences generated were respectively aligned with known reference sequences using BLAST and ClustalX 1.83. Mega 7.0 was used to construct the phylogenetic tree using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method (the Kimura two parameter model) with 1000 bootstrap replicates [17]. Novel genotype(s) of E. bieneusi were named according to the established system of nomenclature [34].

Statistical analysis

The variations in E. bieneusi infection rates in Tibetan pigs between different areas, gender, and ages were compared using the Chi-square test. All tests were two-sided, with p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. SPSS version 22.0 was used on all data. 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to explore the strength of the association between E. bieneusi occurrence and each factor.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

Representative nucleotide sequences of E. bieneusi isolates were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers from MG581429 to MG581432 for ITS sequences and MH142189MH142213 for the microsatellite (MS1, MS3, and MS7) and minisatellite (MS4) loci.

Results and discussion

In the present study, of the 266 Tibetan pigs sampled, 83 were PCR-positive for E. bieneusi. Infection rates detected in Tibetan pigs were 25.4%, 56% and 26.6% in Kangding, Yaan and Qionglai, respectively. Differences between the three areas were significant (χ 2 = 17.648, df = 2, p < 0.01) (Table 1). In addition, the male Tibetan pig groups (17.7%, 47/266) had higher E. bieneusi prevalence than the female groups (13.5%, 36/266). The difference in the infection rate was also significant (χ 2 = 8.906, df = 1, p = 0.003). Although high infection rates were observed in 1–2 year-old pigs (41.51%, 22/53) and 0–1 year-olds (33.33%, 61/183), these rates were not significantly different (χ 2 = 1.240, df = 1, p > 0.05). The results of the present paper were previously published as a preprint [26]. With an overall infection rate of 31.2%, this rate is lower than the documented prevalence of E. bieneusi for wild boars in Sichuan province, China (41.2%), pigs in Henan province, China (45.5%), wild boars in central Europe (33.3%), and pigs in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (59.3%) [10, 24, 28, 46]. However, infection rates recorded in this study were higher than those for pigs in Guangdong province, China (26.39%), central Thailand (28.1%), and Japan (30%) [1, 30, 60]. Differences in infection rates between these studies may be largely attributable to climate and farming modes. Prevalence also varied across sample sites. Kangding, the only site on the Western Sichuan Plateau, had a prevalence of 25.4%, possibly reflecting the area’s high temperatures, and UV radiation, which may limit survival of E. bieneusi spores and reduce transmission. Other factors influencing infection levels may include geo-ecological conditions, feeding/herd densities, herd management, sample size, and the condition of host animals. Differences in prevalence in Tibetan pigs between Yaan and Kangding are thought to reflect differences between traditional and modern herd management and breeding technologies.

Nucleotide sequences from ITS-PCR were obtained from the 83 E. bieneusi-positive specimens. The epidemiology and genotypes of E. bieneusi in different areas are given in Table 2. Four genotypes were detected, including two known genotypes (EbpC, Henan-IV) and two novel genotypes, which were named SCT01 and SCT02. Genotype EbpC was the most prevalent (21.8%, 58/266), and was detected in samples from all three cities. Genotype Henan-IV was only found in Kang ding (8.6%, 23/266). The novel genotypes SCT01 (0.3%, 1/266) and SCT02 (0.3%, 1/266) were only found in single specimens, both of which came from Yaan, and are the first newly-detected E. bieneusi genotypes from Tibetan pigs. Of the four genotypes identified in this study, EbpC was the most prevalent (69.9%, 58/83), and has been found in a number of animals, including cattle, dogs, cats, birds, non-human primates, bears, squirrels, sheep, foxes, deer, and humans [4, 8, 29, 36, 38, 39, 47, 51, 55]. EbpC is the prevalent E. bieneusi genotype associated with pig infection in China, reflecting E. bieneusi’s dominance as a porcine parasite. In addition, we also detected 26 records of Henan-IV (solely in Yaan), a zoonotic genotype associated with human infections in Henan province in China, and to date only recorded from China, where it demonstrates strict host specificity [44], occurring only in pigs and humans. To the best our knowledge, the two genotypes EbpC and Henan-IV were identified for the first time in Tibetan pigs in the present study. This species may be a key reservoir host of these genotypes (Table 4).

Table 2.

Occurrence and genotypes of E. bieneusi in Tibetan pigs from different cities in southwest China.

Table 3.

Multilocus characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolates in Tibetan pigs in southwestern China.

Table 4.

Host ranges and geographical distribution of Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in this study in China.

