Open Access
Issue
Parasite
Volume 25, 2018
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2018001
Published online 01 February 2018

© F. Sauda et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2018

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

In kennel dogs, the prevalence of endoparasite infections is frequently high and may include potential zoonotic and significantly virulent species, often resulting in high dog and public health risks [14,26,28,44]. According to current Italian legislation, stray dogs can be euthanized only when found to be affected by severe diseases or proven to be dangerous for human safety. In all other cases, Italian legislation requires housing of caught stray dogs in public and private kennels where they remain throughout their lives, unless private owners adopt them [18,45]. Therefore, in Italian dog kennels animal density is often very high and may pose serious risks for the spread of canine-specific and potential zoonotic parasites [29,53].

Among dog parasites of major zoonotic concern, Leishmania infantum is an important vector-borne parasite of the dog, which is considered the main domestic reservoir host for human infections [34]. Canine leishmaniosis is endemic in Italy and in other countries of the Mediterranean basin, with a widely variable prevalence [15,40].

Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens are two vector-borne dog filariid nematodes that have been recognized as emerging zoonotic agents, currently spreading throughout Europe [11,14,24,30,43]. In dogs, D. repens is the etiologic agent of subcutaneous dirofilariosis, while D. immitis is the cause of cardiopulmonary dirofilariosis [14].

Infections by respiratory parasites are common in kennel dogs and include the species Eucoleus aerophilus, a potentially zoonotic nematode [9,51].

Concerning intestinal parasites, they may reach a prevalence of up to about 70% in kennel dogs [4,28,44]. Potential zoonotic intestinal parasites of dogs include Toxocara canis, the agent of ocular and visceral larva migrans in humans and of lung and intestinal diseases in dogs [20]. Dog hookworms (mainly Ancylostoma spp.) may be responsible for severe intestinal disease in dogs and cutaneous larva migrans or creeping eruption and eosinophilic enteritis in humans [5,10,31]. Although Strongyloides stercoralis is considered a potential zoonotic nematode parasite of dogs, and human infections have been related to infected dog exposure, recent molecular studies have shown that there are clear differences between human and dog strains and the existence of S. stercoralis subspecies has been proposed. Therefore, the zoonotic potential of dog S. stercoralis is now being challenged and further studies are currently considered of high importance to clarify this serious issue [50]. The tapeworms Echinococcus spp. and Dipylidium caninum are further dog intestinal helminths of zoonotic concern [44]. Zoonotic genotypes of the protozoa Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. may be shared by dogs and humans, in both these species they may be responsible for intestinal signs of variable severity [38,47].

With the aim of verifying the effectiveness of preventive and control measures taken in Italian kennels for dog endoparasites, with particular reference to potentially zoonotic species, this study evaluated the occurrence, prevalence and potential risk factors of L. infantum, D. repens and of potentially zoonotic or host-specific cardiorespiratory and intestinal parasite infections in kennel dogs in central Italy.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Collection of samples and manipulation of animals were authorized by the kennels and the Italian Ministry of Health in the framework of the Italian surveillance programs of potential zoonotic diseases of stray animals (Italian law No. 281-1991). Moreover, veterinarians who performed the sampling and who handled animals examined in this study were authorized by the Italian Ministry of Health.

Animals

In the period November 2011 − November 2014, a total of 639 randomly selected dogs of different breeds and living in public and private kennels of Latium and Tuscany (central Italy), were examined in order to assess the prevalence of dog endoparasite infections caused by L. infantum, D. repens, intestinal and cardiorespiratory parasites. All facilities are equipped with green or gravel common areas where dogs can move freely, while dog density was about 500 animals per kennel as a mean (range 100-800 dogs). In all these kennels, animals are treated with anthelmintic drugs at the time of their entry and then about once or, more rarely, twice a year. Ectoparasiticide treatments are performed only if dogs are found infected by ectoparasites at their entry.

No dogs included in the study were vaccinated against L. infantum or had received chemoprophylaxis for cardiopulmonary dirofilariosis.

All animals were clinical examined in order to evaluate possible presence of compatible clinical pictures.

