Open Access
Research Article
Volume 28, 2021
Article Number 58
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 20 July 2021

© Z. Kasičová et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2021

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The biting midges of the genus Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) are small hematophagous Diptera which are important for their ability to transmit pathogens of microbial and parasitic origin. Only females are hematophagous and they use blood as a source of proteins necessary for laying eggs. So far, 1347 species of biting midges have been described in the world [10]; of these, 64 species have been confirmed in Slovakia [41, 43]. After 2006, when bluetongue virus serotype 8 began to spread extensively, there was increased interest in monitoring biting midge occurrence and in investigating species composition [50]. A few years later, the Schmallenberg virus caused significant economic losses as it spread from Germany [5, 44] to other countries, including Slovakia [40]. From the epizootiological point of view, with regard to the spread of these diseases and recurrence of new foci of infections in Europe, in particular in Germany, Belgium, and France [11, 19, 20], it was necessary to monitor the correlations between the causal agents, vectors, and susceptible hosts. The most important vectors of these viruses in the Palaearctic region were Culicoides obsoletus/C. scoticus, which were also confirmed as the most frequent species by Sarvašová et al. in previous investigations in Eastern Slovakia [41]. The research performed so far in Slovakia has been focussed on monitoring faunistic data, but the host preferences have not yet been studied. One of the first steps within the efforts aimed at understanding the relationships between parasites and hosts was to identify the hosts from which biting midges take blood. Ceratopogonids are vectors of parasites and pathogens between their vertebrate hosts. Little information is available on the circadian Palaearctic biting midges. The biting cycle follows a circadian rhythm. In general, the prevailing view is that midges are most active at dusk. Species of Leptoconops and Lasiohelea are diurnal, as are a small number of Culicoides (e.g. C. impunctatus, C. obsoletus or C. nubeculosus) [3], but most Culicoides are crepuscular and/or nocturnal. Diurnal species commonly show two peaks of activity, in the morning (2–3 h after sunrise) and in the afternoon (close to sunset). According to our previous research [42], the highest flight activity of C. obsoletus/C. scoticus and C. punctatus was observed between midnight and 2.00 am, and of C. pulicaris and C. newsteadi between 2.00 and 4.00 am. A similar survey found that C. punctatus activity increased from 8 pm and peaked between 2.00 and 4.00 am in Turkey [14]. Environmental conditions may modify basic activity patterns. The frequency of feeding varies with species and situation [25, 38]; host availability plays an important role in the feeding behavior of biting midges in general. Most ceratopogonids are mammalophilic or ornithophilic, although some feed on reptiles [9]. Molecular identification of the vertebrate hosts of species of ceratopogonids in Europe has been conducted for 31 species that suck blood on 45 different hosts. Thirty-three species of birds and 12 species of mammals have been identified as hosts [27]. Determining the transmission dynamics of biting midges and pathogens requires an understanding of the interactions between these midges and vertebrate host communities. Such interactions are characterized through molecular methods that determine the taxonomic origin of a ceratopogonid blood meal. Several polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays have been developed to determine host blood of midges, and these assays can be done based on several genes. The COI (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I), Cyt b (cytochrome b) [36, 46] and 16 S rRNA (16S ribosomal RNA) genes are used for blood meal analysis of vertebrates [45]. The purpose of our study was to examine the host’s blood in biting midges captured on cattle and horse farms. This was the first study in Slovakia to analyse the detected host’s blood based on a segment of the mitochondrial gene (cytochrome b).

Materials and methods

Study sites and trapping procedure

Biting midges were captured in 2019 on cattle farms located near villages in Eastern Slovakia, in particular: Turňa nad Bodvou (GPS: 48.6004045, 20.8776599), Ostrov (GPS: 48.7424000, 21.2467712) Horňa (GPS: 48.757778, 22.201944), and near horses kept in a horse-riding arena in Košice (GPS: 48.7163857, 21.2610746). Midges were collected using CDC miniature UV light traps, model 1212 (John W. Hock Company, Gainesville, FL, USA), each fitted with black fluorescent (ultraviolet) light tubes and a 6 V battery. The traps were operated between feedlots, ensuring proximity between the trap and the potential host, at two-week intervals from April to November 2019. The traps were installed in the evening, approximately 1 h before dusk, and collected on the next day, early in the morning, approximately 2 h after sunrise. Sixteen individual collections (trapping nights) were made at each study site. Biting midges were captured together with other insects in a container with approximately 250 mL of 50% ethanol.

