EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 27 (2020) Parasite, 27 (2020) 5 Full HTML
Open Access
Issue
Parasite
Volume 27, 2020
Article Number 5
Number of page(s) 16
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2020003
Published online 27 January 2020

© F. Moravec & J.-L. Justine, published by EDP Sciences, 2020

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Nematodes of the conventional order Spirurida Chitwood, 1933 [3, 8, 12] from marine fishes off New Caledonia have previously been dealt with in several papers [15–17, 28–43], mostly reporting various species of philometrids, camallanids and cystidicolids, less often gnathostomatids or a guyanemid. Nevertheless, taking into account the wealth of marine fish species in New Caledonian waters, it is expected that the nematode fauna of marine fishes, including spirurids, still remains poorly known.

Recent examinations of spirurid nematodes collected by J.-L. Justine and his students in marine fishes from off New Caledonia in the years 2006–2009 revealed the presence of five species of these parasites, two of which were previously insufficiently well described and two are newly recorded in New Caledonian waters. Results of this study are presented herein.

Materials and methods

Fish were caught off New Caledonia by various means; fish from the deep-sea campaign were frozen-thawed. We generally used the “wash” method [18]. The nematodes for morphological studies were fixed in hot 4% formalin or 70% ethanol. For light microscopical examination (LM), they were cleared with glycerine. Drawings were made with the aid of a ZEISS microscope drawing attachment. Specimens used for scanning electron microscopical (SEM) examination were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (in phosphate buffer), dehydrated through a graded acetone series, critical-point-dried and sputter-coated with gold; they were examined using a JEOL JSM-7401F scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 4 kV (GB low mode). All measurements are in micrometres unless otherwise indicated. The fish nomenclature adopted follows FishBase [11].

Results

Family Guyanemidae Petter, 1974

Ichthyofilaroides n. gen.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:6E8F1B66-B534-4320-805F-5DCD273A8FFF

Diagnosis: Dracunculoidea, Guyanemidae, Travassosneminae. Body of female cylindrical, with narrowed anterior and posterior ends; cephalic end rounded, posterior end pointed. Cuticle smooth. Oral aperture circular, surrounded by four small submedian cephalic papillae arranged in two circles and by pair of lateral amphids. Small but distinct, simple buccal capsule present. Oesophagus divided into anterior muscular and short posterior glandular portions; latter with long posteriorly oriented appendix. Intestine ending posteriorly in ligament attached to body wall. Amphidelphic. Posterior ovary much larger than anterior one, extending almost to anterior end of tail. Uterus continuous, filled with larvae. Vulva functional, situated in posterior half of body. Male not known. Parasites of musculature, surface of visceral organs and body cavity of marine fishes.

Type species: I. novaecaledoniensis (Moravec et Justine, 2009) n. comb.

Ichthyofilaroides novaecaledoniensis (Moravec et Justine, 2009) n. comb. Figures 1, 2

Host: Lemon ghost flathead Hoplichthys citrinus Gilbert (Hoplichthyidae, Scorpaeniformes).

thumbnail Figure 1

Ichthyofilaroides novaecaledoniensis (Moravec et Justine, 2009) n. comb., gravid female from Hoplichthys citrinus. (A, B) Anterior ends of two different specimens, lateral views; (C) anterior end, lateral view (enlarged); (D) cephalic end, lateral view; (E) vulva and vagina, lateral view; (F) cephalic end, apical view; (G) tail, lateral view; (H) posterior end, lateral view; (I, J) tail tips of two different specimens.

thumbnail Figure 2

Ichthyofilaroides novaecaledoniensis (Moravec et Justine, 2009) n. comb., scanning electron micrographs of gravid female. (A) Cephalic end, subapical view; (B) region of oral aperture, apical view; (C) cephalic end (another specimen), subapical view; (D) tail end of specimen without terminal caudal projection. (a) Amphid; (b) submedian cephalic papilla of outer circle; (c) submedian cephalic papilla of inner circle; (o) oral aperture.

Site of infection: Unknown with precision, parasites obtained from wash of organs in abdominal cavity of frozen-thawed fish.

Locality: Off New Caledonia, deep-sea cruise TERRASSE [54]. JNC2776, station CP3048, 23°44′S, 168°16′E, 19 October 2008, depth 380–400 m; JNC2791, JNC2795, station CP3089, 22°17′S, 167°12′E, 25 October 2008, depth 390–410 m.

Prevalence, intensity and details of fish: 14% (3 fish infected/22 fish examined); 1–2 nematodes. The infected fish (JNC2776, JNC2791 and JNC2795) were 210–215 mm in total length, 36–38 g in weight.

Deposition of voucher specimens: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France (1 specimen and 2 body fragments in 70% ethanol, MNHN JNC2776, JNC2791 and JNC2795).

Description

Female (four gravid specimens): Body filiform, whitish, 20.21–26.33 mm long, maximum width near middle of body 245–354, tapering at both ends. Cuticle smooth. Anterior end bluntly rounded (Figs. 1A–1C and 2A). Cephalic papillae small, indistinct in lateral view. Oral aperture small, circular, surrounded by cephalic papillae arranged in two circles: four larger submedian papillae of outer circle and four smaller submedian papillae of inner circle; pair of small lateral amphids present (Figs. 1F and 2A–2C). Small buccal capsule 6 long and 7–9 wide present (Fig. 1D). Muscular oesophagus narrow, almost cylindrical, 261–339 long and 24–39 wide at its posterior portion, sometimes forming small bulbous inflation at its anterior end; inflation 30–33 long and 24–36 wide. Length of muscular oesophagus represents 1.1%–1.4% of body length. Glandular oesophagus very short, 27–60 long and 18–45 wide, provided with free posterior appendix 1.02–1.64 mm long and 45–48 in maximum width (Figs. 1A–1C). Nerve ring encircling muscular oesophagus 171–219 from anterior extremity; excretory pore at level of junction of muscular and glandular portions of oesophagus (Figs. 1A–1C); deirids not observed. Intestine light-coloured, 4.62–5.71 mm long, ending blindly, continuing as narrow ligament attached ventrally to body wall at distance of 272–300 from posterior extremity. Amphidelphic. Vulva non-elevated or slightly elevated, located 14.89–18.75 mm from anterior end of body, at 65%–74% of body length (Fig. 1E). Vagina tubular, 213–843 long and 21–24 wide, directed anteriorly from vulva; small oval ovijector present, 30–75 long and 18–48 wide (Fig. 1E). Uterus occupying majority of space of body, being filled with many eggs, developing embryos and free larvae; larvae about 150 long and 9–12 wide. Anterior ovary small, narrow; posterior ovary fairly broad, forming coils (Figs. 1A–1C). Caudal end conical, with or without minute terminal cuticular projection (Figs. 1G–1J and 2D).

