Open Access
Research Article
Issue
Parasite
Volume 26, 2019
Article Number 49
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2019051
Published online 21 August 2019

© F. Beugnet et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2019

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Ticks are endemic throughout the world with more than 800 species, of varying biology and geographic distribution [2]. Ticks commonly infest dogs and are vectors of various canine vector-borne pathogens including Babesia, Ehrlichia, Anaplasma, and Borrelia [1, 4]. Canine babesiosis is a clinically significant tick-borne protozoan disease [2]. Piroplasms in dogs are divided into two morphologically distinct groups, the large forms and the small forms (i.e. > or < the radius of erythrocytes). The large forms have been classified into three separate species, Babesia canis, B. rossi and B. vogeli [4, 20]. Each of these Babesia species is transmitted by a different tick vector, i.e. Dermacentor reticulatus for B. canis, Rhipicephalus sanguineus for B. vogeli and Haemaphysalis elliptica for B. rossi. The clinical signs of canine babesiosis vary from a mild transient illness to acute disease. Babesia vogeli is considered to be the least pathogenic species, inducing mild clinical signs like anaemia and fever, whereas B. canis often induces acute babesiosis including strong febrile syndrome, anaemia, haemoglobinuria, splenomegaly, and icterus. Babesia rossi is considered the most pathogenic, inducing severe haemolysis that rapidly results in death, with possible neurological signs related to intravascular thromboembolism, especially in brain blood vessels [2, 4, 11, 15, 20].

Babesia rossi is considered the primary agent of canine babesiosis, also called “biliary fever”, in South Africa, with jackals as reservoir hosts [5, 21, 22]. It often induces very severe forms, including a typical neuro-babesiosis that clinically resembles human Plasmodium falciparum neuro-malaria [5, 11, 21]. Clinical complications – including cerebral effects, intestinal haemorrhage, haemoglobinuria, acute renal failure and/or pulmonary oedema – are considered common by South African veterinarians and death can occur in more than 10% of cases [11, 15]. Babesia infection follows transmission of the causative agent to a dog during attachment and feeding by an infected tick. It can take more than 24 h of attachment to transmit the parasite from tick to dog, which provides a window of opportunity to kill the tick and prevent transmission [6, 14, 19]. The incubation period between the tick bite and the onset of clinical signs can be as short as two weeks, and signs are the result of intravascular red blood cell destruction following intra-erythrocytic asexual parasite reproduction [11, 15]. Clinically infected dogs are usually diagnosed through the observation of sporozoites in erythrocytes through a stained blood smear. Veterinarians treat canine babesiosis in South Africa with antiparasitic drug administration (i.e. imidocarb dipropionate) as well as blood transfusions and supportive care [11, 15].

Published studies demonstrating the utility of tick control compounds on dogs have been focused on their acaricidal efficacy against a broad range of ixodid tick species [10, 20]. Some experimental studies have shown the protective effect provided by topical (spot on and collar formulations) and oral acaricides against Babesia transmission [3, 8, 9, 12, 13, 18, 25]. Efficacy is based on the repellent/irritant effect by contact, inhibition of attachment and blood meal, and/or a quick speed of kill. The protective effect of an acaricidal molecule given orally to dogs and acting systemically is less obvious as the ticks must attach and start to feed before being killed [3, 9, 25]. Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that pathogens need some time to be transmitted [14, 19]. Moreover, on top of the killing effect, an acaricide may also block the feeding physiology of the tick. Afoxolaner, fluralaner and sarolaner, from the isoxazoline class, have been demonstrated to reduce the risk of transmission of the European Babesia canis species by Dermacentor reticulatus ticks [3, 9, 24]. In this article, we present the results of an experimental study to assess the efficacy of afoxolaner, administered orally in a soft chewable formulation (Nexgard®, Boehringer-Ingelheim), against Haemaphysalis elliptica ticks infected with Babesia rossi in dogs.

Materials and methods

The study was a parallel group, randomised, negative controlled, efficacy study [16]. It included three groups of seven dogs each at the start of the study, selected from an enrolled group of 24 dogs.

