EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 26 (2019) Parasite, 26 (2019) 73 Full HTML
Open Access
Issue
Parasite
Volume 26, 2019
Article Number 73
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2019072
Published online 19 December 2019

© O.M. Amin et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2019

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Most of the recent taxonomic work on the Acanthocephala from Vietnam has been reported by the Amin–Heckmann–Ha team since 2000. We have described over 50 acanthocephalan species and higher taxa from freshwater and marine fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals in Vietnam. A complete listing of this taxonomic literature can be found in Amin et al. [7]. Three other species of Rhadinorhynchus and one species of Gorgorhynchus were previously reported from marine fishes in Vietnam [9].

Eighteen species of acanthocephalans in five families were more recently collected from fishes in the Pacific and amphibians in central Vietnam in 2016 and 2017. Amin et al. [3] discussed the taxonomic status and history of the genus Heterosentis Van Cleave, 1931, with Arhythmacanthus Yamaguti, 1935 as its junior synonym, based on the number of different types of hooks on the proboscis, listed its 15 known species and their distribution, and noted that “the distribution of species of Heterosentis corresponds to that of its host species from the Indo-West Pacific into the Eastern Mediterranean via the Red Sea.”

In the present report, we expand the morphological description of Heterosentis holospinus Amin, Heckmann, Ha, 2011 (Arhythmacanthidae) from the common ponyfish, Leiognathus equulus (Forsskål) (Leiognathidae) in Halong Bay, Vietnam. The common pony fish is distributed in brackish and marine waters from East Africa to Fiji, in the Indian and Western Pacific oceans, Red Sea, and the Arabian Gulf [16]. We also provide, for the first time, descriptions of its molecular profile and Energy Dispersive X-ray pattern, as well as its micropores.

Materials and methods

Collections

Specimens of H. holospinus were collected from an undetermined number of individuals of the common ponyfish, Leiognathus equulus (Forsskål) (Leiognathidae), which were concurrently infected with other acanthocephalans, off the central Pacific coast of Vietnam at Quang Binh (17°30′ N 106°20′ E) in the Gulf of Tonkin near Halong Bay on May 15, 2017, and previously recorded but not described [22] from the same host species in Quang Ninh, also in the Halong Bay area.

Freshly collected specimens were extended in water until proboscides everted then fixed in 70% ethanol for transport to our Arizona, USA laboratory for processing and further studies.

Methods

Worms were punctured with a fine needle and subsequently stained in Mayer’s acid carmine, destained in 4% hydrochloric acid in 70% ethanol, dehydrated in ascending concentrations of ethanol (24 h each), and cleared in 100% xylene then in 50% Canada balsam, and 50% xylene (24 h each). Whole worms were then mounted in Canada balsam. Measurements are in micrometers, unless otherwise noted; the range is followed by the mean values between parentheses. Width measurements represent maximum width. Trunk length does not include proboscis, neck, or bursa.

Specimens were deposited in the University of Nebraska’s State Museum’s Harold W. Manter Laboratory (HWML) collection no. 139404 (voucher specimens on 1 slide), Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

SEM (scanning electron microscopy)

Two specimens that had been fixed and stored in 70% ethanol were processed for SEM following standard methods [27]. These included critical point drying (CPD) in sample baskets and mounting on SEM sample mounts (stubs) using conductive double-sided carbon tape. Samples were coated with gold and palladium for 3 min using a Polaron #3500 sputter coater (Quorum (Q150 TES) https://www.quorumtech.com), establishing an approximate thickness of 20 nm. Samples were placed and observed in an FEI Helios Dual Beam Nanolab 600 (FEI, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA) Scanning Electron Microscope with digital images obtained in the Nanolab software system (FEI) and then transferred to a USB for future reference. Samples were received under low vacuum conditions using 10 kV, spot size 2, 0.7 Torr using a GSE detector.

Energy dispersive X-ray analysis

Standard methods were used for preparation similar to the SEM procedure. Specimens were examined and positioned with the above SEM instrument, which was equipped with a Phoenix energy-dispersive X-ray analyzer (FEI). X-ray spot analysis and live scan analysis were performed at 16 kV with a spot size of five and results were recorded on charts and stored with digital imaging software attached to a computer. The TEAM (Texture and Elemental Analytical Microscopy) software system (FEI) was used. Data were stored on a USB for future analysis. The data included weight percent and atom percent of the detected elements following correction factors.