Remarks

Moravec and Justine [33] described the dracunculoid Ichthyofilaria novaecaledoniensis Moravec et Justine, 2009 from a single subgravid female obtained from the flesh near gills of H. citrinus off New Caledonia, which was studied solely by LM. Since the available specimen was fairly damaged, some of its important morphological features were given inaccurately, as visible from the present study, or were not observed at all. The four newly collected specimens (all gravid females) of this species made it possible to redescribe it based on both LM and SEM examinations.

In contrast to the original description, the present study has revealed the presence of a small, but distinct buccal capsule in this species, which indicates a different generic appurtenance of this nematode. In addition, the shape of the oral aperture, the number and arrangement of cephalic papillae and the presence of amphids and the functional vulva in this nematode are reported for the first time. The present study has also shown that the posterior appendix of the glandular oesophagus is much longer as compared with the original description.

Ichthyofilaria Yamaguti, 1935 was established by Yamaguti [61] to accommodate I. dasycotti Yamaguti, 1935, a species described solely from females from the abdominal cavity of Dasycottus setiger Bean (Psychrolutidae, Scorpaeniformes) in the Sea of Japan. The genus was placed in the Philometridae [8, 14, 61, 62], but later it was transferred to the family Guyanemidae Petter, 1974, subfamily Travassosneminae Moravec, 2006 [26]. To date, Ichthyofilaria includes six, mostly little-known species reported from the abdominal cavity and different tissues of marine fishes: I. argentinensis Incorvaia, 1999 from gadiform fishes in the western South Atlantic Ocean [7, 13, 58]; I. bergensis (Wülker, 1930) Køie, 1993 from gadiform fishes in the eastern North Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea [7, 20, 59]; I. canadensis Appy, Anderson et Khan, 1985 from perciform fishes in the western North Atlantic Ocean [4]; I. dasycotti (type species; see above); I. japonica Moravec et Nagasawa, 1985 from a scorpaeniform fish off Japan [47]; and I. novaecaledoniensis from the scorpaeniform fish Hoplichthys citrinus off New Caledonia [33].

However, as revealed in this study, I. novaecaledoniensis differs substantially from other congeners in possessing a small buccal capsule, by which it shows affinities to species of the dracunculoid family Skrjabillanidae Shigin et Shigina, 1958, parasites of freshwater fishes [25]. It should be noted that skrjabillanids are similar to species of Ichthyofilaria also in having the glandular oesophagus provided with a posterior appendix [25] and the males of both these nematode groups possess a copulatory plate instead of spicules [7, 23, 25, 55, 56]. On the other hand, in contrast to I. novaecaledoniensis and other congeners, the skrjabillanid females are monodelphic (vs. didelphic), possessing the vulva situated in the oesophageal region (vs. in the posterior half of body) and the female tail tip of most species bears three projections. Moreover, all skrjabillanids are parasites of freshwater fishes (see above). Consequently, I. novaecaledoniensis is not a species belonging to the Skrjabillanidae.

Besides the presence of a buccal capsule (see above), the female of I. novaecaledoniensis also differs from congeners in the number and arrangement of cephalic papillae. According to Timi et al. [58], there are eight papillae in the outer circle arranged in four submedian pairs and two (but probably four [26]) submedian single papillae in the inner circle in I. argentinensis females (vs. four submedian papillae in the outer circle and four submedian papillae in the inner circle in I. novaecaledoniensis). Four elevated submedian pairs of papillae were reported for females of I. japonica [47], whereas four poorly defined submedian papillae were found in females of I. bergensis and I. canadensis [4, 20]; the cephalic papillae of I. dasycotti have not yet been studied.

Considering other dracunculoids, based on the number and arrangement of cephalic papillae in the female, I. novaecaledoniensis resembles only Lucionema balatonense Moravec, Molnár et Székely, 1998 (Lucionematidae), a parasite of the swimbladder wall of the freshwater percid Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus) in Europe and Lockenloia sanguinis Adamson et Caira, 1991 (genus incertae sedis), an inadequately described parasite from the heart of the nurse shark Ginglymostoma cirratum (Bonnaterre) in the western North Atlantic Ocean [1, 46]; however, both of these species differ from I. novaecaledoniensis in the structure of the oesophagus and for L. balatonense also in the absence of the buccal capsule and in that its female genital tract is monodelphic (vs. didelphic).

Therefore, we consider it necessary to erect a new genus, Ichthyofilaroides n. gen., to accommodate I. novaecaledoniensis. This new genus is differentiated from Ichthyofilaria mainly by the presence of the buccal capsule and the number and arrangement of the cephalic papillae. Since the buccal capsule has not yet been described in any species of the Guyanemidae, it may be necessary to create a new family for Ichthyofilaroides n. gen. in the future. Nevertheless, since the male of its type species remains unknown, we provisionally assign Ichthyofilaroides to the family Guyanemidae, subfamily Travassosneminae.

In addition to Ichthyofilaroides n. gen., species of the following six genera are placed in the family Guyanemidae [26]: Guyanema Petter, 1974, Histodytes Aragort, Álvarez, Iglesias, Leiro et Sanmartín, 2002, Moravecia Ribu et Lester, 2004, Pseudodelphis Adamson et Roth, 1990 (syn. Syngnathinema Moravec et al., 2001 [48]), Ichthyofilaria and Travassosnema Costa, Moreira et Oliveira, 1991 [2, 5, 9, 52, 53, 61].

It should be noted that, even though the molecular phylogeny of some fish dracunculoids has been studied (e.g. [10, 23, 50, 57, 60]), no such studies have so far been performed on representatives of the Guyanemidae.

Family Philometridae Baylis et Daubney, 1926

Philometra sp. Figure 3

Host: Highfin grouper Epinephelus maculatus (Bloch) (Serranidae, Perciformes).

thumbnail Figure 3

Philometra sp. from Epinephelus maculatus. (A, B) Anterior and posterior ends of male fourth-stage larva, respectively, lateral views; (C, D) anterior and posterior ends of mature female, respectively, lateral views.

Site of infection: Unknown with precision, parasites obtained from wash of organs in abdominal cavity.

Locality: Near Récif Toombo, off New Caledonia, 22°34′S, 166°28′E.

Prevalence, intensity and details about fish: 58% (2 fish infected/32 fish examined); 1 specimen per fish. Fish JNC3031, total length 387 mm, weight 716 g, 1 September 2009; JNC3066, total length 449 mm, weight 959 g, 30 September 2009.

Deposition of voucher specimens: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France (two specimens, MNHN JNC3031 and JNC3066).