Among the examined dogs, 538/639 were males and 101/639 were females, while regarding the age 395/639 dogs were ≤ 24 months and 244/639 dogs were older than 24 months.

Sampling

Individual blood and fecal samples were collected from all examined dogs. From each dog, at least 3 mL of blood were collected, i.e. 1 mL in tubes with EDTA and 2 mL in tubes without anticoagulant. All blood samples were stored at 4 °C and analyzed within 24 hours. Blood samples without anticoagulant were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min to obtain sera that were used for the immunological analysis of D. immitis and L. infantum, while blood samples diluted in EDTA were analyzed to detect blood-circulating microfilariae.

An aliquot of each fecal sample was frozen at −20 °C, pending further molecular analysis. Fecal samples (about 5 g) were stored at 4 °C and analyzed within 24 hours.

Microscopic examination of blood samples for detection of circulating microfilariae

Blood samples in EDTA were tested using the modified Knott technique for the detection of blood-circulating microfilariae that were identified at the species level based on the morphology of the head and tail, length and width [46,51].

Detection of D. immitis circulating antigens

For the detection of D. immitis circulating antigens, serum samples were tested using a canine antigen test kit (PetChek HTWM PF, IDEXX, Westbrook, Maine, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions .

Serology for Leishmania infantum

Serum samples were analyzed by an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) to investigate the presence of specific antibodies against L. infantum.

The in-house IFAT was performed as described in the Manual of the World Organization for Animal Health [27]. The antigen was prepared with promastigotes of L. infantum MHOM/TN/80/IPT1, WHO reference strain of L. infantum, provided by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Rome, Italy) and cultured in the IZSLT laboratory (Rome, Italy). Anti-Leishmania antibodies were detected using anti-dog IgG conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Positive dog serum samples were used as positive controls, while negative dog serum samples and wells containing the antigen and PBS instead of dog serum were used as negative controls. Samples were classified as positive if promastigote cytoplasmic or membrane fluorescence was observed at a serum dilution ≥ 1:160. Reading was performed with an immunofluorescence microscope independently by two observers.

Fecal analysis

Samples were examined for parasites by macroscopic examination to detect the presence of proglottids, nematodes and/or fragments of parasites and then microscopically by flotation test with a low density solution (saturated NaCl solution, s.g. 1.2), to evaluate the presence of worm eggs and/or protozoal (oo)cysts [36]. Fresh and Lugol-stained fecal smears were also prepared to detect G. duodenalis. Moreover, a commercial rapid immunoassay (RIDA QUICK Cryptosporidium/Giardia Combi, R-Biopharm®, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to detect G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium fecal antigens.

Selected Giardia-positive samples were processed by a commercial kit (QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA) for DNA extraction. A nested PCR protocol was applied to amplify a fragment of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSUrDNA) gene. For external PCR, the forward primer RH11 (5′-CATCCGGTCGATCCTGCC-3′) and the reverse primer RH4 (5′-AGTCGAACCCTGATTCTCCGCCCAGG-3′) were used; the internal primers were GIAR-F forward (3′-GACGCTCTCCCCAAGGAC-5′) and GIAR-R reverse (5′-CTGCGTCACGCTCG-3′) [35]. Amplification products were run on 2% ethidium bromide agarose gels and visualized under ultraviolet light. Positive amplicons were purified using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA). Amplification products were sent to an external laboratory for sequencing (Bio-Fab Research, Rome, Italy); sequence multiple alignment was carried out by ClustalW to identify G. duodenalis assemblages. To identify G. duodenalis assemblages, sequence multiple alignment was carried out by ClustalW against reference sequences available in GenBank representing Giardia assemblages A-G [Accession Numbers: AF199446 (assemblage A), AF199447 (assemblage B), AY775200 (assemblage C), AY775199 (assemblage D), AY297957 (assemblage E), AF199444 (assemblage F) and AF199450 (assemblage G)].

DNA of Cryptosporidium spp. was extracted from stool samples found positive on rapid immunoassay by using a QIAamp DNA stool mini kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions modified by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Parasites, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Rome, Italy).

