Open Access
Short Note
Issue
Parasite
Volume 20, 2013
Article Number 29
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2013029
Published online 10 September 2013

© M.R. Yeargan et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2013

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Sarcocystis neurona and Neospora hughesi are apicomplexan protozoa that cause equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM). This debilitating neurologic disease has been estimated to affect about 1 in 1000 horses annually [19] and is typically fatal if not treated. The vast majority of EPM cases are associated with S. neurona. Horses become infected with S. neurona when they ingest food and water contaminated with sporocysts or oocysts passed in the feces of the definitive host, the opossums Didelphis virginiana and Didelphis albiventris [10, 14]. Clinical disease in horses is associated with multiplication of schizonts in the central nervous system. Consistent with the geographic range of opossums, infection with S. neurona is limited to North, Central, and South America, with seroprevalence studies showing that horses are commonly exposed to this parasite [35, 7, 9, 11, 12, 16, 2124].

The definitive host for N. hughesi is not known, but canids are definitive hosts for the related species Neospora caninum. Exposure of horses to N. hughesi is much lower than to S. neurona, but it is evident that N. hughesi has a wider geographic distribution since seropositive horses have been reported in the Americas, Europe, Asia, and New Zealand [2, 69, 11, 12, 1517, 20, 24, 25].

The current study was conducted to assess the exposure of horses in Mexico to S. neurona and N. hughesi. The results indicated that the prevalence of antibodies to S. neurona is variable depending on geography but is generally high overall (approximately 50%). In contrast, antibodies to N. hughesi were detected in only a small proportion of the horses from Mexico, consistent with studies conducted in other parts of the world. These findings confirm that horses in Mexico are at risk of being afflicted with EPM caused by either S. neurona or N. hughesi.

Materials and methods

Blood was collected by jugular venipuncture from 495 horses in three municipalities of Durango State, Mexico. Horse signalment and husbandry information were described previously [1]. Serum was separated by centrifugation and stored at −20 °C until used for serologic testing. The S. neurona trivalent recombinant protein rSnSAG2/4/3 and recombinant N. hughesi SAG1 (rNhSAG1) were produced and used in ELISAs essentially as described previously [17, 27]. The S. neurona positive control serum was from a clinically affected horse that had EPM confirmed by postmortem examination. The negative control serum was from a pre-infection foal used in a prior infection experiment [13]. The positive control sample used for the rNhSAG1 ELISA was a pool of sera from three horses that exhibited high antibody titers to N. hughesi (kindly provided by Dr. Nicola Pusterla, University of California, Davis, CA, USA) based on ELISA and Western blot analysis. All samples were tested in duplicate wells at a dilution of 1:250 for the rSnSAG2/4/3 ELISA and 1:500 for the rNhSAG1 ELISA. Optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm using an Emax microplate reader (Molecular Devices). To remove interplate variation, a percent positivity (PP) relative to the controls was determined for each test sample [26]. A PP cut-off of 10% was used for the rSnSAG2/4/3 ELISA, while a cut-off of 20% was used for the rNhSAG1 ELISA; borderline PP values were rounded up to the nearest whole number (e.g., PP = 19.51 would be considered seropositive for the rNhSAG1 ELISA). At a cut-off of 20%, the rNhSAG1 ELISA was shown previously to provide 94% sensitivity and 95% specificity for detecting antibodies against N. hughesi [17]. The serologic accuracy of the rSnSAG2/4/3 ELISA has not yet been determined, but it is projected to provide greater than 90% sensitivity and specificity based on previous use of these SnSAG surface molecules in ELISAs [27]. To confirm results obtained with the rNhSAG1 ELISA, all samples that yielded a PP value equal to or greater than 10% were tested by Western blot analysis with N. hughesi whole-tachyzoite antigen, as described [17]. Samples were considered positive for antibodies against N. hughesi if they reacted to the two immunodominant bands that correspond to NhSAG1 and NhSRS2 [18].