Group 1 dogs (n = 7) received no product (negative control) and were infested with B. rossi infected ticks on Day 2. Group 2 dogs (n = 7) were also negative controls, and were infested with B. rossi infected ticks on Day 28. Group 3 dogs (n = 7) were treated orally with NexGard® on Day 0, and were infested with B. rossi infected ticks on Days 2 and 28.

The included dogs were clinically healthy as verified by a veterinarian on Day −7 (group 1 and three dogs) or on Day 21 (group 2 dogs); they were seronegative and polymerase chain reaction (PCR−) negative prior to enrolment; they were ≥6 months old (Day −7 or Day 21); they weighed ≥ 10 kg [Day −2 or Day 27]; they were not clinically pregnant; and they had not been treated with a long-acting topical or systemic acaricide/insecticide (including products with repellent activity) during the 12 weeks preceding Day 0.

Sixteen dogs were enrolled on Day −7 and a further eight on Day 21. The 16 dogs enrolled on Day −7 were weighed on Day −2 and the 14 heavier dogs were allocated to groups 1 and 3. The 14 dogs included in the study on Day −2 were ranked within sex in descending order of individual body weights and subsequently blocked into seven blocks of two dogs each. Dog weight range was 11.0–26.5 kg and they were 13–88 months old.

The additional eight dogs enrolled on Day 21 were weighed on Day 27 and the seven heavier dogs were allocated to group 2. Veterinary examinations were performed on Day −7 and on all dogs included in the study on Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49 and 56. Animals were monitored daily for any health changes, and if any such case occurred, a clinical examination was performed.

The dog cages were located in an indoor animal unit, with environmentally controlled temperature (20 °C ± 4 °C). The animals were kept individually in cages (3.0 × 2.1 m). However, animals still had visual and auditory contact with conspecifics.

Each cage was fitted with a sleeping bench. At least one toy/chew was made available to each dog (replenished weekly). The protocol and accommodation were approved by ethics committees in consideration of the South African National Standard SANS 10386: “The care and use of animals for scientific purposes.”

The dogs were fed once a day. Water bowls were replenished at least twice daily.

NexGard® (afoxolaner 2.27% w/w) was administered to group 3 dogs on Day 0. Weighing between 11 and 22 kg, all treated dogs received a 68 mg afoxolaner chew as per the label (one chew for dogs from 10 to 25 kg). The chew was administered by placement in the back of the oral cavity over the tongue to initiate swallowing. No chew was lost due to spitting or vomiting by any of the animals; therefore, no re-dosing was necessary.

Dogs were infested with 50 adult (25 males and 25 females) H. elliptica ticks from a batch infected with B. rossi on Day 2 (groups 1, 3) and Day 28 (groups 2, 3). To facilitate tick infestation, ticks were released on the dog, manually restrained in an infestation crate for 10 min. Ticks were released onto the dorsal areas, behind the shoulder blades of the dog. Before each infestation, a sample of ticks was taken from the batch, and the infectivity was confirmed by PCR analyses. These ticks were fed at the nymphal stages on B. rossi infected dogs, using a method previously developed for Babesia canis [13]. They were then allowed to moult into the adult stage in order to obtain an infected batch of adult ticks.

The Babesia rossi isolate is maintained at ClinVet and was originally collected from the blood of one dog presenting clinical signs of severe babesiosis in a veterinary clinic in Bloemfontein (South Africa) in October 2017.

The ticks used were from a laboratory-bred colony of H. elliptica. The tick colony originated from >20 engorged female ticks collected on one dog in Bloemfontein in February 2014.

Ticks were counted by in situ thumb counting on Day 4 (groups 1, 3) and on Day 30 (groups 2, 3) (i.e. 48 h after infestation). Removal tick counts were conducted on Day 8 (groups 1, 3) and on Day 34 (groups 2, 3) (i.e. 144 h after infestation). The collected ticks were classified as live/dead and free/attached.

Blood samples (3 mL in EDTA tubes) were collected for PCR and immunofluorescence assay (IFA) analysis prior to study start, on Days 2 (prior to tick infestation), 14, 21, 28 (prior to tick infestation), 42, 49 and 56. Blood samples were also collected at any times when high body temperature (>39.4 °C) and/or clinical signs suggestive of babesiosis were observed on dogs (i.e. anaemia, diarrhoea, neurological signs, sleepiness, lethargy, inappetence, reddish urine) [11, 15, 21].

