Open Access
Research Article
Issue
Parasite
Volume 23, 2016
Article Number 9
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2016009
Published online 08 March 2016
  1. Catzeflis F, Barrioz S, Szpigel J-F, de Thoisy B. 2014. Marsupiaux et Rongeurs de Guyane. Institut Pasteur de la Guyane: Cayenne, Guyane française. p. 128. [Google Scholar]
  2. Digiani MC, Navone GT, Durette-Desset MC. 2007. The systematic position of some nippostrongyline nematodes (Trichostrongylina: Heligmosomoidea) parasitic in Argentinean sigmodontine rodents. Systematic Parasitology, 67(2), 87–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Digiani MC, Notarnicola J, Navone GT. 2012. The genus Guerrerostrongylus (Nematoda: Heligmonellidae) in cricetid rodents from the Atlantic rain forest of Misiones, Argentina: emended description of Guerrerostrongylus zetta (Travassos, 1937) and description of a new species. Journal of Parasitology, 98(5), 985–991. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Digiani MC, Notarnicola J, Navone GT. 2015. Rediscovery and new morphological data on two Hassalstrongylus (Nematoda: Heligmonellidae) coparasitic in the marsh rat Holochilus chacarius (Rodentia: Cricetidae) from Argentina. Journal of Parasitology, 101(5), 556–564. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Durette-Desset MC. 1983. No. 10 Keys to genera of the Superfamily Trichostrongyloidea, in CIH Keys to the nematode parasites of Vertebrates, 1st ed., Vol. 10, Anderson RC, Chabaud AG, Editors. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International: Farnham Royal, UK. p. 86. [Google Scholar]
  6. Durette-Desset MC. 1985. Trichostrongyloid nematodes and their vertebrate hosts: reconstruction of the phylogeny of a parasitic group. Advances in Parasitology, 24, 239–306. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Durette-Desset MC, Digiani MC. 2012. The caudal bursa in the Heligmonellidae (Nematoda: Trichostrongylina). Characterization and hypothesis on its evolution. Parasite, 19(1), 3–18. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frey JK, Duszynski DW, Gannon WL, Yates TL, Gardner SL. 1992. Designation and curation of type host specimens (symbiotypes) for new parasite species. Journal of Parasitology, 78(5), 930–932. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibbons LM. 2010. Keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates, Supplementary volume. Commonwealth Agriculture Bureaux International: Cambridge, UK. p. 416. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoberg ER, Lichtenfels JR, Gibbons L. 2004. Phylogeny for species of Haemonchus (Nematoda: Trichostrongyloidea): Considerations of their evolutionary history and global biogeography among Camelidae and Pecora (Artiodactyla). Journal of Parasitology, 90(5), 1085–1102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jiménez FA, Gardner SL, Navone GT, Ortí G. 2012. Four events of host-switching in Aspidoderidae (Nematoda) involve convergent lineages of mammals. Journal of Parasitology, 98(6), 1166–1175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jiménez FA, Peralta-Rodríguez JL, Caspeta-Mandujano JM, Ramírez-Díaz SE. 2014. Macuahuitloides inexpectans n. gen., n. sp., (Molineidae: Anoplostrongylinae) from Mormoops megalophylla (Chiroptera: Mormoopidae). Journal of Parasitology, 100(5), 645–650. [Google Scholar]
  13. Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25(7), 1253–1256. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pritchard MH, Kruse GOW. 1982. The collection and preservation of animal parasites, 1st ed., Technical Bulletin No. 1. University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln, NE. p. 141. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology, 61(3), 539–542. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Scheibel RP, Catzeflis F, Jiménez FA. 2014. The relationships of marsupial-dwelling Viannaiidae and description of Travassostrongylus scheibelorum n. sp. (Trichostrongylina: Heligmosomoidea), from mouse opossums (Didelphidae) from French Guiana. Folia Parasitologica, 61(3), 242–254. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sikes RS, Gannon WL, The Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists. 2011. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy, 92(1), 235–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Simões RD, dos Santos MM, Maldonado A. 2012. A new Heligmonellid (Nematoda: Heligmonellidae) from Oecomys mamorae (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae) in the Pantanal and new data on the synlophe of Guerrerostrongylus zetta from the Atlantic Forest. Brazil. Journal of Parasitology, 98(4), 801–805. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Simões RO, Souza JGR, Maldonado A, Luque JL. 2011. Variation in the helminth community structure of three sympatric sigmodontine rodents from the coastal Atlantic Forest of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Journal of Helminthology, 85(2), 171–178. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sutton CA, Durette-Desset MC. 1991. Nippostrongylinae (Nematoda – Trichostrongyloidea) parasites d’Oryzomys flavescens en Argentine et en Uruguay. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 98(3), 535–553. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey: Champaign, Illinois. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vicente JJ, Rodrigues HO, Gomes DCC, Pinto RM. 1997. Nematóides do Brasil. Parte V: Nematóides de mamíferos. Revista Brasileira de Zoología, 14(1), 1–452. [Google Scholar]
  23. Voss RS, Lunde DP, Simmons NB. 2001. The mammals of Paracou, French Guiana: a neotropical lowland rainforest fauna Part 2. Nonvolant species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 263, 3–236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.