Phylogenetic analysis based on ITS gene sequences of the four E. bieneusi genotypes obtained from the present study (two known and two novel genotypes) enabled classification for the genotypes as a single group (group 1), and further clustered into subgroup 1d, indicating zoonotic potential (Fig. 1). ITS gene sequence analysis revealed two novel genotypes, SCT01 (n = 1) and SCT02 (n = 1), both of which were detected in Yaan and clustered into group 1 zoonotic genotypes with public health significance. Other genotypes in this group include Henan-III in humans and EbpC from humans or wild boars [24, 43, 55]. Modes of transmission and zoonotic potential of E. bieneusi genotypes remain poorly known, and further molecular epidemiology studies are required. MLST holds promise for ongoing investigation of E. bieneusi taxonomy and genetic diversity [9]. Positive specimens were further characterized by PCR analyses of MS4, MS1, MS3 and MS7 to improve taxonomy and population genotypes of E. bieneusi. In all, 47, 48, 23 and 47 E. bieneusi isolates were amplified at the MS1, MS3, MS4, and MS7 loci, respectively, but only 12 samples were PCR-positive simultaneously at all four loci. Four distinct MLGs were observed in Henan-IV and six distinct MLGs in EbpC, named MLG1-4 and MLG5-10, respectively (Table 3). Nine, five, three and four novel types were detected at MS1, MS3, MS4 and MS7 loci, respectively. Analysis of 12 samples at four gene loci identified eight novel MLGs, including three genotype EbpC MLGs and five genotype Henan-IV MLGs (Table 3). These results reveal high genetic diversity in the Henan-IV and EbpC genotypes of E. bieneusi in Tibetan pigs.

thumbnail Figure 1.

Phylogenetic relationship of Enterocytozoon bieneusi groups. The relationships between E. bieneusi genotypes identified in this study and other known genotypes deposited in the genbank were inferred by a neighbor-joining analysis of ITS sequences based on genetic distance by the Kimura-2-parameter model. The numbers on the branches represent percent bootstrapping values from 1000 replicates (only bootstrap values >50% are shown). Each sequence is identified by its accession number, genotype designation, and host origin. Genotypes with black triangles and open triangle are novel and known genotypes identified in this study, respectively.

Conclusions

This study revealed an average E. bieneusi infection rate of 31.2% in three cities in Sichuan province, and is the first report of EbpC and Henan-IV in Tibetan pigs in China. Genetic diversity was characterized using MLST, and ten MLGs were identified. These results identify Tibetan pigs as possible vectors for zoonotic transmission of human microsporidiosis. Tibetan pigs are bred widely and there is frequent human contact, making them a significant public health risk in southwest China. Thus, measures are needed to control the transmission of E. bieneusi and to develop effective vaccines and drugs for use in the event of widespread human microsporidiosis.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was supported by the Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation (CPF2017-12).

