EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 28 (2021) Parasite, 28 (2021) 85 Full HTML
Open Access
Issue
Parasite
Volume 28, 2021
Article Number 85
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2021080
Published online 17 December 2021

© S.N. Vu et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2021

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Sandflies are known to be vectors transmitting leishmaniases and other pathogens to humans and animals. These small insects belong to the Diptera order, Psychodidae family [12, 49] and the Phlebotominae subfamily [14]. In 2015, Hotez et al. emphasized the need to increase surveillance activities on neglected tropical diseases, among which leishmaniases, in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region, where the extent of the burden is far from known [11].

Leishmaniasis is a public health problem in many Asian countries, such as in Western and Central China [23, 24] where more than 40 species of sandflies have been identified. Five of them were identified as vectors of visceral leishmaniasis, i.e. Phlebotomus (Adlerius) chinensis, Ph. (Adl.) longiductus, Ph. (Adl.) sichuanensis, Ph. (Paraphlebotomus) alexandri, and Ph. (Larroussius) smirnovi [8, 25, 50]. In Southeast Asia, the first visceral leishmaniasis case was reported in Thailand in 1996 [47] and since then, 16 symptomatic cases have been notified [18]. An entomological survey revealed that the Se. (Neophlebotomus) gemmea species was the most predominant species in which Leishmania DNA was identified [17]. Nevertheless, Depaquit et al. recently suggested the need to reconsider the identification of this species, underlining that much remains to be done on the classification and determination of Leishmania vector species in Southeast Asia [7].

In Vietnam, a few entomological surveys conducted by Raynal and Gaschen 1935, Parrot and Clastrier 1952, 1962, Lewis 1978, Lewis 1982, 1987 [20–22, 28, 33, 35] described 11 sandfly species in 18 locations of Northern Vietnam: Ph. (Anaphlebotomus) stantoni, Ph. (Euphlebotomus) argentipes, Se. (Parrotomyia) barraudi, Se. (Par.) brevicaulis, Se. (Neo.) hivernus, Se. (Neo.) iyengari, Se. (Neo.) perturbans, Se. (Neo.) sylvatica, Se. (Neo.) tonkinensis, Se. (Ser.) bailyi, and Se. (Ser.) morini. These species have also been included in the list of sandflies described in the Old World by Seccombe, Ready and Huddleston in 1993 [38]. Among them, Ph. argentipes was described as a potential vector of Leishmania in India [16]. In 2019, our team published a first paper on the diversity and ecology of sandflies in Quang Ninh Province, Vietnam [49]. In this paper, four genera were collected and 10 sandfly species were identified: Se. sylvatica, Se. barraudi, Se. hivernus, Se. bailyi, Ph. mascomai, Ph. stantoni, Ph. yunshengensis, Ph. betisi, Chinius junlianensis, and Idiophlebotomus longiforceps. In this province, three visceral leishmaniasis cases were reported in 2001 [10]. However, a series of surveys in the same province on humans, dogs, rodents and sandflies did not detect the presence of Leishmania parasites in this locality [4]. Another case of visceral leishmaniasis was reported in the Quang Binh province in 2018, Central Vietnam [48], 700 km south from the first three cases. The question of Leishmania transmission is therefore still open in Vietnam and the data on sandflies remain incomplete considering the high biodiversity of the ecosystems in the country. This paper provides information on the taxonomy and geographical and environmental distribution of sandflies in 6 northern provinces of Vietnam, including data on Quang Ninh province published in 2019 [49].

Material and methods

Study sites

The 6 provinces: Ninh Binh, Son La, Lang Son, Ha Giang, Lao Cai and Quang Ninh are located in the north of Vietnam, bordered by China (Lang Son, Lao Cai, Ha Giang and Quang Ninh) and by Lao PDR (Son La). These provinces were selected to represent the geographical and environmental diversity of Northern Vietnam (see Fig. 1). For each site, all details such as coordinates, environments, animals and the descriptions of trap locations, were recorded (see Table S1). All the data collected in the first study in Quang Ninh province were included in this paper in order to give an overview of the spatial and environmental distribution of sandflies in Northern Vietnam ([49] and Table S1).

thumbnail Figure 1.

Collection sites and sandfly species composition in 6 provinces of Northern Vietnam.

Sampling

CDC miniature light traps (LT, John W. Hock Co. FL, U.S.A.) were used to collect sandflies from May 30 to October 13, 2016 at 116 sites distributed in the 6 provinces (Fig. 1). At each sampling site, 2–9 LTs were installed depending on the site environment (inside and/or outside houses, animal barns, caves, crevices in walls) and were operated overnight from 6:00 pm to 09:00 am the next day. In total, 428 LTs were set up at the 116 sites (see Table S1).

After each night of trapping, captured specimens were transferred individually into 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes containing 90% ethanol and labeled. Prior to mounting, the sandfly heads and genitalia were removed. Bodies were stored separately for future diagnostic analysis. The heads and genitalia were mounted in Euparal after different successive baths: 2 h in 10% potassium hydroxide, 2 h in distilled water, 10 h in a Marc-André solution [1], 10 h in distilled water, 20 min in 70% ethanol, 20 min in 90% ethanol, 20 min in 100% ethanol, and 10 h in a clove oil solution. Specimen identification was individually verified based on the morphology of the cibarium, pharynx and/or the male genitalia or female spermathecae, as described by Abonnenc (1972), Johnson (1991) and Lewis (1982) [1, 13, 21].