Statistical analysis was performed using Epi Info software version 3.5.4 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: http://wwwn.cdc.gov/epiinfo/) and SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). We used the Pearson’s chi-square test and the Fisher exact test (when values were less than 5) for comparison of the frequencies among groups. Multivariate analyses were used to assess the association between the characteristics of the horses and S. neurona and N. hughesi seropositivity. Variables were included in the multivariate analysis if they had a P value equal to or less than 0.25 in the bivariate analysis. Odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by multivariate analysis, using backward stepwise logistic regression analysis. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Antibodies to S. neurona were detected in 240 (48.5%) of 495 horses based on reactivity to the rSnSAG2/4/3 recombinant antigen (Table 1). The PP values in the seropositive samples ranged from 9.52 to 144.16, with a mean of 22.11. The seroprevalence of S. neurona exposure in horses varied significantly among farms (P < 0.001) and municipalities (P = 0.001) of Durango, Mexico (Table 1). Horse signalment and husbandry data and their relation with S. neurona and N. hughesi exposures are shown in Table 2. Bivariate analysis of the association of S. neurona seropositivity with horse characteristics showed a number of characteristics with a P value equal to or less than 0.25 including age (P < 0.004), sex (P = 0.07), breed (P = 0.007), urban area (P = 0.03), type of feeding (P = 0.01), and herd size (P = 0.007). Multivariate analysis of these six characteristics showed that S. neurona seropositivity was associated only with age (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01–1.10; P = 0.006), feeding with grains and crops (OR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.17–4.66; P = 0.01), and small (up to 28 horses) herd size (OR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.31–2.87; P = 0.0009).

Table 1.

Seroprevalence of Sarcocystis neurona and Neospora hughesi in domestic horses in Durango, Mexico.

Table 2.

General characteristics of horses and seroprevalence of Sarcocystis neurona and Neospora hughesi.

Antibodies to N. hughesi were found in 15 (3.0%) of the 495 serum samples, based on the rNhSAG1 ELISA analysis (Table 1). The ELISA PP values ranged from 20.57 to 115.68 and had a mean of 53.62. To confirm the rNhSAG1 ELISA results, Western blot analysis using N. hughesi whole-tachyzoite antigen was conducted on the 15 ELISA-positive sera and 33 additional sera that had ELISA PP values between 10% and 20%. This analysis revealed that 2 of the 15 ELISA-positive samples were negative for antibodies to N. hughesi; these sera had ELISA PP values of 21.21 and 22.13%. Two sera that had ELISA PP values between 10 and 20%, and were therefore considered negative by ELISA, tested positive by Western blot for antibodies against N. hughesi. One serum had an ELISA PP = 11.12 and reacted strongly in Western blot to NhSRS2 at 35 kDa but weakly with NhSAG1 at 29 kDa (data not shown). The second serum had an ELISA PP = 19.25 and recognized both surface antigens strongly in Western blot (data not shown). The remaining 31 sera with PP values between 10% and 20% were negative by Western blot for N. hughesi antibodies. Overall, the 15 N. hughesi-positive sera had a mean ELISA PP of 48.49 that ranged from 11.12% to 115.68%. Exposure to N. hughesi in the farms investigated varied from 0% to 33.3%. However, differences in seroprevalence among farms and municipalities were not statistically significant (Table 1).

With respect to N. hughesi seropositivity, characteristics with a P value equal to or less than 0.25 in the bivariate analysis included age (P = 0.25), breed (P = 0.22), urban area (P = 0.06), and feeding (P = 0.17). Multivariate analysis showed that none of these four characteristics were associated with N. hughesi seropositivity.

Discussion

Although seroprevalence of S. neurona can vary widely, from 15% in wild horses in Wyoming [11] to 89% of horses in Oklahoma [3], antibodies to S. neurona are typically detected in 35% to 65% of horses in regions where this parasite is known to exist [4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 16, 2124]. Therefore, the relatively high seroprevalence observed in these horses from Mexico (48.9%) is similar to what has been documented in many regions of North, Central, and South America. Interestingly, a significant proportion of Durango State is mountainous and rather arid, which has been associated with low S. neurona seroprevalence [11, 23, 24]. Consequently, the number of seropositive horses observed in this study was higher than might be predicted based on the geography and climate of this region. Horses were raised in the valleys region of Durango, Mexico. Exposure to S. neurona was associated with age, type of feeding, and herd size. The higher seroprevalence in horses fed with grains and crops than horses fed on pasture might suggest a contamination of food source in farms and a lower frequency of S. neurona in fields. Similarly, the association of exposure with small herd size may be related to the type of feeding. Herds of small size are commonly fed with grains and crops in stables while large herds are fed freely in the field.