Ion sectioning of hooks

A dual-beam SEM with a gallium (Ga) ion source (GIS) is used for the LIMS (Liquid Ion Metal Source) part of the process. The hooks of the acanthocephalans were centered on the SEM stage and cross sectioned using a probe current between 0.2 nA and 2.1 nA, according to the rate at which the area is cut. The time of cutting was based on the nature and sensitivity of the tissue. Following the initial cut, the sample also underwent a milling process to obtain a smooth surface. The cut was then analyzed with X-ray at the tip, middle, and base of hooks for chemical ions with an electron beam (Tungsten) to obtain an X-ray spectrum. Results were stored with the attached imaging software. The intensity of the GIS was variable, according to the nature of the material being cut.

Molecular methods

Genetic comparisons and phylogenetic analyses were based on a fragment of 621 bp of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene. Sequences of four individuals of Heterosentis holospinus from ponyfish Leiognathus equulus from two collections constituted the Vietnam sample. The samples were digested overnight at 55 °C and genomic DNA was isolated using a commercial extraction kit (Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and the COI gene was amplified using the primers detailed by Folmer et al. [15]. PCR amplification of COI was carried out in 25 μL. Thermal cycling parameters for rDNA amplifications included a denaturation period of 3 min at 94 °C, followed by denaturation of 30 s, annealing of 45 s at 48 °C, and extension of 1 min at 72 °C, with final incubation at 72 °C for 10 min [37]. Amplicons were sequenced using an external sequencing service (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, South Korea). New DNA sequences were edited using Codon-Code (Codon Code Aligner, Dedham, Massachusetts, USA) and deposited in GenBank (MN715352–MN715355). The 4 new sequences were integrated to a matrix with other sequences downloaded from GenBank. Sampling included all available sequences belonging to species of the family Arhythmacanthidae along with sequences of the genera Acanthocephalus (Echinorhynchidae) and Filisoma (Cavisomidae), which are phylogenetically close to Arhythmacanthidae. In addition, sequences of one species of each family of the orders Echinorhynchida and Polymorphida were also included (Table 1). As such, the ingroup encompasses 31 sequences; sequences of Atactorhynchus duranguensis, Hebesoma violentum and Mayarhynchus karlae which belong to the Class Eoacanthocephala were used as the outgroup.

Table 1

Species of acanthocephalans, their hosts, origins, and GenBank accession numbers used for phylogenetic analysis based on the cox1 gene.

Sequences were aligned in Clustal as implemented in MEGA 7 [26], using default parameter values. Observed genetic p-distances (p) between haplotype and sample pairs were calculated in MEGA 7. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred via maximum likelihood analyses using IQ-TREE [33], as implemented in the online W-IQ-TREE (http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at; [40]). The IQ-TREE software was also used to select the model of nucleotide substitution (TPM3 + G4). Support for clades found in the most likely tree was calculated via the SH-aLRT test [21] and with 1000 ultrafast bootstrap pseudo-replications (BL) also with IQ-TREE.

Results

Specimens of H. holospinus are recorded from a new host, L. equulus (family Leiognathidae) which was concurrently infected with other acanthocephalans, in a new locality off Quang Ninh at the Gulf of Tonkin near Halong Bay, where the type specimens were originally collected. Heterosentis holospinus is apparently wide spread in fish from at least two percid families in the Halong Bay area.