Laboratory processing of biting midges and their morphological diagnostics

Biting midges were diagnosed using the morphological keys of Mathieu et al. [28]; based on their characteristic wing spots, they were divided into individual complexes, and individual species were identified under a binocular microscope (Zeiss Stemi DV4). Biting midges were stored in 70% ethanol and kept in a refrigerator at +4 °C. The physiological condition of females was identified according to Dyce [15], based on burgundy pigment present in females’ abdomens. Four groups of biting midges were differentiated: nulliparous (empty abdomen without the presence of blood, i.e., they never sucked blood); parous (empty abdomen, with traces of burgundy pigment after blood sucking); engorged (abdomen filled with blood); and gravid (abdomen with eggs). Females with abdomen filled with blood were subjected to PCR analysis of the host’s blood.

DNA extraction

The total genomic DNA of blood-engorged Culicoides females was extracted using a DNeasy® Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, GmbH, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocol. To obtain DNA from female midges, we used the whole body, which we removed from residual water in 96% ethanol before extraction. The concentrations of extracted DNA were measured by a Nano Drop Lite Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) and diluted to the final concentration of 20–50 ng/μL. The samples were stored in a freezer at −20 °C and used for the PCR assay.

Identification of Culicoides species

The molecular identification of Culicoides spp. was based on the sequencing of partial mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) sequences representing an identification barcode for the species. Culicoides obsoletus/Culicoides scoticus is determined only based on morphological features (Table 1). By repeated PCR analysis, we could not determine the Culicoides species. The partial COI sequences for the individual midges were obtained using forward C1-J-1718 (5′–GGAGGATTTGGAAATTGATTAGT–3′) and reverse C1-N-2191 (5′–CAGGTAAAATTAAAATATAAACTTCTGG–3′) primers [10, 13]. The resulting length of the amplified COI fragments was about 523 bp.

Table 1

Host blood meals from blood-fed Culicoides spp.

The PCR reactions were performed in 50 μL of the reaction mixture consisting of: 1.5 μL of total genomic DNA template; 25 μL of OneTaq®2x Master Mix with Standard Buffer; 21.5 μL of nuclease free water; and 1 μL of each primer (Sigma-Aldrich). The reactions were carried out in a programmable Master cycler nexus X2 (Eppendorf, Germany) using an amplification program consisting of an initial denaturing step at 95 °C for 5 s, 5 cycles (94 °C, 40 s; 45 °C, 40 s; 72 °C, 60 s), followed by 45 cycles (94 °C, 40 s; 50 °C, 40 s; 72 °C, 1 s), and a final elongation at 72 °C for 7 min [29].

Blood-meal molecular analysis

Molecular identification of the blood meals from individual blood-engorged females was performed by sequencing part of the cytochrome b (cyt b) mitochondrial gene (350 bp). All PCRs were performed in a total volume of 47 μL, including 3 μL of total genomic DNA template, 21 μL of Emerald AmpGT PCR Master Mix (Takara, Shiga, Japan), 21 μL of nuclease-free water, and 1 μL of each primer (Sigma-Aldrich). The PCRs were performed on a Master cycler nexus X2 (Eppendorf, Germany) using universal vertebrate primers, forward cyt bb1 (5′–CCA TCM AAC ATY TCA DCA TGA AA–3′) and reverse cyt bb2 (5′–GCH CCT CAG AAT GAY ATT TGK CCT CA–3′) [35]. The amplification process consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 5 min, then 35 × (94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min), and elongation at 72 °C for 7 min.

The following steps including visualization, purification, and sequencing of PCR products were the same for the determination of Culicoides spp., as well as for host blood diagnostics, i.e., 5 μL of amplicons were run on 1% agarose gel, stained with GoodViewTM Nucleic Acid Stain and visualized under UV light. The PCR products were sent to the Microsynth Seqlab (Vienna, Austria) or SEQme (Dobříš, Czech Republic) for purification and sequencing. The sequencing was performed in both strands with identical primers used for the PCR.