An RFLP-PCR protocol was applied to amplify fragments of the COWP Cryptosporidium spp. gene and to identify Cryptosporidium at the species level [33]. For the nested-COWP procedure (N-COWP), an external 769-bp fragment of the COWP gene was amplified with forward primer BCOWPF (5’-ACCGCTTCTCAACAACCATCTTGTCCTC-3’) and reverse primer BCOWPR (5’-CGCACCTGTTCCCACTCAATGTAAACCC-3’). For the internal 553-bp COWP gene fragment, the primers Cry9 (5’-GGA CTG AAA TAC AGG CAT TAT CTT G-3’) and Cry15 (5’-GTA GAT AAT GGA AGA GAT TGT G-3’) were used [30,44]. Amplification products were run on 2% agarose gels containing Gel Red 10,000X (Biotium; Hayward, California, USA) and visualized under ultraviolet light. RsaI digestion of N-COWP fragments was resolved by electrophoresis in 3% agarose gels containing Gel Red 10,000X (Biotium; Hayward, California, USA) [7]. The number and size of restriction fragments were used to identify the species of Cryptosporidium, as previously described [30,47,48]. Positive and negative controls were included in each Giardia/Cryptosporidium PCR and nested PCR run.

For the isolation of nematode larvae from fecal samples, such as A. vasorum and S. stercoralis larvae, the Baermann technique was used, and isolated larvae were identified according to their morphological and metric features [51].

Statistical methods

A database was developed ad hoc using Excel 5.0. Data analysis was performed using the statistical software Epi Info Version 3.5.3.

Gender, age and presence of compatible clinical pictures were the putative risk factors considered in the study. To evaluate risk factors, multivariable analysis with logistic regression and a Chi square test for univariable analysis were performed. The Fischer’s exact test was used when the percentages were small. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

An overall prevalence of 52.6% (336/639) (95% CI 48.6-56.5) was observed in examined animals for investigated endoparasite infections. Moreover, 253/639 dogs (39.6%) (95% CI 35.8-43.5) were found infected by potentially zoonotic species and 249/639 dogs (39%) (95% CI 35.2-42.9) showed compatible clinical pictures (Table 1).

As shown in Table 1, L. infantum and D. repens had a prevalence of 2.5% (16/639, 95% CI 1.5-4.1) and 2.8% (18/639, 95% CI 1.7-4.5), respectively. In addition, L. infantum was found significantly prevalent in dogs older than 2 years in age (p < 0.05).

The overall prevalence of cardiorespiratory nematodes was 7.8% (50/639, 95% CI 5.9-10.3), but these infections were found significantly prevalent (p < 0.05) in older dogs (age ≥ 2 years). Identified species included Angiostrongylus vasorum (5.2%, 95% CI 3.6-7.3), Eucoleus aerophilus (1.7%, 95% CI 0.9-3.2), Eucoleus boehmi (0.8%, 95% CI 0.3-1.9) and D. immitis (0.2%, 95% CI 0.001-1).

Intestinal parasites were prevalent (38.8%, 248/639, p < 0.05) in examined dogs and the age ≤ 2 years was found to be a risk factor for intestinal parasite infections (p < 0.05). Identified intestinal parasites included ancylostomatids (A. caninum and Uncinaria stenocephala) (11.3%, 95% CI 9-14), T. canis (7.8%, 95% CI 5.9-10.3), Trichuris vulpis (7.5%, 95% CI 5.6-9.9), Cystoisospora canis (5.9%, 95% CI 4.3-8.10), Giardia duodenalis (4.8%, 95% CI 3.4-6.9), D. caninum (0.5%, 95% CI 0.1-1.5), Taeniidae eggs (0.3%, 95% CI 0.1-1.3), Entamoeba sp. (0.3%, 95% CI 0.1-1.3), S. stercoralis (0.2%, 95% CI 0.0.001-1) and Cryptosporidium spp. (0.2%, 95% CI 0.001-1).

In molecular studies, the assemblages A (33%, 95% CI 16.7-51.4) and C (67%, 95% CI 48.6-83.3) of G. duodenalis and the species Cryptosporidium parvum were identified.

