Open Access
Issue
Parasite
Volume 33, 2026
Article Number 15
Number of page(s) 16
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2026016
Published online 30 March 2026
  1. Achatz TJ, Pulis EE, Junker K, Binh TT, Snyder SD, Tkach VV. 2019. Molecular phylogeny of the Cyathocotylidae (Digenea, Diplostomoidea) necessitates systematic changes and reveals a history of host and environment switches. Zoologica Scripta, 48, 545–556. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agustina V, Saichua P, Laha T, Tangkawatana S, Prakobwong S, Laoprom N, Kamphasri W, Chareonchai C, Blair D, Suttiprapa S. 2024. Exploring the second intermediate hosts and morphology of human- and cat-specific Opisthorchis viverrini-like populations. International Journal for Parasitology, 54, 497–506. [Google Scholar]
  3. Attwood SW, Upatham ES, Meng XH, Qiu D-C, Southgate VR. 2002. The phylogeography of Asian Schistosoma (Trematoda: Schistosomatidae). Parasitology, 125, 99–112. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Belopolskaja MM. 1963. Family Microphallidae Travassos, 1920. Osnovy Trematodologii, 21, 259–502. [Google Scholar]
  5. Blair D, Davis GM, Wu B. 2001. Evolutionary relationships between trematodes and snails emphasizing schistosomes and paragonimids. Parasitology, 123, 229–243. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowles J, Blair D, McManus DP. 1995. A molecular phylogeny of the human schistosomes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 4, 103–109. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowles J, Hope M, Tiu WU, Liu X, McManus DP. 1993. Nuclear and mitochondrial genetic markers highly conserved between Chinese and Philippine Schistosoma japonicum. Acta Tropica, 55, 217–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brant SV, Loker ES. 2013. Discovery-based studies of schistosome diversity stimulate new hypotheses about parasite biology. Trends in Parasitology, 29, 449–459. [Google Scholar]
  9. Briggs JC. 2003. Guest editorial: Marine centres of origin as evolutionary engines. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  10. Brooks DR, McLennan DA. 1993. Parascript – Parasites and the language of evolution. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ching HL. 1961. Three trematodes from the harlequin duck. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 39, 373–376. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chuang Y, Shinn AP, Bron JE. 2025. In vitro culture and confocal microscopy study of Maritrema gratiosum Nicoll, 1907 (Digenea): From metacercaria to ovigerous adult. Parasitology Research, 124, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  13. Clement M, Snell Q, Walke P, Posada D, Crandall K. 2002. TCS: estimating gene genealogies, in Proceedings of the 16th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: IEEE. p. 7. [Google Scholar]
  14. Combes C. 2001. Parasitism: The ecology and evolution of intimate interactions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  15. Combes C, Théron A. 2000. Metazoan parasites and resource heterogeneity: Constraints and benefits. International Journal for Parasitology, 30, 299–304. [Google Scholar]
  16. Corel Corporation. 2022. CorelDRAW Graphics Suite [computer program]. Version 24.0.0.301. Ottawa, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cribb TH, Anderson GR, Adlard RD, Bray RA. 1998. A DNA-based demonstration of a three-host life-cycle for the Bivesiculidae (Platyhelminthes: Digenea). International Journal for Parasitology, 28, 1791–1795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cribb TH, Bray RA, Olson PD, Littlewood DTJ. 2003. Life cycle evolution in the Digenea: A new perspective from phylogeny, in The Evolution of Parasitism – A Phylogenetic Perspective, Littlewood DTJ, Editor. Academic Press: London. p. 197. [Google Scholar]
  19. Daczkowski CM, Pung OJ. 2016. In vitro insemination of the microphallid digenean Gynaecotyla adunca. Journal of Parasitology, 102, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  20. Edler D, Klein J, Antonelli A, Silvestro D. 2021. raxmlGUI 2.0: A graphical interface and toolkit for phylogenetic analyses using RAxML. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 373–377. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fedosov A, Achaz G, Gontchar A, Puillandre N. 2022. mold, a novel software to compile accurate and reliable DNA diagnoses for taxonomic descriptions, Molecular Ecology Resources, 22, 2038–2053. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fraija-Fernández N, Olson PD, Crespo EA, Raga JA, Aznar FJ, Fernández M. 2015. Independent host switching events by digenean parasites of cetaceans inferred from ribosomal DNA. International Journal for Parasitology, 45, 167–173. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gagnon DK, Detwiler JT. 2019. Broader geographic sampling increases extent of intermediate host specificity for a trematode parasite (Notocotylidae: Quinqueserialis quinqueserialis). Journal of Parasitology, 105, 874. [Google Scholar]