Data analyses

The sequences of both COI and cyt b genes represented by chromatograms were analyzed and edited using MEGA X software [22]. Assemblage of the nucleotide sequences was carried out in Gene Tool Lite 1.0 software (BioTools Inc., Jupiter, FL, USA). The sequences of COI or cyt b genes obtained by sequencing in our study were compared to the reference sequences from the NCBI database using Blast (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool). When the similarity of our COI or cyt b gene sequences reached ≥98%, the corresponding taxonomic identity was assigned to the reference sequence.


A total of 28,752 individuals of 17 species of Culicoides biting midges were captured on the cattle and horse farms (Table 2). The highest abundance was observed in C. obsoletus/C. scoticus species n = 26,137 (90.9%). Biting midges from the Culicoides subgenus represented 7.4% (n = 2137) of the total number of biting midges. Individual percentages were as follows: C. newsteadi Austen, 1921 n = 1112 (3.9%); C. punctatus Meigen, 1804 n = 595 (2.1%); C. lupicaris Downes & Kettle, 1952 n = 320 (1.1%); C. pulicaris Linnaeus, 1758 n = 97 (0.3%); and C. bysta Sarvašová & Mathieu, 2017 n = 13 (0.05%). Other biting midges included C. furcillatus Callot, Kremer & Paradis, 1962 n = 229 (0.8%); C. festivipennis Kieffer, 1914 n = 72 (0.3%); C. riethi Kieffer, 1914 n = 33 (0.1%); C. circumscriptus Kieffer, 1918 n = 33 (0.1%); and C. stigma Meigen, 1818 n = 28 (0.1%). Less than 10 captured individuals were of C. slovacus Országh, 1969/C. tauricus Gutsevich, 1959, C. salinarius Kieffer, 1914, C. clastieri Callot, Kremer & Deduit, 1962, C. subfascipennis Kieffer, 1919, and C. dewulfi Goetghebuer, 1936 species. Of 28,696 females, 54% (15,516) were nulliparous, 9486 (31.1%) were parous, 10.8% (3102) were classified as fully engorged, and 2.1% (592) were gravid (Table 2).

Table 2

Species and abundance of Culicoides females trapped on four farms.

The samples also included males (n = 56; 0.2%) that were recorded in three localities. Twenty-one males of C. obsoletus/C. scoticus were trapped in the riding area of Košice. We also recorded 33 males, namely C. obsoletus/C. scoticus (n = 32) and C. punctatus (n = 1) on a farm in Turňa nad Bodvou. One piece of C. obsoletus/C. scoticus and C. lupicaris were obtained from a farm in Ostrov.

Detection of the host’s blood was carried out with 48 samples of biting midges of C. obsoletus/C. scoticus, C. dewulfi, C. punctatus, C. pulicaris, C. newsteadi, C. lupicaris, C. tauricus/slovacus, C. riethi, and C. furcillatus species. We detected host blood from species of biting midges that had an abdomen filled with blood (not all species of trapped Culicoides in our study had blood in the abdomen). We selected representative samples. The majority of engorged females were from C. obsoletus/C. scoticus. We randomly selected females and tried to diagnose engorged females from each locality for host blood meal analysis. It was observed that altogether seven species of biting midges took blood from the cattle (Bos taurus), in particular: C. obsoletus/C. scoticus, C. punctatus, C. pulicaris, C. newsteadi, C. lupicaris, C. riethi, and C. furcillatus. Horse blood (Equus caballus) was detected in the females of C. dewulfi species. Humans were parasitised by C. punctatus and C. obsoletus. The European hare (Lepus europaeus) and chicken (Gallus gallus) were fed on by the biting midges of the C. obsoletus species. The blood of the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) was diagnosed with C. obsoletus/C. scoticus (Table 1).


Determining species composition and detecting host blood are essential to control the spread of new species of biting midges, and the consequent transmission of pathogens. Thanks to the monitoring of Culicoides species, we can prevent the introduction of new pathogens into areas where they have not occurred before. Our work was the first study to investigate the mitochondrial gene for cytochrome b of vertebrae in Slovakia. This gene facilitates the identification of hosts parasitized by biting midges. Most species of Culicoides biting midges parasitize birds or mammals; certain species, however, feed on the blood of reptiles and amphibians [9]. Multiple studies investigating the hosts of biting midges, for example, in Denmark [24], presented 8 species of mammals and 7 species of birds as the most frequent hosts. For Culicoides spp., 9 mammalian and 24 avian species were detected as host for Romania [45]. In Germany, Santiago-Alarcon et al. [39] monitored the hosts of biting midges in forests located near human dwellings. In the Czech Republic, Votýpka et al. [49] examined biting midges parasitizing birds. In Great Britain, they examined the parasite–host relationships between biting midges and exotic animals kept in zoological gardens [16]. These data contributed to the knowledge that hematophagous females of biting midges parasitize a wide range of vertebrates, but they prefer mammals and birds [26]. For example, C. kibunensis parasitize birds and C. chiopterus and C. deltus preferably parasitize mammals. The majority of species of biting midges, such as C. obsoletus and C. festivipennis, belong to non-host specific species, which take blood from both mammals and birds [39].