New morphological observations of specimens from recent collection (Figs. 1–6)

Ten specimens of H. holospinus were collected from Leiognathus equulus Forsskål (Leiognathidae) in Quang Binh, Gulf of Tonkin on May 15, 2017 [22]. Six of these specimens were processed for microscopical studies. We provide morphological comparisons with the original description by Amin et al. [3]. The six specimens (one male and five gravid females) were similar to those described earlier [3], but with some disparities. Comparable and new descriptive features were noted in the SEM images, including the proboscis with apical and larger subapical hooks, unspined anterior trunk cone, and post-cone spined trunk (Fig. 1), one of 3–4 small spine-like hooks in a row (Fig. 2), a field of trunk spines (Fig. 3), a single magnified trunk spine exhibiting its unusual duck-billed shape and its innervation with micropores like those in the adjacent body wall (Figs. 4 and 5), and the posterior end of a female specimen showing the posterior-most distribution of trunk spines (Fig. 6). We also observed the characteristic receptacle shape, the plump longer lemnisci, and trunk shape, and size. The male reproductive structures, especially the shape of the thick sperm ducts, the rounded bursa, and the shape, and position of the testes and cement glands were comparable to those noted in the original description. The female reproductive system especially the complex vagina, the prominent and widening uterus, the uterine bell with many cells, and the eggs were also very similar. The nucleated pouch at the posterior end of the receptacle was, however, not consistently prominent and the trunk spines in the microscope specimens were faint and less readily distinct.

thumbnail Figures 1–6

SEM of specimens of Heterosentis holospinus from Leiognathus equulus from Vietnam. (1) The anterior part of a worm showing the proboscis, the spineless anterior trunk cone, and the anterior part of the spiny trunk. (2) A longitudinal Gallium cut section of the anterior hook. Note the thickness of the hook layers and the relationship between the hook and the size and shape of the root. (3) Posterior hooks of the proboscis. (4) A general view of trunk spines and their pattern of distribution. (5) A high magnification of a typical duck-bill-shaped trunk spine showing a continuation of trunk micropores. (6) Micropores in a mid-section of the trunk.

Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA)

Figures 7 and 8, and Table 2 demonstrate that different parts of the hook vary in the composition and distribution of metals with the basal hook arch having a considerably higher level of calcium and phosphorus but lower level of sulfur than the hook tip and edge.

thumbnail Figure 7

Energy dispersive X-ray spectrum of the basal arch of a Gallium cut hook of a Heterosentis holospinus specimen showing high levels of calcium and phosphorus similar to those of the hook base (Table 2). The X-ray data are the elemental analysis of the hook arch (see bolded figures in Table 2). Insert: SEM of a longitudinal Gallium cut hook.

thumbnail Figure 8

Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectrum of a Gallium cut hook tip of a Heterosentis holospinus specimen showing high levels of sulfur similar to those of the hook edge at mid-cut (Table 2). The X-ray data are the elemental analysis of the hook tip (see bolded figures in Table 2). Insert: SEM of a whole proboscis and cross sections near the hook tip of Gallium cut hooks showing the thick, high-sulfur hook edge.

Table 2

Chemical composition of Gallium (LMIS) cut hooks of Heterosentis holospinus.*

Molecular results

The phylogenetic tree of the Class Palaeacanthocephala (Fig. 9) is subdivided into eleven orders and three individuals belong to the Class Eoacanthocephala as outgroup. Within the order Arhythmacanthidae Yamaguti, 1935 and among the four sequences of H. holospinus, two distinct haplotypes were found (haplotype I [XX14–XX18]; haplotype II [XX02–XX04]), that showed a low level of genetic variation (0.5%). In the genealogical analysis (Fig. 9), these haplotypes form a strongly supported (BL = 100) monophyletic group, which is sister to Acanthocephaloides propinquus (Dujardin, 1845) Meyer, 1932 in a moderately supported clade (BL = 87) corresponding to Arhythmacanthidae. Sequences of H. holospinus and A. propinquus and order Arhythmacanthidae and Eoacanthocephalans sequences differ on average by 28% and 45%, respectively.

thumbnail Figure 9

Genealogical relationships of haplotypes of the cox1 gene of specimens of Heterosentis holospinus and specimens of Class Palaeacanthocephala recovered in a maximum likelihood analysis (Ln = −11,079.294). Support values, only given for species and multispecies clades, correspond to SH-aLRT test and ultrabootstrap proportions. The number below the internal nodes shows ML bootstrap support values. The clades with different colors, Echinorhynchidae (red), Cavisomidae (green), and Rhadinorhynchidae (blue) indicate a paraphyletic arrangement. GenBank accession numbers are also given at the terminal labels and bolded names were generated in this study.

