Open Access
Original contribution
Issue
Parasite
Volume 19, Number 4, November 2012
Page(s) 417 - 422
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2012194417
Published online 15 November 2012

© PRINCEPS Editions, Paris, 2012, transferred to Société Française de Parasitologie

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

The tick-borne diseases are still closely related to huge economic losses particularly in developing countries (Uilenberg, 1995). Babesiosis (Tick fever), theilerioses (East Coast fever, January disease, and Corridor disease), ehrlichiosis (Heartwater disease), and anaplasmosis belong to the most important tick-transmitted diseases affecting cattle farming in sub-Saharan Africa (i.a. Gachohi et al., 2010; Makala et al., 2003; Okuthe & Buyu, 2006). Worldwide distributed bovine babesiosis is caused by infection with intraerythrocytic parasites Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina transmitted by Rhipicephalus spp. tick (Sonenshine, 1993). Competent tick vectors Rhipicephalus evertsi and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus were reported as a dominant tick species in livestock also in Angola (Gomes et al., 1994). The massive death associated with intravascular haemolysis should appear in endemic unstable areas where B. bovis is more pathogenic than B. bigemina. The most important diseases caused by Theileria spp. is undoubtedly connected with Theileria parva infection. Acute, frequently fatal East Coast fever is transmitted between cattle by Rhipicephalus appendiculatus tick, whereas Corridor disease causing almost 100 % morbidity is transmitted from its asymptomatic carrier African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) to cattle also by Rhipicephalus zambeziensis and Rhipicephalus duttoni (Lawrence et al., 2004). Both, bovine anaplasmosis usually associated with Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle, and anaplasmosis of small ruminants caused by Anaplasma ovis are distributed worldwide with higher prevalence in tropical and subtropical areas (Bowles et al., 2000). An infection by this obligate intracellular parasite results in mild to severe anaemia and icterus without hemoglobinaemia and hemoglobinuria (Kocan et al., 2010). Febrile heartwater disease is endemic in sub-Saharan Africa and in the islands in the Carribean Sea (Provost & Bezuidenhout, 1987). Ehrlichia ruminantium, its agent, causes serious lesions of nervous and circulatory system leading to reduction of cardiac and lung function (Van Amstel et al., 1987).

As a consequence of nearly 30 years lasting civil war, the basic information about current epidemiological status of livestock in Angola is lacking. After the war, domestic animals from different parts of Africa were taken to replace and re-form indigenous herds. We suppose that endemic stability in relation to tick-borne diseases is not understood to these days. In the frame of broader developmental project, we were allowed to perform a brief veterinary survey in Bié Province in Central Angola. Presented paper contributes to increase our knowledge on presence and distribution of four major tick-borne pathogens in this country.

Materials and Methods

Blood Sampling and Studied Area

Research was carried out in Bié Province in Central Angola during January and February 2009, the months representing there part of the rainy season (http://news.bbc.co.uk/weather/hi/ country_guides; http://www.angola.climatetemp.info/). Altogether 76 cattle blood samples were obtained by puncture of ventral coccygeal vein at seven selected farms operating by mixed farming system – namely in Andulo (n = 6), Cunhinga (n = 4), Kuito (n = 4), Kukema (n = 11), Kunje (n = 11), Lioema (n = 21), and Vila Graça (n = 19) (Fig. 1). All individuals originated from the south of the country (Huíla province) and belonged to local Ovambo breed. Thirteen (13) blood samples were collected from goats living in Catabola (n = 10) and Kuito (n = 3). All selected animals were adults without any symptom of disease. Small amount of collected full blood (0.5 ml) was preserved by surplus of pure 96 % ethanol and transported to laboratory.

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Distribution of sampling sites in Bié Province (dots).

Numbers at each locality correspond to those in the Table II. Position of Bié Province in the territory of Angola is evident on small inserted map at right down corner.

DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

DNA was isolated from ethanol preserved blood using NucleoSpin Tissue kit (MACHEREY-NAGEL, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol, and then stored at - 20 °C until further analysis. Polymerase chain reactions were conducted to amplify specific DNA fragments of Babesia/Theileria spp., Ehrlichia ruminantium, and Anaplasma marginale/ovis, following modified protocols published by (da Silveira et al., 2011), Mahan et al. (1992), and de la Fuente et al. (2001), respectively. All reactions were performed in 25 μl volume – PCR reaction mixture consisted of 12.5 μl Combi PPP Master Mix (Top-Bio s.r.o. Prague, Czech Republic), 10 pmol of each primer (Integrated DNA Technologies, Belgium), 8.5 μl of PCR water (Top-Bio s.r.o. Prague, Czech Republic), and 2 μl of DNA template. In case of nested PCR (detection of Babesia/Theileria spp.), 1 μl of PCR product from the first round of amplification was used instead of DNA template.

The sequences of the primers and PCR conditions used in the study are presented in Table I. Initial denaturation step at 94 °C lasted five, ten and two minutes for Babesia/Theileria spp., E. ruminantium, and A. marginale/ ovis, respectively. Final extension step lasted eight minutes at 72° C for Babesia/Theileria spp., ten minutes at 72 °C for E. ruminantium, and seven minutes at 68 °C in case of A. marginale/ovis. All PCR products were subjected to 1.2 % agarose gel with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light.

Table I.

PCR conditions and primers used in the study.

Dna Sequencing

Representative part of positive PCR products were selected, purified after gel electrophoresis using Gel/ PCR DNA Fragments Extraction Kit (Geneaid Biotech Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan) and sequenced (Macrogen, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Similarity of the obtained sequences was compared with sequences available at GenBank database using BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) algorithm (http://blast.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/) and MEGA program (version 5.05, Tamura et al., 2011).

Results

All 13 goats’ samples were positive only for the presence of partial sequence of msp4 gene coding Anaplasma marginale/ovis surface protein (Table II). Altogether nine out of 13 PCR products were sequenced and all of them revealed 98-100 % similarity to Chinese A. ovis isolates deposited in Gen- Bank (HQ456347, HQ456348).

Table II.

Prevalences of detected tick-transmitted pathogens.

We detected gene segments of A. marginale, and Babesia/Theileria spp. in bovine blood samples (Table II). The msp4 gene of Anaplasma spp. was success- fully amplified from 29 bovine samples, 17 of them were sequenced, revealing 99-100 % similarity to an A. marginale sequences from Israel (AY786993), Italy (AY702922) and Zimbabwe (AY666011). A. marginale was detected at six out of seven farms, with prevalence ranging between 16 % and 55 %. Sequencing of 12 amplified 18S rRNA fragments of Babesia/Theileria spp. and their following analysis employing MEGA software showed that one sample from Andulo displayed the highest similarity (99 %) with B. bigemina isolate originated from Kenya (accession number EF458200). All 11 remaining sequences revealed the highest similarity (99 %) with Theileria velifera strain from Tanzania (AF097993). The prevalence of Theileria sp. within particular herds ranged between 9 % and 33 %, whereas samples of cattle from Kunhinga (n = 4) and Kuito (n = 4) was PCR negative. In total, we detected six animals being infected by both A. marginale and T. velifera. We did not find any E. ruminantium positive sample. The results are summarized in Table II.

Discussion

We have diagnosed presence of four important tick-borne haemopathogens among only 89 sampled ruminants from eight farms (Fig. 1). The most prevalent blood parasites in our samples were A. ovis (100 %) in goats, and A. marginale (38 %) in cattle. Such a high prevalence could be explained by the easy transmission routes, when species of the genus Anaplasma can be transmitted by ticks, but mechanical transmission mediated by biting flies and vertical transmission can play a role as well (De Waal, 2000). Biological transmission is effected by more than 20 tick species (Kocan et al., 2004), when at least five competent vector ticks - namely Argas persicus, Rhipicephalus evertsi, R. sanguineus, R. simus and R. (Boophilus) decoloratus were recorded also from Angola (Walker et al., 2003). We do not expect that all goats in the region are Anaplasma-positive; however, the high prevalence of Anaplasma in goat herd in sub-Saharan Africa is not a surprise (e.g. Bell-Sakyi et al., 2004).

