Open Access
Volume 25, 2018
Article Number 21
Number of page(s) 4
Published online 10 April 2018
  1. Almería S, Cabezón O, Paniagua J, Cano-Terriza D Jiménez-Ruiz S, Arenas-Montes A, Dubey JP, García-Bocanegra I. 2018. Toxoplasma gondii in sympatric domestic and wild ungulates in the Mediterranean ecosystem. Parasitology Research, in press, DOI: 10.1007/s00436-017-5705-6. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aubert D, Ajzenberg D, Richomme C, Gilot-Reomont E, Terrier ME, de Gevigney C, Game Y, Maillard D, Gibert P, Dardé ML, Villena I. 2010. Molecular and biological characteristics of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from wildlife in France. Veterinary Parasitology, 171(3-4), 346-349. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bárlová E, Sedlak K, Pavlik I, Literak I. 2007. Prevalence of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in wild ruminants from the countryside or captivity in the Czech Republic. Journal of Parasitology, 93(5), 1216-1218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calero-Bernal R, Saugar JM, Frontera E, Pérez-Martín JE, Habela MA, Serrano FJ, Reina D, Fuentes I. (2015) Prevalence and genotype identification of Toxoplasma gondii in wild animals from southwestern Spain. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 51, 233-238. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doherty TS, Bengsen AJ, Davis RA. 2014. A critical review of habitat use by feral cats and key directions for future research and management. Wildlife Research, 41(5), 435-446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dubey JP. 2009. History of the discovery of the life cycle of Toxoplasma gondii. International Journal for Parasitology, 39(8), 877-882. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dubey JP. 2010. Toxoplasmosis of animal and humans. 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p. 1-313. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dubey JP, Thulliez P, Weigel RM, Andrews CD, Lind P, Powell EC. 1995. Sensitivity and specificity of various serologic tests for detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection in naturally infected sows. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 56(8), 1030-1036. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. EFSA. 2013. Scientific Opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat from farmed game. EFSA, 11(6), 3264, pp 181. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gauss CBL, Dubey JP, Vidal D, Cabezón O, Ruiz-Fons F, Vicente J, Marco I, Lavin S, Gortazar C, Almería S. 2006. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in red deer (Cervus elaphus) and other wild ruminants from Spain. Veterinary Parasitology, 136(3-4), 193-200. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hecking-Veltman J, Tenter AM, Daugschies A. 2001. Studien zur Parasitenfauna bei streunden Katzen im Raum Mönchengladbach. Praktischer Tierarzt, 82, 563-569. [Google Scholar]
  12. Heddergott M, Frantz AC, Stubbe M, Stubbe A, Ansorge H, Osten-Sacken N. 2017. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection in invasive raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Central Europa. Parasitology Research, 116(8), 2335-2340. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hejlícek K, Literák I, Nezval J. 1997. Toxoplasmosis in wild mammals from the Czech Republic. Journal of Wildlife Disease, 33(3), 480-485. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hertwig ST, Schweizer M, Stepanow S, Jungnickel A, Böhle UR, Fischer MS. 2009. Regionally high rates of hybridization and introgression in German wildcat populations (Felis silvestris, Carnivora, Felidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 47, 283-297 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hwang YT, Pitt JA, Quirk TW, Dubey JP. 2007. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in mesocarnivores of the Canadian prairies. Journal of Parasitology, 93(6), 1370-1373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones JL, Parise ME, Fiore AE. 2014. Neglected parasitic infections in the United Sates: toxoplasmosis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 90(5), 794-799. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Klar N, Fernández N, Kramer-Schadt S, Herrmann M, Trinzen M, Büttner I, Niemitz C. 2008. Habitat selection models for European wildcat conservation. Biological Conservation, 141(1), 308-319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lorencova A, Lamka J, Slany M. 2015. Toxoplasma gondii in wild ruminants bred in game preserves and farms with production destined for human consumption in the Czech Republic. Postravinarstvo, 9(1), 288-292. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lutz W. 1997. Serologischer Nachweis von Antikörpern gegen Toxoplasma gondii und Leptospira bei Schwarzwild. Zeitschrift Jagdwissenschaft, 43(4), 283-287. [Google Scholar]
  20. Piegert H, Uloth W. 2000. Das Europäische Mufflon. DSV Verlag GmbH, Hamburg, p. 1-258 [Google Scholar]
  21. Rieck W. 1968. Das Bestimmen des Muffelwildalters. Beiträge zur Jagd und Wildforschung, 6, 103-105. [Google Scholar]
  22. Steeb S. 2015. Postmortale Untersuchungen an der Europäischen Wildkatze (Felis silvestris silvestris Schreber, 1777). PhD thesis, Justus Liebig Universität, Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin, Gießen, VVB Laufersweiler Verlag Gießen, pp 1–231. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tackmann K. 1997. Seroprevalence of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii in wild boars (Sus scrofa). In: EUR 18476-COST 820 Vaccines against animal coccidioses − Annual report 1887. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, p. 167. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tenter AM, Vietmeyer C, Johnson AM, Janitschke K, Rommel M, Lehmacher W. 1994. ELISAs based on recombinant antigens for seroepidemiological studies on Toxoplasma gondii infections in cats. Parasitology, 109(1), 29-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Telle R. 1979. Untersuchungen zu ausgewählten Problemen der Bewirtschaftung des Muffelwildes in der DDR. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät Bau-, Wasser- und Forstwissenschaft, Dresden. [Google Scholar]
  26. Verma SK, Su C, Dubey JP. 2014. Toxoplasma gondii Isolates from Mouflon Sheep (Ovis ammon) from Hawaii, USA. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 2014, 1-3. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.