Data analysis

Different parameters were calculated for characterizing sandfly populations at the different sites: density of collected sandflies (number of specimens per trap and per night); relative abundance (number of specimens of species/total number of specimens × 100); species richness (number of species in a given area). A Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare the distribution of sandflies by province and according to the environment.

Results

Species and genus composition, density and abundance

A total of 2585 sandfly specimens, including 1511 males (58.5%) and 1049 females (40.5%) specimens, corresponding to a ratio of 1.44, were collected from the 116 sites. We could not define the gender for 25 specimens because of damaged organs. The overall sandfly density for the 428 traps and the 23 nights of trapping was 0.26.

In total, 2458 specimens were identified to the genus level and among these, 1090 were identified to the species level. One hundred and twenty-seven specimens (4.91%) could not be identified because of missing or damaged parts. The 1157 specimens characterized only to the genus or subgenus level (defined as sp. and und_sp.), as expected, were mainly Sergentomyia males (80.21%) (Tables 1 and S1).

Table 1.

Number of specimens per taxon, sex ratio, density and relative abundance according to the taxa.

The main genus found was Sergentomyia (n = 2067, 79.96%), followed by Phlebotomus (n = 340, 13.15%), Chinius (n = 31, 1.2%), Idiophlebotomus (n = 14, 0.54%), and Grassomyia (n = 6, 0.23%) (Table 1). In total, thirteen species could be identified, among which 7 Sergentomyia species which consisted of 779 specimens (Tables 1 and S1). The Se. barraudi group and Se. sylvatica were the predominant species with 324 and 249 specimens, respectively. We used the Se. barraudi group as a designation since we observed morphological variabilities in this taxon (data not shown). Five other species accounted for 206 specimens including Se. bailyi (n = 55), Se. hivernus (n = 49), Se. brevicaulis (n = 66), Se. khawi (n = 25), and Se. perturbans (n = 11). Four species accounting for another 274 specimens belonged to the Phlebotomus genus: Ph. stantoni (n = 102), Ph. yunshengensis (n = 87), Ph. betisi (n = 50), Ph. mascomai (n = 35) and unknown Phlebotomus species (n = 66). Figure 2 illustrates the classical characteristics of Ph. mascomai, Ph. yunshengensis and Ph. betisi. Additionally, Ph. stantoni and Se. sylvatica were previously illustrated in Vu et al. [49]. Two other genera, consisting of 37 specimens, were represented by only one species each, Ch. junlianensis and Gr. indica (Table 1). The 14 specimens of the last genus, Idiophlebotomus, could not be validated with certainty to the species level and were named Idiophlebotomus sp. (see Table S1 and below). Moreover, 211 specimens (8.16%), classified as Se. sp2 and Se. sp3, exhibited morphological characteristics difficult to attribute to existing species (Tables 1 and S1). It is worth noting that the specimens described as Sp1 in Vu et al. [49], after detailed study, are ultimately thought to be females of Ph. yunshengensis (see discussion for more details).

thumbnail Figure 2.

Classical characteristics of Phlebotomus mascomai, Ph. yunshengensis and Ph. betisi males. A and B: Genitalia and cibarium of Ph. mascomai male, respectively; C and D: Genitalia and cibarium of Ph. yunshengensis male, respectively; E and F: Genitalia and cibarium of Ph. betisi male, respectively.

Sandfly diversity between provinces

The number of specimens was different according to the province. In all, 416 specimens were collected in Quang Ninh province using 68 light traps for 4 nights, 612 were collected in Ninh Binh province with 85 light traps for 4 nights, 728 specimens were collected in Lang Son province using 76 light traps for 4 nights, 122 specimens were collected in Lao Cai province using 74 light traps for 4 nights, 347 specimens were collected in Ha Giang province using 53 light traps for 3 nights, and 360 specimens were collected in Son La province using 72 light traps for 4 nights (see Tables 2 and S1).

Table 2

Number of specimens per taxon, relative abundance, density and species richness per province

The Sergentomyia genus was the most predominant genus in the 6 provinces followed by the Phlebotomus genus. It is worth noting that distribution according to the genus between provinces was not significantly different. Furthermore, the distribution of specimens according to species identification, including Se. sp2 et Se. sp3, was significantly different between provinces (p-value = 0.002, α = 0.05 see Fig. 1 and Table 2). As examples, Se. bailyi and Se. sp2 were mainly detected in Ninh Binh province, Se. barraudi group in Lang Son and Se. sylvatica in Quang Ninh. The highest species richness (SR = 12) was observed in Ninh Binh, whereas the highest relative abundance and density were detected in Lang Son (RA = 28.16, D = 2.39, respectively).

Collection sites and habitat preferences

At each of the 428 sites, light traps were installed in different environments, indoors, outdoors, in animal sheds or caves. Depending on the station, the number of light traps varied from 2 to 9.