Description

Male fourth-stage larva (one specimen): Body of specimen undergoing last moult 3.17 mm long, maximum width 30, slightly narrowed posterior to cephalic end (Fig. 3A). Width of cephalic end 24, of narrowed cephalic region 21 and that of caudal end 21. Entire oesophagus 186 long, slightly inflated at anterior end, 15 in maximum width. Nerve ring and cell nucleus of oesophageal gland 57 and 132, respectively, from anterior extremity. Spicules equal, 189 long, representing 6% of body length (Fig. 3B). Gubernaculum not yet developed. Newly formed caudal end broadly oval, still inside moulted cone-shaped larval cuticle (Fig. 3B).

Mature female (one specimen): Body whitish, 3.17 mm long, maximum width 81, slightly narrowed posterior to rounded cephalic end (Fig. 3C). Width of cephalic end 39, of narrowed cephalic region 36. Entire oesophagus 216 long, representing 7% of body length, its maximum width 24. Nerve ring and cell nucleus of oesophageal gland 75 and 150, respectively, from anterior extremity (Fig. 3C). Uterus poorly developed, empty. Vulva present, being situated 2.26 mm from anterior extremity, at 71% of body length; short vagina directed anteriorly from vulva. Caudal end rounded, 30 wide (Fig. 3D).

Remarks

To date, 14 nominal species of Philometra Costa, 1845 have been reported from marine fishes in New Caledonia [28, 32, 33, 37–39], of which P. cephalopholidis Moravec et Justine, 2015, P. cyanopodi Moravec et Justine, 2008, P. fasciati Moravec et Justine, 2008, P. ocularis Moravec, Ogawa, Suzuki, Miyazaki et Donai, 2002 and P. piscaria Moravec et Justine, 2014 were recorded from fishes of the family Serranidae. Of the species with described males, only P. cyanopodi from the ovary of Epinephelus cyanopodus (Richardson) has a length of spicules (183–229 μm) similar to that of the present male larva from E. maculatus (189 μm) and the body lengths are also similar (2.72–3.59 mm vs. 3.17 mm). However, since other taxonomically important features (especially the structure of the gubernaculum) of the present specimen are not known, and considering the high degree of host specificity of Philometra species parasitizing serranid fishes [27, 45], the present nematode is unidentifiable to species. Nevertheless, the finding of Philometra sp. in E. maculatus represents the first record of a philometrid in this host species.

Family Cystidicolidae Skryabin, 1946

Ascarophis (Dentiascarophis) adioryx Machida, 1981

Syn.: Ascarophis holocentri Parukhin, 1984.

Host: Sabre squirrelfish Sargocentron spiniferum (Forsskål) (Holocentridae, Beryciformes).

Site of infection: Digestive tract.

Locality: Récif Crouy, off New Caledonia (collected 13 May 2008).

Prevalence, intensity and details of fish: 1 fish infected/4 fish examined; 1 nematode. The infected fish (JNC2530) was 185 mm in total length and 185 g in weight.

Deposition of voucher specimen: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France Paris (1 specimen, MNHN JNC2530).

Remarks

Ascarophis adioryx has already been reported from two species of holocentrid fish hosts off New Caledonia, Sargocentron spiniferum and Neoniphon sammara (Forsskål) and, on the basis of available specimens, the species was redescribed in detail based on LM and SEM [34]. The present material contained only a single specimen (gravid female); therefore, we have refrained from describing it.

Originally this nematode species was described from S. spiniferum and S. rubrum (Forsskål) in the Philippine Sea off the Palau Islands (Republic of Palau), Oceania [21] and later it was recorded under the synonym Ascarophis holocentri Parukhin, 1984 from S. spiniferum and S. punctatissimum (Cuvier) in the Red Sea [51]. Consequently, A. adioryx seems to be a specific parasite of holocentrid fishes in the Indo-Pacific region.

Ascarophis (Ascarophis) nasonis Machida, 1981 Figures 4–6

Hosts: Orangespine unicornfish Naso lituratus (Forster) and bluespine unicornfish Naso unicornis (Forsskål) (Acanthuridae, Perciformes).

thumbnail Figure 4

Ascarophis (Ascarophis) nasonis Machida, 1981 from Naso spp. (A) Oesophageal part of female body, dorsoventral view; (B) anterior end of female, lateral view; (C) anterior end of female (another specimen, enlarged), dorsoventral view; (D) cephalic end, apical view; (E) vulva and vagina, lateral view; (F) tail of female, lateral view; (G) posterior end of male tail, lateral view; (H) posterior end of male, lateral view; (I) deirid; (J, K) egg. (A) and (C)–(J) from N. lituratus; (B) and (K) from N. unicornis.

Site of infection: Anterior part of intestine (N. lituratus) and digestive tract (N. unicornis).

Localities: Near Ilôt Signal (collected 30 May 2006) (N. lituratus) and near Ilôt Goëland (collected 26 October 2007) (N. unicornis), both off New Caledonia.

Prevalence, intensity and details of fish: N. lituratus: 1 fish infected/2 fish examined; 5 nematodes. N. unicornis: 5% (1/19); 5. N. lituratus, fish JNC1843, total length 275 mm, weight 590 g; N. unicornis, fish JNC2345, total length 435 mm, weight 1800 g.

Deposition of voucher specimens: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France (6 specimens, MNHN JNC1843, JNC2345) and Helminthological Collection, Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic (1 specimen, IPCAS N–1206).

Description

General: Small, whitish nematodes. Maximum width of body near its middle. Cuticle thick, with distinct transverse striations (Figs. 5F, 6E, 6F). Cephalic end rounded, with two pseudolabia with terminal protrusions possessing rounded tips (Figs. 4B, 4C, 5A–5D and 6E). Oral aperture oval, dorsoventrally elongate, slightly narrowed equatorially (Figs. 4D, 5B). Lateral pseudolabia rather large, each provided with rounded terminal protrusion; in apical view, inner parts of pseudolabia partly cover mouth (Figs. 4D, 5B). Oral aperture surrounded by continuous mound bearing four submedian cephalic papillae and pair of lateral amphids; submedian sublabia poorly developed, narrow, appearing to be fused together dorsally and ventrally (Figs. 4D, 5A–5D). Vestibule (stoma) long, almost cylindrical, with well-developed funnel-shaped anterior prostom visible in lateral view (Fig. 4B). Glandular oesophagus conspicuously long, 6–24 times longer than muscular; both parts of oesophagus distinctly separated from each other (Figs. 4A, 4B). Nerve ring encircles muscular oesophagus near its anterior end; excretory pore located somewhat posterior to level of nerve ring; deirids small, bifurcate, situated approximately at 1/3 of vestibule length; only 2 posteriorly oriented arms of each deirid visible on surface of cuticle (Figs. 4B, 4C, 4I and 5E).