  24. Galaktionov KV. 2009. Description of maritae and determination of the species status of Microphallus pseudopygmaeus sp. nov. (Trematoda: Microphallidae). Parazitologiya, 43, 289–299. [Google Scholar]
  25. Galaktionov KV. 1980. Four types of metacercariae species in molluscs, Littorina saxatilis and L. obtusata from the Barents and White Seas. Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta, 3, 21–28. [Google Scholar]
  26. Galaktionov KV. 1983. Microphallids in the pygmaeus group. 1. Description of the species Microphallus pygmaeus (Levinsen 1881) nec Odhner, 1905 and M. piriformes (Odhner, 1905) nom. nov. (Trematoda, Microphallidae). Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta Biologiya, 1983(3), 20–30. [Google Scholar]
  27. Galaktionov KV. 1984. Microphallids of the “pygmaeus” group II. Microphallus triangulatus sp. nov. (Trematoda: Microphallidae). Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta, 3, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  28. Galaktionov KV. 1986. Metacercariae from the family Microphallidae Travassos, 1920 in benthic mollusks in the south-eastern part of the Barents Sea. Parazitologiya, 20, 389–396. [Google Scholar]
  29. Galaktionov KV. 1993. Life cycles of trematodes as components of ecosystems. Apatity: Kola Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  30. Galaktionov KV, Blasco-Costa I. 2018. Microphallus ochotensis sp. nov. (Digenea, Microphallidae) and relative merits of two-host microphallid life cycles. Parasitology Research, 117, 1051–1068. [Google Scholar]
  31. Galaktionov KV, Blasco-Costa I, Olson PD. 2012. Life cycles, molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the “pygmaeus” microphallids (Digenea: Microphallidae): Widespread parasites of marine and coastal birds in the Holarctic. Parasitology, 139, 1346–1360. [Google Scholar]
  32. Galaktionov KV, Dobrovolskij AA. 2003. The trematode life cycle as a system of adaptations, in The biology and evolution of trematodes: An essay on the biology, morphology, life cycles, transmissions, and evolution of digenetic trematodes. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht. [Google Scholar]
  33. Galaktionov KV, Marasaev SF. 1986. Ecological analysis of the trematode fauna of benthic mollusks in the south-eastern zone of the Barents Sea. Parazitologiya, 20, 455–460. [Google Scholar]
  34. Galaktionov KV, Regel KV, Atrashkevich GI. 2010. Microphallus kurilensis sp. nov., a new species of microphallids from the pygmaeus species group (Trematoda, Microphallidae) from the coastal areas of Okhotsk and Bering Seas. Parazitologiia, 44, 496–507. [Google Scholar]
  35. Galaktionov KV, Solovyeva AI, Miroliubov A. 2021. Elucidation of Himasthla leptosoma (Creplin, 1829) Dietz, 1909 (Digenea, Himasthlidae) life cycle with insights into species composition of the north Atlantic Himasthla associated with periwinkles Littorina spp. Parasitology Research, 120, 1649–1668. [Google Scholar]
  36. Galaktionov KV, Węsławski JM, Stempniewicz L. 2021. Food chain, parasites and climate changes in the high Arctic: A case study on trophically transmitted parasites of common eider Somateria mollissima at Franz Josef Land. Polar Biology, 44, 1321–1342. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gonchar A, Galaktionov KV. 2021. It is marine: distinguishing a new species of Catatropis (Digenea: Notocotylidae) from its freshwater twin. Parasitology, 148, 74–83. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hoberg EP. 1992. Congruent and synchronic patterns in biogeography and speciation among seabirds, pinnipeds, and cestodes. Journal of Parasitology, 78, 601. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hoberg EP, Brooks DR. 2008. A macroevolutionary mosaic: Episodic host-switching, geographical colonization and diversification in complex host–parasite systems. Journal of Biogeography, 35, 1533–1550. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hoberg EP, Brooks DR. 2015. Evolution in action: Climate change, biodiversity dynamics and emerging infectious disease. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370, 20130553. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hoberg EP, Cook JA, Agosta SJ, Boeger W, Galbreath KE, Laaksonen S, Kutz SJ, Brooks DR. 2017. Arctic systems in the Quaternary: Ecological collision, faunal mosaics and the consequences of a wobbling climate. Journal of Helminthology, 91, 409–421. [Google Scholar]