Theilerioses, diseases caused by Apicomplexan parasites of the genus Theileria, belong to most important infectious diseases of ruminants in tropics and subtropics (Yusufmia et al., 2010). Among them, infection by different strains of T. parva causes the most severe theilerioses of cattle in Africa called East Coast fever (ECF), January disease, and Corridor disease. Whereas Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, the vector of ECF, is distributed in eastern Africa, R. duttoni and R. zambeziensis, both important vectors of Corridor disease, occur naturally also in Angola (Gomes et al., 1994; Walker et al., 2000, 2003). Moreover, earlier reports on clinical cases of Corridor disease in Angola are available (Sonenshine & Mather, 1994). Nevertheless, we did not detect T. parva in our samples. It corresponds well with predicting distribution model for theileriosis in sub-Saharan Africa, where Angola remains “untouched” by ECF and by its tick vector R. appendiculatus (Olwoch et al., 2008). We found parasites of the genus Theileria widely distributed in Bié when sequencing attributes our isolates to T. velifera. This Theileria species is for long time considered to be non-pathogenic, and thus having low economic importance (Stoltsz, 1989; Bell-Sakyi et al., 2004). Nevertheless, Oura et al. (2004) stated that T. velifera, T. mutans, and T. taurotragi can cause in infected cattle ECF-like symptoms. Hence, our finding of T. velifera in five herds should not be ignored. Comparing to previous authors reporting mixed infections by different Theileria species in Rwanda, Uganda and South Africa (e.g. Bazarusanga et al., 2007; Oura et al., 2004; Yusufmia et al., 2010); we did not detect any animal possessing Theileria multi-infection.

B. bovis and B. bigemina are the causative agents of bovine babesiosis in sub-Saharan Africa, where their distribution ranges overlap into large scale (Bock et al., 2004). Among them, B. bigemina possess wider distribution, following the distribution of its main vector ticks R. (Boophilus) decoloratus and R. evertsi (Bock et al., 2004; Walker et al., 2003). We did not find B. bovis in our samples collection (data not shown, methodology according to Aboulaila et al., 2010). This situation can be caused by the lack of R. (Boophilus) microplus (the main vector of B. bovis) in Angola, as published by previous authors (e.g. Gomes et al., 1994; Walker et al., 2003). Our results correspond partially with outcomes of survey of 386 bovine sera collected in north-eastern South Africa by Mtshali et al. (2004). This team discovered 94 % prevalence of B. bigemina, 87 % prevalence of Anaplasma sp., and absence of B. bovis among studied animals. Despite the fact that we found only 1 % prevalence of B. bigemina, due to the time-limited nature of parasitaemia leading to relatively smaller chance to detect Babesia by PCR method, this result should not be overlooked.

Ehrlichia ruminantium, the causative agent of heartwater disease, was not detected among our samples, despite the fact that Amblyomma pomposum and A. variegatum, both considered as competent heartwater vectors, were reported from Angola as a frequent tick species infesting cattle (Gomes et al., 1994; Walker & Olwage, 1987). Regarding to the widespread occurrence and dynamics of spreading of heartwater disease intensified with possible vertical transmission (Deem et al., 1996), further study including serological analysis should be carried out to estimate the most imperilled areas by E. ruminantium in Angola.

Notably, despite the presence of four above mentioned blood parasites in Central Angola, all cattle and goats were without symptoms of disease. Asymptomatic development of infections could testify their endemic stability in the area. Such a state is defined as relationships between host, vector, and pathogen in environment, when clinical cases or symptoms of disease absent, or occur rarely (Bock et al., 2004). In spite of existence of vaccination programs in Angola, vast majority of farmers cannot support us with information about applied vaccines in their herds due to absence of reliable records. Hence, influence of acquired immune mechanisms (and innate immunity as well) in suppression of symptoms can also play a role. We found mixed infections of A. marginale and Theileria sp. in six animals. As confirmed by many previous authors, multi-infections in both wild and domestic ruminants of sub-Saharan Africa, are frequent (e.g. Awad et al., 2011; Figueroa et al., 1998; Oura et al., 2004; Pfitzer et al., 2011; Simuunza et al., 2011; Yusufmia et al., 2010).

PCR methods give us short-term perspective in monitoring of epidemiological situation calling for employing serological methods. To clarify recent epidemiological threats and to reduce the economic losses in cattle farming in Angola, we suppose as basic the following measures - extensive epidemiological survey employing serology together with molecular genetic methods, monitoring of distribution of tick vectors, availability of vaccination programs, and tracking of animal transports.