thumbnail Figure 5

Ascarophis (Ascarophis) nasonis Machida, 1981 from Naso spp., scanning electron micrographs. (A, B) Cephalic end, lateral and apical views, respectively; (C, D) cephalic end, dorsoventral views (two different specimens); (E) deirid; (F) detail of cuticle at middle part of body. (a) Amphid; (b) cephalic papilla; (p) pseudolabium; (s) sublabium.

thumbnail Figure 6

Ascarophis (Ascarophis) nasonis Machida, 1981 from Naso spp., scanning electron micrographs. (A) Tail of male, sublateral view (arrows indicate postanal papillae); (B) precloacal region of male, ventrolateral view (arrows indicate preanal papillae); (C) region of cloaca, subventral view; (D) posterior part of male tail, ventral view (arrows indicate postanal papillae); (E) anterior end of body, lateral view; (F) tail of female, lateral view; (G) posterior end of female tail, lateral view. (c) Cloacal aperture; (d) median depression on posterior cloacal lip; (e) papillae of first postanal pair; (f) deirid; (g) anus; (h) phasmid.

Male (two specimens from N. lituratus. Measurements of one specimen from N. unicornis in parentheses): Length of body 14.42–14.43 (15.61) mm, maximum width 150–163 (204). Height of pseudolabia 3 (3). Vestibule including prostom 165–189 (171) long; prostom 15 (–) long and 12 (–) wide. Length of muscular oesophagus 285–291 (282), maximum width 24–27 (27); length of glandular oesophagus 5.51–6.05 (5.59) mm, maximum width 60–66 (72); length ratio of muscular and glandular parts of oesophagus 1:19–21 (1:20). Length of entire oesophagus and vestibule represents 41%–45% (39%) of total body length. Deirids, nerve ring and excretory pore 60–66 (42), 207–225 (204) and 372–375 (–), respectively, from anterior extremity. Posterior end of body spirally coiled, provided with narrow caudal alae (Fig. 4H). Preanal papillae: four pairs of subventral pedunculate papillae present, being arranged in two longitudinal rows (more subventral row formed by three pairs and one pair more lateral, at same level as third more subventral pair) (Figs. 4H and 6B). Postanal papillae: six pairs present, including five pairs of pedunculate subventral papillae and one pair of minute ventral sessile papillae located approximately at level of last pair of subventrals (Figs. 4G, 4H, 6A, 6C and 6D). Ventral cuticular ridges (area rugosa) anterior to cloaca well developed, consisting of about four longitudinal lines of elevated cuticle (Fig. 6B). Large (left) spicule 846–870 (858) long, with obtuse distal tip; small (right) spicule boat-shaped, 144–147 (141) long, with small dorsal barb on distal end rounded distal end (Fig. 4H). Length ratio of spicules 1:5.8–6.0 (1:6.1). Tail conical, 354 (394) long, with rounded tip (Figs. 6A and 6D).

Female (3 ovigerous specimens from N. lituratus. Measurements of four ovigerous specimens from N. minor in parentheses): Length of body 16.91–19.57 (8.51–11.26) mm, maximum width 177–204 (109–190). Height of pseudolabia 3 (3). Vestibule including prostom 180–183 (126–171) long; prostom 15 (12) long and 12 (12) wide. Length of muscular oesophagus 264–288 (255–330), maximum width 17–30 (21–24); length of glandular oesophagus 5.86–6.94 (1.50–2.03) mm, maximum width 75 (39–75); length ratio of muscular and glandular parts of oesophagus 1:22–24 (1:6). Length of entire oesophagus and vestibule represents 37–38 (22–24)% of total body length. Deirids, nerve ring and excretory pore 45–63 (39–48), 210–216 (126–189) and 315–321 (246–429), respectively, from anterior extremity. Tail conical, 195–228 (150–225) long, with rounded tip without any terminal appendage (Figs. 4F, 6F, 6G). Vulva mostly postequatorial, situated 10.17–14.42 (4.28–5.96) mm from anterior end of body, at 60%–74% (49%–53%) of body length; vulval lips not elevated (Fig. 4E). Vagina directed posteriorly from vulva (Fig. 4E). Amphidelphic. Anterior ovary and uterus not extending anteriorly to oesophageal part of body. Uterus filled with many eggs. Mature eggs (containing larvae) elongate-oval, thick-walled, size 42–45 × 18–21 (33–39 × 18–24); thickness of egg wall 3 (3); surface of eggs without filaments (Figs. 4J and 4K).

Remarks

The present specimens are morphologically similar to A. nasonis Machida, 1981, described from the same two hosts species, N. unicornis (now considered to be probably a synonym of N. minor [11]) (type host) and N. lituratus, from off southern Japan (Okinawa Prefecture) and Palau Islands [21] and there is no doubt that they belong to this species. Based on LM, Machida [21] gave a relatively good description of this species, but he could not observe some morphological details visible only with the use of SEM. The present SEM examination of this species revealed, for the first time, the presence of ventral precloacal cuticular ridges in the male, the presence and location of phasmids in the female and showed the exact structure of the nematode’s cephalic end.

This is the second finding of A. nasonis since its original description [21] and the first record of this nematode from fishes in New Caledonian waters. Previously two other congeneric species were reported from New Caledonia, Ascarophis adioryx from holocentrids (see above) and A. richeri Moravec et Justine, 2007 from the scorpaeniform fish Hoplichthys citrinus [30]. Whereas A. nasonis can be easily distinguished from the otherwise similar A. adioryx by the longer left spicule (810–1100 μm vs. 516–610 μm) and the mouth structure (mouth without dorsal and ventral median projections and pseudolabia without conspicuous inner dorsoventral extensions), both A. adioryx and A. nasonis differ from A. richeri mainly in possessing nonfilamented eggs (vs. eggs with long filaments on either pole) and some other features such as the mouth structure, shape of deirids and the structure of ventral precloacal ridges in the male.

Based on the structure of the mouth, each deirid with two posteriorly oriented arms separated one from another by the body cuticle, an unusually long glandular oesophagus, a fairly long female tail, the obtuse distal tip of the left spicule and the shape of eggs, A. nasonis is similar to the recently described A. scatophagi Moravec, Yooyen et Sanprick, 2018, a parasite of Scatophagus argus (Linnaeus) (Scatophagidae, Perciformes) in the Gulf of Thailand [49]. However, in contrast to A. nasonis, A. scatophagi possesses a distinctly shorter left spicule (555–642 μm vs. 846–1100 μm) and more numerous (about 10 vs. about 4) longitudinal precloacal cuticular ridges; moreover, the hosts of these two nematode species belong to different fish families (Acanthuridae vs. Scatophagidae).