All dogs suspected of developing babesiosis were examined and two blood smears were prepared and evaluated for the presence of B. rossi sporozoites [11, 15, 21]. If a dog was positive for B. rossi on a blood smear, blood was kept for PCR analysis, and the dog immediately received rescue treatment. Rescue treatment consisted of 1 mL/20 kg body weight Berenil® RTU (diminazine aceturate) IM, followed by 1.2 mL/20 kg body weight Forray 65® (imidocarb dipropionate) SC the day following a dose of Berenil®. This therapy has been demonstrated to clear infections [11, 15].

IFAs were performed at ARC-Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute/Research (ARC-OVR, http://www.arc.agric.za/arc-ovi/Pages/ARC-OVI-Homepage.aspx).

Rectal body temperatures were recorded for all included dogs three times a week from Days 7 to 28 (groups 1, 3) and Days 33 to 56 (groups 2, 3). The completion of the animal phase of the study was on Day 28 for the animals in group 1 and on Day 56 for the dogs in groups 2 and 3.

For PCR, total genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood samples, using the GeneJet genomic DNA isolation kit (Thermo Scientific). PCR entailed the use of primers Babesia2F (5′–GGAAGGAGAAGTCGTAACAAGGTTTCC–3′) and Brossi2R (5′–CTCAGAACTTCAGGCCATCCAAAG–3′) specific for the amplification of the 18S–ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 region of B. rossi rDNA [20]. Up to 400 ng isolated DNA served as a template for PCR amplification of the target region. PCR entailed the use of Phire Green Hot Start II PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific) in a 20 μL reaction volume containing 500 nM of each primer. Thermal cycling entailed 98 °C for 5 min followed by 45 cycles of 98 °C for 5 s, 68 °C for 5 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, followed by a final elongation at 72 °C for 1 min. PCR products were analysed using agarose gel electrophoresis and results were documented. A PCR product of approximately 567 bp indicated the presence of the B. rossi rDNA target region in the sample. Positive, negative, no template, as well as internal amplification controls were included in each run. The PCR setup and conditions used in this study resulted in a minimum detection sensitivity of ≥5 target copies per PCR, and no cross-reaction with B. canis and B. vogeli DNA could be detected (data not shown).

For serology, the blood was allowed to clot at room temperature for 15 min prior to being centrifuged. For serum separation, the blood samples were centrifuged at room temperature. The serum was transferred to two pre-labelled cryo tubes (primary and duplicate aliquots) and stored at −18 °C or below after collection until shipment to the serology laboratory. For detection of B. rossi antibodies, the sera were diluted and results were expressed as 1/80 or 1/40 (indicating the sample being positive when fluorescence at dilution 1/80 or 1/40 was observed) or negative (no fluorescence).

The primary efficacy criterion was the number of dogs that became infected with B. rossi. A dog had a viable infection with B. rossi if the dog was positive for B. rossi on blood smear; or tested serologically positive for B. rossi antibodies; or tested positive for B. rossi by PCR analysis.

The percentage of transmission blocking efficacy for the treated groups was calculated as follows:where:

  • Tc = total number of untreated control dogs (group 1 or 2) that became infected;

  • Tt = total number of dogs that became infected in the IVP group (group 3).

In consideration of available guidelines, it was decided that the acaricidal efficacy calculations should be based on arithmetic mean values rather than geometric mean values.

Efficacy against ticks was calculated for the NexGard treated group at the assessment day according to the following formula:where:

  • Mc = Arithmetic mean number of live ticks (categories 1 and 2) on dogs in the negative control groups (group 1 or 2) at a specific time point;

  • Mt = Arithmetic mean number of live ticks (categories 1 and 2) on dogs in the IVP group (group 3) at a specific time point.

The statistical unit was the individual dog. The groups were compared using an ANOVA (Proc. GLM procedure in SAS) with a treatment effect on both untransformed and logarithmic transformed tick (count + 1) data. SAS Version 9.3 TS Level 1M2 was used for all the statistical analyses. The level of significance of the formal tests was set at 5%, all tests were two-sided.