In the statistical analysis, investigated endoparasite infections were overall found significantly associated with the presence of compatible clinical pictures (p < 0.05). The main clinical signs found in animals positive for intestinal helminth infections were diarrhea (41.4%), polyphagia (19.3%) and weight loss (15.3%), while diarrhea was the prevalent clinical sign (97.2%) in dogs affected by intestinal protozoa. Symptomatic dogs affected by cardiorespiratory parasite infections showed cough (23.5%), nasal discharge (17.6%), reverse sneezing (8.8%), heart failure (8.8%), and dyspnea (5.8%). A dog infected by D. repens showed skin nodules (5.5%). Finally, symptomatic L. infantum infected dogs showed furfuraceous dermatitis with alopecic areas on the face (50%), onychogryphosis (20%), uveitis (10%), lameness (10%), and weight loss (10%).

Coinfections were found in 3.9% (25/639, 95 % CI 2.6-5.8) of examined dogs, and males (84%, 21/25; 95% CI 63.9-95.5) were found more frequently infected by different parasite species than females (16%, 4/25; 95% CI 4.5-36.1) at statistical analysis (p < 0.05).

Table 1

Prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) of intestinal, cardiorespiratory and vector-borne parasites identified in the total number of examined dogs (639) and in the same dogs separated into apparently healthy or clinically suspect dogs on the basis of clinical examination.

Discussion

Results from this study add new and significant data on the prevalence of L. infantum, Dirofilaria spp. and other endoparasite infections in kennel dogs in Italy. First, the results obtained show a significant prevalence of these parasites in this dog population as more than half of the examined animals were positive for at least one parasite species. Second, about 4/10 dogs were found to be infected by potentially zoonotic species. These findings confirm the important role played by kennel and shelter dogs in Italy in the spread of potential zoonotic parasites [26,28,31,44,53]. As already reported [44], results from the present study are also indicative of high health risks for dogs housed in these facilities, especially considering that among positive dogs, examined parasites were significantly prevalent in clinically suspect animals.

In this study, the seroprevalence of L. infantum (2.5%) was found to be higher in older animals and overall similar to that recently observed in kennels from other areas of central and northern Italy, showing low/medium infection levels, from 2.8% to 17.9% [3,39,40]. L. infantum is a protozoan species responsible for a very important zoonotic disease representing a serious veterinary and public health problem. Transmission of L. infantum occurs through phlebotomine sand fly vectors, and dogs are the main domestic reservoirs of this protozoan parasite [3,6,40]. In endemic areas, the identification of infected dogs and the use of effective control measures are considered extremely important for limiting the spread of the disease and interrupting the transmission of L. infantum to the vector [6]. This is the main reason why in these areas, leishmaniosis surveillance programs are carried out in dog kennels, with monitoring activities aimed at identifying infected animals [3,39,40]. The parasitological and clinical positivity found in dogs examined in this study underline the need to improve interventions on leishmaniosis surveillance and control in public and private dog kennels in Italy.

Prevalence observed for D. repens (2.8%) is in line with data previously reported in kennel dogs from central Italy, ranging from 1.7% to about 12% [21,41]. D. immitis is a further filariid species considered the most important cardiopulmonary nematode in dogs [23]. In the present study, D. immitis showed a low prevalence (0.2%) since a single dog was found positive at serological and microscopic analysis. This result differs greatly from previous data reported in kennel dogs in Italy where higher prevalence rates (2.8-12.5%) were observed [8,21,47]. However, this result confirms the findings of a previous study in dogs from central Italy [41]. Importantly, both methods used in this study to evaluate the prevalence of D. immitis may fail in the identification of some infected dogs, especially those with low D. immitis burdens and it is possible that the prevalence found in this study is underestimated. Indeed, dogs with low D. immitis numbers may have single sex infections resulting in absence of patency. In areas of high heartworm prevalence, some dogs may also possess anti-microfilaria antibodies through repeated infections that promote clearance of microfilariae from the circulation [19]. Furthermore, antigen detection tests can give false-negative results due to low worm counts, infections with immature worms and all-male infections, since they target the antigens released from the reproductive tract of adult D. immitis females [42]. In Europe, D. repens is the main agent of human dirofilariosis [17,23], while D. immitis human infections have recently been reported in Italy [2]. Considering the zoonotic potential of both these parasite species and the severity of the disease that D. immitis may cause in infected dogs, the results obtained here suggest the need to perform effective control measures against these nematodes in kennel dogs, including chemoprophylaxis for cardiopulmonary dirofilariosis.