In contrast to the majority of congeneric species, the fully developed (larvated) eggs of A. nasonis were described and illustrated to be conspicuously elongate [21]; similar, markedly elongate-oval eggs were also described for A. longiovata Moravec et Klimpel, 2009 and A. scatophagi [44, 49]. Nevertheless, although the fully developed eggs of the present specimens of A. nasonis from N. lituratus are typical in shape of this species (i.e. conspicuously elongate) (Fig. 4J), those of A. nasonis from N. unicornis are relatively wider with respect to their length and some of them appear to bear a small, poorly developed swelling on one pole (Fig. 4K). Since the gravid A. nasonis females from N. unicornis were smaller and less developed (with smaller numbers of eggs in uteri) as compared with those from N. lituratus, it may well be that the egg shape is influenced by the state of the female development.

Ascarophis nasonis has not been recorded previously from New Caledonian waters.

Ascarophisnema tridentatum Moravec et Justine, 2010 Figures 7–9

Host: Blue-lined large-eye bream Gymnocranius grandoculis (Valenciennes) (Lethrinidae, Perciformes).

thumbnail Figure 7

Ascarophisnema tridentatum Moravec et Justine, 2010 from Gymnocranius grandoculis, female.

Site of infection: Stomach.

Locality: Near Récif Toombo, off Nouméa, New Caledonia (collected 15 May 2007).

Prevalence, intensity and details of fish: 1 fish infected/11 fish examined; 1 nematode. The infected fish, JNC2166, was 595 mm in total length and 3800 g in weight.

Deposition of voucher specimen: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France (body fragment of 1 specimen, MNHN JNC2166).

Description

Female (1 ovigerous specimen): Small, whitish filiform nematode. Body length 35.39 mm, maximum width of body in caudal region 150. Cuticle thick, with distinct transverse striations (Figs. 8E, 8F and 9A–9D). Cephalic end rounded, with two pseudolabia with terminal protrusions three high (Figs. 7F, 8A–8D and 8F). Oral aperture oval, dorsoventrally elongate, slightly narrowed equatorially (Figs. 7D and 8A–8C). Lateral pseudolabia small, each provided with conspicuous conical terminal protrusion; in apical view, inner parts of pseudolabia only moderately cover mouth; expanded dorsoventrally, each forming 2 (1 dorsolateral and 1 ventrolateral) extensions with distally rounded ends (Figs. 7D, 8A and 8B); in sublateral view, both, somewhat depressed extensions of each pseudolabium appear as tooth-like formations protruding anteriorly from common base of pseudolabium, which grows out of lateral wall of buccal cavity (Figs. 7F and 8A–8D). Submedian sublabia well developed, fused together dorsally and ventrally, forming thus continuous, dorsal and ventral U-shaped inner margins of oral aperture (Figs. 7D, 7F and 8A–8C). Four elongate submedian cephalic papillae and pair of smaller lateral amphids present (Figs. 7D and 8A–8C). Entire vestibule (stoma) including prostom 144 long; well-developed funnel-shaped anterior prostom visible in lateral view (Figs. 7A–7C) 18 long, 15 wide. Length of muscular oesophagus 270, maximum width 27; length of glandular oesophagus 2.22 mm, maximum width 63; length ratio of muscular and glandular parts of oesophagus 1:8. Length of entire oesophagus and vestibule represents 7% of total body length. Nerve ring encircles muscular oesophagus near its anterior end, 195 from anterior extremity; excretory pore located somewhat posterior to level of nerve ring, 273 from anterior end of body; deirids small, trident-like, situated somewhat anterior to mid-length of vestibule length, at 63 from anterior extremity (Figs. 7B, 7E, 8E and 8F). Tail conical, 126 long, with rounded tip bearing small terminal cuticular knob 3 long and 6 wide (Figs. 7H, 7I and 9A–9C); pair of small lateral phasmids present near tail tip (Figs. 7H, 7I and 9A–9C). Vulva postequatorial, situated 21.18 mm from anterior end of body, at 60% of body length; vulval lips not elevated. Vagina short, directed anteriorly from vulva. Anterior ovary and uterus not extending anteriorly to oesophageal part of body; posterior ovary forms coils in region anterior to rectum (Figs. 7A and 7H). Uterus filled with many eggs. Mature eggs (containing larvae) oval, thick-walled, size 39–45 × 24–30; thickness of egg wall 4–5; surface of eggs without filaments (Fig. 7G).

thumbnail Figure 8

Ascarophisnema tridentatum Moravec et Justine, 2010 from Gymnocephalus grandoculis, scanning electron micrographs of female. (A, B) Cephalic end, lateral and apical views, respectively (arrows indicate tooth-like pseudolabial extensions); (C) cephalic end, dorsoventral view (arrow indicates tooth-like pseudolabial extension); (D) enlarged region of pseudolabium, dorsoventral view; (E) deirid; (F) anterior end of body, sublateral view. (a) Amphid; (b) cephalic papilla; (d) deirid; (p) pseudolabium; (s) sublabium.

thumbnail Figure 9

Ascarophisnema tridentatum Moravec et Justine, 2010 from Gymnocranius grandoculis, scanning electron micrographs of female. (A) Tail, lateral view; (B) posterior part of tail, lateral view; (C) tail tip; (D) detail of cuticle at anterior part of body. (g) Anus; (h) phasmid.

Remarks

Since the morphology and measurements of the only available female specimen, including the fine structure of the mouth and the shape of deirids, are much the same as those of Ascarophisnema tridentatum (except for a slightly longer body length) described from the congeneric host Gymnocranius euanus (Günther) from off New Caledonia [35], this specimen is considered to belong to this species. The present finding of A. tridentatum in G. grandoculis represents a new host record.