Regarding other palaeacanthocephalan families, two are not monophyletic. One of these is Echinorhynchidae as per analyzed species of the family. However, Echinorhynchus bothniensis Zdzitowiecki et Valtonen, 1987 forms a paraphyletic group to Cavisomidae, as Pseudoacanthocephalus Petrochenko, 1956 falls within Filisoma Van Cleave, 1928. Meanwhile, E. bothniensis constitutes the second lineage of echinorhynchids that is a highly divergent lineage within the radiation of Palaeacanthocephala. Also, E. bothniensis falls in a moderately supported clade (BL = 79) with Illiosentidae, Centrorhynchidae, Plagiorhynchidae, and Polymorphidae. The second family that is not monophyletic is Rhadinorhynchidae. Neorhadinorhynchus nudus (Harada, 1938) Yamaguti, 1939 forms a part of the main clade (BL = 79) of Palaeacanthocephala together with (BL = 98) Gymnorhadinorhynchidae, Transvenidae, which is sister (BL = 79) to the clade N. nudus-Gymnorhadinorhynchidae, and the family Pomphorhynchidae (BL = 98). Meanwhile, Gorgorhynchoides bullocki Cable and Mafarachisi, 1970 appear as sisters, in a weakly supported (BL = 59) relationship, to Centrorhynchidae. This latter clade is sister (BL = 60) to the clade (BL = 82) formed by Plagiorhynchidae and Polymorphidae. Finally, Illiosentidae (BL = 100) is sister to all other palaeacanthocephalans.

Discussion

Morphology

A number features observed in this collection provided an enhanced description of H. holospinus that was not available in previous material and confirmed its morphological identity from a second host species, L. Equulus, in a second family (Leiognathidae) in a new locality. New details of the anterior trunk cone, proboscis hooks, micropores, wholly spined trunk, duck-bill-like spines with micropores, and micropore distribution, increase our understanding of the anatomy of this species. New information on the unique chemical composition of its hooks added new elements to its description supporting its unique “personality.”

Micropores

The electron dense micropores present throughout epidermal surface of the trunk of H. holospinus have not been discussed in the two other descriptions of the species [3, 22]. The micropores of H. holospinus, like those reported from other species of the Acanthocephala, are associated with internal crypts and vary in diameter and distribution in different trunk regions corresponding to differential absorption of nutrients. We have reported micropores in a large number of acanthocephalan species [23] and in a few more since, and demonstrated the tunneling from the cuticular surface into the internal crypts by TEM. Amin et al. [2] gave a summary of the structural–functional relationship of the micropores in various acanthocephalan species, including Rhadinorhynchus ornatus Van Cleave, 1918, Polymorphus minutus (Goeze, 1782) Lühe, 1911, Moniliformis moniliformis (Bremser, 1811) Travassos (1915), Macracanthorhynchus hirudinaceus (Pallas, 1781) Travassos (1916, 1917), and Sclerocollum rubrimaris Schmidt and Paperna, 1978. Byram and Fisher [13] and Wright and Lumsden [44] reported that the peripheral canals of the micropores are continuous with canalicular crypts. These crypts appear to “constitute a huge increase in external surface area… implicated in nutrient up take.” Whitfield [43] estimated a 44-fold increase at a surface density of 15 invaginations per 1 μm2 of Moniliformis moniliformis (Bremser, 1811) Travassos, 1915 tegumental surface. The micropores and the peripheral canal connections to the canaliculi of the inner layer of the tegument of Corynosoma strumosum (Rudolphi, 1802) Lühe, 1904 from the Caspian seal Pusa caspica (Gmelin) in the Caspian Sea were demonstrated by transmission electron micrographs in Amin et al. [4]. All the micropores that have been studied have the same basic plan; presumably because they have the same functions and similar variations, due to differential absorption occurring across the species that have been studied.

Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA)

Results of the X-ray scans of the gallium cut hooks (dual beam SEM) of H. holospinus show differential composition and distribution of metals in different hook parts, with the calcium and phosphorus being considerably higher at the basal arch of hooks where tension and strength are paramount compared to the hook tip and edge where the level of sulfur was considerably higher (Table 2, Figs. 7 and 8). The chemical elements present in the hooks are typical for acanthocephalans [1, 5, 6, 22]. Note the thin outer layer (Fig. 2) of the hook which relates to the sulfur (S) content (Table 2) in the hook of H. holospinus, which is less than in other acanthocephalans [1, 6]. The high sulfur content shows up in the outer edge of X-ray scans of hooks (Table 2, Amin et al. [6]). The hook center in mid cuts has a completely different chemical profile than the cortical layer (Table 2). X-ray scans (EDXA) provide insight into the hardened components, e.g., calcium and phosphorus, of acanthocephalan hooks. The EDXA appears to be species-specific, as in finger prints, and is shown to have significant diagnostic value in acanthocephalan systematics, e.g. Moniliformis cryptosaudi Amin, Heckmann, Sharifdini, & Albayati, 2019 was erected based primarily on its EDXA pattern [8].

Molecular discussion

The molecular analysis showed that H. holospinus, parasite of L. equulus from Vietnam, exhibits a low level of genetic variation; recovered haplotypes differ on average by 0.5%. At the same time, H. holospinus is highly divergent (28%) from A. propinquus, the other member of Arhythmacanthidae included in the analysis, and this species, in the present analysis, appears as its sister species. The limited size of the analyzed sample (four specimens) may provide a biased picture on the genetic diversity of the species. Nevertheless, this may not be the only cause of the low level of genetic diversity observed. Similar results were found for the genus Profilicollis Meyer, 1931 [30, 38]. The results of the present study should be seen as the starting point for clarifying the level and patterns of genetic variation in H. holospinus.

Various studies have suggested that the classification of acanthocephalans based only on morphological characters is unstable due to the existence of a conservative and simple morphology [12, 19, 34, 36]. Our findings, in accordance with those of previous studies [17, 36, 41] substantiate that the classification of Palaeacanthocephala needs adjustments. We found that two families, Echinorhynchidae and Rhadinorhynchidae, are not monophyletic. This finding is somewhat not surprising as acanthocephalan classification is mostly based on morphologic characters that may be prone to convergence. Additional analyses, including denser taxonomic and character sampling is much needed in order to obtain a robust phylogeny that would support a more stable classification and be the backbone for evolutionary and ecology studies.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare compliance with relevant ethical standards and no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The specimens were previously provided by Dr. Nguyen Van Ha, Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Hanoi, Vietnam, as has already been acknowledged [22], to whom we express our gratitude. This project was supported by an Institutional Grant from the Biology Department, Brigham Young University (BYU), Provo, Utah, and the Parasitology Center, Inc. (PCI), Scottsdale, Arizona. We thank Madison Laurence, Bean Museum (BYU), Provo, Utah for expert help in the preparation and organization of plates and figures, and Michael Standing, Electron Optics Laboratory (BYU), for his technical help and expertise.