Results

Fever and clinical signs associated with B. rossi infection were observed in 10 of the control dogs (6/6 dogs in control group 1, and 4/7 dogs in control group 2) with positive blood smears, confirming the pathogenicity of this Babesia species (Tables 1 and 4) [11, 15, 21]. Symptoms appeared 10–14 days after tick infestation. No infections could be observed on blood smears prepared for dogs treated with NexGard® (group 3) for the duration of the study.

Table 1

Signs reported during the daily health observations.

On Day 14, dog 287 8A5 (group control 1) was found collapsed in the cage, with increased and laboured breathing. A blood smear confirmed B. rossi infection with secondary acute respiratory distress syndrome. The rescue treatment was initiated immediately, including specific treatment and fluid therapy; nevertheless, the dog’s condition did not improve (Table 2). The dog died approximately two hours following the onset of treatment. A full post-mortem examination was performed and samples for histopathological analysis were collected. The post-mortem indicated congested lungs, liver and kidneys with widespread petechial haemorrhages, cyanosis and watery blood. B. rossi was also confirmed positive through PCR.

Table 2

Diagnosis and prescription of concomitant medication.

Dog DF6 793 (group 1) was inadvertently rescue treated on Day 15 due to fever and suspicion of babesiosis, which was finally not confirmed, and was therefore excluded from all statistical analyses.

Abnormal signs observed during daily observations are summarised in Table 1. Most signs observed were associated with infection with B. rossi.

The arithmetic mean number of attached H. elliptica ticks counted at 48 h and 144 h after infestation on Day 2 (groups 1, 3) and Day 28 (groups 2, 3) is shown in Table 3. The untreated control groups had an arithmetic mean ranging from 20.3 to 26.8 on these assessment days, demonstrating successful tick challenges.

Table 3

Acaricidal efficacy using arithmetic mean for Haemaphysalis elliptica ticks.

Based on arithmetic means, statistically significantly (p < 0.05) less ticks were observed on the NexGard® treated group compared to the untreated control groups (groups 1 and 2) on all assessment days. NexGard® provided 100% efficacy against H. elliptica ticks on all assessment days.

The infection rates of tick batches with B. rossi used for challenge on Days 2 and 28 were 12.8% and 6%, respectively.

The IFA results recorded during this study for each dog are summarised in Table 4. Babesia rossi antibodies were detected in all dogs (6/6) in the untreated control group 1, four dogs (4/7) in the untreated control group 2, and no dogs (0/7) in the afoxolaner treated group 3.

Table 4

Summary of body temperatures, blood smear analysis, IFA and PCR performed during the study.

The PCR results recorded during this study for each dog are summarised in Table 4. Babesia rossi DNA was detected in all dogs (6/6) dogs in the untreated control group 1, four dogs (4/7) in the untreated control group 2, and no dogs (0/7) in the afoxolaner treated group 3.

A dog was regarded as positively infected if it was positive for B. rossi on blood smear, tested serologically positive for B. rossi antibodies, or tested positive for B. rossi by PCR analysis. In this experimental study, all dogs infected with B. rossi tested positive for all three diagnostic techniques (blood smear, PCR and IFA). Based on the criteria above, 100% (6/6) dogs were infected in control group 1, 57.1% (4/7) in control group 2, and 0% (0/7) in NexGard® treated group 3 (for Days 2 and 28).

Discussion

Babesia species are considered to be pathogens with slow transmission by ticks, needing more than 48 h after tick attachment [14, 19]. Mehlhorn et al. have indicated a time of 48–72 h being required after initiation of attachment for sporogony of B. canis to occur in D. reticulatus, and for sporozoites to be able to be transmitted by the tick, as observed by microscopy [17]. Piesman & Spielman, 1980 observed transmission of Babesia microti in 36 h by Ixodes dammini to mice [23]. Consequently, it seems possible to decrease or prevent the transmission of Babesia species by using acaricidal treatment on animals. These treatments need to provide enough sustained speed of kill or a repellent effect. Thus, recent studies have been conducted in dogs to assess the preventive effect of anti-tick product against Babesia transmission [3, 9, 12, 13, 18, 24]. In all these models, as in the present study, adult ticks were allowed to feed on the animals for at least four days in order for the transmission to be observed in the negative control groups.