Acknowledgments

Study was enabled by the project 279389/2009-ČRA of the Czech Development Agency, implemented by the Institute of Tropics and Subtropics of the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague. Study was supported by the project “CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology” (CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068) from European Regional Development Fund. Lab works were supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (project No.524/09/0715). Michaela Kubelová is a Holder of Brno PhD Talent Financial Aid sponsored by Brno city municipality. We are indebted to all co-operative farmers for their assistance with sampling, and to Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Republic of Angola, for necessary permits (No.03/ CSEA/GDG/SV/2009). Lesley Bell-Sakyi (University of Edinburgh, Scotland) and Gábor Földvári (Szent István University, Budapest, Hungary) provide us with Ehrlichia ruminantium and Anaplasma sp. positive controls, respectively.

References

  1. Aboulaila M., Yokoyama N. & Igarashi I. Development and evaluation of a nested PCR based on spherical body protein 2 gene for the diagnosis of Babesia bovis infection. Veterinary Parasitology, 2010, 169, 45–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  2. Awad H., Antunes S., Galindo R.C., Do Rosário V.E., de La Fuente J., Domingos A. & El Hussein A.M. Prevalence and genetic diversity of Babesia and Anaplasma species in cattle in Sudan. Veterinary Parasitology, 2011, 181, 146–152. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  3. Bazarusanga T., Vercruysse J., Marcotty T. & Geysen D. Epidemiological studies on theileriosis and the dynamics of Theileria parva infections in Rwanda. Veterinary Parasitology, 2007, 143, 214–221. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  4. Bell-Sakyi L., Koney E.B.M., Dogbey O. & Walker A.R. Incidence and prevalence of tick-borne haemoparasites in domestic ruminants in Ghana. Veterinary Parasitology, 2004, 124, 25–42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  5. Bock R., Jackson L., De Vos A. & Jorgensen W. Babesiosis of cattle. Parasitology, 2004, 129, S247–S269. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  6. Bowles P.M., Molloy J.B., Blight G.W., Singh S. & Mabikacheche L.G. Evaluation of a commercially available kit for detection of antibodies to Anaplasma marginale and A. centrale in cattle in Australia and Zimbabwe. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 2000, 67, 83–86. (In the text)
  7. da Silveira J.A.G., Rabelo É.M.L. & Ribeiro M.F.B. Detection of Theileria and Babesia in brown brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira) and marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Veterinary Parasitology, 2011, 177, 61–66. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  8. Deem S.L., Norval R.A.I., Donachie P.L. & Mahan S.M. Demonstration of vertical transmission of Cowdria ruminantium, the causative agent of heartwater from cows to their calves. Veterinary Parasitology, 1996, 61, 119–132. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  9. de La Fuente J., van den Bussche R. & Kocan K.M. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of North American isolates of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiaceae: Ehrlichieae). Veterinary Parasitology, 2001, 97, 65–76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  10. De Waal D.T. Anaplasmosis control and diagnosis in South Africa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2000, 916, 474–483. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  11. Figueroa J.V., Alvarez J.A., Ramos J.A., Rojas E.E., Santiago C., Mosqueda J.J., Vega C.A. & Buening G.M. Bovine babesiosis and anaplasmosis follow-up on cattle relocated in an endemic area for hemoparasitic diseases. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1998, 849, 1–10. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  12. Gachohi J.M., Ngumi P.N., Kitala P.M. & Skilton R.A. Estimating seroprevalence and variation to four tick-borne infections and determination of associated risk factors in cattle under traditional mixed farming system in Mbeere District, Kenya. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2010, 95, 208–223. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  13. Gomes A.F., Pombal Jr A.M. & Venturi L. Observations on cattle ticks in Huila Province (Angola). Veterinary Parasitology, 1994, 51, 333–336. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  14. Kocan K.M., de La Fuente J., Blouin E.F. & Garcia-Garcia J.C. Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae): recent advances in defining host-pathogen adaptations of a tick-borne rickettsia. Parasitology, 2004, 129, S285–S300. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  15. Kocan K.M., de La Fuente J., Blouin E.F., Coetzee J.F. & Ewing S.A. The natural history of Anaplasma marginale. Veterinary Parasitology, 2010, 167, 95–107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  16. Lawrence J.A., Perry B.D. & Williamson S.M. Coetzer J.A.W. & Tustin R.C. Corridor disease, in: Infectious diseases of livestock, 2nd ed. Cape Town, Southern Africa, Oxford University Press, 2004, 468–471. (In the text)