Besides D. immitis, in examined dogs the (cardio)-respiratory nematode species E. boehmi, E. aerophilus and A. vasorum were also identified. Overall, these parasites were found to be prevalent in older animals. E. aerophilus and E. boehmi are two closely related capillariid nematodes that live embedded underneath the epithelium of the upper respiratory tract [9,54]. E. aerophilus infects the trachea and bronchi and is a potentially zoonotic species [51]. The prevalence of E. aerophilus found in the present study (1.7%) is consistent with previous data reported in dogs from Italy, ranging from about 0.3% to 17% [9,31,50,53]. Concerning E. boehmi, a canine nasal nematode, the prevalence observed in this study was lower than that (2.2%) previously reported in dogs [22]. A. vasorum is a cardiopulmonary nematode whose adults localize in the right heart and the pulmonary artery of the dog and may be responsible for cardiorespiratory and neurologic signs and coagulopathies, with possible fatal outcomes [23,52]. The prevalence of A. vasorum found in this study (5%) is higher than that observed (about 2%) in dogs from other areas of Italy [8,9,16]. This finding confirms that regions in central Italy may offer ideal environmental and epidemiological conditions for the spread of this parasite [9,16]. Regarding intestinal species, data from this study show that young age is an important factor associated with a higher prevalence of these parasites in dogs and confirm that these infections, mainly ascarid and ancylostomatid species potentially pathogenic for humans, are prevalent in kennel dogs in Italy [53]. As previously observed [28,31,37,44], data from this study also show that in kennel dogs, intestinal helminths are more prevalent than intestinal protozoa. Nevertheless, D. caninum, S. stercoralis and taeniids showed a low prevalence, although these results may be underestimated for the low sensitivity of macroscopic examination and the flotation test to diagnose cestodes [44] and of the Baermann technique to diagnose S. stercoralis [32,50]. Concerning intestinal protozoa, in examined dogs G. duodenalis was identified with a prevalence (5%) lower than that recently observed in other shelters and kennels in Europe (about 7-16%), including Italy [25,28,31,44,49,53]. With regard to Cryptosporidium, results obtained in this study agree with previous data from Italy, showing a prevalence of dog cryptosporidiosis ranging from 0.2% to 3.3% [12,13,31,44,50,55]. However, the identification among positive dogs of Giardia (assemblage A) and Cryptosporidium (C. parvum) genotypes of zoonotic concern, may indicate potential infection risks for human operators working in these kennels and also for other humans if the (oo)cysts of these protozoan parasites can contaminate the environment outside infected rescues. The prevalence of coccidian (C. canis) infections found in this study is in line with previous data from owned and kenneled dog populations in Italy, reporting a prevalence of about 6-10% [36,44,50]. Few dogs (0.3%) were found positive for Entamoeba spp., a genus that includes a group of intestinal protozoan species of humans and other mammals all over the world [1].

In conclusion, data from this study show high prevalence rates of L. infantum, D. repens, and intestinal and cardiorespiratory parasites in kennel dogs of Italy. Prevalence of identified parasites varied mainly according to the age of dogs examined here. However, intestinal and potentially zoonotic species were prevalent. In a context of improving the health and welfare of housed dogs and reducing the risk of disease transmission to humans in kennels in Italy, these results highlight the need to perform more frequent and effective parasitological surveillance, preventive interventions and treatments of infected animals. Effective environmental management procedures and hygiene measures should also be implemented.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Alicia Linder and Dr. Cristina Amoruso for their valuable assistance. The authors are also grateful to the Veterinary Service staff of the AUSL Rome D and AUSL 5 of Pisa for their kind collaboration.