To conduct these experimental studies, the generation of a large batch of ticks with an adequate Babesia infection rate is necessary. This requires breeding tick colonies and to have Babesia infected donor dogs on which tick nymphs are fed [12]. The rate of infection in moulted adult ticks is calculated by conducting PCR on a batch of ticks. Regardless of which sex or if both sexes transmit the Babesia, the tick infection rate needs to be sufficient to successfully transmit the infection to the untreated (control) dogs. In this study, the infection rate was 12.8% at Day 2 (estimated from 40 ticks) and 6% (estimated from 50 ticks) at Day 28. This means that on average, 3–6 adult ticks deposited on each dog were infective. As a result, 10/14 untreated dogs were infected and were rescue treated immediately after diagnosis. The rescue treatment was particularly important when dealing with this highly pathogenic agent Babesia rossi. Even though the dogs were checked on a daily basis to observe the first sign of infection, i.e. lethargy and fever, one of the dogs died during this experiment. The early rescue treatment based on the appearance of fever for the majority of the infected control dogs in this study can explain the absence of the complete list of symptoms of babesiosis, including fever syndrome, anaemia, haemolysis, haemoglobinuria, and icterus [11, 15]. In line with published studies indicating an average of two weeks of incubation, we observed the first signs in control dogs on Day 14 after tick challenge. In all suspected cases, stained blood smears were positive for intra-erythrocytic forms of Babesia rossi. The PCR exam on blood provided the exact same results, and all infected dogs became seropositive within three weeks after tick challenge.

The acaricidal treatment assessed in this experiment was an oral formulation, meaning that ticks need to attach and start to feed before being killed. No data were available in regards to the efficacy of afoxolaner against Haemaphysalis elliptica, but only Dermacentor reticulatus [3, 7]. This study demonstrated 100% acaricidal efficacy of NexGard® against Haemaphysalis elliptica within 48 h (thumb counts) for 28 days. The sustained efficacy made it possible to prevent transmission of Babesia rossi in all treated dogs after two infective challenges, on Days 2 and 28, respectively.

Competing interest

The work reported herein was funded by Merial SAS, now part of Boehringer-Ingelheim. The authors are current employees or contractors of Boehringer-Ingelheim.

NEXGARD® is a registered trademark of Merial, now part of Boehringer-Ingelheim. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.

This document is provided for scientific purposes only. Any reference to a brand or trademark herein is for informational purposes only and is not intended for a commercial purpose or to dilute the rights of the respective owner(s) of the brand(s) and trademark(s).