Although biting midges had been paid less attention than other blood-sucking vectors in the past, the interest in these Diptera has increased enormously over the last two decades, mainly due to the economic losses suffered by ruminant breeders which resulted from viral transmission (BTV, SBV) [44]. The present research was carried out on four cattle and horse farms in Eastern Slovakia, with the result of the confirmed presence of 17 species of biting midges. Given that host blood can only be collected from blood-engorged females, the females of 10 species of biting midges were selected and the hosts they parasitized were identified. In addition to the detection of the host’s blood, each sample was also examined using the partial mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI), and this facilitated the molecular confirmation of the species of biting midges, in addition to the morphological diagnostics.

The highest abundance of females with blood was observed in biting midges of the Culicoides subgenus, which parasitized hosts in 6 groups. Individuals collected within our study represented the C. obsoletus/C. scoticus and C. dewulfi species. Culicoides obsoletus/C. scoticus species belong to the most widespread species present in the Palaearctic realm, and they prefer mammals as their hosts. However, 14% of studies confirmed avian hemosporidian parasites in parous females of Culicoides obsoletus/C. scoticus [6]. It was impossible to distinguish between C. obsoletus and C. scoticus based on morphological features; this is why a PCR analysis was carried out with the aim of confirming the species [1]. In our study, molecular methods were applied to confirm C. obsoletus; out of 27 examined samples, 74% parasitized cattle (Bos taurus). Our results are similar to those of other studies [4, 30, 39], which concluded that cattle were the most frequent species on which Culicoides biting midges fed in Europe. Culicoides obsoletus parasitizing cattle were detected on each of the monitored farms. As the samples were also collected near horses, it was obvious that another identified host of these biting midges was horses (Equus caballus).

The light traps used to collect the biting midges were installed as usual, i.e., at the height of approximately 1.5 m above the ground. However, scientists who have examined biting midges parasitizing birds claim that due to the behavior of avian hosts, it is advisable to place the light traps at the height of four meters [8, 49]. As our traps were placed at lower heights, the captured biting midges included those parasitizing small mammals; in particular, the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) and the European hare (Lepus europaeus). As for the avian hosts, one species was detected, i.e., a chicken (Gallus gallus). The chicken was parasitized by biting midges of the C. obsoletus species in the horse-riding arena where no poultry was kept. However, on the other side of the horse-riding arena, there were family houses with gardens where the poultry were bred. Biting midges are most abundant in proximity to production breeding sites. They disperse into surrounding areas in search suitable hosts. The flight distance for any individual, however, can be much lower or higher [21, 42]. Actually, Culicoides biting midges are not good fliers; they are only able to fly to the maximum distance of 5 km within several days. With strong winds, however, they may travel more than 100 km [30]. We assume that it was particularly the airflow that facilitated the detection of biting midges with the chicken blood inside the horse-riding arena. Host availability has a significant impact on the observed host-feeding patterns of Culicoides spp. that can also be used to estimate dispersal distances [21, 31]. Culicoides feed on reptiles, birds, mammals, and humans. Females must locate on the host in order to draw blood, and this process is influenced and controlled to some extent by environmental factors such as sunlight, wind speed, humidity, and ambient temperature, which can limit flight activity [7]. The daily rhythm of the attack is influenced by a periodically repeating change in temperature and light. Most midges are active at the dusk and at night, but some species are active during the day, with an increase in activity observed in the morning after sunrise and in the afternoon around sunset. Culicoides obsoletus attack the host during the day. Females prefer to feed on the host in warm humid and windless weather. Flight activity conditioned by host search is affected by temperature, humidity, and light intensity and inhibited by wind. Culicoides also fly to altitudes 170–200 m above the ground, where the temperature inversion peaks during the early hours of the night. Local maxima of air temperature and wind speed at this altitude are particularly favorable for insect migration, as showed by Chapman et al. [12], Reynolds et al. [37], and Sanders et al. [38], who trapped 14 species at these altitudes, including C pulicaris, C. punctatus, C. nubeculosus, and species from the subgenus Avaritia – C. obsoletus, C. scoticus, C. dewulfi, and C. chiopterus. According to a study by Kluisters et al. [21] in the United Kingdom, Obsoletus Group members successfully disperse between farms. Similarly, Mignotte et al. [31] confirmed the high dispersing capacity of C. obsoletus in France [32]. They confirmed that species of the Obsoletus Group are able to disperse 2.5 km or more, with males able to disperse to a distance of 1 km in 24 h.