Yamaguti [61] described Rhabdochona gymnocranii Yamaguti, 1935 from two gravid females collected in the stomach of Gymnocranius griseus (Temminck et Schlegel) from the Inland Sea, Japan and later the species was transferred to Ascarophis van Beneden, 1871 [6]. The species has not been recorded since its original description. Yamaguti’s type specimens were re-examined and illustrated by Moravec [24] and Ko [19], but because these were mounted as permanent slides and some taxonomically important features, in particular detailed cephalic structures, could not be studied on them, this species has been considered to be a species inquirenda [35]. Taking into account that Ascarophis sp. of Mamaev, 1970, described from G. griseus of the Gulf of Tonkin near Vietnam [22] which is probably identical with A. gymnocranii [35], is similar to Ascarophisnema tridentatum, the species Ascarophis gymnocranii was provisionally transferred to Ascarophisnema Moravec et Justine, 2010 [35]. It may well be that future studies on A. gymnocranii show its identity with A. tridentatum.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank all colleagues and students who have participated in the parasitological survey over the years; detailed lists were provided in previous papers [15–17]. The deep-sea cruise TERRASSES was led by Sarah Samadi. Thanks are also due to the Laboratory of Electron Microscopy, Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre CAS, institution supported by the MEYS CR (LM2015062 Czech-BioImaging) for their support with obtaining the scientific data presented in this paper, and to Blanka Škoríková of the same Institute for help with the illustrations. This study was partly funded by the institutional support of the Institute of Parasitology, BC AS CR (585110/9500).

Conflict of interest

The Editor-in-Chief of Parasite is one of the authors of this manuscript. COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics, http://publicationethics.org), to which Parasite adheres, advises special treatment in these cases. In this case, the peer-review process was handled by an Invited Editor, Jérôme Depaquit.