The data showed that in the 6 provinces, sandflies were mainly collected in caves (n = 1431, relative abundance = 55.36 and Dcave = 0.79, Table 3) with the highest species richness (SRcave = 15, including Se. sp2 et Se. sp3). Regarding relative abundance, we also collected numerous sandflies outdoors (in gardens), with 936 specimens corresponding to a relative abundance of 36.21 and a species richness of 15 (including Se. sp2 and Se. sp3). Nevertheless, sandfly density was higher in dog sheds (Ddogs = 0.36 vs. Doutdoor = 0.23, Table 3). The density of sandflies indoors was weak and similar to the density in chicken/bird/duck sheds and lower than the density in buffalo/cow/goat sheds (Dindoor = 0.08; Dchicken/bird/duck = 0.10; Dbuffalo/cow/goat = 0.12; see Table 3). This distribution according to the environment was similar (no significant differences) between the 6 provinces.

Table 3

Number of specimens per taxon, relative abundance, mean value (number of sandflies/number of CDC traps), density and species richness according to different environments.

In caves, all the genera and species were found (see Tables 3 and S1). Nevertheless, the Sergentomyia genus was the most represented, followed by the Phlebotomus genus. In dog sheds and indoors, the most represented sandfly was Ph. stantoni (n = 7 out of 16 and n = 11 out of 30, respectively) (Tables 3 and S1). As described in Vu et al. [49], two Ph. stantoni specimens were found in the house of one of the patients infected by leishmaniasis in 2001 [10]. It is worth noting that Se. sp2, Se. sp3 and the Se. und_sp. were mainly detected in caves and outdoors. The statistical analyses showed that the distribution of species was globally different according to the environment (p-value < 0.01, α = 0.01).

Discussion

Only a few studies on sandflies have been carried out in Vietnam since three autochthonous cases of visceral leishmaniasis were reported in Quang Ninh province in 2001 [10]. At that time, a survey on humans, dogs, rodents and sandflies was carried out in Quang Ninh province that confirmed the presence of sandflies, but not the presence of parasites [4]. Since then, no further information has been gathered regarding the diversity, ecology and medical significance of these insects. We recently published data obtained in Quang Ninh province [49]. This study showed that sandflies are abundant in Quang Ninh province, that some species are found close to domestic animals and inhabitants, and that we still have a lot to learn about sandflies in Vietnam. To complete the picture on the ecology, distribution and diversity of sandflies in Northern Vietnam, we extended the study to five other northern provinces, Ninh Binh, Son La, Lang Son, Ha Giang, and Lao Cai. The data obtained in the six provinces were combined in this paper to improve knowledge on the taxonomy and the ecology of sandflies, but also to explore the risk of Leishmania transmission.

Taxonomy

Until now, 11 species have been reported in Vietnam (see above). In our study, by combining the data obtained in the six provinces, 13 species could be identified of which seven were already described in Vietnam (Se. barraudi group, Se. brevicaulis, Se. hivernus, Se. perturbans, Se. sylvatica, Ph. Stantoni, and Ph. yunshengensis). Six species or genera were not previously reported (Se. bailyi, Se. khawi, Ph. mascomai, Ph. betisi, Ch. junlianensis, Gr. indica, and Idiophlebotomus sp.), and two taxa could belong to new Sergentomyia species, Se. sp2 and Se. sp3. We created a last group called “Se. und_sp.” which is composed of specimens with heterogeneous characters (see below). These specimens will be further described by molecular characterization.

In this study, the main species in northern Vietnam which are characterized are Se. barraudi group (n = 324), Se. sylvatica (n = 249) and Ph. stantoni (n = 102). A total of 294 specimens showing unknown morphological characters were classified in the groups named Se. sp2, Se. sp3 and Se. und_sp. The main one is Se. sp2 with 201 specimens and Se. und_sp. with 83 specimens. These specimens need to be further studied. Molecular methods and detailed morphological characterization will be carried out to define their taxonomic status. As described in our previous paper, finding new sandfly taxa was to be expected since, so far, only few studies have been carried out in Vietnam but also in Southeast Asia [49]. Nevertheless, based on the small number of publications, the high diversity of sandflies and the lack of data show that it is essential to entirely revisit the sandfly classification in Southeast Asia and at a larger scale in Asia for consistency of identifications. This will help determine identification keys for Asian sandfly species as underlined in the research of Phumee et al. in Southern Thailand [30]. The need for standardized species criteria in this region is highlighted by recent work that shows the misidentification of Se. gemmea species in Thailand [7].

We added below some comments about morphological description and taxonomical identification.

Comments about the Phlebotomus species

Phlebotomus stantoni is a common species easy to identify definitively.

The identification of Ph. mascomai seems logical in terms of biogeography because Vietnam is not far from Thailand, the country where this species was described for the first time. Importantly, Ph. mascomai is a species closely related to Ph. argentipes. Misidentifications are possible. Phebotomus mascomai differs from Ph. argentipes by the antennal formula in both genders; by a greater number of rings of the spermathecae form the female; by the position of the spines on the gonostyle, the absence of lateral spine of the paramere, and by the length of the aedeagal ducts [26].

The identification of Ph. betisi is easy since it is the only species belonging to the subgenus Larroussius recorded in Southeast Asia. In addition, some characters differ from the other members of the subgenus i.e. the neck of the spermathecae or the position of the spines in the gonostyle [15].

We caught 59 males of Ph. yunshengensis in the present paper and 28 sympatric females exhibiting characters never previously observed in described species. Consequently, according to their sympatry with the Ph. yunshengensis males, we tentatively describe the female as being that of Ph. yunshengensis. The description and anatomical nomenclature are in agreement with the latest guidelines [9].