Biting midges of the Culicoides subgenus include 14 species, i.e., C. pulicaris; C. lupicaris; C. impunctatus; C. punctatus; C. grisescens; C. newsteadi; C. flavipulicaris; C. fagineus; C. subfagineus; C. bysta; C. paradoxalis.; C. boyi; C. selandicus; and C. kalix [51]. The faunistic entomological papers published in Slovakia [33, 41, 43, 47] reported that the Culicoides subgenus contained the following 5 species of biting midges: C. pulicaris, C. punctatus, C. newsteadi, C. lupicaris, and C. bysta. As for the Culicoides subgenus, we examined 22 samples of biting midges, i.e., C. newsteadi (n = 8), C. pulicaris (n = 7), C. punctatus (n = 5), and C. lupicaris (n = 2). We confirmed again that cattle (Bos taurus) were the main host species. However, C. punctatus species held the second place in our study, and these individuals were confirmed to contain human blood in their abdomens. Similarly, data reported from Bulgaria indicate that C. punctatus is a source of human host blood [8]. It was also observed in this study that 4 other species of biting midges parasitized cattle, including C. riethi, a species that occurs only rarely. Similar results were reported by Martínez-de la Puente et al. [27] who confirmed in their study that these biting midges contained bovine blood.

In our study, diagnosis of a physiological condition based on morphological features was not always accurate [15] because it was not possible to successfully diagnose all engorged females of biting midges. Even though their abdomens were red, this did not mean they contained blood. They might have been filled with other liquids, such as herbal juices for example. Moreover, females of different species may have abdomens of different colors, and this may cause a negative result of a PCR analysis. Furthermore, blood contained in females might have degraded while being stored in ethanol [32], or biting midges might have taken blood from animals with sequences not yet included in GenBank. Females might also have taken blood from invertebrates with hemolymph circulating in their bodies. As for our results, out of the 48 examined samples, in 4 cases (8%) a host could not be identifiable.

The blood taken by biting midges affects their intestinal microflora and this is also a source of proteins, which females needed to lay eggs. Some studies confirmed that the selection of a suitable host for Culicoides biting midges may have been limited by the host availability in the area where they live [34]. On the other hand, anthropogenic activity facilitates the spread of vectors, as well as new pathogens to people. These implications were examined in Germany [39], where it was assumed that people who live near forests are exposed to a wide range of parasites of wild animals. Vectors that feed on various hosts probably change the source of their food when environmental conditions change, and thus a change between the vector and the host occurs. This means that the species taking blood of mammals parasitize birds, and vice versa [48]. The selection of a suitable host, blood ingestion, and transmission of pathogens are also affected by other factors, including the biting midges count, the presence of a host, and the frequency of feeding. All these factors affect the transmission of pathogens [18, 20]. Considering our results, we assume that potential vectors of pathogens, i.e., biting midges, parasitize a wide range of hosts. Further research is required, particularly on hosts that are only parasitized by certain specific species of biting midges. Such hosts are, for example, horses kept in the horse-riding arena subjected to our monitoring.


Our study was the first of its kind in Slovakia, and it was aimed at identifying a diversified range of hosts from which biting midges took blood. The dominant species found at the chosen locations was Culicoides obsoletus, representing 91.1% of the fauna out of all captured biting midges. Particularly C. obsoletus was designated as a potential vector of BTV and SBV [17, 23]. Our results indicate that biting midges select their hosts opportunistically, preferably cattle; this piece of information should be taken into account in epizootiological model studies. Bartsch et al. [4] and Ayllón et al. [2] made the same conclusions in their studies. The results of this study may be used in the future as an important indicator when modelling the transmission of pathogens and designing veterinary emergency plans.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding and source

This research was funded by project VEGA No. 1/0043/19 (Share 0.7), and project “Open scientific community for modern interdisciplinary research in medicine (OPENMED)”, ITMS2014+: 313011V455 supported by the Operational Programme Integrated Infrastructure, funded by the ERDF (Share 0.3).

