Open Access
Research Article
Volume 26, 2019
Article Number 50
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 21 August 2019
  1. Alden KJ. 1995. Helminths of the opossum Didelphis virginiana, in southern Illinois, with a compilation of all helminths reported from this host in North America. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 62(2), 197–208. [Google Scholar]
  2. Amato JFR, Castro PT, Grisi L. 1976. Spirura guianensis (Ortlepp, 1924), parasita de Philander opossum quica (Temminck, 1825) no estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil (Nematoda, Spiruridae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 36(1), 123–127. [Google Scholar]
  3. Arcangeli J, Light JE, Cervantes FA. 2018. Molecular and morphological evidence of the diversification in the gray mouse opossum, Tlacuatzin canescens (Didelphimorphia), with description of a new species. Journal of Mammalogy, 99(1), 138–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Astúa D. 2009. Evolution of scapula size and shape in Didelphid marsupials (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae). Evolution, 63(9), 2438–2456. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brugni N, Flores VR. 2007. Allassogonoporus dromiciops n. sp. (Digenea: Allassogonoporidae) from Dromiciops gliroides (Marsupialia: Microbiotheriidae) in Patagonia, Argentina. Systematic Parasitology, 68(1), 45–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cássia-Silva C, Sales LP. 2019. The imprints left by historical contingency on marsupials’ life-history traits. Journal of Zoology, 307(2), 149–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chabaud AG, Bain O. 1981. Quentius kozeki n. gen., n. sp., Nématode rictulaire parasite d’un Marsupial américain. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée, 56(2), 175–178. [Google Scholar]
  8. Feijó IA, Torres EJL, Maldonado A Jr., Lanfredi RM. 2008. A new oxyurid genus and species from Gracilinanus agilis (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) in Brazil. Journal of Parasitology, 94(4), 847–851. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Flores-Barroeta L, Hidalgo-Escalante E, Montero-Gei F. 1961. Céstodos de vertebrados. VIII. Revista de Biología Tropical, 9(2), 187–207. [Google Scholar]
  10. Galbreath KE, Hoberg EP, Cook JA, Armién B, Bell KC, Campbell ML, Dunnum JL, Dursahinhan AT, Eckerlin RP, Gardner SL, Greiman SE, Heikki Henttonen F, Jiménez A, Koehler AVA, Nyamsuren B, Tkach VV, Torres-Pérez F, Tsvetkova A, Hope AG. 2019. Building an integrated infrastructure for exploring biodiversity: field collections and archives of mammals and parasites. Journal of Mammalogy, 100(2), 382–393. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gardner AL, Editor. 2007. Mammals of South America. Vol. 1. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. p. 669. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gardner SL, Hugot JP. 1995. A new pinworm, Didelphoxyuris thylamisis n. gen., n. sp. (Nematoda: Oxyurida) from Thylamys elegans (Waterhouse, 1839) (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) in Bolivia. Research and Reviews in Parasitology, 55(3), 139–147. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gomes DC, Pinto RM. 1972. Castroia inquassata sp. n., trematódeo de Marmosa sp. (Trematoda, Castroiinae). Atas da Sociedade de Biologia do Rio de Janeiro, 15(3), 129–131. [Google Scholar]
  14. González-Christen A, Rodríguez-Santiago NV. 2014. Primer registro de Tlacuatzin canescens, (Mammalia, Didelphimorphia: Marmosidae) en Veracruz, México. Therya, 5(3), 845–854. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guerrero R, Hugot J-P. 2003. Monodelphoxyuris dollmeiri n. g., n. sp. (Nematoda: Oxyurida) from Monodelphis emiliae in Peru. Systematic Parasitology, 55(1), 73–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gutiérrez EE, Jansa SA, Voss RS. 2010. Molecular systematics of mouse opossums (Didelphidae: Marmosa): assessing species limits using mitochondrial DNA sequences, with comments on phylogenetic relationships and biogeography. American Museum Novitates, 3692, 1–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guzmán-Cornejo C, Garciá-Prieto L, Acosta-Gutiérrez R, Falcón-Ordaz J, León-Paniagua L. 2012. Metazoarios parásitos de Tlacuatzin canescens y Marmosa mexicana (Mammalia: Didelphiomorphia) de México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 83(2), 557–561. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiménez FA, Braun JK, Campbell ML, Gardner SL. 2008. Endoparasites of fat-tailed opossums (Thylamys: Didelphidae) from northwestern Argentina and southwestern Bolivia, with the description of a new species of tapeworm. Journal of Parasitology, 94(5), 1098–1102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Monet-Mendoza A, Osorio-Sarabia D, García-Prieto L. 2005. Helminths of the Virginia opossum Didelphis virginiana (Mammalia: Didelphidae) in Mexico. Journal of Parasitology, 91(1), 213–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Navone GT, Suriano DM. 1992. Pterigodermatites (Paucipectines) spinicaudatis n. sp. (Nematoda: Rictularidae) from Dromiciops australis (Marsupiala: Microbiotheriidae) in Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina. Biogeographical distribution and host-parasite relationships. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 87(4), 533–538. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Navone GT, Suriano DM, Pujol CA. 1985. Neohilgertia venusti gen. n. sp. n. (Nematoda: Oxyuridae) from Thylamys venustus cinderellus (Thomas) Reig, Kirsch & Marshall, 1985 (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) in Burruyacu, Tucuman, Argentina- Systematic position and possible evolution. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 85(2), 185–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Quentin JC. 1973. Présence de Spirura guianensis (Ortlepp, 1924) chez des Marsupiaux néotropicaux. Cycle évolutif. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée, 48(1), 117–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rossi RV, Voss RS, Lunde DP. 2010. A revision of the didelphid marsupial genus Marmosa Part 1. The species in Tate’s “mexicana” and “Mitts” sections and other closely related forms. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 334(334), 3–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Santos-Rondon MVS, Pires MP, dos Reis SF, Ueta MT. 2012. Marmosa paraguayana (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) as a new host for Graciloxyurus agilisis (Nematoda: Oxyuridae) in Brazil. Journal of Parasitology, 98, 170–174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Silva MGQE, Costa HMA. 1999. Helminths of white-bellied opossum from Brazil. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 35(2), 371–374. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd Edn. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman. p. 887. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  27. Teta P, D’Elía G, Flores DA, de la Sancha NU. 2009. Diversity and distribution of the mouse opossums of the genus Thylamys (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae) in northeastern and central Argentina. Gayana, 73(2), 180–199. [Google Scholar]
  28. Voss RS, Emmons LH. 1996. Mammalian diversity in Neotropical lowland rainforests: A preliminary assessment. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 230, 3–115. [Google Scholar]
  29. Voss RS, Gutierrez EE, Solari S, Rossi RV, Jansa SA. 2014. Phylogenetic relationships of mouse opossums (Didelphidae, Marmosa) with a revised subgeneric classification and notes on sympatric diversity. American Museum Novitates, 3817, 1–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Voss RS, Jansa SA. 2009. Phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials, and extant radiation of New World metatherian mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 322, 1–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Voss RS, Lunde DP, Simmons NB. 2001. The mammals of Paracou, French Guiana: a neotropical lowland rainforest fauna Part 2. Nonvolant species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 263, 3–236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Voss RS, Tarifa T, Yensen E. 2004. An introduction to Marmosops (Marsupialia: Didelphidae), with the description of a new species from Bolivia and notes on the taxonomy and distribution of other Bolivian forms. American Museum Novitates, 3466, 1–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.