The counts and measurements provided below are those of the specimen labelled M1-10-58.

Information about thorax, legs and wings could not be added because they were kept for molecular analyses.

Head

Occiput with two narrow lines of well individualized setae.

Clypeus 112.5 μm long, 68.7 μm wide with 20 setae randomly distributed.

Eyes 208 μm long, 83 μm wide with about 90–100 facets.

Incomplete interantennal suture.

Complete interocular suture but not reaching the interantennal one.

Cibarium (Fig. 3A) armed with a group of about 25 discrete teeth. Absence of pigment patch.

thumbnail Figure 3.

Ph. yunshengensis female. A: pharynx and cibarium; B: flagellomeres 1, 2, and 3; C: palp; D: detail of 3rd palpal article; E: spermathecae.

Pharyngeal armature (Fig. 3A) made with small dots-like teeth at the back and some short anterior grouped triangular teeth.

Flagellomeres (Fig. 3B) f1 = 369 μm, f2 = 154 μm, f3 = 158.3 μm. Flagellomere 1 longer than f2 + f3. Ascoidal formula: 2/f1–f7 with long ascoids, not reaching the next article, flagellomeres broken after f9.

One distal papilla on f1, f2 and f3. Absence of simple setae on flagellomeres f1, f2 and f3. One simple seta on flagellomeres f4, to f7.

Palpi (Figs. 3C, 3D) p1 = 33 μm, p2 = 164 μm, p3 = 120 μm, p4 = 97 μm, p5 = 283 μm. Palpal formula: 1, 4, 3, 2, 5. Presence of two groups of about 10 and 3 club-like Newstead’s sensillae in the middle of the third palpal segment. No newstead’s sensilla on other palpal segment. Presence of one spiniform setae on p3; 4 on p4 and 8 on p5.

Labrum-Epipharynx 223 μm long. f1/E = 1.65.

Labium: labial furca closed.

Abdomen

VIII tergite: presence of 30 setae each side.

Tergite IX without any protuberance.

Genital apparatus (Fig. 3E)

Thin-walled smooth spermathecae. external head nuclear mushroom-like. Individual 184 μm long ducts tapeworms-like.

Comments about the Idiophlebotomus species

We caught a few specimens of Idiophlebotomus (n = 14). Our sampling could include two populations being identified as Id. longiforceps or a species closely related to this species. At this time, we prefer to identify all the specimens in the present study as Idiophlebotomus sp., pending a revision of this genus with more specimens and molecular studies.

Comments about the genus Chinius

The genus Chinius had never been recorded in Vietnam. Our specimens were caught in caves. We identified Ch. junlianensis according the the short R2 vein of their wings [19] and to the length of the aedeagal and spermathecal ducts [6].

Comments about the genus Grassomyia

The taxonomic status of Gr. indica needs to be revised in the light of an integrative taxonomy of the whole genus, including all the species available and many populations from Africa, Madagascar and Asia. Pending this revision, we consider Gr. indica to be a valid species despite the synonymy proposed by Quate [33]. However, we observed several differences between the Indian specimens and those we studied in the present paper, i.e. the number of cibarial teeth ranged from 33 to 36 in the original description, whereas it ranged from 25 to 33 (Fig. 4A) in the present study. Without access to Indian specimens, we consider that our specimens belong to Gr. indica s. l.

thumbnail Figure 4.

Microphotographs of cibaria of females of Grassomyia indica s. l. (A), the Sergentomyia barraudi group (B and C), Se. khawi (D), and the Se. anodontis group (E), ascoid of flagellomere 3 of Se. sp.3 with a retrograde spur, cibarium of the Se. brevicaulis group (G), cibarium of Se. sylvatica (H), cibarium of Se. bailyi (I), cibarium of Se. hivernus (J), cibarium of the Se. perturbans group (K), cibarium of Idiophlebotomus sp. (L), all at the same scale.

Comments about the genus Sergentomyia

As described in the “Results” section, the Se. barraudi group should be further studied because of considerable heterogeneity in the morphological characters, such as the number and distribution of teeth on the cibarium. The cibarium in the original description made [41] from Indian specimens included 40 teeth and a forked anterior part of the sclerotized area. The specimens we examined showed a similar forked sclerotized area but 52 to 70 cibarial teeth (Figs. 4B, 4C), which appears quite different from the original description. Considering the different biogeographical subzones of the Indo-Malay area, it seems logical the populations from Vietnam are individualized from those from India, and possibly belong to different species. In our opinion, Se. brevicaulis can be split from the Se. barraudi group not taking into consideration the number of cibarial teeth, but taking into consideration the lack of a forked anterior part of the sclerotized area of the cibarium.

Many records of Se. iyengari have been made in Southeastern Asia. However, this species has been described from the most Southern part of India [43]. In our opinion, all the records of Se. iyengari in Southeastern Asia refer in fact to Se. khawi [37] (Fig. 4D).

Among the species historically considered junior synonyms of Se. iyengari, it clearly appears that the synonymization of Se. hivernus is wrong. Sergentomyia hivernus is now considered a valid species [30] which can be identified thanks to its wide spermatheca and to the low number of vertical teeth of the cibarium [33].