Author contribution

Conceived the study: ZK, AK; Designed the experiment: ZK, AK, AS; Performed the field activities and sampling: ZK, AK; Performed the laboratory work: ZK, AKI, AS; Analyzed and interpreted the data: ZK, AS, AKI; Wrote the original draft of the manuscript: AK, AS, AKI; Reviewed and edited the final version of the manuscript: AK, ZK, AS; Supervision: AK.


We are very grateful to Bruno Mathieu for his critical comments on the manuscript. The authors thank an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments on a previous version of the manuscript.


  1. Augot D, Sauvage F, Jouet D, Simphal E, Veuille M, Couloux A, Kaltenbach ML, Depaquit J. 2010. Discrimination of Culicoides obsoletus and Culicoides scoticus, potential bluetongue vectors, by morphometrical and mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I analysis. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 10, 629–637. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayllón T, Nijhof AN, Weiher W, Bauer B, Allène X, Clausen PH. 2014. Feeding behaviour of Culicoides spp. (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) on cattle and sheep in northeast Germany. Parasites & Vectors, 7, 34. [Google Scholar]
  3. Balenghien T, Cêtre-Sossah T, Grillet C, Delécolle J-C, Mathieu B, Baldet T. 2008. Diurnal activity of potential bluetongue vectors in northern Europe. Veterinary Record, 162, 323–324. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartsch S, Bauer B, Wiemann A, Clausen PH, Steeuber S. 2009. Feeding patterns of biting midges of the Culicoides obsoletus and Culicoides pulicaris groups on selected farms in Brandenburg, Germany. Parasitology Research, 105, 373–380. [Google Scholar]
  5. Beer M, Conraths FJ, van der Poel WHM. 2013. “Schmallenberg virus” – a novel orthobunyavirus emerging in Europe. Epidemiology & Infection, 141, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernotiene R, Žiegytė R, Vaitkutė G, Valkiūnas G. 2019. Identification of a new vector species of avian haemoproteins, with a description of method for the determination of natural vectors of haemosporidian parasites. Parasites & Vectors, 12, 307. [Google Scholar]
  7. Blackwell A. 1997. Diel flight periodicity of the biting midge Culicoides impunctatus and the effects of meteorological conditions. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 11, 361–367. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bobeva A, Zehtindjiev P, Ilieva M, Dimitrov D, Mathis A, Bensch S. 2015. Host preferences of ornithophilic biting midges of the genus Culicoides in the Eastern Balkans. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 29, 290–296. [Google Scholar]
  9. Borkent A. 2005. The biting midges, the Ceratopogonidae (Diptera). V: Biology of Disease Vectors. New York: Elsevier Academic Press. 785 p. [Google Scholar]
  10. Borket A, Dominiak P. 2020. Catalogue of the biting midges of the wold (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Zootaxa, 4787, 1–377. [Google Scholar]
  11. Carpenter S, Groschup MH, Garros C, Felippe-Bauer ML, Purse BV. 2013. Culicoides biting midges, arboviruses and public health in Europe. Antiviral Research, 100, 102–113. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chapman JW, Drake VA, Reynolds DR. 2011. Recent insights from radar studies of insect flight. Annual Review of Entomology, 56, 337–356. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dallas JF, Cruickshank RH, Linton YM, Nolan DV, Patakakis M, Braverman Y, Capela R, Capela M, Pena I, Meiswinkel R, Ortega MD, Baylis M, Mellor PS, Mordue Luntz AJ. 2003. Phylogenetic status and matrilineal structure of the biting midge, Culicoides imicola, in Portugal, Rhodes and Israel. Medical Veterinary Entomology, 17, 379–387. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dik B, Ergül R. 2006. Nocturnal flight activities of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) species in Konya. Türkiye Parazitoloji Derğisi, 30, 213–216. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dyce AL. 1969. The recognition of nulliparous and parous Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogidae) without dissection. Journal of the Australian Entomology Society, 8, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  16. England ME, Perce-Kelly P, Brugman VA, King S, Gubbins S, Sach F, Sanders CJ, Masters NJ, Denison E, Carpenter S. 2020. Culicoides species composition and molecular identification of host blood meals at two zoos in the UK. Parasites & Vectors, 13, 139. [Google Scholar]