  42. Jägerskiöld LA. 1900. Levinsenia (Distomum) pygmaea Levinsen, ein genitalnapftragendes Distomum. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, 1, 732–740. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28, 1647–1649. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. 2019. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics, 35, 4453–4455. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Králová-Hromadová I, Špakulová M, Horáčková E, Turčeková L, Novobilský A, Beck R, Koudela B, Marinculić A, Rajský D, Pybus M. 2008. Sequence analysis of ribosomal and mitochondrial genes of the giant liver fluke Fascioloides magna (Trematoda: Fasciolidae): Intraspecific variation and differentiation from Fasciola hepatica. Journal of Parasitology, 94, 58–67. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kremnev G, Gonchar A, Krapivin V, Knyazeva O, Krupenko D. 2020. First elucidation of the life cycle in the family Brachycladiidae (Digenea), parasites of marine mammals. International Journal for Parasitology, 50, 997–1009. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kremnev G, Gonchar A, Krapivin V, Uryadova A, Miroliubov A, Krupenko D. 2021. Life cycle truncation in Digenea, a case study of Neophasis spp. (Acanthocolpidae), International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife, 15, 158–172. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kremnev G, Gonchar A, Uryadova A, Krapivin V, Skobkina O, Gubler A, Krupenko D. 2023. No tail no fail: Life cycles of the Zoogonidae (Digenea). Diversity, 15, 121. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kremnev G, Krapivin V, Krupenko D. 2025. Second intermediate hosts range and their infection patterns in Orthosplanchnus arcticus, a potentially zoonotic parasite from the family Brachycladiidae (Digenea). Journal of Helminthology, 99, 109. [Google Scholar]
  50. Krupenko D, Kremnev G, Gonchar A, Gubler A, Skobkina O. 2024. Wandering the taxonomic mine-field: the Podocotyle species complex (Digenea: Opecoelidae). Systematic Parasitology, 101, 72. [Google Scholar]
  51. Krupenko D, Kremnev G, Gonchar A, Uryadova A, Miroliubov A, Krapivin V, Skobkina O, Gubler A, Knyazeva O. 2022. Species complexes and life cycles of digenetic trematodes from the family Derogenidae. Parasitology, 149, 1590–1606. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Laidemitt MR, Brant SV, Mutuku MW, Mkoji GM, Loker ES. 2019. The diverse echinostomes from East Africa: With a focus on species that use Biomphalaria and Bulinus as intermediate hosts. Acta Tropica, 193, 38–49. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lawton SP, Hirai H, Ironside JE, Johnston DA, Rollinson D. 2011. Genomes and geography: Genomic insights into the evolution and phylogeography of the genus Schistosoma. Parasites & Vectors, 4, 131. [Google Scholar]
  54. Levakin IA, Nikolaev KE, Galaktionov KV. 2013. Long-term variation in trematode (Trematoda, Digenea) component communities associated with intertidal gastropods is linked to abundance of final hosts. Hydrobiologia, 706, 103–118. [Google Scholar]
  55. Levinsen GMR. 1881. Bidrag til kundskab om Grønlands trematodfauna. Oversigt over det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger. 52, 84. [Google Scholar]
  56. Linnaeus C. 1758. Taenia intestinalis, in Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, 10th edn, vol. 1, Holmiae (Stockholm): Laurentii Salvii. p. 824. [Google Scholar]
  57. Lockyer AE, Olson PD, Østergaard P, Rollinson D, Johnston DA, Attwood SW, Southgate VR, Horak P, Snyder SD, Le TH, Agatsuma T, McManus DP, Carmichael AC, Naem S, Littlewood DTJ. 2003. The phylogeny of the Schistosomatidae based on three genes with emphasis on the interrelationships of Schistosoma Weinland, 1858. Parasitology, 126, 203–224. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Louvard C, Corner RD, Cutmore SC, Cribb TH. 2022. Evidence that host ecology drives first intermediate host use in the Didymozoidae (Trematoda: Hemiuroidea): An asexual infection in a vermetid (Gastropoda). Journal of Helminthology, 96(e88), 1–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Martin SB, Sasal P, Cutmore SC, Ward S, Aeby GS, Cribb TH. 2018. Intermediate host switches drive diversification among the largest trematode family: evidence from the Polypipapiliotrematinae n. subf. (Opecoelidae), parasites transmitted to butterflyfishes via predation of coral polyps. International Journal for Parasitology, 48, 1107–1126. [Google Scholar]