Sergentomyia bailyi has been described in India from specimens caught at different altitudes ranging from sea level to 1830 m above sea level [42]. Sinton explained that he observed considerable variability within his sampling, according to the altitude where the specimens orginated, suggesting a subspecies for specimens caught at high altitudes (Se. bailyi campester). Later, Raynal and Quate redescribed Se. bailyi from Southeast Asia [33, 34], in agreement with the original description but emphasizing variability in the length of the flagellomeres of the cibarial teeth, and the absence or presence of a sclerotized area of the cibarium. Consequently, we recorded Se. bailyi in Vietnam according to this supposed intraspecific variability pending a taxonomic revision.

Sergentomyia sylvatica was first described as Se. sylvatica from Vietnam [36] and the specimens collected in the present study are in agreement with the original description: a few teeth in the center of the cibarium and spermathecae not completely segmented.

The taxonomic status of Se. perturbans remains doubtful. Described from Indonesia [5], the cibarium of the female was described later from Chinese specimens [20, 29]; Lewis (1978) explained the confusion related to this species. Its status remains unclear. The capture of new specimens from different countries and their morphological study coupled to a molecular approach, will help us to better understand what Se. perturbans really is and to decide on the synonymizations made over the years. The specimens observed during the present study exhibit a few cibarial teeth and spermathecae in agreement with the redescription of Lewis [20], but they also exhibit some vertical teeth never recorded previously. Consequently, our records of Se. perturbans need to be approved by a systematic revision in the future.

In the present paper, we called Sergentomyia sp.2 (Se. sp2) the sandflies which are closely related to Se. anodontis. At the present time, we are not able to decide whether the specimens processed in the present study belong to Se. anodontis or to a new species. In the original description, the cibarium is described as “unarmed, but with spine-like projections from fold in membrane above sclerotized part and with median projection over which is inverted V-shaped bar” [32], and the drawing provided did not exhibit any lateral teeth. The specimens observed in Vietnam exhibit many lateral small teeth (Fig. 4E), differentiating this population from the original one. However, we do not know if this difference is of a specific or populational level. Moreover, the spermathecae of the specimens from Vietnam seem to be wider at their top than those described in the original description. We called Se. sp3 a Sergentomyia with a spur on the ascoid (Fig. 4F), which we think has not yet been described. We are waiting for more samples and molecular data to be able to describe it properly.

A heterogeneous pool of 83 specimens that we are unable to identify yet are here named undetermined species (und_sp.). We will need to carry out complementary analyses in order to be able to sort them out. New material and molecular data are needed as we think this pool may host new species to describe.

Ecology and preference habitats according to the provinces

The distribution of sandflies, all species combined, is heterogeneous according to province in terms of species richness but also abundance and density. The largest numbers of sandflies were collected in Lang Son and Ninh Binh and the lowest number in Lao Cai (Tables 2 and S1). The differences between these provinces are probably due to the fact that Lang Son and Ninh Binh are rich in rounded rocky peaks, commonly called “sugar loaves”. It is worth noting that it is within these sugar loaves which shelter caves and crevices that 55.36% of sandflies were collected. All genera and species including the unknown Se. sp2 and Se. sp3 were reported in these specific environments. Previous studies carried out in Southeast Asia, as well as in Africa and South America, already reported that these environments are favorable to sandflies [3, 27, 46]. After caves and crevices, outdoor areas were the next preferred type of habitat, including gardens (Table 3), with 936 specimens collected in this environment, representing 36.21% of the sampling. Moreover, 16 sandfly specimens were collected in dog sheds, representing a density of 0.36, lower than the density found in caves (Dcave = 0.79) but higher than that found in outdoor areas (Doutdoor = 0.23) and other areas. In indoor environments and in bird/buffalo/pig sheds, the number of collected sandflies and their densities were very low. The statistical analyses showed that the distribution of species was not statistically different according to province but strongly different according to environment. The highest species richness values were found in caves and outdoors (SR = 15 including Se. sp2 and Se. sp3). In animal sheds and indoors, the species richness varied between five and nine, showing more anthropophilic behaviors or attraction for domestic animals for a few species such as Ph. stantoni. Ind fact, even though this species was found in all environments, it was the main species collected indoors (11/30 specimens, 36.67%) and in dog sheds (7/16 specimens, 43.75%). In caves, this species represented only 2.24% (32/1431 specimens). Further studies are necessary on this species in terms of feeding preferences since it was described as a cavernicolous species in Thailand and Malaysia [2, 31, 40]. As described in our previous paper focusing on Quang Ninh, two females out of nine specimens were found in the household of one of the leishmaniasis patients diagnosed in 2001 [10].

Leishmania transmission risk to humans

Autochthonous visceral leishmaniasis was detected in the 2000s in Quang Ninh province and in 2018 in Quang Binh province [10, 48]. These cases raise the question of local Leishmania transmission in Vietnam. The isolate from one patient in Quang Ninh was identified by the Queensland International Institute, Brisbane, Australia as Leishmania infantum or Le. donovani (patient’s family, personal communication). It is worth noting that Le. infantum is a zoonotic parasite using dogs as its main reservoir and Le. donovani is an anthroponotic parasite. Thus, many questions remain unanswered.