As seen in multiple prior surveys [7, 9, 12, 1517], the current study found that the proportion of horses with antibodies against N. hughesi was quite low (<3%). Several studies have detected antibodies to N. hughesi in more than 10% of horses [2, 6, 25], and even as high as 30% of horses [11, 24], and it is likely that this can be attributed partly to geographic differences. However, studies that used Western blot analysis to confirm serologic results have suggested that seroprevalence to N. hughesi may be commonly overestimated [7, 17, 24]. In the present study, multivariate analysis did not show an association of exposure to N. hughesi with any of the horse characteristics considered. However, the lack of association was potentially due to an insufficient number of positive sera to reach statistical significance.

In summary, the findings from this study show that horses in the state of Durango, Mexico are at risk of EPM. It is probable that this risk extends to other regions of Mexico, particularly where opossums are found. Without question, there are other risk factors that contribute to the development of this disease. However, the presence of the two known etiologic parasite species implies that EPM must be considered when a horse exhibits clinical signs of a neurologic disorder.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded partly by the Amerman Family Equine Research Endowment. The information reported in this paper (Manuscript #13-14-109) is part of a project of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published with the approval of the Director.

References

  1. Alvarado-Esquivel C, Rodriguez-Pena S, Villena I, Dubey JP. 2012. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic horses in Durango state. Mexico. Journal of Parasitology, 98(5), 944–945. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartova E, Sedlak K, Syrova M, Literak I. 2010. Neospora spp. and Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in horses in the Czech Republic. Parasitology Research, 107(4), 783–785. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bentz BG, Granstrom DE, Stamper S. 1997. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona in horses residing in a county of southeastern Pennsylvania. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 210(4), 517–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bentz BG, Ealey KA, Morrow J, Claypool PL, Saliki JT. 2003. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona in equids residing in Oklahoma. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 15(6), 597–600. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blythe LL, Granstrom DE, Hansen DE, Walker LL, Bartlett J, Stamper S. 1997. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona in horses residing in Oregon. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 210(4), 525–527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheadle MA, Lindsay DS, Rowe S, Dykstra CC, Williams MA, Spencer JA, Toivio-Kinnucan MA, Lenz SD, Newton JC, Rolsma MD, Blagburn BL. 1999. Prevalence of antibodies to Neospora sp. in horses from Alabama and characterisation of an isolate recovered from a naturally infected horse [corrected]. International Journal for Parasitology, 29(10), 1537–1543. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dangoudoubiyam S, Oliveira JB, Viquez C, Gomez-Garcia A, Gonzalez O, Romero JJ, Kwok OC, Dubey JP, Howe DK. 2011. Detection of antibodies against Sarcocystis neurona, Neospora spp., and Toxoplasma gondii in horses from Costa Rica. Journal of Parasitology, 97(3), 522–524. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Duarte PC, Conrad PA, Wilson WD, Ferraro GL, Packham AE, Bowers-Lepore J, Carpenter TE, Gardner IA. 2004. Risk of postnatal exposure to Sarcocystis neurona and Neospora hughesi in horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 65(8), 1047–1052. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubey JP, Kerber CE, Granstrom DE. 1999. Serologic prevalence of Sarcocystis neurona, Toxoplasma gondii, and Neospora caninum in horses in Brazil. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 215(7), 970–972. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dubey JP, Venturini MC, Venturini L, McKinney J, Pecoraro M. 1999. Prevalence of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona, Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in horses from Argentina. Veterinary Parasitology, 86(1), 59–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Kerber CE, Kasai N, Pena HF, Gennari SM, Kwok OC, Shen SK, Rosenthal RM. 2001. First isolation of Sarcocystis neurona from the South American opossum, Didelphis albiventris, from Brazil. Veterinary Parasitology, 95(2–4), 295–304. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dubey JP, Mitchell SM, Morrow JK, Rhyan JC, Stewart LM, Granstrom DE, Romand S, Thulliez P, Saville WJ, Lindsay DS. 2003. Prevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum, Sarcocystis neurona, and Toxoplasma gondii in wild horses from central Wyoming. Journal of Parasitology, 89(4), 716–720. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fenger CK, Granstrom DE, Langemeier JL, Stamper S, Donahue JM, Patterson JS, Gajadhar AA, Marteniuk JV, Xiaomin Z, Dubey JP. 1995. Identification of opossums (Didelphis virginiana) as the putative definitive host of Sarcocystis neurona. Journal of Parasitology, 81(6), 916–919. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fenger CK, Granstrom DE, Gajadhar AA, Williams NM, McCrillis SA, Stamper S, Langemeier JL, Dubey JP. 1997. Experimental induction of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis in horses using Sarcocystis sp. sporocysts from the opossum (Didelphis virginiana). Veterinary Parasitology, 68(3), 199–213. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gupta GD, Lakritz J, Kim JH, Kim DY, Kim JK, Marsh AE. 2002. Seroprevalence of Neospora, Toxoplasma gondii and Sarcocystis neurona antibodies in horses from Jeju island, South Korea. Veterinary Parasitology, 106(3), 193–201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoane JS, Yeargan MR, Stamper S, Saville WJ, Morrow JK, Lindsay DS, Howe DK. 2005. Recombinant NhSAG1 ELISA: a sensitive and specific assay for detecting antibodies against Neospora hughesi in equine serum. Journal of Parasitology, 91(2), 446–452. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoane JS, Gennari SM, Dubey JP, Ribeiro MG, Borges AS, Yai LE, Aguiar DM, Cavalcante GT, Bonesi GL, Howe DK. 2006. Prevalence of Sarcocystis neurona and Neospora spp. infection in horses from Brazil based on presence of serum antibodies to parasite surface antigen. Veterinary Parasitology, 136(2), 155–159. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marsh AE, Howe DK, Wang G, Barr BC, Cannon N, Conrad PA. 1999. Differentiation of Neospora hughesi from Neospora caninum based on their immunodominant surface antigen, SAG1 and SRS2. International Journal for Parasitology, 29(10), 1575–1582. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. NAHMS. 2001. Equine Protozoal Myeloencephalitis (EPM) in the U.S., USDA, APHIS, VS, Editors. Fort Collins, CO: Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pitel PH, Pronost S, Romand S, Thulliez P, Fortier G, Ballet JJ. 2001. Prevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum in horses in France. Equine Veterinary Journal, 33(2), 205–207. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rossano MG, Kaneene JB, Marteniuk JV, Banks BD, Schott HC, Mansfield LS. 2001. The seroprevalence of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona in Michigan equids. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 48(2), 113–128. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Saville WJ, Reed SM, Granstrom DE, Hinchcliff KW, Kohn CW, Wittum TE, Stamper S. 1997. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona in horses residing in Ohio. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 210(4), 519–524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tillotson K, McCue PM, Granstrom DE, Dargatz DA, Smith MO, Traub-Dargatz JL. 1999. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona in horses residing in northern Colorado. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 19(2), 122–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vardeleon D, Marsh AE, Thorne JG, Loch W, Young R, Johnson PJ. 2001. Prevalence of Neospora hughesi and Sarcocystis neurona antibodies in horses from various geographical locations. Veterinary Parasitology, 95(2–4), 273–282. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Villalobos EM, Furman KE, Lara Mdo C, Cunha EM, Finger MA, Busch AP, de Barros Filho IR, Deconto I, Dornbusch PT, Biondo AW. 2012. Detection of Neospora sp antibodies in cart horses from urban areas of Curitiba, Southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, 21(1), 68–70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wright PF, Nilsson E, VanRooij EM, Lelenta M, Jeggo MH. 1993. Standardisation and validation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques for the detection of antibody in infectious disease diagnosis. Revue Scientifique et Technique Office International des Épizooties, 12(2), 435–450. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yeargan MR, Howe DK. 2011. Improved detection of equine antibodies against Sarcocystis neurona using polyvalent ELISAs based on the parasite SnSAG surface antigens. Veterinary Parasitology, 176(1), 16–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Yeargan MR, Alvarado-Esquivel C, Dubey JP & Howe DK: Prevalence of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona and Neospora hughesi in horses from Mexico. Parasite, 2013, 20, 29.

All Tables

Table 1.

Seroprevalence of Sarcocystis neurona and Neospora hughesi in domestic horses in Durango, Mexico.

Table 2.

General characteristics of horses and seroprevalence of Sarcocystis neurona and Neospora hughesi.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.