Open Access
Issue
Parasite
Volume 25, 2018
Article Number 43
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2018043
Published online 15 August 2018

© P. Quillfeldt et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2018

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Parasites play an important role in evolution. As they constantly co-evolve with their host, parasites have direct impacts on natural communities and are a key factor in ecosystems [11]. Parasitic infections can have a negative impact on the body condition of their hosts and lead to reduced expression of sexual ornaments [32] and decreased reproductive success [16, 38, 51].

The phylum Apicomplexa contains a large diversity of single-celled eukaryotic organisms, known to parasitize vertebrates, including humans, and invertebrate hosts. The Apicomplexa are a poorly studied group, where 1.2–10 million species have been estimated, but only about 0.1% have been named and described to date [2, 37]. A review concluded that much more widespread sampling needs to occur before any reliable phylogenies are likely to emerge [36]. Within the more than 300 recognized genera of Apicomplexa, there is a major bias in knowledge towards just five genera: Babesia, Cryptosporidium, Plasmodium, Theileria and Toxoplasma account for 98% of the nucleotide sequences of Apicomplexa found in the GenBank database [36]. Thus, although Apicomplexans constitute one of the largest components of world biodiversity, they are possibly the most poorly known large taxonomic group, in terms of biodiversity [2], although environmental genomic information has recently resulted in a wealth of new information (e.g. [3]). Taxon and character sampling still seem to be the most serious impediments to elucidating apicomplexan phylogeny.

Of the protozoan blood parasites of vertebrates, the best studied group is the suborder Haemosporina (e.g. genera Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, Leucocytozoon), which is common in birds and mammals. A specific database for these parasite genera in birds has been set up [6]. However, much less is known of the eight genera of the suborder Adeleorina, and the two genera (Lankesterella and Schellackia) of the suborder Eimeriorina. Many hemogregarines have been described in snakes and lizards [43].

In the present study, we analyzed blood samples collected from side-blotched lizards Uta stansburiana from San Benito Oeste Island, off the Mexican Pacific coast. Previous studies have suggested infection of Uta stansburiana hesperis in Santa Cruz Island, Southern California with Schellackia occidentalis [8]. A recent study of Uta stansburiana hesperis from Corn Springs (southern California) and from Los Baños (western California) confirmed the presence of S. occidentalis through microscopic examination of blood smears [31]. However, the phylogenetic analyses indicated that the 18S rRNA sequences were distant from Schellackia species found in Old World lizards, but were closely related to the genus Lankesterella Labbé, 1899. The suggested new nomenclature for this parasite is Lankesterella occidentalis (Bonorris & Ball, 1955) [31].

We therefore tested if this parasite also infects side-blotched lizards from the San Benito Islands, and if so, determined whether the geographic isolation led to genetic differences.

Materials and methods

Study site and study species

The study took place on San Benito Oeste Island, the largest of a group of three small islands off the Pacific coast of Baja California, Mexico (28°18′N, 115°35′W). Side-blotched lizards U. stansburiana stellata are very common on this island. They belong to the family Phrynosomatidae (Squamata) and are small iguanid lizards living on the Pacific coast of North America with body lengths up to 7 cm. Side-blotched lizards are generalists, but their main diet consists of small arthropods and they reproduce all year long [4]. Populations from San Benito and nearby Cedros Island were formerly separated as distinct species Uta stellata and U. concinna, but are now included in U. stansburiana.

Field work

Field work took place from August to September 2014. Lizards were caught by hand or in traps made from empty 5-L plastic water bottles with tomato juice and pieces of fresh or dried fruit used as bait. The base of the tail was disinfected with ethanol. Blood samples (n = 27) were drawn with a sterile syringe (0.33 mm, 29G) from the caudal (tail) vein, and a drop was transferred onto a Whatman FTA classic card. After sample collection, the lizards were released at the capture site.

Laboratory analyses

In the laboratory, a 2×2 mm piece of the dried blood sample was cut out of the FTA card and the DNA was isolated using an ammonium acetate protocol (adapted from [26]). The final DNA concentration of the sample was determined with a NanoDrop2000c UV-Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).