  17. Mahan S.M., Waghela S.D., McGuire T.C., Rurangirwa F.R., Wassink L.A. & Barbet A.F. A cloned DNA probe for Cowdria ruminantium hybridizes with eight heartwater strains and detects infected sheep. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1992, 30, 981–986. [PubMed] (In the text)
  18. Makala L.H., Mangani P., Fujisaki K. & Nagasawa H. The current status of major tick borne diseases in Zambia. Veterinary Research, 2003, 34, 27–45. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] (In the text)
  19. Mtshali M.S., De Waal D.T. & Mbati P.A. A sero-epidemiological survey of blood parasites in cattle in the northeastern Free State, South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 2004, 71, 67–75. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  20. Okuthe O.S. & Buyu G.E. Prevalence and incidence of tickborne diseases in smallholder farming systems in the western-Kenya highlands. Veterinary Parasitology, 2006, 141, 307–312. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  21. Olwoch J.M., Reyers B., Engelbrecht F.A. & Erasmus B.F.N. Climate change and the tick-borne disease, theileriosis (East Coast fever) in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, 2008, 72, 108–120. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  22. Oura C.A.L., Bishop R.P., Wampande E.M., Lubega G.W. & Tait A. Application of a reverse line blot assay to the study of haemoparasites in cattle in Uganda. International Journal of Parasitology, 2004, 34, 603–613. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  23. Pfitzer S., Oosthuizen M.C., Bosman A.M., Vorster I. & Penzhorn B.L. Tick-borne blood parasites in nyala (Tragelaphus angasii, Gray 1849) from Kwa-Zulu-Natal, South Africa. Veterinary Parasitology, 2011, 176, 126–131. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  24. Provost A. & Bezuidenhout J.D. The historical background and global importance of heartwater. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 1987, 54, 165–169. (In the text)
  25. Simuunza M., Weir W., Courcier E., Tait A. & Shiels B. Epidemiological analysis of tick-borne diseases in Zambia. Veterinary Parasitology, 2011, 175, 331–342. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  26. Sonenshine D.E. Biology of Ticks, vol. 2. Oxford University Press, NY, USA, 1993. (In the text)
  27. Sonenshine D.E. & Mather T.N. Ecological dynamics of Tick-borne zoonoses. Oxford University Press, NY, USA, 1994. (In the text)
  28. Stoltsz W.H. Theileriosis in South Africa: a brief review. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Épizooties, 1989, 8, 93–102. (In the text)
  29. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M. & Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  30. Uilenberg G. International collaborative research: significance of tick-borne haemoparasitic diseases to world animal health. Veterinary Parasitology, 1995, 57, 19–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] (In the text)
  31. Van Amstel S.R., Guthrie A.J., Reyers F., Bertschinger H., Oberem P.T., Killeen V.M. & Mathee O. The clinical pathology and pathophysiology of heartwater: a review. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 1987, 54, 287–290. (In the text)
  32. Walker A.R., Bouattour A., Camicas J.L., Estrada-Peña A., Horak I.G., Latif A.A., Pegram R.G. & Preston P.M. Ticks of domestic animals in Africa. A guide to identification of species. Bioscience Reports, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 2003. (In the text)
  33. Walker J.B. & Olwage A. The tick vectors of Cowdria ruminantium (Ixodoidea, Ixodidae, Genus Amblyomma) and their distribution. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 1987, 54, 353–379. (In the text)
  34. Walker J.B., Keirans J.E. & Horak I.G. The genus Rhipicephalus (Acari, Ixodidae). A guide to the brown Ticks of the World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000. [CrossRef]
  35. Yusufmia S.B.A.S., Collins N.E., Nkuna R., Troskie M., Van den Bossche P. & Penzhorn B.L. Occurence of Theileria parva and other haemoprotozoa in cattle at the edge of Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of South African Veterinary Association,2010, 81, 45–49. (In the text)

All Tables

Table I.

PCR conditions and primers used in the study.

Table II.

Prevalences of detected tick-transmitted pathogens.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Distribution of sampling sites in Bié Province (dots).

Numbers at each locality correspond to those in the Table II. Position of Bié Province in the territory of Angola is evident on small inserted map at right down corner.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.