  17. Foxi C, Delrio G, Falchi G, Marche MG, Satta G, Ruiu L. 2016. Role of different Culicoides vectors (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in bluetongue virus transmission and overwintering in Sardinia (Italy). Parasites & Vectors, 9, 440. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hestvik G, Ekman S, Lindberg R. 2006. Onchocercosis of an intervertebral joint capsule causing cervical vertebral stenotic myelopathy in a horse. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 18, 307–310. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoffmann B, Scheuch M, Hoper D, Jungblut R, Holsteg M, Schirrmeier H, Eschbaumer M, Goller KV, Wernike K, Fischer M, Breithaupt A, Mettenleiter TC, Beer M. 2012. Novel orthobunyavirus in cattle, Europe, 2011. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 18, 469–472. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacquot M, Nomikou K, Palmarini M, Mertens P, Biek R. 2017. Bluetongue virus spread in Europe is a consequence of climatic, landscape and vertebrate host factors as revealed by phylogeographic inference. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 284, 20170919. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kluisters G, Swales H, Baylis M. 2015. Local dispersal of Palaearctic Culicoides biting midges estimated by mark-release-recapture. Parasites & Vectors, 8, 86. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K, Mega X. 2018. Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar]
  23. Larska M, Lechowski L, Grochowska M, Zmudziński JF. 2013. Detection of the Schmallenberg virus in nulliparous Culicoides obsoletus/scoticus complex and C punctatus-the possibility of transovarial virus transmission in the midge population and of a new vector. Veterinary Microbiology, 166, 467–473. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lassen BS, Nielsen AS, Kristensen M. 2012. Identity and diversity of blood meal hosts of biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae: Culicoides Latreille) in Denmark. Parasites & Vectors, 5, 143. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mands V, Kline DL, Blackwell A. 2004. Culicoides midge trap enhancement with animal odour baits in Scotland. Medical Veterinary Entomology, 18, 336–342. [Google Scholar]
  26. Martínez-de la Puente J, Ruiz S, Soriguer R, Figuerola J. 2013. Effect of blood meal digestion and DNA extraction protocol on the success of blood meal source determination in the malaria vector Anopheles atroparvus. Malaria Journal, 12, 109. [Google Scholar]
  27. Martínez-de la Puente J, Figuerola J, Soriguer R. 2015. Fur or feather? Feeding preferences of species of Culicoides biting midges in Europe. Trends in Parasitology, 31, 16–22. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mathieu B, Cetre-Sossah C, Garros C, Chavernac D, Balenghien T, Carpenter S, Setier-Rio ML, Vignes-Lebbe R, Ung V, Candolfi E, Delécolle JC. 2012. Development and validation of IIKC: an interactive identification key for Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) females from the Western Palaearctic region. Parasites & Vectors, 5, 137. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mathieu B, Garros C, Balenghien T, Candolfi E, Delécolle JC, Cêtre-Sossah C. 2020. A phylogenetic analysis of the biting midges belonging to Culicoides Latreille (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) subgenus Avaritia using molecular data. Parasites & Vectors, 13, 243. [Google Scholar]
  30. McGrath G, More SJ, O’Neill R. 2017. Hypothetical route of the introduction of Schmallenberg virus into Ireland using two complementary analyses. Veterinary Record, 182, vetrec-2017-104302. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mignotte A, Garros C, Dellicour S, Jasquot M, Gilbert M, Gardès L, Balenghien T, Duhayon M, Rakotoarivony I, de Wavrechin M, Huber K. 2021. High dispersal capacity of Culicoides obsoletus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), vector of bluetongue and Schmallenberg viruses, revealed by landscape genetic analyses. Parasites & Vectors, 14, 93. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ninio C, Augot D, Delécolle JC, Dufour B, Depaquit J. 2011. Contribution to the knowledge of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) host preferences in France. Parasitology Research, 108, 657–663. [Google Scholar]
  33. Országh I. 1976. Die Gattung Culicoides Latreille, 1809 (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in Slowakei. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae – Zoologia, 21, 1–89. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pettersson E, Bensch S, Ander M, Chirico J, Sigvald R, Ignell R. 2012. Molecular identification of bloodmeals and species composition in Culicoides biting midges. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 27, 104–112. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rádrová J, Seblová V, Votýpka J. 2013. Feeding behavior and spatial distribution of Culex mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in wetland areas of the Czech Republic. Journal Medical Entomology, 50, 1097–1104. [Google Scholar]