DNA samples were screened for the presence of parasitic DNA by PCR using primers HepF300 (5′-GTTTCTGACCTATCAGCTTTCGACG-3′) and Hep900 (5′-CAAATCTAAGAATTTCACCTCTGAC-3′) that target a part of the 18S rDNA gene in Hepatozoon spp. [47]. These primers were designed to amplify 633 bps of Hepatozoon DNA, but are also found to amplify DNA of other parasite species like Eimeria and Sarcocystis [17]. To obtain longer sequences for Sanger sequencing, we designed a new primer set Hep600F1N (5′-CTCGTAGTTGGATTTCTGTCG-3′) and Hep1615R (5′-AAAGGGCAGGGACGTAATC-3′, [27]), which amplifies 1029 bps of the DNA sequences (18SrRNA gene).

PCR amplicons were separated by gel electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel stained with Midori GreenTM (Biozym, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany) and 1× TAE (40 mM Tris, 20 mM acetic acid, 1 mM EDTA) as an electrophoresis buffer. A negative and a positive control (sample DNA of a Least storm-petrel (Oceanodroma microsoma) infected with Hepatozoon peircei [34]) were also included.

PCR reactions were run in a total volume of 16 μL containing 20 ng of template DNA, 8 μL Multiplex mastermix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with 3 mM MgCl2 and 0.2 μM of each primer. Reactions were cycled at the following parameters using a Biometra TPersonal Thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany): 94 °C for 15 min (polymerase activation), nine cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 65 °C for 90 s (annealing temperature was reduced by 1 °C each step), and 72 °C for 30 s. Finally, 30 cycles were performed at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 90 s and 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min.

PCR amplicons were visualized on agarose gels under UV light. PCR products from the samples with the strongest bands on the gel were sent to the Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology (Vienna, Austria) for sequencing with an Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Forward and reverse sequences were aligned using Codon Code Aligner 5.0 (CodonCode Corporation, Centerville, MA, USA) and sequences with any ambiguous positions were excluded. Sequences were aligned to sequences deposited in the GenBank nucleotide database using Blast (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Related sequences with the highest similarity (97–99%) were downloaded. The downloaded sequences, the consensus sequences from our own samples, and a sequence from Toxoplasma gondii (GenBank accession no. EF472967) as the outgroup were aligned in BIOEDIT [15] using the ClustalW multiple alignment tool. The final length was 1279 nucleotides, which contained 333 polymorphic sites, of which 147 were parsimony-informative.

A phylogenetic tree was inferred with the reference sequences and outgroup. The final alignment included 48 nucleotide sequences (one outgroup, 19 sequences from this study and 28 reference sequences).

The best suitable nucleotide substitution model (TN93 [44], with gamma distribution and invariant sites) for our alignment was determined jModelTest 2.1.7 [10] using Bayesian Information Criterion scores. A Bayesian phylogenetic tree was generated with BEAST v1.8.4 [12]. Model parameters for this analysis were selected in BEAUTi v1.8.4 with the TN93+I+G substitution model, strict clock as clock type and a Yule speciation process [14] as tree prior. The chain length for the Metropolis coupled Markov Chain (MCMC) was set to 25 Mio. generations (burn-in 10%), and one tree was recorded every 1000 generations. Using Tracer v1.6 [40], we verified the trace for convergence. We used TreeAnnotator in BEAST v1.8.4 to generate a maximum clade credibility tree (MCCT). Finally, FigTree v1.4.3 [39] was used to visualize the final phylogenetic tree. Similarities between sample sequences were calculated in BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). A Maximum Likelihood analysis was also performed for comparison, using the same dataset and nucleotide substitution model (Supplement 1).

A median-joining haplotype network was estimated using PopART (http://popart.otago.ac.nz). The 19 sequences were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers MH459280MH459298.

For the morphological inspection of blood parasites, blood smears were stained with Giemsa stain and a monolayer of blood cells was scanned with a light microscope (1000×, oil immersion, Bresser Researcher Trino 40×–1000×, with Amscope MU300 3 MP microscope camera) for parasites. Sample vouchers (blood smears) will be deposited in a curated collection (Naturkundemuseum Stuttgart, Germany).

