EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 23 (2016) Parasite, 23 (2016) 43 References
Open Access
Issue
Parasite
Volume 23, 2016
Article Number 43
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2016054
Published online 14 October 2016
  1. Alho AM, Landum M, Ferreira C, Meireles J, Goncalves L, de Carvalho LM, Belo S. 2014. Prevalence and seasonal variations of canine dirofilariosis in Portugal. Veterinary Parasitology, 206(1–2), 99–105. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bacsadi A, Papp A, Szeredi L, Toth G, Nemes C, Imre V, Tolnai Z, Szell Z, Sreter T. 2016. Retrospective study on the distribution of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Hungary. Veterinary Parasitology, 220, 83–86. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Byeon KH, Kim BJ, Kim SM, Yu HS, Jeong HJ, Ock MS. 2007. A serological survey of Dirofilaria immitis infection in pet dogs of Busan, Korea, and effects of chemoprophylaxis. Korean Journal of Parasitology, 45(1), 27–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Courtney CH, Zeng Q. 2001. Comparison of heartworm antigen test kit performance in dogs having low heartworm burdens. Veterinary Parasitology, 96(4), 317–322. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Falidas E, Gourgiotis S, Ivopoulou O, Koutsogiannis I, Oikonomou C, Vlachos K, Villias C. 2016. Human subcutaneous dirofilariasis caused by Dirofilaria immitis in a Greek adult. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 9(1), 102–104. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fan CK, Su KE, Lin YH, Liao CW, Du WY, Chiou HY. 2001. Seroepidemiologic survey of Dirofilaria immitis infection among domestic dogs in Taipei City and mountain aboriginal districts in Taiwan (1998–1999). Veterinary Parasitology, 102(1–2), 113–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. He G, Tian W, Wang P, Wang W, Han J, Jian C, An Y. 2010. Colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip for rapid detection of Dirofilaria immitis. Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 42(6), 89–91 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  8. Hou H, Zhang X, Li J, Gong P. 2007. Development of indirect ELISA for the detection of canine dirofilariasis. Journal of Pathogen Biology, 2(1), 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hou H, Shen G, Wu W, Gong P, Liu Q, You J, Cai Y, Li J, Zhang X. 2011. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs from Dandong, China. Veterinary Parasitology, 183(1–2), 189–193. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Khedri J, Radfar MH, Borji H, Azizzadeh M, Akhtardanesh B. 2014. Canine Heartworm in Southeastern of Iran with review of disease distribution. Iranian Journal of Parasitology, 9(4), 560–567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kramer F, Schaper R, Schunack B, Polozowski A, Piekarska J, Szwedko A, Jodies R, Kowalska D, Schupbach D, Pantchev N. 2014. Serological detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Ehrlichia canis antibodies and Dirofilaria immitis antigen in a countrywide survey in dogs in Poland. Parasitology Research, 113(9), 3229–3239. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee AC, Montgomery SP, Theis JH, Blagburn BL, Eberhard ML. 2010. Public health issues concerning the widespread distribution of canine heartworm disease. Trends in Parasitology, 26(4), 168–173. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu C, Yang N, He J, Yang M, Sun M. 2013. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Shenyang, Northeastern China. Korean Journal of Parasitology, 51(3), 375–377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. McCall JW, Genchi C, Kramer LH, Guerrero J, Venco L. 2008. Heartworm disease in animals and humans. Advances in Parasitology, 66, 193–285. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Montoya-Alonso JA, Carreton E, Simon L, Gonzalez-Miguel J, Garcia-Guasch L, Morchon R, Simon F. 2015. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs from Barcelona: validation of a geospatial prediction model. Veterinary Parasitology, 212(3–4), 456–459. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Montoya-Alonso JA, Carreton E, Morchon R, Silveira-Viera L, Falcon Y, Simon F. 2016. The impact of the climate on the epidemiology of Dirofilaria immitis in the pet population of the Canary Islands. Veterinary Parasitology, 216, 66–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nelson CT, McCall JW, Rubin SB, Buzhardt LF, Dorion DW, Graham W, Longhofer SL, Guerrero J, Robertson-Plouch C, Paul A, Executive Board of the American Heartworm Society. 2005. 2005 Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and management of heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) infection in dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, 133(2–3), 255–266. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rojas A, Rojas D, Montenegro VM, Baneth G. 2015. Detection of Dirofilaria immitis and other arthropod-borne filarioids by an HRM real-time qPCR, blood-concentrating techniques and a serological assay in dogs from Costa Rica. Parasites & Vectors, 8, 170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Simon F, Siles-Lucas M, Morchon R, Gonzalez-Miguel J, Mellado I, Carreton E, Montoya-Alonso JA. 2012. Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 25(3), 507–544. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sun M, Zhuo W, Guo S, Liao S, Shi D, Liu J, Cheng Z, Liu Y, Niu X, Wang S, Yang D. 2012. Serological survey of canine dirofilariosis in Chongqing, Kunming, Nanchang, Fuzhou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Nanning in Southern China. Veterinary Parasitology, 185(2–4), 225–228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang CR, Qiu JH, Zhao JP, Xu LM, Yu WC, Zhu XQ. 2006. Prevalence of helminthes in adult dogs in Heilongjiang Province, the People’s Republic of China. Parasitology Research, 99(5), 627–630. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wu CC, Fan PC. 2003. Prevalence of canine dirofilariasis in Taiwan. Journal of Helminthology, 77(1), 83–88. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.