References

  1. Adamson ML, Caira JN. 1991. Lockenloia sanguinis n. gen., n. sp. (Nematoda: Dracunculoidea) from the heart of a nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum, in Florida. Journal of Parasitology, 77, 663–665. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adamson ML, Roth M. 1990. Prevalence and intensity of Pseudodelphis oligocotti n. gen., n. sp. (Dracunculoidea; Guyanemidae) in the tidepool sculpin, Oligocottus maculosus (Scorpaeniformes; Cottidae). Journal of Parasitology, 76, 509–514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson C, Chabaud AG, Willmott S, Editors. 2009. Keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates. Archival volume. Wallingford: CAB International. p. 463. [Google Scholar]
  4. Appy RG, Anderson RC, Khan RA. 1985. Ichthyofilaria canadensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Dracunculoidea) from eelpouts (Lycodes spp.). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 63, 1590–1592. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aragort W, Álvarez F, Iglesias R, Leiro J, Sanmartín ML. 2002. Histodytes microocellatus gen. et sp. nov. (Dracunculoidea: Guyanemidae), a parasite of Raja microocellata on the European Atlantic coast (north-western Spain). Parasitology Research, 88, 932–940. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campana-Rouget Y. 1955. Sur deux nouveaux genres de spirurides parasites de poissons; discussion systématique des genres voisins. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée, 30, 316–362. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cantatore DMP, Merella P, Timi JT. 2010. Males of Ichthyofilaria argentinensis Incorvaia, 1999 and I. bergensis (Wülker, 1930) (Dracunculoidea, Guyanemidae): new morphological aspects and emendation of the generic diagnosis. Folia Parasitologica, 57, 289–294. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chabaud AG. 1975. Keys to genera of the order Spirurida. Part 1. Camallanoidea, Dracunculoidea, Gnathostomatoidea, Physalopteroidea, Rictularioidea and Thelazioidea, in CIH Keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates, No. 3. Anderson RC, Chabaud AG, Willmott S, Editors. Farnham Royal, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. p. 27. [Google Scholar]
  9. Costa HMA, Moreira NIB, Oliveira CL. 1991. Travassosnema gen. n. with the description of T. travassosi sp. n. (Dracunculoidea, Guyanemidae) parasite of Acestrorhynchus lacustris Reinhardt, 1874 (Characidae) from Três Marias Reservoir, MG, Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 86, 437–439. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Černotíková E, Horák A, Moravec F. 2011. Phylogenetic relationships of some spirurine nematodes (Nematoda: Chromadorea: Rhabditida: Spirurina) parasitic in fishes inferred from SSU rRNA gene sequences. Folia Parasitologica, 58, 135–148. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Froese R, Pauly D, Editors. 2019. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org, 09/2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gibbons LM. 2010. Keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates. Supplementary volume. Wallingford: CABI. p. 416. [Google Scholar]
  13. Incorvaia IS. 1999. Ichthyofilaria argentinensis sp. nov. (Nematoda: Philometridae) parásita de Merluccius hubbsi (Pisces: Merlucciidae). Ciencias Marinas, 25, 439–444. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ivashkin VM, Sobolev AA, Khromova LA. 1971. Camallanata of animals and man and the diseases caused by them. Osnovy nematodologii 22. Moscow: Nauka. p. 388 (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  15. Justine J-L, Beveridge I, Boxshall GA, Bray RA, Miller TL, Moravec F, Trilles J-P, Whittington ID. 2012. An annotated list of fish parasites (Isopoda, Copepoda, Monogenea, Digenea, Cestoda, Nematoda) collected from snappers and bream (Lutjanidae, Nemipteridae, Caesionidae) in New Caledonia confirms high parasite biodiversity on coral reef fish. Aquatic Biosystems, 8, 22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Justine J-L, Beveridge I, Boxshall GA, Bray RA, Moravec F, Trilles J-P, Whittington ID. 2010. An annotated list of parasites (Isopoda, Copepoda, Monogenea, Digenea, Cestoda and Nematoda) collected in groupers (Serranidae, Epinephelinae) in New Caledonia emphasizes parasite biodiversity in coral reef fish. Folia Parasitologica, 57, 237–262. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Justine J-L, Beveridge I, Boxshall GA, Bray RA, Moravec F, Whittington ID. 2010. An annotated list of fish parasites (Copepoda, Monogenea, Digenea, Cestoda and Nematoda) collected from emperors and emperor bream (Lethrinidae) in New Caledonia further highlights parasite biodiversity estimates on coral reef fish. Zootaxa, 2691, 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  18. Justine J-L, Briand MJ, Bray RA. 2012. A quick and simple method, usable in the field, for collecting parasites in suitable condition for both morphological and molecular studies. Parasitology Research, 111, 341–351. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ko RC. 1986. A preliminary review of the genus Ascarophis van Beneden, 1871 (Nematoda: Cystidicolidae) of the gastrointestinal tract of fishes. Hong Kong: Occasional Publications. Department of Zoology, University of Hong Kong. p. 54. [Google Scholar]
  20. Køie M. 1993. Nematode parasites in teleosts from 0 to 1540 m depth off the Faroe Islands (the North Atlantic). Ophelia, 38, 217–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Machida M. 1981. Two new species of Ascarophis (Nematoda, Spirurida) from marine fishes of Japan and Palau. Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Tokyo, Series A, 7, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mamaev YuL. 1970. Helminths of some commercial fishes of the Gulf of Tonkin, in Gel'minty zhivotnykh yugo-vostochnoy Azii. Oshmarin PG, Mamaev YuL, Lebedev BI, Editor. Moscow: Nauka. p. 127–190. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  23. Mejía-Madrid HH, Aguirre-Macedo ML. 2011. Systematics of Mexiconema cichlasomae (Nematoda: Daniconematidae) based on sequences of SSU rDNA. Journal of Parasitology, 97, 160–162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moravec F. 1975. Reconstruction of the nematode genus Rhabdochona Railliet, 1916 with a review of the species parasitic in fishes of Europe and Asia. Studie ČSAV No. 8. Prague: Academia. p. 104. [Google Scholar]
  25. Moravec F. 2004. Some aspects of the taxonomy and biology of dracunculoid nematodes parasitic in fishes: a review. Folia Parasitologica, 51, 1–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Moravec F. 2006. Dracunculoid and anguillicoloid nematodes parasitic in vertebrates. Prague: Academia. p. 634. [Google Scholar]
  27. Moravec F, Chaabane A, Neifar L, Gey D, Justine J-L. 2016. Descriptions of Philometra aenei n. sp. and P. tunisiensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Philometridae) from Epinephelus spp. off Tunisia confirm a high degree of host specificity of gonad-infecting species of Philometra Costa, 1845 in groupers (Serranidae). Systematic Parasitology, 93, 115–128. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2005. Two species of Philometra (Nematoda, Philometridae) from serranid fishes off New Caledonia. Acta Parasitologica, 50, 323–331. [Google Scholar]
  29. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2006. Three nematode species from elasmobranchs off New Caledonia. Systematic Parasitology, 64, 131–145. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2007. A new species of Ascarophis (Nematoda, Cystidicoldae) from the stomach of the marine scorpaeniform fish Hoplichthys citrinus from a seamount off the Chesterfield Islands, New Caledonia. Acta Parasitologica, 52, 238–246. [Google Scholar]
  31. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2007. Redescription of Metabronema magnum (Nematoda: Cystidicolidae), a swimbladder parasite of the carangid fish Gnathanodon speciosus off New Caledonia. Folia Parasitologica, 54, 293–300. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2008. Some philometrid nematodes (Philometridae), including four new species of Philometra, from marine fishes off New Caledonia. Acta Parasitologica, 53, 369–381. [Google Scholar]
  33. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2009. New data on dracunculoid nematodes from fishes off New Caledonia, including four new species of Philometra (Philometridae) and Ichthyofilaria (Guyanemidae). Folia Parasitologica, 56, 129–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2009. Two cystidicolids (Nematoda, Cystidicolidae) from marine fishes off New Caledonia. Acta Parasitologica, 54, 341–349. [Google Scholar]
  35. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2010. Two new genera and species of cystidicolids (Nematoda, Cystidicolidae) from marine fishes off New Caledonia. Parasitology International, 59, 198–205. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2011. New data on the morphology of Procamallanus (Procamallanus) annulatus and Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) monotaxis (Nematoda: Camallanidae) from marine fishes off New Caledonia. Helminthologia, 48, 41–50. [Google Scholar]
  37. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2011. Two new gonad-infecting Philometra species (Nematoda: Philometridae) from the marine fish Lutjanus vitta (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) off New Caledonia. Folia Parasitologica, 58, 302–310. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2014. Philometrids (Nematoda: Philometridae) in carangid and serranid fishes off New Caledonia, including three new species. Parasite, 21, 21. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2015. New records of species of Philometra (Nematoda: Philometridae) from marine fishes off New Caledonia, including P. cephalopholidis sp. n. from Cephalopholis sonnerati (Serranidae). Parasitology Research, 114, 3223–3228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2017. Two new species of nematode parasites, Cucullanus epinepheli sp. n. (Cucullanidae) and Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) sinespinis sp. n. (Camallanidae), from marine serranid and haemulid fishes off New Caledonia. Folia Parasitologica, 64, 011. [Google Scholar]
  41. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2018. Rasheedia n. nom. (Nematoda, Physalopteridae) for Bulbocephalus Rasheed, 1966 (a homonym of Bulbocephalus Watson, 1916), with description of Rasheedia heptacanthi n. sp. and R. novaecaledoniensis n. sp. from fishes of New Caledonia. Parasite, 25, 39. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Moravec F, Justine J-L. 2019. New species and new records of camallanid nematodes from marine fishes and sea snakes in New Caledonia (Nematoda, Camallanidae). Parasite, 26, 66. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Moravec F, Justine J-L, Rigby MC. 2006. Some camallanid nematodes from marine perciform fishes off New Caledonia. Folia Parasitologica, 53, 223–239. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Moravec F, Klimpel S. 2009. Two new species of cystidicolid nematodes from the digestive tract of the deep-sea fish Coryphaenoides mediterraneus (Giglioli) (Macrouridae) from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Systematic Parasitology, 73, 37–47. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Moravec F, Manoharan J. 2016. Gonad-infecting species of Philometra (Nematoda: Philometridae) from groupers Epinephelus spp. (Osteichthyes: Serranidae) in the Bay of Bengal. Acta Parasitologica, 59, 596–605. [Google Scholar]
  46. Moravec F, Molnár K, Székely C. 1998. Lucionema balatonense gen. et sp. n., a new nematode of a new family Lucionematidae fam. n. (Dracunculoidea) from the swimbladder of the European pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (Pisces). Folia Parasitologica, 45, 57–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Moravec F, Nagasawa K. 1985. Ichthyofilaria japonica sp. n. (Philometridae) and some other nematodes from marine fishes from Hokkaido, Japan. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemoslovacae, 49, 211–223. [Google Scholar]
  48. Moravec F, Novacovsky GN, Hernández-Orts JS. 2018. Pseudodelphis eleginopsis n. sp. (Nematoda: Guyanemidae), a new tissue-dwelling parasite of the Patagonian blennie Eleginops maclovinus (Cuvier) (Perciformes: Eleginopsidae) in Argentina, with notes on related forms. Systematic Parasitology, 95, 403–414. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Moravec F, Yooyen T, Sanprick A. 2018. Two nematode species from freshwater and marine fishes in Thailand, including Ascarophis scatophagi sp. nov. (Cystidicolidae) from Scatophagus argus (Scatophagidae). Acta Parasitologica, 63, 89–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nadler SA, Carreno RA, Mejía-Madrid H, Ullberg J, Pagan C, Houston R, Hugot J-P. 2007. Molecular phylogeny of clade III nematodes reveals multiple origins of tissue parasitism. Parasitology, 134, 1421–1442. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Parukhin AM. 1984. New species of nematodes from fishes of the southern seas, in Parasites of animals and plants. Mamaev YuL, Dvoriadkin VA, Eroshenko AS, Editors. Vladivostok: Far-Eastern Scientific Center of the USSR Academy of Sciences. p. 40–43. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  52. Petter A-J. 1974. Deux nouvelles espèces de Nématodes Camallanina parasites de Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus (Characidae, Cypriniformes) en Guyane; création d’une nouvelle famille: les Guyanemidae (Dracunculoidea). Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 3e série, Zoologie, 156, 803–812. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ribu DL, Lester RJG. 2004. Moravecia australiensis n. g., n. sp. (Dracunculoidea: Guyanemidae) from the gills of the green porcupine fish Tragulichthys jaculiferus (Cuvier) in Australia. Systematic Parasitology, 57, 59–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Samadi S. 2008. TERRASSE cruise. RV Alis, French Oceanographic Cruises. https://doi.org/10.17600/8100100. [Google Scholar]
  55. Shigin AA, Shigina NG. 1958. A new parasite of tench, Skrjabillanus tincae nov. gen., nov. sp. (Nematoda: Camallanata). Studies in helminthology. On the occasion of the 80th birthday of Academician K. I. Skrjabin. Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, pp. 395–399. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  56. Sokolov SG. 2003. Morphology of nematodes of the family Skrjabillanidae (Spirurida, Camallanina). Vestnik Zoologii, 37, 23–29. (In Russian with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  57. Sokolov SG, Malysheva SV, Pospekhov VV. 2017. The phylogenetic relationships within Philonema genus (Dracunculoidea, Philonematidae) from salmon fishes of the Far East of Russia. Proceedings of the Conference “Salmonids, Biology, Conservation and Restoration”, Petrozavodsk, Karelia, Russia 18–22 September 2017, pp. 132–133. [Google Scholar]
  58. Timi JT, Navone GT, Sardella NH. 2001. Redescription of Ichthyofilaria argentinensis Incorvaia, 1999 (Nematoda: Philometridae) parasite of Merluccius hubbsi (Pisces: Merlucciidae) from Argentina. Folia Parasitologica, 48, 139–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wülker G. 1930. Über Nematoden aus Nordseetieren. I. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 87, 293–302. [Google Scholar]
  60. Van Megen H, van den Elsen S, Holterman M, Karssen G, Mooyman P, Bongers T, Holovachov O, Bakker J, Helder J. 2009. A phylogenetic tree of nematodes based on about 1200 full-length small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Nematology, 11, 927–950. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Yamaguti S. 1935. Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 9. Nematodes of fishes, 1. Japanese Journal of Zoology, 6, 337–386. [Google Scholar]
  62. Yamaguti S. 1961. The nematodes of vertebrates. Part 1. Systema helminthum III. New York, London: Interscience Publishers. p. 679. [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Moravec F & Justine JL. 2020. New records of spirurid nematodes (Nematoda, Spirurida, Guyanemidae, Philometridae & Cystidicolidae) from marine fishes off New Caledonia, with redescriptions of two species and erection of Ichthyofilaroides n. gen. Parasite 27, 5.