Authors’ contributions

All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Baneth G. 2014. Tick-borne infections of animals and humans: a common ground. International Journal for Parasitology, 44, 591–596. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beugnet F. 2013. Guide to vector borne diseases of pets. Lyon, France: Ed. Merial. p. 425. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beugnet F, Halos L, Larsen D, Labuschagné M, Erasmus H, Fourie J. 2014. The ability of an oral formulation of afoxolaner to block the transmission of Babesia canis by Dermacentor reticulatus ticks to dogs. Parasites & Vectors, 7, 283. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chomel B. 2011. Tick-borne infections in dogs – an emerging infectious threat. Veterinary Parasitology, 179, 294–301. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark IA, Jacobson LS. 1998. Do babesiosis and malaria share a common disease process? Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 92, 483–488. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. 2016. Best practices for preventing vector-borne diseases in dogs and humans. Trends in Parasitology, 32, 43–55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dumont P, Blair J, Fourie J, Chester TS, Larsen D. 2014. Evaluation of the efficacy of Afoxolaner against two European dog tick species: Dermacentor reticulatus and Ixodes ricinus. Veterinary Parasitology, 201, 216–219. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fourie JJ, Stanneck D, Jongejan F. 2013. Prevention of transmission of Babesia canis by Dermacentor reticulatus ticks to dogs treated with an imidacloprid/flumethrin collar. Veterinary Parasitology, 192, 273–278. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Geurden T, Six R, Becskei C, Maeder S, Lloyd A, Mahabir S, Fourie J, Liebenberg J. 2017. Evaluation of the efficacy of sarolaner (Simparica®) in the prevention of babesiosis in dogs. Parasites & Vectors, 10(1), 415. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Halos L, Baneth G, Beugnet F, Bowman AS, Chomel B, Farkas R, Franc M, Guillot J, Inokuma H, Kaufman R, Jongejan F, Joachim A, Otranto D, Pfister K, Pollmeier M, Sainz A, Wall R. 2012. Defining the concept of “tick repellency” in veterinary medicine. Parasitology, 139, 419–423. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jacobson LS. 2006. The South African form of severe and complicated canine babesiosis: clinical advances 1994–2004. Veterinary Parasitology, 138, 126–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jongejan F, Fourie JJ, Chester ST, Manavella C, Mallouk Y, Pollmeier MG, Baggott D. 2011. The prevention of transmission of Babesia canis canis by Dermacentor reticulatus tick to dogs using a novel combination of fipronil, amitraz and (S)-methoprene. Veterinary Parasitology, 179, 343–350. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jongejan F, de Vos C, Fourie JJ, Beugnet F. 2015. A novel combination of fipronil and permethrin (Frontline Tri-Act®/Frontect®) reduces risk of transmission of Babesia canis by Dermacentor reticulatus and of Ehrlichia canis by Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks to dogs. Parasites & Vectors, 8, 602. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kidd L, Breitschwerdt EB. 2003. Transmission times and prevention of tick-borne diseases in dogs. Compendium on Continuing Education for Practitioner Veterinarians, 10, 742–751. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lavan R, Tunceli K, de Swardt H, Chelchinskey C, Abatzidis M, Armstrong R. 2018. Canine babesiosis treatment rates in South African veterinary clinics between 2011 and 2016. Parasites & Vectors, 11, 386. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marchiondo AA, Holdsworth PA, Fourie LJ, Rugg D, Hellmann K, Snyder DE, Dryden MW. 2013. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) second edition: guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of parasiticides for the treatment, prevention and control of flea and tick infestations on dogs and cats. Veterinary Parasitology, 194, 84–97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mehlhorn H, Schein E, Voigt WP. 1980. Light and electron microscopic study on developmental stages of Babesia canis within the gut of the tick Dermacentor reticulatus. Journal of Parasitology, 66, 220–228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Navarro C, Reymond N, Fourie J, Hellmann K, Bonneau S. 2015. Prevention of Babesia canis in dogs: efficacy of a fixed combination of permethrin and fipronil (Effitix®) using an experimental transmission blocking model with infected Dermacentor reticulatus ticks. Parasites & Vectors, 8, 32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Otranto D. 2018. Arthropod-borne pathogens of dogs and cats: From pathways and times of transmission to disease control. Veterinary Parasitology, 251, 68–77. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Otranto D, Wall R. 2008. New strategies for the control of arthropod vectors of disease in dogs and cats. Medical Veterinary and Entomology, 22, 291–302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Penzhorn BL. 2011. Why is Southern African canine babesiosis so virulent? An evolutionary perspective Parasites & Vectors, 4, 51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Penzhorn BL, Vorster I, Harrison-White RF, Oosthuizen MC. 2017. Black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) are natural hosts of Babesia rossi, the virulent causative agent of canine babesiosis in sub-Saharan Africa. Parasites & Vectors, 10, 124. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Piesman J. 1995. Dispersal of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdoferi to salivary glands of feeding nymphal Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 32, 519–521. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shoop WL, Hartline E, Gould B, Waddell M, McDowell R, Kinney J, Lahm G, Long J, Xu M, Wagerle T, Jones G, Dietrich R, Cordova D, Schroeder M, Rhoades D, Benner E, Confalone P. 2014. Discovery and mode of action of afoxolaner, a new isoxazoline parasiticide for dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, 201, 179–189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Taenzler J, Liebenberg J, Roepke RK, Heckeroth AR. 2015. Prevention of transmission of Babesia canis by Dermacentor reticulatus ticks to dogs treated orally with fluralaner chewable tablets (Bravecto™). Parasites & Vectors, 8, 305. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Beugnet F, Lebon W & de Vos C. 2019. Prevention of the transmission of Babesia rossi by Haemaphysalis elliptica in dogs treated with Nexgard®. Parasite 26, 49.

All Tables

Table 1

Signs reported during the daily health observations.

Table 2

Diagnosis and prescription of concomitant medication.

Table 3

Acaricidal efficacy using arithmetic mean for Haemaphysalis elliptica ticks.

Table 4

Summary of body temperatures, blood smear analysis, IFA and PCR performed during the study.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.