References

  1. Amin OM, Heckmann RA. 2017. Neoandracantha peruensis n. gen. n. sp. (Acanthocephala: Polymorphidae) described from cystacanths infecting the ghost crab Ocypode gaudichaudi on the Peruvian coast. Parasite, 24, 1–15. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amin OM, Heckmann RA, Radwan NA, Mantuano JS, Alcivar MAZ. 2009. Redescription of Rhadinorhynchus ornatus (Acanthocephala: Rhadinorhynchidae) from skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis, collected in the Pacific Ocean off South America, with special reference to new morphological features. Journal of Parasitology, 95, 656–664. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amin OM, Heckmann RA, Ha NV. 2011. Description of Heterosentis holospinus n. sp. (Acanthocephala: Arhythmacanthidae) from the striped eel catfish Plotosus lineatus in Halong Bay, Vietnam, with a key to species of Heterosentis and reconsideration of the subfamilies of Arhythmacanthidae. Comparative Parasitology, 78, 29–38. [Google Scholar]
  4. Amin OM, Heckmann RA, Halajian A, El-Naggar AM. 2011. The morphology of an unique population of Corynosoma strumosum (Acanthocephala, Polymorphidae) from the Caspian seal, Pusa caspica, in the land-locked Caspian Sea using SEM, with special notes on histopathology. Acta Parasitologica, 56, 438–445. [Google Scholar]
  5. Amin OM, Heckmann RA, Zargar UR. 2017. Description of a new quadrigyrid acanthocephalan from Kashmir, with notes on metal analysis and histology, and a key to species of the subgenus Acanthosentis from the Indian subcontinent. Journal of Parasitology, 103, 458–470. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Amin OM, Heckmann RA, Ha NV. 2018. Descriptions of Acanthocephalus parallelcementglandatus (Echinorhynchidae) and Neoechinorhynchus (N.) pennahia (Neoechinorhynchidae) (Acanthocephala) from amphibians and fish in Central and Pacific coast of Vietnam, with notes on N. (N.) longnucleatus. Acta Parasitologica, 63, 572–585. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amin OM, Heckmann RA, Dallarés S, Constenla M, Ha NV. 2019. Morphological and molecular description of Rhadinorhynchus laterospinosus Amin, Heckmann, Ha, 2011 (Acanthocephala: Rhadinorhynchidae) from marine fish off the Pacific coast of Vietnam. Parasite, 26, 14. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Amin OM, Heckmann RA, Sharifdini M, Albayati NY. 2019. Moniliformis cryptosaudi n. s (Acanthocephala: Moniliformidae) from the long-eared hedgehog Hemiechinus auratus (Gmelin) (Erinaceidae) in Iraq; a case of incipient cryptic speciation related to M. Saudi in Saudi Arabia. Acta Parasitologica, 64, 195–204. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Arthur JR, Te BQ. 2006. Check list of parasites of fishes of Vietnam. FAO Fisher Tech Paper 369/2. Rome, Italy: Fishery Resources Div., 123 pp. [Google Scholar]
  10. Baker TG, Sotka E. 2005. Population structure of Dollfusentis chandleri (Acanthocephala) based on the COI gene and implications on croaker stock structure. USA: Grice Marine Laboratory, College of Charleston. [Google Scholar]
  11. Benesh DP, Hasu T, Suomalainen LR, Valtonen ET, Tiirola M. 2006. Reliability of mitochondrial DNA in an acanthocephalan: The problem of pseudogenes. International Journal for Parasitology, 36, 247–254. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Braicovich PE, Lanfranchi AL, Farber MD, Marvaldi AE, Luque JL, Timi JT. 2014. Genetic and morphological evidence reveals the existence of a new family, genus and species of Echinorhynchida (Acanthocephala). Folia Parasitologica, 61, 377–384. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Byram JE, Fisher FM Jr. 1973. The absorptive surface of Moniliformis dubius (Acanthocephala). 1. Fine structure. Tissue & Cell, 5, 553–579. [Google Scholar]
  14. Costa-Fernandes VS, Amin O, Borges JN, Santos CP. 2019. A new species of the Acanthocephalan genus Filisoma (Cavisomidae) from Perciform fishes in Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Acta Parasitologica, 64, 176–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3, 294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Froese R, Pauly D. 2015. Fishbase, “Leiognathus equulus”. http://www.fishbase.org. [Google Scholar]
  17. García-Varela M, Nadler SA. 2005. Phylogenetic relationship of Palaeacanthocephala (Acanthocephala) inferred from SSU and LSU rDNA gene sequences. Journal of Parasitology, 91, 1401–1409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. García-Varela M, Nadler SA. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships among Syndermata inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 40, 61–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. García-Varela M, Pérez-Ponce de León G. 2008. Validating de systematic position of Profilicollis Meyer, 1931 and Hexaglandula Petrochenko, 1950 (Acanthocephala: Polymorphidae) using citochrome c oxidase (Cox 1). Journal of Parasitology, 94, 212–217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. García-Varela M, Mendoza-Garfias B, Choudhury A, Pérez-Ponce de León G. 2017. Morphological and molecular data for a new species of Pomphorhynchus Monticelli, 1905 (Acanthocephala: Pomphorhynchidae) in the Mexican redhorse Moxostoma austrinum Bean (Cypriniformes: Catostomidae) in central Mexico. Systematic Parasitology, 94, 989–1006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hor-dijk W, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihhod phylogenies: assesing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology, 59, 307–321. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ha NV, Amin OM, Ngo HD, Heckmann RA. 2018. Descriptions of acanthocephalans, Cathayacanthus spinitruncatus (Rhadinorhynchidae) male and Pararhadinorhynchus magnus n. sp. (Diplosentidae), from marine fish of Vietnam, with notes on Heterosentis holospinus (Arhythmacanthidae). Parasite, 25, 35. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Heckmann RA, Amin OM, El-Naggar AM. 2013. Micropores of Acanthocephala, a scanning electron microscopy study. Scientia Parasitologica, 14, 105–113. [Google Scholar]