  36. Reeves LE, Gillett-Kaufman JL, Kawahara AY, Kaufman PE. 2018. Barcoding blood meals: New vertebrate-specific primer sets for assigning taxonomic identities to host DNA from mosquito blood meals. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 12, e0006767. [Google Scholar]
  37. Reynolds DR, Smith AD, Chapman JW. 2008. A radar study of emigratory flight and layer formation by insects at dawn over southern Britain. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 98, 35–52. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sanders CJ, Shortall CR, Gubbins S, Burgin L, Gloster J, Harrington R, Reynolds DR, Mellor PS, Carpenter S. 2011. Influence of season and meteorological parameters on flight activity of Culicoides biting midges. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 1355–1364. [Google Scholar]
  39. Santiago-Alarcon D, Havelka P, Pineda E, Segelbacher G, Schaefer M. 2013. Urban forests as hubs for novel zoonosis: blood meal analysis, seasonal variation in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) vectors, and avian haemosporidians. Parasitology, 140, 1799–1810. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sarvašová A, Goffredo M, Kočišová A, Savini G, Sopoliga I. 2014. Culicoides midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) and their role as vectors of orbiviruses in Slovakia. Veterinaria Italiana, 50, 203–212. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sarvašová A, Kočišová A, Halán M, Delécolle JC, Mathieu B. 2014. Morphological and molecular analysis of the genus Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in Slovakia with five new records. Zootaxa, 3872, 541–560. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sarvašová A, Kočišová A, Liptáková E, Hlavatá H, Mathieu B. 2016. First insights into indoor and outdoor Culicoides activity related to risk period for Bluetongue transmission in eastern Slovakia. Acta Parasitologica, 61, 743–755. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sarvašová A, Kočišová A, Candolfi E, Mathieu B. 2017. Description of Culicoides (Culicoides) bysta n. sp., a new member of the Pulicaris group (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from Slovakia. Parasites & Vectors, 10, 279. [Google Scholar]
  44. Stavrou A, Daly JM, Maddison B, Gough K, Tarlinton R. 2017. How is Europe positioned for a re-emergence of Schmallenberg virus? Veterinary Journal, 230, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tomazatos A, Jöst H, Schulze J, Spînu M, Chanasit JS, Cadar D, Lühken R. 2020. Blood-meal analysis of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) reveals a broad range and new species records for Romania. Parasites & Vectors, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  46. Townzen JS, Brower AVZ, Judd DD. 2008. Identification of mosquito bloodmeals using mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I and cytochrome b gene sequences. Medical Veterinary Entomology, 22, 386–393. [Google Scholar]
  47. Trpiš M, Országh I. 1971. Notes on the distribution of biting midges (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in East Slovakia as indicated by light traps. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae Bratislava, 17, 97–108. [Google Scholar]
  48. Viennet E, Garros C, Gardès L, Rakotoarivony I, Allène X, Lancelot R, Crochet D, Moulia C, Baldet T, Balenghien T. 2013. Host preferences of Palaearctic Culicoides biting midges: implications for transmission of orbiviruses. Medical Veterinary Entomology, 27, 255–266. [Google Scholar]
  49. Votýpka J, Synek P, Svobodová Z. 2009. Endophagy of biting midges attacking cavity-nesting birds. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 23, 277–280. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wilson AJ, Mellor PS. 2009. Bluetongue in Europe: past, present and future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 2669–2681. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zittra C, Wöss G, Van der Vloet L, Bakran-Lebl K, Shani Barogh B, Sehnal P, Fuehrer HP. 2020. Barcoding of the genus Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in Austria – An update of the species inventory including the first records of three species in Austria. Pathogens, 9, 406. [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Kasičová Z, Schreiberová A, Kimáková A, & Kočišová A. 2021. Blood meal analysis: host-feeding patterns of biting midges (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae, Culicoides Latreille) in Slovakia. Parasite 28, 58.

All Tables

Table 1

Host blood meals from blood-fed Culicoides spp.

Table 2

Species and abundance of Culicoides females trapped on four farms.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.