As described above, in the six provinces under study, the majority of sandfly specimens were collected in cavernicolous environments and especially in sugar loaves, suggesting trophic preferences for cavernicolous wild animals, such as bats (Table 3). Sugar loaves are generally surrounded by houses either at the periphery of the towns or villages or in rural environments. This suggests possible contact between cavernicolous sandflies, humans and domestic animals. This is illustrated by the fact that all the species identified (including Se. sp2 and Se. sp3) were found in caves and outdoors, whereas species diversity was much lower indoors and in animal sheds (from 15 different species in caves to 5 in dog and pig sheds).

Combining all the data of the six provinces, out of 2585 specimens, only 46 specimens were found indoors or in dog sheds. The main species found in these environments was Ph. stantoni (18/46, 39.13%), with Ph. stantoni collected in the household of the patient diagnosed with leishmaniasis [10]. We cannot make any assumptions since until now, this species has been little studied and was never described as a vector of Leishmania. Nevertheless, two papers reported that human blood and non-identified Trypanosoma DNA were detected in Ph. stantoni in Thailand [30, 44].

Several studies strongly suggested that unexpected sandfly species could be able to transmit Leishmania [25, 37, 39]. Recently, the data published by Srisuton et al. [45] indicated that several species of sandflies might be potential vectors of Leishmania and Trypanosoma parasites in Southern Thailand. Thus, all the species and ecosystems need to be explored. In Vietnam, Leishmania could be transmitted by an unexpected sandfly species, and the transmission could occur in caves frequently visited by humans due to the presence of small temples. All these aspects underline the need to further study sandfly populations in Vietnam for vector identification and location of leishmaniasis transmission. In this context, the next steps are: to further study Ph. stantoni, to characterize all the Sp. specimens using detailed morphological and molecular studies, to explore the variability of the Se. barraudi group, to determine the feeding preferences of sandflies in the different ecosystems, to look for the parasite using PCR diagnosis, and to carry out field work in Quang Binh province, where the visceral leishmaniasis case was recently reported [48].

Supplementary material

Table S1. Total data collection. Access here

Acknowledgments

This study was performed within the framework of a Nafosted project (Ecology of sandfly species in remote areas of Northern Vietnam and risk of Leishmania transmission in human communities, project No: 106-YS.05-2015.42). We would like to thank the CDC Director and staff of all the provinces under study for their help with field activities. We are grateful to Heïdi Lançon for the English revision of the manuscript. We also thank the NIHE and the IRD for their support.