Results

A total of 23 of 27 samples (85%) were PCR-positive. We successfully sequenced 19 PCR products. The Blast search revealed a 97–99% identity with published sequences from a variety of Eimeriorina (Table 1). We found highly similar (99%) sequences for all samples except one (SBL_170, highest similarity 97%). In the Bayesian phylogenetic tree (Figure 1), the sequences from the present study formed two clusters. Thirteen samples (68%) formed a unique cluster together with Lankesterella sp. haplotypes US1, DD2 and DD3 with 100% support (cluster 1 in Figure 1). The remaining six sequences formed a separate unique cluster, albeit with weaker support (95%, cluster 2 in Figure 1, related to Lankesterella sp. haplotype US3 found in side-blotched lizards in California, as well as a Lankesterella haplotype found in lizards Phymaturus payuniae in Argentina (PP1, Figure 1).

thumbnail Figure 1.

Molecular Phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood Bayesian Analysis, based on parasite DNA sequences (18S rRNA gene). Phylogenetic relationships of blood parasites found in side-blotched Lizards (SBL) Uta stansburiana on San Benito Oeste Island. Posterior probabilities of the nodes are shown. Details of the reference sequences, including blood parasite and host species identity and code and location, are given in Table 1. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 48 nucleotide sequences (one outgroup, 19 sequences from this study and 28 reference sequences).

Table 1.

Reference sequences for the phylogenetic relationships in Figure 2 obtained from GenBank.

The mean similarity of the 18 sequences of SBL samples was 97% (range 89–100%, Table 2). Within clades (Figure 1) high similarities were observed (cluster 1: mean 99%, range 96–100%, cluster 2: mean 90%, range 94–100%), while lower similarities were found when comparing sequences of cluster 1 to those of cluster 2 (mean 95%, range 89–97%).

Table 2.

Pairwise similarities between sequences of coccidian blood parasites found in side-blotched lizards (SBL) Uta stansburiana on San Benito Oeste Island.

A variety of Eimeriorina (genera Eimeria, Isospora, Caryospora and Schellackia) from lizards and a diverse range of hosts including snakes, geckos and mammals, were also related to the Lankesterella sp. haplotypes (Figure 1).

The median-joining haplotype network analysis (Figure 2) detected the same clusters and associations. The minimum distance between sequences of cluster 1 and cluster 2 (Figure 1) was 29 mutations (Figure 2). The network analysis further detected multiple nodes corresponding to hypothetical haplotypes not sampled.

thumbnail Figure 2.

Median-joining haplotype network of parasite DNA sequences (18S rRNA gene). Details of the reference sequences, including blood parasite and host species identity and code and location, are given in Table 1. The size of the color-coded circles is proportional to haplotype frequency. The hatch marks represent mutational steps.

Microscopic examination

Intraerythrocytic sporozoites (Figure 3): A single large sporozoite was seen in each erythrocyte. Sporozoites were elongated, convex on one side, and straight on the side next to the nucleus, with rather pointed ends. Some degree of hypertrophy of the host cell was variably noted, and only slight displacement of the host cell nucleus. Further characteristics were: pale cytoplasm (pale blue with Giemsa stain), nucleus in the form of a band of chromatin granules at one side of the center of the parasite, and a reserve vacuole (refractile body) was present, which was stained very pale orange.

thumbnail Figure 3.

Two examples of erythrocytes from the side-blotched Lizards Uta stansburiana on San Benito Oeste Island infected with the blood parasite (sporozoite) detected in this study. Blood smears are stained with Giemsa.

Discussion

In the present study, we analyzed blood samples collected from side-blotched lizards Uta stansburiana from San Benito Oeste Island, off the Mexican Pacific coast. We found two different blood parasite sequence clusters, which were closest to certain published sequences of Lankesterella (Figures 1 and 2).

The Apicomplexa are grouped into four groups designed to be utilitarian rather than to reflect evolutionary history [1, 3]: the coccidians, the gregarines, the hemosporidians, and the piroplasmids. These groups as well as the taxa contained within are not based on phylogenetic relationships, but on characteristics such as their associated host and/or vector [5, 20], and which particular tissues they inhabit. Their evolutionary relationships and their taxonomy are presently unclear (e.g. [7]), and the current classification does not take modern molecular data into account [3]).