References

  1. Abe N, Kimata I. 2010. Molecular survey of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in a Japanese porcine population. Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases, 10, 425. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen D, Wang SS, Zou Y, Li Z, Xie SC, Shi LQ, Zou FC, Zhu XQ, Yang JF, Zhao GH. 2018. Prevalence and multi-locus genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in black-boned sheep and goats in Yunnan Province, southwestern China. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 65, 385–391, S1567134818306397. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cong W, Qin SY, Meng QF. 2018. Molecular characterization and new genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in minks (Neovison vison) in China. Parasite, 25, 34. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deng L, Li W, Yu X, Gong C, Liu X, Zhong Z, Xie N, Lei S, Yu J, Fu H, Chen H, Xu H, Hu Y, Peng G. 2016. First report of the human-pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi from Red-Bellied Tree Squirrels (Callosciurus erythraeus) in Sichuan, China. PLoS One, 11, e0163605. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deng L, Li W, Zhong Z, Gong C, Liu X, Huang X, Xiao L, Zhao R, Wang W, Feng F. 2016. Molecular characterization and multilocus genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi among horses in southwestern China. Parasites & Vectors, 9, 561. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Didier ES, Weiss LM. 1969. Microsporidiosis: not just in AIDS patients. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 24, 490–495. [Google Scholar]
  7. Didier ES, Weiss LM. 2006. Microsporidiosis: current status. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 19, 485. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ding S, Huang W, Qin Q, Tang J, Liu H. 2018. Genotype identification and phylogenetic analysis of Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolates from stool samples of diarrheic children. Journal of Parasitology, 104, 297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feng Y, Li N, Dearen T, Lobo ML, Matos O, Cama V, Xiao L. 2011. Development of a multilocus sequence typing tool for high-resolution genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 77, 4822–4828. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fiuza VR, Oliveira FC, Fayer R, Santín M. 2015. First report of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pigs in Brazil. Parasitology International, 64, 18–23. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hu Y, Feng Y, Huang C, Xiao L. 2014. Occurrence, source, and human infection potential of Cryptosporidium and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in drinking source water in Shanghai, China, during a pig carcass disposal incident. Environmental Science & Technology, 48, 14219–14227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hu S, Liu Z, Yan F, Zhang Z, Zhang G, Zhang L, Jian F, Zhang S, Ning C, Wang R. 2017. Zoonotic and host-adapted genotypes of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dairy cattle in Hebei and Tianjin, China. Veterinary Parasitology, 248, 68–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang J, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Wang R, Zhao J, Jian F, Ning C, Zhang L. 2017. New genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolated from Sika Deer and Red Deer in China. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 879. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Karim MR, Dong H, Li T, Yu F, Li D, Zhang L, Li J, Wang R, Li S, Li X. 2015. Predomination and new genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in captive nonhuman primates in zoos in China: high genetic diversity and zoonotic significance. Plos One, 10, e0117991. [Google Scholar]
  15. Karim MR, Dong H, Yu F, Jian F, Zhang L, Wang R, Zhang S, Rume FI, Ning C, Xiao L. 2014. Genetic diversity in Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolates from dogs and cats in China: host specificity and public health implications. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 52, 3297–3302. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Karim MR, Wang R, Dong H, Zhang L, Li J, Zhang S, Rume FI, Qi M, Jian F, Sun M, Yang G, Zou F, Ning C, Xiao L. 2014. Genetic polymorphism and zoonotic potential of Enterocytozoon bieneusi from nonhuman primates in China. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 80, 1893. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33, 1870–1874. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li N, Xiao L, Wang L, Zhao S, Zhao X, Duan L, Guo M, Liu L, Feng Y. 2012. Molecular surveillance of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi by genotyping and subtyping parasites in wastewater. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 6, e1809. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li W, Diao R, Yang Xiao L, Lu Y, Li Y, Song M. 2014. High diversity of human-pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in swine in northeast China. Parasitology Research, 113, 1147. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li W, Li Y, Li W, Yang J, Song M, Diao R, Jia H, Lu Y, Zheng J, Zhang X. 2014. Genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in livestock in China: high prevalence and zoonotic potential. Plos One, 9, e97623. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li W, Tao W, Jiang Y, Diao R, Yang J, Xiao L. 2014. Genotypic distribution and phylogenetic characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in diarrheic chickens and pigs in multiple cities, China: potential zoonotic transmission. Plos One, 9, e108279. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li W, Li Y, Song M, Lu Y, Yang J, Tao W, Jiang Y, Wan Q, Zhang S, Xiao L. 2015. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of Cryptosporidium, Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Giardia duodenalis in cats and dogs in Heilongjiang province, China. Veterinary Parasitology, 208, 125–134. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li J, Luo N, Wang C, Qi M, Cao J, Cui Z, Huang J, Wang R, Zhang L. 2016. Occurrence, molecular characterization and predominant genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dairy cattle in Henan and Ningxia, China. Parasites & Vectors, 9, 1–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li W, Deng L, Wu K, Huang X, Song Y, Su H, Hu Y, Fu H, Zhong Z, Peng G. 2017. Presence of zoonotic Cryptosporidium scrofarum., Giardia duodenalis assemblage A and Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in captive Eurasian wild boars (Sus scrofa) in China: potential for zoonotic transmission. Parasites & Vectors, 10, 10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu H, Jiang Z, Yuan Z, Yin J, Wang Z, Yu B, Zhou D, Shen Y, Cao J. 2017. Infection by and genotype characteristics of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in HIV/AIDS patients from Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region, China. BMC Infectious Diseases, 17, 684. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Luo R, Xiang L, Liu H, Zhong Z, Liu L, Deng L, Song Y, Liu L, Huang X, Zhou Z, Fu H, Luo Y. 2018. First report and multilocus genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi from Tibetan pigs in southwestern China. DOI: 10.1101/327767. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ma J, Feng Y, Hu Y, Villegas EN, Xiao L. 2016. Human infective potential of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in urban wastewater treatment plant effluents. Journal of Water & Health, 14, 411–423. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nemejc K, Sak B, Kvetonová D, Hanzal V, Janiszewski P, Forejtek P, Rajský D, Kotková M, Ravaszová P, Mcevoy J. 2014. Prevalence and diversity of Encephalitozoon spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Central Europe. Parasitology Research, 113, 761. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Piekarska J, Kicia M, Wesołowska M, Kopacz Ż, Gorczykowski M, Szczepankiewicz B, Kvac M, Sak B. 2017. Zoonotic microsporidia in dogs and cats in Poland. Veterinary Parasitology, 246, 108–111. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Prasertbun R, Mori H, Pintong AR, Sanyanusin S, Popruk S, Komalamisra C, Changbunjong T, Buddhirongawatr R, Sukthana Y, Mahittikorn A. 2016. Zoonotic potential of Enterocytozoon genotypes in humans and pigs in Thailand. Veterinary Parasitology, 233, 73–79. [Google Scholar]
  31. Qi M, Jing B, Jian F, Wang R, Zhang S, Wang H, Ning C, Zhang L. 2017. Dominance of Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotype J in dairy calves in Xinjiang, Northwest China. Parasitology International, 66, 960–963. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Qi M, Li J, Zhao A, Cui Z, Wei Z, Jing B, Zhang L. 2018. Host specificity of Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in Bactrian camels (Camelus bactrianus) in China. Parasites & Vectors, 11, 219. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Qi M, Wang R, Wang H, Jian F, Li J, Zhao J, Dong H, Zhu H, Ning C, Zhang L. 2016. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in grazing horses in China and their zoonotic transmission potential. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 63, 591–597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Santin M, Fayer R. 2010. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotype nomenclature based on the internal transcribed spacer sequence: a consensus. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 56, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  35. Santin M, Fayer R. 2011. Microsporidiosis: Enterocytozoon bieneusi in domesticated and wild animals. Research in Veterinary Science, 90, 363–371. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shi K, Li M, Wang X, Li J, Karim MR, Wang R, Zhang L, Jian F, Ning C. 2016. Molecular survey of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in sheep and goats in China. Parasites & Vectors, 9, 23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sulaiman IM, Ronald F, Lal AA, Trout JM, Schaefer FW, Lihua X. 2003. Molecular characterization of microsporidia indicates that wild mammals harbor host-adapted Enterocytozoon spp. as well as human-pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 69, 4495. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tang C, Cai M, Wang L, Guo Y, Li N, Feng Y, Xiao L. 2018. Genetic diversity within dominant Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in pre-weaned calves. Parasites & Vectors, 11, 170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tavalla M, Mardani-Kateki M, Abdizadeh R, Soltani S, Saki J. 2017. Molecular diagnosis of potentially human pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon species in exotic birds in Southwestern Iran. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 11, 192–196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tian GR, Zhao GH, Du SZ, Hu XF, Wang HB, Zhang LX, Yu SK. 2015. First report of Enterocytozoon bieneusi from giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) and red pandas (Ailurus fulgens) in China. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 34, 32–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wan Q, Lin Y, Mao Y, Yang Y, Li Q, Zhang S, Jiang Y, Tao W, Li W. 2016. High prevalence and widespread distribution of zoonotic Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in swine in Northeast China: implications for public health. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 63, 162–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang L, Xiao L, Duan L, Ye J, Guo Y, Guo M, Liu L, Feng Y. 2013. Concurrent infections of Giardia duodenalis, Enterocytozoon bieneusi, and Clostridium difficile in children during a cryptosporidiosis outbreak in a pediatric hospital in China. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 7(9), e2437. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang L, Zhang H, Zhao X, Zhang L, Zhang G, Guo M, Liu L, Feng Y, Xiao L. 2013. Zoonotic Cryptosporidium species and Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in HIV-positive patients on antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 51, 557–563. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang SS, Li JQ, Li YH, Wang XW, Fan XC, Liu X, Li ZJ, Song JK, Zhang LX, Zhao GH. 2018. Novel genotypes and multilocus genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pigs in northwestern China: a public health concern. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 63, 89–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang SS, Wang RJ, Fan XC, Liu TL, Zhang LX, Zhao GH. 2018. Prevalence and genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in China. Acta Tropica, 183, 142–152. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang H, Zhang Y, Wu Y, Li J, Qi M, Li T, Wang J, Wang R, Zhang S, Jian F. 2018. Occurrence, molecular characterization and assessment of zoonotic risk of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pigs in Henan, Central China. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 65, 893–901. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wu J, Han JQ, Shi LQ, Zou Y, Li Z, Yang JF, Huang CQ, Zou FC. 2018. Prevalence, genotypes, and risk factors of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) in Yunnan Province, Southwestern China. Parasitology Research, 117, 1–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yang J, Song M, Wan Q, Li Y, Lu Y, Jiang Y, Tao W, Li W. 2014. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in children in Northeast China and assessment of risk of zoonotic transmission. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 52, 4363. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yu F, Qi M, Zhao Z, Lv C, Wang Y, Wang R, Zhang L. 2018. The potential role of synanthropic rodents and flies in the transmission of Enterocytozoon bieneusi on a dairy cattle farm in China. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. DOI: 10.1111/jeu.12687. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang Z, Huang J, Karim MR, Zhao J, Dong H, Ai W, Li F, Zhang L, Wang R. 2015. Zoonotic Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in Pere David’s deer (Elaphurus davidianus) in Henan, China. Experimental Parasitology, 155, 46–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang XX, Cong W, Lou ZL, Ma JG, Zheng WB, Yao QX, Zhao Q, Zhu XQ. 2016. Prevalence, risk factors and multilocus genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in farmed foxes (Vulpes lagopus), Northern China. Parasites & Vectors, 9, 1–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang Q, Cai J, Li P, Wang L, Guo Y, Li C, Lei M, Feng Y, Xiao L. 2018. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in Tibetan sheep and yaks. Parasitology Research, 117, 1–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang XX, Jiang RL, Ma JG, Xu C, Zhao Q, Hou G, Liu GH. 2018. Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Minks (Neovison vison) in Northern China: a Public Health Concern. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 1221. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang Y, Koehler AV, Wang T, Haydon SR, Gasser RB. 2018. First detection and genetic characterisation of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in wild deer in Melbourne’s water catchments in Australia. Parasites & Vectors, 11, 2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhong Z, Li W, Deng L, Song Y, Wu K, Tian Y, Huang X, Hu Y, Fu H, Geng Y. 2017. Multilocus genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi derived from nonhuman primates in southwest China. Plos One, 12, e0176926. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhong Z, Tian Y, Song Y, Deng L, Li J, Ren Z, Ma X, Gu X, He C, Geng Y. 2017. Molecular characterization and multi-locus genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi from captive red kangaroos (Macropus Rfus) in Jiangsu province, China. Plos One, 12, e0183249. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhao W, Zhang W, Yang F, Cao J, Liu H, Yang D, Shen Y, Liu A. 2014. High prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in asymptomatic pigs and assessment of zoonotic risk at the genotype level. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 80, 3699–3707. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhao GH, Du SZ, Wang HB, Hu XF, Deng MJ, Yu SK, Zhang LX, Zhu XQ. 2015. First report of zoonotic Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia intestinalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in golden takins (Budorcas taxicolor bedfordi). Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 34, 394–401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhao W, Wang J, Yang Z, Liu A. 2017. Dominance of the Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotype BEB6 in red deer (Cervus elaphus) and Siberian roe deer (Capreolus pygargus) in China and a brief literature review. Parasite, 24, 54. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zou Y, Hou JL, Li FC, Zou FC, Lin RQ, Ma JG, Zhang XX, Zhu XQ. 2018. Prevalence and genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pigs in southern China. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 66, 52–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhao W, Zhang W, Yang Z, Liu A, Zhang L, Yang F, Wang R, Ling H. 2015. Correction: Genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in farmed Blue Foxes (Alopex lagopus) and Raccoon Dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in China. Plos One, 10(11), e0143992. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Luo R, Xiang L, Liu H, Zhong Z, Liu L, Deng L, Liu L, Huang X, Zhou Z, Fu H, Luo Y & Peng G. 2019. First report and multilocus genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi from Tibetan pigs in southwestern China. Parasite 26, 24.

All Tables

Table 1.

Factors associated with prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Tibetan pigs in southwestern China.

Table 2.

Occurrence and genotypes of E. bieneusi in Tibetan pigs from different cities in southwest China.

Table 3.

Multilocus characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolates in Tibetan pigs in southwestern China.

Table 4.

Host ranges and geographical distribution of Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in this study in China.

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1.

Phylogenetic relationship of Enterocytozoon bieneusi groups. The relationships between E. bieneusi genotypes identified in this study and other known genotypes deposited in the genbank were inferred by a neighbor-joining analysis of ITS sequences based on genetic distance by the Kimura-2-parameter model. The numbers on the branches represent percent bootstrapping values from 1000 replicates (only bootstrap values >50% are shown). Each sequence is identified by its accession number, genotype designation, and host origin. Genotypes with black triangles and open triangle are novel and known genotypes identified in this study, respectively.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.