References

  1. Abonnenc E. 1972. Les phlébotomes de la région éthiopienne (Diptera, Psychodidae). Paris: ORSTOM. p. 289. multigr. (Mémoires ORSTOM; 55). [Google Scholar]
  2. Apiwathnasorn C, Samung Y, Prummongkol S, Phayakaphon A, Panasopolkul C. 2011. Cavernicolous species of phlebotomine sand flies from Kanchanaburi Province, with an updated species list for Thailand. Southeast Asian Journal Tropical Medical Public Health, 42(6), 1405–1409. [Google Scholar]
  3. Carvalho G, Brazil R, Rêgo F, Ramos M, Zenóbio A, Filho J. 2017. Molecular detection of Leishmania DNA in wild-caught phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) from a cave in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Journal of Medical Entomology, 54(1), 196–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Châu N, Đề N. 2005. Kết quả bước đầu điều tra dịch tễ bệnh trùng roi đường máu Leishmania tại Quảng Ninh trong năm 2002–2003. Tạp chí Phòng chống bệnh Sốt rét và các bệnh ký sinh trùng, 3, 84–91. [Google Scholar]
  5. De Meijere J. 1909. Blutsaugende micro-dipteren aus Niederländisch ostindien pp. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie, 52, 191–204. [Google Scholar]
  6. Depaquit J, Léger N, Zhang L, Leng J, Parasitology. 2007. Chinius junlianensis Leng 1987 (Diptera: Psychodidae): new morphological data. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology, 101(2), 181–184. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Depaquit J, Vongphayloth K, Siriyasatien P, Polseela R, Phumee A, Loyer M, Vol A, Varlot G, Rahola N, Brey P. 2019. On the true identity of Sergentomyia gemmea and description of a closely related species: Se. raynali n. sp. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 33(4), 521–529. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feng W, Limin S, Hongtao J, Hai L, Wensen L, Zhongyi L, Hongwei G, Quan L. 2011. Molecular detection and genetic diversity of Leishmania donovani in naturally infected Phlebotomus chinensis from southwestern China. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 11(7), 849–852. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Galati E, Galvis-Ovallos F, Lawyer P, Léger N, Depaquit J. 2017. An illustrated guide for characters and terminology used in descriptions of Phlebotominae (Diptera, Psychodidae). Parasite, 24, 26. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hòa L, De N, Ham N, Mai N, Hanh D, Cong L, Nga N, Mc Manus DP. 2001. Bước đầu giám định tác nhân gây bệnh Kala - azar được bộ y tế công nhận ở Việt Nam thuộc giống Leishmania bằng sinh học phân tử. Tạp chí Phòng chống các bệnh Sốt rét và Ký sinh trùng, 4, 66–73. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hotez P, Bottazzi M, Strych U, Chang L-Y, Lim Y, Goodenow M, AbuBakar S. 2015. Neglected tropical diseases among the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): overview and update. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases, 9(4), e0003575. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bigot J. 1854. Essai d’une classification générale et synoptique de l’ordre des insectes diptères (3ème mémoire). Tribu de Tipulidii (mihi). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 2(3), 447–482. [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnson H. 1991. The identification of female sandflies of the subgenus Larroussius by the morphology of the spermathecal ducts. Parassitologia, 33, 1. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kertész K, Becker T, Bezzi M, Stein P. 1903. Katalog der Paläarktischen Dipteren, Vol. 1. Budapest, Hungary, Hódmezövåsárhely: Wesselényi, (iii + 382 pp). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Khadri M, Depaquit J, Bargues M, Ferté H, Mas-coma S, Lee H, Ahmad A, Léger N. 2008. First description of the male of Phlebotomus betisi Lewis and Wharton, 1963 (Diptera: Psychodidae). Parasitology International, 57(3), 295–299. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Killick-Kendrick R. 1990. Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review. Medical and Veterinary Entomolology, 4(1), 1–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kobkan K, Siripattanapipong S, Ninsaeng U, Hitakarun A, Jitkaew S, Kaewtaphaya P, Tan-ariya P, Mungthin M, Charoenwong C, Leelayoova S. 2013. Sergentomyia (Neophlebotomus) gemmea, a potential vector of Leishmania siamensis in southern Thailand. BMC Infectious Diseases, 13, 333. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leelayoova S, Siripattanapipong S, Manomat J, Piyaraj P, Tan-Ariya P, Bualert L, Mungthin M. 2017. Leishmaniasis in Thailand: a review of causative agents and situations. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 96(3), 534–542. [Google Scholar]
  19. Leng Y. 1987. A preliminary survey of phlebotomine sandflies in limestone caves of Sichuan and Guizhou Provinces, south-west China, and description and discussion of a primitive new genus Chinius. Parasitology, 81(3), 311–317. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lewis D. 1978. The Phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) of the Oriental Region. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), 37, 217–343. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lewis DJ. 1982. A taxonomic review of the genus Phlebotomus (Diptera: Psychodidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), 45(2), 121–209. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lewis D. 1987. Phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) from the Oriental Region. Systematic Entomology, 12, 163–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Guan LR, Zhou ZB, Jin CF, Fu Q, Chai JJ. 2016. Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) transmitting visceral leishmaniasis and their geographical distribution in China: a review. Infect Dis Poverty, 23(5), 15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lun ZR, Wu MS, Chen YF, Wang JY, Zhou XN, Liao LF, Chen JP, Chow LM, Chang KP. 2015. Visceral leishmaniasis in China: an endemic disease under control. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 28(4), 987–1004. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Maia C, Depaquit J. 2016. Can Sergentomyia (Diptera, Psychodidae) play a role in the transmission of mammal-infecting Leishmania? Parasite, 23, 55. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Muller F, Depaquit J, Nicole L. 2007. Phlebotomus (Euphlebotomus) mascomai n. sp. (Diptera–Psychodidae). Parasitology Research, 101(6), 1597–1602. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Obame-Nkoghe J, Rahola N, Ayala D, Yangari P, Jiolle D, Allene X, Bourgarel M, Maganga G, Berthet N, Leroy E, Paupy C. 2017. Exploring the diversity of blood-sucking Diptera in caves of Central Africa. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 250. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Parrot L, Clastrier J. 1952. Notes sur les Phlébotomes. LXV. Phlébotomes d’Indochine. Archives de l’Institut Pasteur d’Algérie, 30, 153–171. [Google Scholar]
  29. Patton W, Hindle E. 1926. The North Chinese species of the genus Phlebotomus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 100, 405–412. [Google Scholar]
  30. Phumee A, Tawatsin A, Thavara U, Pengsakul T, Thammapalo S, Depaquit J, Gay F, Siriyasatien P. 2017. Detection of an unknown Trypanosoma DNA in a Phlebotomus stantoni (Diptera: Psychodidae) collected from Southern Thailand and records of new sand flies with reinstatement of Sergentomyia hivernus Raynal & Gaschen, 1935 (Diptera: Psychodidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 54(2), 429–434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Polseela R, Vitta A, Nateeworanart S, Apiwathnasorn C. 2011. Distribution of cave-dwelling phlebotomine sand flies and their nocturnal and diurnal activity in Phitsanulok Province, Thailand. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 42(6), 1395–1404. [Google Scholar]
  32. Quate L. 1961. Zoogeography of Pacific Psychodidae (Diptera). Pacific Insects, 2(3), 203–222. [Google Scholar]
  33. Quate L. 1962. A review of the Indo-Chinese Phlebotominae (Diptera: Psychodidae). Pacific Insects, 4(2), 251–267. [Google Scholar]
  34. Raynal J. 1935. Contribution à l’étude des phlébotomes d’Indochine. Archives des Instituts Pasteur d’Indochine, 19, 237–292. [Google Scholar]
  35. Raynal J, Gaschen H. 1935. Sur les phlébotomes d’Indochine. V. Présence de Phlebotomus barraudi, Sinton 1929, dans le Haut-Bassin du Fleuve-Rouge et description de Phlebotomus barraudi cr. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique, 28, 117–118. [Google Scholar]
  36. Raynal J. 1935. Sur les phlébotomes d’Indochine. IX. Phlebotomus sylvaticus n. sp. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique, 28, 592–601. [Google Scholar]
  37. Raynal J. 1936. Sur une nouvelle espèce de phlebotome du nord de la Chine: Phlebotomus khawi n. sp. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée, 14(6), 529–540. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  38. Seccombe AK, Ready PD, Huddleston LM. 1993. A catalogue of old world phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae, Phlebotominae). Occasional Papers on Systematic Entomology, 8, 1–57. [Google Scholar]
  39. Senghor M, Niang A, Depaquit J, Ferté H, Faye M, Elguero E, Gaye O, Alten B, Perktas U, Cassan C, Faye B, Bañuls A-L. 2016. Transmission of Leishmania infantum in the canine leishmaniasis focus of Mont-Rolland, Senegal: ecological, parasitological and molecular evidence for a possible role of Sergentomyia Sand Flies. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10(11), e0004940. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shahar M, Hassan A, Lee H, Salmah M. 2011. Studies of phlebotomine sand fly (Diptera: Psychodidae) populations in limestone areas and caves of western Malaysia. Southeast Asian Journal Tropical Medical and Public Health, 42(1), 83–93. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sinton J. 1929. Notes on some Indian species of the genus Phlebotomus. Part XXIV. Phlebotomus barraudi n. sp. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 16(3), 716–724. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sinton J. 1931. Notes on some Indian species of the Genus Phlebotomus. Part XXVII. Phlebotomus bailyi n. sp. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 17, 821–829. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sinton J. 1933. Notes on some Indian species of the genus Phlebotomus. Part XXXIV. Phlebotomus iyengari n. sp. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 21(1), 221–224. [Google Scholar]
  44. Siripattanapipong S, Leelayoova S, Ninsaeng U, Mungthin M. 2018. Detection of DNA of Leishmania siamensis in Sergentomyia (Neophlebotomus) iyengari (Diptera: Psychodidae) and molecular identification of blood meals of sand flies in an affected area, Southern Thailand. Journal of Medical Entomology, 55(5), 1277–1283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Srisuton P, Phumee A, Sunantaraporn S, Boonserm R, Sor-Suwan S, Brownell N, Pengsakul T, Siriyasatien P. 2019. Detection of Leishmania and Trypanosoma DNA in field-caught sand flies from endemic and non-endemic areas of Leishmaniasis in southern Thailand. Insects, 10(8), 238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sukantamala J, Sing K-W, Jaturas N, Polseela R, Wilson J-J. 2017. Unexpected diversity of sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in tourist caves in Northern Thailand. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 28(6), 949–955. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Thisyakorn U, Jongwutiwes S, Vanichsetakul P, Lertsapcharoen P. 1999. Visceral leishmaniasis: the first indigenous case report in Thailand. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 93(1), 23–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tien P. 2018. A case report of leismaniasis and HIV coinfection in Hue central hospital, in The 8th Asean Conference of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology (ACTMP), 2018. Hanoi City: Vietnam Journal of Infectious Diseases. [Google Scholar]
  49. Vu N, Tran S, Tran P, Tran T, Tran D, Dang A, Nguyen Y, Vu L, Ngo P, Nguyen H, Cassan C, Nguyen C, Rahola N, Bañuls AL. 2020. Diversity and ecology of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae), potential vectors of Leishmania in the Quang Ninh Province, Vietnam. Journal of Medical Entomology, 57(1), 259–265. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang L, Leng Y. 1997. Eighty-year research of phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in China. II. Phlebotomine vectors of leishmaniasis in China (1915–1995). Parasite, 4(4), 299–306. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Vu SN, Tran HS, Tran VP, Tran CT, Tran ND, Dang DA, Nguyen TY, Vu TL, Ngo KP, Nguyen VH, Hoàng NA, Cassan C, Prudhomme J, Depaquit J, Rahola N & Bañuls A.-L. 2021. Taxonomical insights and ecology of sandfly (Diptera, Psychodidae) species in six provinces of Northern Vietnam. Parasite 28, 85.