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1

Ichthyofilaroides novaecaledoniensis (Moravec et Justine, 2009) n. comb., gravid female from Hoplichthys citrinus. (A, B) Anterior ends of two different specimens, lateral views; (C) anterior end, lateral view (enlarged); (D) cephalic end, lateral view; (E) vulva and vagina, lateral view; (F) cephalic end, apical view; (G) tail, lateral view; (H) posterior end, lateral view; (I, J) tail tips of two different specimens.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 2

Ichthyofilaroides novaecaledoniensis (Moravec et Justine, 2009) n. comb., scanning electron micrographs of gravid female. (A) Cephalic end, subapical view; (B) region of oral aperture, apical view; (C) cephalic end (another specimen), subapical view; (D) tail end of specimen without terminal caudal projection. (a) Amphid; (b) submedian cephalic papilla of outer circle; (c) submedian cephalic papilla of inner circle; (o) oral aperture.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 3

Philometra sp. from Epinephelus maculatus. (A, B) Anterior and posterior ends of male fourth-stage larva, respectively, lateral views; (C, D) anterior and posterior ends of mature female, respectively, lateral views.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 4

Ascarophis (Ascarophis) nasonis Machida, 1981 from Naso spp. (A) Oesophageal part of female body, dorsoventral view; (B) anterior end of female, lateral view; (C) anterior end of female (another specimen, enlarged), dorsoventral view; (D) cephalic end, apical view; (E) vulva and vagina, lateral view; (F) tail of female, lateral view; (G) posterior end of male tail, lateral view; (H) posterior end of male, lateral view; (I) deirid; (J, K) egg. (A) and (C)–(J) from N. lituratus; (B) and (K) from N. unicornis.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 5

Ascarophis (Ascarophis) nasonis Machida, 1981 from Naso spp., scanning electron micrographs. (A, B) Cephalic end, lateral and apical views, respectively; (C, D) cephalic end, dorsoventral views (two different specimens); (E) deirid; (F) detail of cuticle at middle part of body. (a) Amphid; (b) cephalic papilla; (p) pseudolabium; (s) sublabium.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 6

Ascarophis (Ascarophis) nasonis Machida, 1981 from Naso spp., scanning electron micrographs. (A) Tail of male, sublateral view (arrows indicate postanal papillae); (B) precloacal region of male, ventrolateral view (arrows indicate preanal papillae); (C) region of cloaca, subventral view; (D) posterior part of male tail, ventral view (arrows indicate postanal papillae); (E) anterior end of body, lateral view; (F) tail of female, lateral view; (G) posterior end of female tail, lateral view. (c) Cloacal aperture; (d) median depression on posterior cloacal lip; (e) papillae of first postanal pair; (f) deirid; (g) anus; (h) phasmid.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 7

Ascarophisnema tridentatum Moravec et Justine, 2010 from Gymnocranius grandoculis, female.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 8

Ascarophisnema tridentatum Moravec et Justine, 2010 from Gymnocephalus grandoculis, scanning electron micrographs of female. (A, B) Cephalic end, lateral and apical views, respectively (arrows indicate tooth-like pseudolabial extensions); (C) cephalic end, dorsoventral view (arrow indicates tooth-like pseudolabial extension); (D) enlarged region of pseudolabium, dorsoventral view; (E) deirid; (F) anterior end of body, sublateral view. (a) Amphid; (b) cephalic papilla; (d) deirid; (p) pseudolabium; (s) sublabium.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 9

Ascarophisnema tridentatum Moravec et Justine, 2010 from Gymnocranius grandoculis, scanning electron micrographs of female. (A) Tail, lateral view; (B) posterior part of tail, lateral view; (C) tail tip; (D) detail of cuticle at anterior part of body. (g) Anus; (h) phasmid.
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.