Molecular data can be used to resolve previously unknown classifications. For example, in the present dataset, the samples Gec_2 and Tur_1 can be determined to genus level (Lankesterella sp. and Schellackia sp., respectively), based on Bayesian analysis (Figure 1).

Few studies have been published characterizing apicomplexan parasites in lizards at the molecular level, and the relationships of many of these protozoan species are unresolved, indicating that more work is required [19, 36]. This may explain some poor support values within the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1) and the occurrence of multiple nodes corresponding to hypothetical haplotypes not sampled in the network analyses (Figure 2). The sequence for Lankesterella minima (Fro_1) also illustrates the uncertainty: it was a sister group to all other Lankesterella in the Bayesian analysis (Figure 1), while grouping with both Lankesterella and Caryospora in the Maximum Likelihood analysis (Supplement 1) and the network (Figure 2). Morphologically, Lankesterella minima differed from the Lankesterella parasites observed here by having eosinophilic globules on each side of the nucleus [24]. Genetically, Lankesterella minima was also found to be closely related to Caryospora sequences in a study of blood parasites in sedge warblers Acrocephalus schoenobaenus (Aves [7]).

Another problem is the scarcity of differential phenotypic traits, which qualifies molecular phylogenetics based on genetic data as the best method to shed more light on the phylogenetic relationships among the coccidia [36].

The family Lankesterellidae belongs to the coccidians and is characterized by the fact that both the merogony and sporogony occur in the liver and intestine of the vertebrate. For this family the vertebrate thus acts as the definitive host. This means that no further development takes place in blood-sucking arthropods, especially mites, but also mosquitoes and sandflies [23], which take up the pathogens in the form of intra-erythrocytic sporozoites, and consequently act as purely mechanical carriers. As a consequence, host specificity is considered to be low on the side of the vector and infected vertebrate animals can also serve as a source of infection for other vertebrate animals [41, 45]. Experiments of transferring species of the genus Schellackia (Lankesterellidae) to new hosts by feeding infested mosquitoes and ticks failed [9, 21, 23]. On the side of the vertebrate hosts, in which the complete development takes place, however, specificity is high [33].

None of the sequences found in this study was 100% identical to previously published sequences and the genetic variability among the sequences found was relatively high. The lowest similarity observed between two sequences was 89% (Table 2) and the average difference between sequences of cluster 1 and cluster 2 was 4%. This difference is high compared to intraspecific differences in coccidians in other studies. For example, isosporoid coccidia (Isospora and Atoxoplasma spp.) in most passerine birds had average distances of 0.1% (i.e. 99.9% similarities [42]), but some exceptions were also observed (3.5% between genotypes in cowbirds Molothrus ater [42]). Most likely, a 4% difference would indicate that cluster 1 and cluster 2 sequences belong to different species of Lankesterella.

However, criteria for the differentiation of Lankesterella species are limited (e.g. the sporozoite shape) and a system for taxonomic differentiation has not been developed. Sporozoites are mostly described in peripheral blood erythrocytes, while other stages of the life cycle, e.g. the liver or intestine stages may be informative. Moreover, since the sporozoites lack specific micro-morphological differences, light microscopy of blood smears is not suitable for identification to the species level [46]. Electron microscopic fine structure analyses would be needed to determine specific micro-morphological differences.

In conclusion, in the present study we found new haplotypes of Lankesterella sp. infecting side-blotched lizards on a remote oceanic island of the Pacific Ocean off Mexico. We also found high genetic variability, including genetic similarities (i.e. related haplotypes with maximum 99% similarity) and differences (new haplotypes) between the blood parasites of the island population and the population further north on the mainland. Given the wide distribution range of this species on different islands and on the continent, this species would present a good study model for the microevolution of lizard and parasitic haplotypes.

Conflict of Interest

We declare that we have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our colleagues from Grupo de Ecología y Conservación de Islas A.C., who were actively involved in this work. We thank Secretaría de Gobernación and Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales for granting permission to conduct the activities described in this paper. We also thank S.C.P.P. Pescadores Nacionales de Abulón for their logistic support. Fieldwork on San Benito was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Germany (DFG, Grant No. PQ148/5), the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the Marisla Foundation, and the Grupo de Ecología y Conservación de Islas, A.C.