References

  1. Alam MA, Maqbool A, Nazir MM, Lateef M, Khan MS, Lindsay DS. 2015. Entamoeba infections in different populations of dogs in an endemic area of Lahore, Pakistan. Veterinary Parasitology, 207, 216-219. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avellis FO, Kramer LH, Mora P, Bartolino A, Benedetti P, Rivasi F. 2011. A case of human conjunctival dirofilariosis by Dirofilaria immitis in Italy. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 11, 451-452. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldelli R, Piva S, Salvatore D, Parigi M, Melloni O, Tamba M, Bellini R, Poglayen G. 2011. Canine leishmaniosis surveillance in a northern Italy kennel. Veterinary Parasitology, 179, 57-61. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barutzki D, Schaper R. 2011. Results of parasitological examinations of faecal samples from cats and dogs in Germany between 2003 and 2010. Parasitology Research, 109 Suppl 1, S45-S60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowman DD, Montgomery SP, Zajac AM, Eberhard ML, Kazacos KR. 2010. Hookworms of dogs and cats as agents of cutaneous larva migrans. Trends in Parasitology, 26, 162-167. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cabezón O, Millán J, Gomis M, Dubey JP, Ferroglio E, Almería S. 2010. Kennel dogs as sentinels of Leishmania infantum, Toxoplasma gondii, and Neospora caninum in Majorca Island, Spain. Parasitology Research, 107, 1505-1508. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cacciò S, Pinter E, Fantini R, Mezzaroma I, Pozio E. 2002. Human Infection with Cryptosporidium felis: Case Report and Literature Review. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 8, 85–86. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Del Prete L, Maurelli MP, Pennacchio S, Bosco A, Musella V, Ciuca L, Cringoli G, Rinaldi L. 2015. Dirofilaria immitis and Angiostrongylus vasorum: the contemporaneous detection in kennels. BMC Veterinary Research, 11, 305. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Di Cesare A, Castagna G, Meloni S, Milillo P, Latrofa S, Otranto D, Traversa D. 2011. Canine and feline infections by cardiopulmonary nematodes in central and southern Italy. Parasitology Research, 109 Suppl 1, S87-S96. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Epe C. 2009. Intestinal nematodes: biology and control. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 39, 1091-107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Genchi C, Mortarino M, Rinaldi L, Cringoli G, Traldi G, Genchi M. 2011. Changing climate and changing vector-borne disease distribution: the example of Dirofilaria in Europe. Veterinary Parasitology, 176, 295-299. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Giangaspero A, Iorio R, Paoletti B, Traversa D, Capelli G. 2006. Molecular evidence for Cryptosporidium infection in dogs in Central Italy. Parasitology Research, 99, 297-299. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Giangaspero A, Berrilli F, Brandonisio O. 2007. Giardia and Cryptosporidium and public health: the epidemiological scenario from the Italian perspective. Parasitology Research, 101, 1169-1182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Giangaspero A, Marangi M, Latrofa MS, Martinelli D. Traversa D, Otranto D, Genchi C. 2013. Evidences of increasing risk of dirofilariosis in southern Italy. Parasitology Research, 112, 1357-1361. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gramiccia M. 2011. Recent advances in leishmaniosis in pet animals: epidemiology, diagnostics and anti-vectorial prophylaxis. Veterinary Parasitology, 181, 23-30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guardone L, Schnyder M, Macchioni F, Deplazes P, Magi M. 2013. Serological detection of circulating Angiostrongylus vasorum antigen and specific antibodies in dogs from central and northern Italy. Veterinary Parasitology, 192, 192-198. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harizanov RN, Jordanova DP, Bikov I.S. 2014. Some aspects of the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of human dirofilariasis caused by Dirofilaria repens. Parasitology Research, 113, 1571-1579. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Italian law n. 281. 1991. http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_normativa_911_allegato.pdf [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee ACY, Bowman DD, Forster AL, Beall MJ, Liotta JL, Dillon R. 2011. Evaluation of a new in-clinic method for the detection of canine heartworm antigen. Veterinary Parasitology, 177, 387-391. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Macpherson CN. 2013. The epidemiology and public health importance of toxocariasis: a zoonosis of global importance. International Journal for Parasitology, 43, 999-1008. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Magi M, Guardone L, Prati MC, Tozzini G, Torracca B, Monni G, Macchioni F. 2012. Canine filarial infections in Tuscany, central Italy. Journal of Helminthology, 86, 113-116. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Magi M, Guardone L, Prati MC, Torracca B, Macchioni F. 2012. First report of Eucoleus böhmi (syn. Capillaria böhmi) in dogs in North-Western Italy with scanning electron microscopy of the eggs. Parasite, 19, 433-435. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Maia C, Coimbra M, Ramos C, Cristóvão JM, Cardoso L, Campino L. 2015. Serological investigation of Leishmania infantum, Dirofilaria immitis and Angiostrongylus vasorum in dogs from southern Portugal. Parasites & Vectors, 8, 152. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Maia C, Lorentz S, Cardoso L, Otranto D, Naucke TJ. 2016. Detection of Dirofilaria repens microfilariae in a dog from Portugal. Parasitology Research, 115, 441-443. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mircean V, Györke A, Cozma V. 2012. Prevalence and risk factors of Giardia duodenalis in dogs from Romania. Veterinary Parasitology, 184, 325-329. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Miró G, Checa R, Montoya A, Hernández L, Dado D, Gálvez R. 2012. Current situation of Leishmania infantum infection in shelter dogs in northern Spain. Parasites & Vectors, 5, 60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. OIE, World Organisation for Animal Health. 2008. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, cap. 2.1.8, par. B.2, 2008. Available at www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.01.08_LEISHMANIOSIS.pdf [Google Scholar]
  28. Ortuño A, Scorza V, Castellà J, Lappin M. 2014. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in shelter and hunting dogs in Catalonia, Northeastern Spain. Veterinary Journal, 199, 465-467. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F. 2010. Canine and feline vector-borne diseases in Italy: current situation and perspectives, Parasites & Vectors, 3, 2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Brianti E, Traversa D, Petric D, Genchi C, Capelli G. 2013. Vector-borne helminths of dogs and humans in Europe. Parasites & Vectors, 6, 16. [Google Scholar]
  31. Paoletti B, Traversa D, Iorio R, De Berardinis A, Bartolini R, Salini R, Di Cesare A. 2015. Zoonotic parasites in feces and fur of stray and private dogs from Italy. Parasitology Research, 114, 2135-2141. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Paradies P, Iarussi F, Sasanelli M, Capogna A, Lia RP, Zucca D, Greco B, Cantacessi C, Otranto D. 2017. Occurrence of strongyloidiasis in privately owned and sheltered dogs: clinical presentation and treatment outcome. Parasites & Vectors, 10, 345. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pedraza-Díaz S, Amar C, Nichols GL, Mc Lauchlin J. 2001. Nested polymerase chain reaction for amplification of the Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein gene. Emerging and Infectious Diseases, 7, 49-56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Quinnell RJ, Courtenay O. 2009. Transmission, reservoir hosts and control of zoonotic visceral leishmaniosis. Parasitology, 136, 1915-1934. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Read C, Walters J, Robertson ID, Thompson RC. 2002. Correlation between genotype of Giardia duodenalis and diarrhea. International Journal for Parasitology, 32, 229-231. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Riggio F, Mannella R, Ariti G, Perrucci, S. 2013. Intestinal and lung parasites in owned dogs and cats from central Italy. Veterinary Parasitology, 193, 78-84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rinaldi L, Pennacchio S, Musella V, Maurelli MP, La Torre F, Cringoli, G. 2015. Helminth control in kennels: is the combination of milbemycin oxime and praziquantel a right choice? Parasites & Vectors, 8, 30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ryan U, Cacciò SM. 2013. Zoonotic potential of Giardia. International Journal for Parasitology, 43, 943-956. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Salvatore D, Di Francesco A, Parigi M, Poglayen G, Battistini M, Baldelli R. 2013. Canine leishmaniosis surveillance program in a San Marino Republic kennel. Veterinaria Italiana, 49, 341-346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Santi A, Renzi M, Baldelli R, Calzolari M, Caminiti A, Dell’Anna S, Galletti G, Lombardini A, Paternoster G, Tamba M. 2014. A surveillance program on canine leishmaniosis in the public kennels of Emilia-Romagna region, Northern Italy. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 14, 206-211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Scaramozzino P, Gabrielli S, Di Paolo M, Sala M, Scholl F, Cancrini G. 2005. Dog filariosis in the Lazio region (Central Italy): first report on the presence of Dirofilaria repens. BMC Infectious Diseases, 5, 75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schnyder M, Deplazes P. 2012. Cross-reactions of sera from dogs infected with Angiostrongylus vasorum in commercially available Dirofilaria immitis test kits. Parasites & Vectors, 5, 258. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Simón F, Siles-Lucas M, Morchón R, González-Miguel J, Mellado I, Carretón E, Montoya-Alonso J. 2012. Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. Clinical Microbiology Review, 25, 507-544. [Google Scholar]
  44. Simonato G, Frangipane di Regalbono A, Cassini R, Traversa D, Beraldo P, Tessarin C, Pietrobelli M. 2015. Copromicroscopic and molecular investigations on intestinal parasites in kenneled dogs. Parasitology Research, 114, 1963-1970. [Google Scholar]
  45. Slater MR, Di Nardo A, Pediconi O, Dalla Villa P, Candeloro L, Alessandrini B, Del Papa S. 2008. Free-roaming dogs and cats in central Italy: public perceptions of the problem, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 84, 27-47. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sloss MW, Kemp RL, Zajac AM. 1994. Veterinary Clinical Parasitology, Sixth Edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sotiriadou I, Pantchev N, Gassmann D, Karanis P. 2013. Molecular identification of Giardia and Cryptosporidium from dogs and cats. Parasite, 20, 8. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Spano F, Putignani L, McLauchlin J, Casemore DP, Crisanti A. 1997. PCR-RFLP analysis of the Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein (COWP) gene discriminates between C.wrairi and C. parvum isolates of human and animal origin. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 150, 209-217. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tamponi C, Varcasia A, Pinna S, Melis E, Melosu V, Zidda A, Sanna G., Pipia AP, Zedda MT, Pau S, Brianti E, Scala A. 2017. Endoparasites detected in faecal samples from dogs and cats referred for routine clinical visit in Sardinia, Italy. Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports, 10, 13-17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Thamsborg SM, Ketzis J, Horii Y, Matthews JB. 2017. Strongyloides spp. infections of veterinary importance. Parasitology 144, 274-284. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Traversa D, Di Cesare A, Conboy G. 2010. Canine and feline cardiopulmonary parasitic nematodes in Europe: emerging and underestimated. Parasites & Vectors, 23 3, 62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Traversa D, Di Cesare A, Meloni S, Frangipane di Regalbono A, Milillo P, Pampurini F, Venco L. 2013. Canine angiostrongylosis in Italy: occurrence of Angiostrongylus vasorum in dogs with compatible clinical pictures. Parasitology Research, 112, 2473-2480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Traversa D, Di Cesare A, Simonato G, Cassini R, Merola C, Diakou A, Halos L, Beugnet F, Frangipane di Regalbono A. 2017. Zoonotic intestinal parasites and vector-borne pathogens in Italian shelter and kennel dogs. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 51, 69-75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Veronesi F, Lepri E, Morganti G, Di Palma S, Mechelli L, Moretti A, Traversa D. 2013. Nasal eucoleosis in a symptomatic dog from Italy. Veterinary Parasitology, 195, 187-191. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zanzani SA, Gazzonis AL, Scarpa P, Berrilli F, Manfredi MT. 2014. Intestinal parasites of owned dogs and cats from metropolitan and micropolitan areas: prevalence, zoonotic risks, and pet owner awareness in Northern Italy. BioMed Research International, 2014, ID 696508. [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Sauda F, Malandrucco L, Macrì G, Scarpulla M, De Liberato C, Terracciano G, Fichi G, Berrilli F, Perrucci S. 2018. Leishmania infantum, Dirofilaria spp. and other endoparasite infections in kennel dogs in central Italy. Parasite 25, 2

All Tables

Table 1

Prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) of intestinal, cardiorespiratory and vector-borne parasites identified in the total number of examined dogs (639) and in the same dogs separated into apparently healthy or clinically suspect dogs on the basis of clinical examination.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.