  24. Irena VS, Damir V, Damir K, Zrinka D, Emil G, Helena C, Emin T. 2013. Molecular characterisation and infection dynamics of Dentitruncus truttae from trout (Salmo trutta and Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Krka River, Croatia. Veterinary Parasitology, 197, 604–613. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kang J, Li L. 2018. First report on cystacanths of Sphaerirostris lanceloides (Petrochenko, 1949) (Acanthocephala: Centrorhynchidae) from the Asiatic toad Bufo gargarizans Cantor (Amphibia: Anura) in China. Systematic Parasitology, 95, 447–454. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33, 1870–1874. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee RE. 1992. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 458 p. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li L, Chen HX, Amin OM, Yang Y. 2018. Morphological variability and molecular characterization of Pomphorhynchus zhoushanensis sp. nov. (Acanthocephala: Pomphorhynchidae), with comments on the systematic status of Pomphorhynchus Monticelli, 1905. Parasitology International, 66, 693–698. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li L, Wayland MT, Chen HX, Yang Y. 2018. Remarkable morphological variation in the proboscis of Neorhadinorhynchus nudus (Harada, 1938) (Acanthocephala: Echinorhynchida). Parasitology, 146, 348–355. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lorenti E, Rodríguez SM, Cremonte F, D’Elía G, Díaz JI. 2018. Life cycle of the parasite Profilicollis chasmagnathi (Acanthocephala) on the Patagonian coast of Argentina based on morphological and molecular data. Journal of Parasitology, 104, 479–485. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Malyarchuk B, Derenko M, Mikhailova E, Denisova G. 2014. Phylogenetic relationships among Neoechinorhynchus species (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae) from North-East Asia based on molecular data. Parasitology International, 63, 100–107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nakao M. 2016. Pseudoacanthocephalus toshimai sp. nov. (Palaeacanthocephala: Echinorhynchidae), a common acanthocephalan of anuran and urodelan amphibians in Hokkaido, Japan, with a findings of its intermediate host. Parasitology International, 65, 323–332. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pichelin S, Cribb TH. 1999. A review of the Arhytmacanthidae (Acanthocephala) with a description of Heterosentis hirsutus n. sp. from Cnidoglanis macrocephala (Plotosidae) in Australia. Parasite, 6, 293–302. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pinacho-Pinacho CD, Hernández-Orts JS, Sereno-Uribe AL, Pérez-Ponce de León G, García-Varela M. 2017. Mayarhynchus karlae n. g., n. sp. (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae), a parasite of cichlids (Perciformes: Cichlidae) in southeastern Mexico, with comments on the paraphyly of Neoechinorhynchus Stiles & Hassall, 1905. Systematic Parasitology, 94, 351–365. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Presswell B, García-Varela M, Smales LR. 2017. Morphological and molecular characterization of two new species of Andracantha (Acanthocephala: Polymorphidae) from New Zealand shags (Phalacrocoracidae) and penguins (Spheniscidae) with a key to the species. Journal of Helminthology, 92, 740–751. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rodríguez SM, D’Elía G. 2016. Pan-American marine coastal distribution of Profilicollis altmani based on morphometric and phylogenetic analysis of cystacanths from the mole crab Emerita brasiliensis. Journal of Helminthology, 91, 371–375. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rodríguez SM, D’Elía G, Valdivia N. 2017. The phylogeny and life cycle of two species of Profilicollis (Acanthocephala: Polymorphidae) in marine hosts off the Pacific coast of Chile. Journal of Helminthology, 91, 589–596. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Steinauer ML, Garcia-Vedrenne AE, Weinstein SB, Kuris AM. 2019. Acanthocephalan parasites of the Oarfish, Regalecus russelii (Regalecidae), with a description of a new species of Gymnorhadinorhynchus (Acanthocephala: Gymnorhadinorhynchidae). Journal of Parasitology, 105, 124–132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Trifinoupoulus J, Nguyen LT, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2016. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research, 44, 232–235. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Verweyen L, Klimpel S, Palm HW. 2011. Molecular phylogeny of the Acanthocephala (Class Palaeacanthocephala) with a paraphyletic assemblage of the Orders Polymorphida and Echinorhynchida. PLoS One, 6(12), e28285. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wayland MT, Vainio JK, Gibson DI, Herniou EA, Littlewood DT, Väinölä R. 2015. The systematics of Echinorhynchus zoega in Müller, 1776 (Acanthocephala, Echinorhynchidae) elucidated by nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data from eight European taxa. Zookeys, 26, 25–52. [Google Scholar]
  43. Whitfield PJ. 1979. The biology of parasitism: An introduction to the study of associating organisms. Baltimore, Maryland: University Park Press. 277 p. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wright RD, Lumsden RD. 1969. Ultrastructure of the tegumentary pore-canal system of the acanthocephalan Moniliformis dubius. Journal of Parasitology, 55, 993–1003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Amin OM, Rodríguez SM & Heckmann RA. 2019. Morphological updates and molecular description of Heterosentis holospinus Amin, Heckmann, & Ha, 2011 (Acanthocephala, Arhythmacanthidae) in the Pacific Ocean off Vietnam. Parasite 26, 73.