We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

References

  1. Adl SM, Simpson AGB, Farmer MA, Andersen RA, Anderson OR, Barta JR, Bowser SS, Brugerolle G, Fensome RA, Fredericq S, James TY, Karpov S, Kugrens P, Krug J, Lane CE, Lewis LA, Lodge J, Lynn DH, Mann DG, Mccourt RM, Mendoza L, Moestrup Ø, Mozley-Standridge SE, Nerad TA, Shearer CA, Smirnov AV, Spiegel FW, Taylor MFJR. 2005. The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 52, 399–451. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adl SM, Leander BS, Simpson AG, Archibald JM, Anderson OR, Bass D, Bowser SS, Brugerolle G, Farmer MA, Karpov S, Kolisko M, Lane CE, Lodge DJ, Mann DG, Meisterfeld R, Mendoza L, Moestrup Ø, Mozley-Stanridge SE, Smirnov AV, Spiegel F. 2007. Diversity, nomenclature, and taxonomy of protists. Systematic Biology, 56, 684–689. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adl SM, Simpson AGB, Lane CE, Lukeš J, Bass D, Bowser SS, Brown MW, Burki F, Dunthorn M, Hampl V, Heiss AA, Hoppenrath M, Lara E, le Gall L, Lynn DH, McManus H, Mitchell EAD, Mozley-Stanridge SE, Parfrey LW, Pawlowski J, Rueckert S, Shadwick L, Schoch CL, Smirnov A, Spiegel FW. 2012. The revised classification of eukaryotes. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 59, 429–493. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alonzo SH, Sinervo B. 2001. Mate choice games, context-dependent good genes, and genetic cycles in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49, 176–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett GF, Garnham PCC, Fallis AM. 1965. On the status of the genera Leucocytozoon Ziemann, 1898 and Haemoproteus Kruse, 1890 (Haemosporidiida: Leucocytozoidae and Haemoproteidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 43(6), 927–932. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bensch S, Hellgren O, Pérez-Tris J. 2009. MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 1353–1358. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Biedrzycka A, Kloch A, Migalska M, Bielanski W. 2013. Molecular characterization of putative Hepatozoon sp. From the sedge warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus). Parasitology, 140, 695–698. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonorris JS, Ball GH. 1955. Schellackia occidentalis n.sp., a blood-inhabiting coccidian found in lizards in Southern California. Journal of Protozoology, 2, 31–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bristovetzky M, Paperna I. 1990. Life cycle and transmission of Schellackia cf. agamae, a parasite of the starred lizard Agama stellio. International Journal for Parasitology, 20, 883–892. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods, 9(8), 772. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dobson AP, Hudson PJ. 1986. Parasites, disease and the structure of ecological communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 11–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. 2012. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29, 1969–1973. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferguson SD, Wellehan JF Jr, Frasca S Jr, Innis CJ, Harris HS, Miller M, Stacy BA. 2016. Coccidial infection of the adrenal glands of leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea). Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 52, 874–882. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gernhard T. 2008. Yule processs. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 253, 769–778. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hamilton WD, Zuk M. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science, 218, 384–387. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harris DJ, Maia JP, Perera A. 2012. Molecular survey of Apicomplexa in Podarcis wall lizards detects Hepatozoon, Sarcocystis, and Eimeria species. Journal of Parasitology, 98, 592–597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Harris DJ, Borges-Nojosa DM, Maia JP. 2015. Prevalence and diversity of Hepatozoon in native and exotic geckos from Brazil. Journal of Parasitology, 101, 80–85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hill NJ, Richter C, Power ML. 2012. Pinning down a polymorphic parasite: New genetic and morphological descriptions of Eimeria macropodis from the Tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii). Parasitology International, 61, 461–465. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jirku M, Jirku M, Obornik M, Lukes J, Modry D. 2009. A model for taxonomic work on homoxenous coccidia: redescription, host specificity, and molecular phylogeny of Eimeriaranae dobell, 1909, with a review of anuran-host Eimeria (Apicomplexa: Eimeriorina). Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 56, 39–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Karadjian G, Chavatte JM, Landau I. 2015. Systematic revision of the adeleid haemogregarines, with creation of Bartazoon ng, reassignment of Hepatozoon argantis Garnham, 1954 to Hemolivia, and molecular data on Hemolivia stellata. Parasite, 22, 31. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Klein TA, Young DG, Greiner EC, Telford SR Jr, Butler JF. 1988. Development and experimental transmission of Schellackia golvani and Schellackia occidentalis by ingestion of infected blood-feeding arthropods. International Journal of Parasitology, 18, 259–267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kvičerová J, Hypša V. 2013. Host-parasite incongruences in rodent Eimeria suggest significant role of adaptation rather than cophylogeny in maintenance of host specificity. PloS One, 8, e63601. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lainson R, Shaw JJ, Ward RD. 1976. Schellackia landauae sp. nov. (Eimeriorina: Lankesterellidae) in the Brazilian lizard Polychrus marmoratus (Iguanidae): experimental transmission by Culex pipiens fatigans. Parasitology, 72, 225–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Levine ND, Nye RR. 1977. A survey of blood and other tissue parasites of leopard frogs Rana pipiens in the United States. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 13, 17–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Maia JP, Harris DJ, Carranza S, Gomez-Diaz E. 2016. Assessing the diversity, host-specificity and infection patterns of apicomplexan parasites in reptiles from Oman, Arabia. Parasitology, 143, 1730–1747. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Martínez J, Martínez-de la Puente J, Herrero J, Del Cerro S, Lobato E, Rivero-de Aguilar J, Merino S. 2009. A restriction site to differentiate Plasmodium and Haemoproteus infections in birds: on the inefficiency of general primers for detection of mixed infections. Parasitology, 136, 713–722. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Martinez J, Vasquez RA, Venegas C, Merino S. 2015. Molecular characterisation of haemoparasites in forest birds from Robinson Crusoe Island: is the Austral Thrush a potential threat to endemic birds? Bird Conservation International, 25, 139–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Megía-Palma R, Martínez J, Merino S. 2013. Phylogenetic analysis based on 18S rRNA gene sequences of Schellackia parasites (Apicomplexa: Lankesterellidae) reveals their close relationship to the genus Eimeria. Parasitology, 140, 1149–1157. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Megía-Palma R, Martínez J, Merino S. 2014. Molecular characterization of haemococcidia genus Schellackia (Apicomplexa) reveals the polyphyletic origin of the family Lankesterellidae. Zoologica Scripta, 43, 304–312. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Megía-Palma R, Martínez J, Nasri I, Cuervo JJ, Martín J, Acevedo I, Merino S. 2016. Phylogenetic relationships of Isospora, Lankesterella, and Caryospora species (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) infecting lizards. Organisms Diversity and Evolution, 16, 275–288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Megía-Palma R, Martínez J, Paranjpe D, D’Amico V, Aguilar R, Palacios MG, Merino S. 2017. Phylogenetic analyses reveal that Schellackia parasites (Apicomplexa) detected in American lizards are closely related to the genus Lankesterella: is the range of Schellackia restricted to the Old World? Parasites & Vectors, 10, 470. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Megía-Palma R, Martínez J, Merino S. 2017. Manipulation of parasite load induces significant changes in the structural-based throat color of male iberian green lizards. Current Zoology, 64, 293–302. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Megía-Palma R, Martínez J, Cuervo JJ, Belliure J, Jiménez-Robles O, Gomes V, Cabido C, Pausas JG, Fitze PS, Martín J, Merino S. 2018. Molecular evidence for host-parasite co-speciation between lizards and Schellackia parasites. International Journal of Parasitology, in press., 48, 709–718. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Merino S, Martínez J, Masello JF, Bedolla Y, Quillfeldt P. 2014. First molecular characterization of a Hepatozoon species (Apicomplexa: Hepatozoidae) infecting birds and description of a new species infecting storm petrels (Aves: Hydrobatidae). Journal of Parasitology, 100, 338–343. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Modrý D, Votýpka J, Jirků M, Oborník M, Luke J, Koudela B. 2001. Eimeria telekii n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Coccidia) from Lemniscomys striatus (Rodentia: Muridae): morphology, pathology and phylogeny. Parasitology, 122, 133–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Morrison DA. 2009. Evolution of the Apicomplexa: where are we now? Trends in Parasitology, 25, 375–382. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ogedengbe ME, Ogedengbe JD, Whale JC, Elliot K, Juárez-Estrada MA, Barta JR. 2016. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of tissue coccidia (Sarcocystidae; Apicomplexa) based on nuclear 18s RDNA and mitochondrial COI sequences confirms the paraphyly of the genus Hammondia. Parasitology Open, 2, E2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Power ML, Richter C, Emery S, Hufschmid J, Gillings MR. 2009. Eimeria trichosuri: phylogenetic position of a marsupial coccidium, based on 18S rDNA sequences. Experimental Parasitology, 122, 165–168. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rambaut A (2007). FigTree, a graphical viewer of phylogenetic trees. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree [Google Scholar]
  41. Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie W, Drummond AJ (2013). Tracer v1.6.0. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer [Google Scholar]
  42. Rogier E. 1977. Description et cycle biologique de Schellackia agamae (Laveran et Petit, 1909) Lankesterellidae parasite d’agames de République Centre Africaine. Protistology, 13, 9–13. [Google Scholar]
  43. Rückert S, Simdyanov TG, Aleoshin VV, Leander BS. 2011. Identification of a divergent environmental DNA sequence clade using the phylogeny of gregarine parasites (Apicomplexa) from crustacean hosts. PLoS One, 6, e18163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schrenzel MD, Maalouf GA, Gaffney PM, Tokarz D, Keener LL, McClure D, Griffey S, McAloose D, Rideout BA. 2005. Molecular characterization of isosporoid coccidia (Isospora and Atoxoplasma spp.) in passerine birds. Journal of Parasitology, 91, 635–647. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith TG. 1996. The genus Hepatozoon (Apicomplexa: Adeleina). Journal of Parasitology, 82, 565–585. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10(3), 512–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Telford SR Jr. 1984. Haemoparasites of reptiles, in Diseases of Amphibians and Reptiles. Hoff GL, Frye FL, Jacobson R, Editors. Plenum Publishing Corporation: New York. p. 385–517. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Telford SR. 2009. Hemoparasites of the Reptilia: color atlas and text. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ujvari B, Madsen T, Olsson M. 2004. High prevalence of Hepatozoon spp. (Apicomplexa, Hepatozoidae) infection in water pythons (Liasis fuscus) from tropical Australia. Journal of Parasitology, 90(3), 670–672. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhao X, Duszynski DW. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships among rodent Eimeria species determined by plastid ORF470 and nuclear 18S rDNA sequences. International Journal for Parasitology, 31, 715–719. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zuk M. 1992. The role of parasites in sexual selection: current evidence and future directions. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 21, 39–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Quillfeldt P, Romeike T, Masello JF, Reiner G, Willems H & Bedolla-Guzmán Y. 2018. Molecular survey of coccidian infections of the side-blotched lizard Uta stansburiana on San Benito Oeste Island, Mexico. Parasite 25, 43.

All Tables

Table 1.

Reference sequences for the phylogenetic relationships in Figure 2 obtained from GenBank.

Table 2.

Pairwise similarities between sequences of coccidian blood parasites found in side-blotched lizards (SBL) Uta stansburiana on San Benito Oeste Island.

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1.

Molecular Phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood Bayesian Analysis, based on parasite DNA sequences (18S rRNA gene). Phylogenetic relationships of blood parasites found in side-blotched Lizards (SBL) Uta stansburiana on San Benito Oeste Island. Posterior probabilities of the nodes are shown. Details of the reference sequences, including blood parasite and host species identity and code and location, are given in Table 1. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 48 nucleotide sequences (one outgroup, 19 sequences from this study and 28 reference sequences).

In the text
thumbnail Figure 2.

Median-joining haplotype network of parasite DNA sequences (18S rRNA gene). Details of the reference sequences, including blood parasite and host species identity and code and location, are given in Table 1. The size of the color-coded circles is proportional to haplotype frequency. The hatch marks represent mutational steps.

In the text
thumbnail Figure 3.

Two examples of erythrocytes from the side-blotched Lizards Uta stansburiana on San Benito Oeste Island infected with the blood parasite (sporozoite) detected in this study. Blood smears are stained with Giemsa.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.