  60. Nazarizadeh M, Nováková M, Drábková M, Catchen J, Olson PD, Štefka J. 2024. Highly resolved genome assembly and comparative transcriptome profiling reveal genes related to developmental stages of tapeworm Ligula intestinalis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 291, 20232563. [Google Scholar]
  61. Pakharukova MY, Mordvinov VA. 2022. Similarities and differences among the Opisthorchiidae liver flukes: insights from Opisthorchis felineus. Parasitology, 149, 1306–1318. [Google Scholar]
  62. Posit Team. 2025. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software. Boston, MA: PBC. [Google Scholar]
  63. Puillandre N, Brouillet S, Achaz G. 2021. ASAP: Assemble species by automatic partitioning. Molecular Ecology Resources, 21, 609–620. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Pung OJ, Lester T, Burger AR, Alyanak E, O’Leary PA. 2011. Optimization of culture conditions for in vitro fertilization and reproduction of Microphallus turgidus (Trematoda: Microphallidae). Journal of Parasitology, 97, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  65. R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  66. Reid DG. 1996. Systematics and evolution of Littorina. London: The Ray Society. [Google Scholar]
  67. Reid DG. 2001. New data on the taxonomy and distribution of the genus Littoraria Griffith and Pidgeon, 1834 (Gastropoda: Littorinidae) in Indo-West Pacific mangrove forests. Nautilus, 115, 115–139. [Google Scholar]
  68. Reid DG, Dyal P, Williams ST. 2012. A global molecular phylogeny of 147 periwinkle species (Gastropoda, Littorininae). Zoologica Scripta, 41, 125–136. [Google Scholar]
  69. Repkin EA, Maltseva AL, Varfolomeeva MA, Aianka RV, Mikhailova NA, Granovitch AI. 2020. Genetic and morphological variation of metacercariae of Microphallus piriformes (Trematoda, Microphallidae): Effects of paraxenia and geographic location. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife, 11, 235–245. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology, 61, 539–542. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Saville DH, Galaktionov KV, Irwin SWB, Malkova II. 1997. Morphological comparison and identification of metacercariae in the “pygmaeus” group of microphallids, parasites of seabirds in western palaearctic regions. Journal of Helminthology, 71, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  72. Sirenko BI. 2001. List of species of free-living invertebrates of Eurasian Arctic seas and adjacent deep waters. St. Petersburg: Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  73. Sirenko BI. 2013. Check-list of species of free-living invertebrates of the Russian Far Eastern seas. St. Petersburg: Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  74. Skírnisson K, Galaktionov KV. 2002. Life cycles and transmission patterns of seabird digeneans in SW Iceland. Sarsia, 87, 144–151. [Google Scholar]
  75. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 38, 3022–3027. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Tkach VV, Littlewood DTJ, Olson PD, Kinsella JM, Swiderski Z. 2003. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Microphalloidea Ward, 1901 (Trematoda: Digenea). Systematic Parasitology, 56, 1–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Vences M, Miralles A, Brouillet S, Ducasse J, Fedosov A, Kharchev V, Kumari S, Patmanidis S, Puillandre N, Scherz MD, Kostadinov I, Renner SS. 2021. iTaxoTools 0.1: Kickstarting a specimen-based software toolkit for taxonomists. Megataxa, 6, 77–92. [Google Scholar]
  78. Waltho C, Coulson J. 2015. The Common Eider. London: T. & A. D. Poyser. [Google Scholar]
  79. Webster BL, Littlewood DTJ. 2012. Mitochondrial gene order change in Schistosoma (Platyhelminthes: Digenea: Schistosomatidae). International Journal for Parasitology, 42, 313–321. [Google Scholar]
  80. Wee NQ, Cribb TH, Corner RD, Ward S, Cutmore SC. 2021. Gastropod first intermediate hosts for two species of Monorchiidae Odhner, 1911 (Trematoda): I can’t believe it’s not bivalves! International Journal for Parasitology, 51, 1035–1046. [Google Scholar]
  81. Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.