Open Access
Research Article
Issue
Parasite
Volume 28, 2021
Article Number 75
Number of page(s) 21
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2021069
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. Abbot P, Dill LM. 2001. Sexually transmitted parasites and sexual selection in the milkweed leaf beetle, Labidomera clivicollis. Oikos, 92, 91–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Athias-Binche F. 1993. From phoresy to parasitism: the example of mites and nematodes. Research and Reviews in Parasitology-Revista, 53, 73–79. [Google Scholar]
  3. Atlas of Living Australia. 2020. https://bie.ala.org.au/species/urn:lsid:biodiversity.org.au:afd.taxon:7bbbcf53-08e7-4c98-8373-211849be892c; accessed 10 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Australian Faunal Directory. 2020. https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/Gnathaphanus; accessed 10 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baehr M, Will K. 2019. Carabidae Latreille, 1802, in “Australian Beetles”: Archostemata, Myxophaga, Adephaga, Polyphaga, Vol. 2, Slipinskí A, Lawrence JF, Editors. CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia. p. 61–217. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartlow AW, Agosta SJ. 2021. Phoresy in animals: review and synthesis of a common but understudied mode of dispersal. Biological Reviews, 96, 223–246. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bochkov AV, OConnor BM, Wauthy G. 2008. Phylogenetic position of the mite family Myobiidae within the infraorder Eleutherengona (Acariformes) and origins of parasitism in eleutherengone mites. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 247, 15–45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cross EA, Moser JC. 1971. Taxonomy and biology of some Pyemotidae (Acarina: Tarsonemoidea) inhabiting bark beetle galleries in North American conifers. Acarologia, 13, 47–64. [Google Scholar]
  9. De Heij SE, Willenborg CJ. 2020. Connected carabids: Network interactions and their impact on biocontrol by carabid beetles. BioScience, 70, 490–500. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gullan PJ, Cranston PS. 2014. The insects: an outline of entomology, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hajiqanbar H, Husband RW, Kamali K, Saboori A, Kamali H. 2007. Ovacarus longisetosus n. sp. (Acari: Podapolipidae) from Amara (Paracelia) saxicola Zimm. (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and new records of Coccipolipus, Dorsipes, Eutarsopolipus and Tarsopolipus from Iran. International Journal of Acarology, 33, 241–244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hajiqanbar H, Mortazavi A. 2012. First record of the myzus species group (Acari: Podapolipidae: Eutarsopolipus Berlese, 1911) from Asia, with the description of two new species parasitising carabid beetles. Systematic Parasitology, 83, 189–202. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hajiqanbar H, Mortazavi A, Khaustov A. 2019. Two new species of Eutarsopolipus (Acari: Prostigmata: Podapolipidae) parasitizing Syntomus lateralis (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from Iran. Zootaxa, 4647, 154–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday B. 2019. The enemy of my parasite is my friend: the possible role of predatory mites as biological control agents of pest beetles in soil. International Journal of Acarology, 45, 189–196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Houck MA, OConnor BM. 1991. Ecological and evolutionary significance of phoresy in the Astigmata. Annual Review of Entomology, 36, 611–636. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hunter PE, Rosario RM. 1988. Associations of Mesostigmata with other arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology, 33, 393–417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hurst GD, Sharpe RG, Broomfield AH, Walker LE, Majerus TM, Zakharov IA, Majerus ME. 1995. Sexually transmitted disease in a promiscuous insect, Adalia bipunctata. Ecological Entomology, 20, 230–236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Husband RW. 1984. Dilopolipus, Panesthipolipus, Peripolipus and Stenopolipus, new genera of Podapolipidae (Acarina) from the Indo-Australian Region. International Journal of Acarology, 10, 251–269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Husband RW. 2007. Regenpolipus hexastichus n. sp. (Acari: Podapolipidae), parasite of Anthia hexastichum Gerstaecker (Coleoptera: Carabidae), from Kenya. International Journal of Acarology, 33, 327–332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Husband RW, Khaustov AA. 2004. A new species of Eutarsopolipus (Acari: Podapolipidae) from Calathus fuscipes (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from Ukraine. International Journal of Acarology, 30, 329–333. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Husband RW, Kurosa K. 2000. Two new genera and a new species of mites (Acari: Podapolipidae) associated with weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Argentina. International Journal of Acarology, 26, 247–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Husband RW, Kurosa K. 2013. Eutarsopolipus asiaticus sp. nov. (Acari: Podapolipidae), subelytral parasite of Chlaenius costiger Chaudoir (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from Japan. Systematic & Applied Acarology, 18, 61–70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Husband RW, Raros LA. 1989. New species of Podapolipus and a new species of Eutarsopolipus (Acari: Podapolipidae) from the Philippines. Philippine Entomologist, 7, 525–536. [Google Scholar]
  24. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 1999. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature (ed.), London. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kaliszewski M, Athias-Binche F, Lindquist EE. 1995. Parasitism and parasitoidism in Tarsonemina (Acari: Heterostigmata) and evolutionary considerations. Advances in Parasitology, 35, 335–367. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Katlav A, Hajiqanbar H. 2018. First description of male and larval female of parasitic mite Eutarsopolipus abdominis (Acari: Podapolipidae) with redescription of the adult female. Journal of Parasitology, 104, 1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Katlav A, Hajiqanbar H, Talebi AA. 2014. Dorsipes caspius n. sp. (Acari: Podapolipidae), a subelytral parasite of Pterostichus caspius (Menetries) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with notes on host range of the genus and the distribution of the platysmae group. Systematic Parasitology, 89, 117–132. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Katlav A, Hajiqanbar H, Talebi AA. 2014. First record of the genus Acanthomastix Mahunka, 1972 (Acari: Dolichocybidae) from Asia, with the description of a new species. International Journal of Acarology, 40, 7–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Katlav A, Hajiqanbar H, Talebi AA. 2015. First record of the genus Aethiophenax (Acari: Acarophenacidae) from Asia, redefinition of the genus and description of a new species. Journal of Asia Pacific Entomology, 18, 389–395. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Katlav A, Hajiqanbar H, Talebi AA. 2015. Pseudopygmephorellus mazandaranicus sp. nov. (Acari: Heterostigmata: Pygmephoridae), phoretic on scarabaeid dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from Iran. Zootaxa, 3919, 100–110. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Katlav A, Riegler M, Seeman OD. 2020. Tiny hitchhikers and parasites: a review of Australian heterostigmatic mites (Acari: Prostigmata) associated with insects, with description of three new species. Austral Entomology, 59, 401–421. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lindquist EE. 1986. The world genera of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata): a morphological, phylogenetic, and systematic revision, with a reclassification of family-group taxa in the Heterostigmata. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 118, 1–517. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Linz DM, Hu AW, Sitvarin MI, Tomoyasu Y. 2016. Functional value of elytra under various stresses in the red flour beetle. Tribolium castaneum. Scientific Reports, 6, 34813. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lovei GL, Sunderland KD. 1996. Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annual Review of Entomology, 41, 231–256. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mortazavi A, Hajiqanbar H, Lindquist EE. 2018. A new family of mites (Acari: Prostigmata: Raphignathina), highly specialized subelytral parasites of dytiscid water beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Dytiscinae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 184, 695–749. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Moser JC, Konrad H, Kirisits T, Carta LK. 2005. Phoretic mites and nematode associates of Scolytus multistriatus and Scolytus pygmaeus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Austria. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 7, 169–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Poinar GO Jr, Curcic BP, Cokendolpher JC. 1998. Arthropod phoresy involving pseudoscorpions in the past and present. Acta Arachnologica, 47, 79–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Regenfuss H. 1968. Untersuchungen zur morphologie, systematik und oekologie der Podapolipidae (Acarina: Tarsonemini). Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 177, 183–282. [Google Scholar]
  39. Regenfuss H. 1972. Über die Einnischung synhospitaler Parasitenarten auf dem Wirtskörper: Untersuchungen an ektoparasitischen Milben (Podapolipidae) auf laufkäfern (Carabidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 10, 44–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schroder RF. 1982. Effect of infestation with Coccipolipus epilachnae Smiley (Acarina: Podapolipidae) on fecundity and longevity of the Mexican bean beetle. International Journal of Acarology, 8, 81–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Seeman OD. 2019. New species of Eutarsopolipus (Trombidiformes: Podapolipidae) from the pterostichine genera Castelnaudia and Trichosternus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Australia. Zootaxa, 4717, 206–230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Seeman OD. 2019. Two new species of Australian Eutarsopolipus (Acariformes: Podapolipidae) from Nurus medius (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Zootaxa, 4647, 134–153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Seeman OD. 2020. Unusual new species of Australian Eutarsopolipus (Acariformes: Podapolipidae) from Clivina (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annales Zoologici, 70, 425–438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Seeman OD. 2021. Contrasting species diversification of Eutarsopolipus (Acariformes: Podapolipidae) on Castelnaudia and Notonomus (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Zootaxa, 4971, 1–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Seeman OD, Nahrung HF. 2013. Two new species of Chrysomelobia Regenfuss, 1968 (Acariformes: Podapolipidae) from Paropsis charybdis Stål (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Systematic Parasitology, 86, 257–270. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Stork NE, McBroom J, Gely C, Hamilton AJ. 2015. New approaches narrow global species estimates for beetles, insects, and terrestrial arthropods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 7519–7523. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Trach VA, Khaustov AA. 2007. A review of mites of the family Canestriniidae (Acari, Astigmata) associated with the leaf beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) in Ukraine with description of a new species of the genus Pseudamansia. Vestnik Zoologii, 41, 267–272. [Google Scholar]
  48. van de Kamp T, Riedel A, Greven H. 2016. Micromorphology of the elytral cuticle of beetles, with an emphasis on weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea). Arthropod Structure & Development, 45, 14–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Walter DE, Lindquist EE, Smith IM, Cook DR, Krantz GW. 2009. Order Trombidiformes, in A manual of acarology, 3rd edn. Krantz GW, Walter DE, Editors. Texas Tech University Press: Texas, USA. p. 233–420. [Google Scholar]
  50. Walter DE, Seeman OD. 2017. A new species of Paracarophenax (Acariformes: Acarophenacidae) with a new means of phoretic attachment. International Journal of Acarology, 43, 329–335. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wohltmann A, Gabryś G, Mąkol J. 2006. Acari: Acari: Terrestrial Parasitengona inhabiting transient biotopes, in Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa, Chelicerata: Araneae/Acari I. Spektrum. Gerecke R, Editor. Elsevier: München. p. 158–240. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zawal A, Pešić V. 2018. The diversity of assemblages of water mites from Lake Skadar and its catchment, in The Skadar/Shkodra Lake environment. Pešić V, Karaman GS, Kostianoy AG, Editors. Springer: Berlin. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.