All Tables

Table 1

Species of acanthocephalans, their hosts, origins, and GenBank accession numbers used for phylogenetic analysis based on the cox1 gene.

In the text
Table 2

Chemical composition of Gallium (LMIS) cut hooks of Heterosentis holospinus.*

In the text

All Figures

thumbnail Figures 1–6

SEM of specimens of Heterosentis holospinus from Leiognathus equulus from Vietnam. (1) The anterior part of a worm showing the proboscis, the spineless anterior trunk cone, and the anterior part of the spiny trunk. (2) A longitudinal Gallium cut section of the anterior hook. Note the thickness of the hook layers and the relationship between the hook and the size and shape of the root. (3) Posterior hooks of the proboscis. (4) A general view of trunk spines and their pattern of distribution. (5) A high magnification of a typical duck-bill-shaped trunk spine showing a continuation of trunk micropores. (6) Micropores in a mid-section of the trunk.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 7

Energy dispersive X-ray spectrum of the basal arch of a Gallium cut hook of a Heterosentis holospinus specimen showing high levels of calcium and phosphorus similar to those of the hook base (Table 2). The X-ray data are the elemental analysis of the hook arch (see bolded figures in Table 2). Insert: SEM of a longitudinal Gallium cut hook.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 8

Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectrum of a Gallium cut hook tip of a Heterosentis holospinus specimen showing high levels of sulfur similar to those of the hook edge at mid-cut (Table 2). The X-ray data are the elemental analysis of the hook tip (see bolded figures in Table 2). Insert: SEM of a whole proboscis and cross sections near the hook tip of Gallium cut hooks showing the thick, high-sulfur hook edge.
In the text
thumbnail Figure 9

Genealogical relationships of haplotypes of the cox1 gene of specimens of Heterosentis holospinus and specimens of Class Palaeacanthocephala recovered in a maximum likelihood analysis (Ln = −11,079.294). Support values, only given for species and multispecies clades, correspond to SH-aLRT test and ultrabootstrap proportions. The number below the internal nodes shows ML bootstrap support values. The clades with different colors, Echinorhynchidae (red), Cavisomidae (green), and Rhadinorhynchidae (blue) indicate a paraphyletic arrangement. GenBank accession numbers are also given at the terminal labels and bolded names were generated in this study.
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.