All Tables

Table 1.

Number of specimens per taxon, sex ratio, density and relative abundance according to the taxa.

In the text
Table 2

Number of specimens per taxon, relative abundance, density and species richness per province

In the text
Table 3

Number of specimens per taxon, relative abundance, mean value (number of sandflies/number of CDC traps), density and species richness according to different environments.

In the text

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1.

Collection sites and sandfly species composition in 6 provinces of Northern Vietnam.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 2.

Classical characteristics of Phlebotomus mascomai, Ph. yunshengensis and Ph. betisi males. A and B: Genitalia and cibarium of Ph. mascomai male, respectively; C and D: Genitalia and cibarium of Ph. yunshengensis male, respectively; E and F: Genitalia and cibarium of Ph. betisi male, respectively.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 3.

Ph. yunshengensis female. A: pharynx and cibarium; B: flagellomeres 1, 2, and 3; C: palp; D: detail of 3rd palpal article; E: spermathecae.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 4.

Microphotographs of cibaria of females of Grassomyia indica s. l. (A), the Sergentomyia barraudi group (B and C), Se. khawi (D), and the Se. anodontis group (E), ascoid of flagellomere 3 of Se. sp.3 with a retrograde spur, cibarium of the Se. brevicaulis group (G), cibarium of Se. sylvatica (H), cibarium of Se. bailyi (I), cibarium of Se. hivernus (J), cibarium of the Se. perturbans group (K), cibarium of Idiophlebotomus sp. (L), all at the same scale.
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.