EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 20 (2013) Parasite, 20 (2013) 48 References
Open Access
Issue
Parasite
Volume 20, 2013
Article Number 48
Number of page(s) 4
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2013048
Published online 28 November 2013
  1. Antolová D, Reiterová K, Dubinský I. 2007. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in wild boars (Sus scrofa) in the Slovak Republic. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 14(1), 71–73. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bártová E, Sedlák K, Literák I. 2006. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum antibodies in wild boars in the Czech Republic. Veterinary Parasitology, 142(1–2), 150–153. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beral M, Rossi M, Aubert D, Gasqui P, Terrier ME, Klein F, Villena I, Abrial D, Gilot-Fromont E, Richomme C, Hars J, Jourdain E. 2012. Environmental factors associated with the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Wild Boars (Sus scrofa), France. Ecohealth, 9(3), 303–309. [Google Scholar]
  4. Choi WJ, Nam HW, Kwak NH, Huh W, Kim YR, Kang MW, Cho SY, Dubey JP. 1997. Foodborne outbreaks of human toxoplasmosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 175, 1280–1282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook AJC, Gilbert RE, Buffolano W, Zufferey J, Petersen E, Foulon W, Semprini AE, Dunn DT. 2000. Sources of Toxoplasma infection in pregnant women: European multicentre case-control study. British Medical Journal, 321, 142–147. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Deni D, Brocherel G, Casati D, Donnini C, Giannetti C, Gori R, Medici G, Palmerini L, Scicluna T, Tanganelli C, Palarchi M. 2006. Wild boar zoonoses. Obiettivi e Documenti Veterinari, 27(3), 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  7. Diderrich V, New JC, Noblet GP, Patton S. 1996. Serologic survey of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in free-ranging wild hogs (Sus scrofa) from the Great Smoky Mountains National Park and from sites in South Carolina. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 43, 122S. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Directive 2003/99/EC Of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the monitoring of zoonoses and zoonotic agents, amending Council Decision 90/424/EEC and repealing Council Directive 92/117/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 325, 12.12.2003. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubey JP. 2009. Toxoplasmosis in pigs – the last 20 years. Veterinary Parasitology, 164(2–4), 89–103. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. European Food Safety Authority. 2007. Surveillance and monitoring of Toxoplasma in humans, food and animals- Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Biological Hazards. EFSA Journal, 583, 1–64. [Google Scholar]
  11. European Food Safety Authority. 2012. Scientific of EFSA and ECDC: The European Union Summary Report on Trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2010. EFSA Journal, 10(3), 2597. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gortazar C, Vicente J, Fierro Y, Leon L, Cubero MJ, Gonzalez M. 2002. Natural Aujeszky’s disease in a Spanish wild boar population. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 969, 210–212. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kijlstra A, Jongert E. 2008. Control of the risk of human toxoplasmosis transmitted by meat. International Journal of Parasitology, 38, 1359–1370. [Google Scholar]
  14. Magnino S, Frasnelli M, Fabbi M, Bianchi A, Zanoni MG, Merialdi G, Pacciarini ML, Gaffuri A. 2011. The monitoring of selected zoonotic disease of wildlife in Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy, in Game Meat Hygiene in Focus: Microbiology, Epidemiology, Risk Analysis and Quality Assurance, Paulsen P, Bauer A, Vodnansky M, Winkelmayer R, Smulders FJM, Eds. Wageningen Academic Publisher: Wageningen. p. 223–244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Opsteegh M, Swart A, Fonville M, Dekkers L, van der Giessen J. 2011. Age-related Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in Dutch wild boar inconsistent with lifelong persistence of antibodies. PLoS One, 6(1), e16240. [Google Scholar]
  16. Paştiu AI, Györke A, Blaga R, Mircean V, Rosenthal BM, Cozma V. 2013. In Romania, exposure to Toxoplasma gondii occurs twice as often in swine raised for familial consumption as in hunted wild boar, but occurs rarely, if ever, among fattening pigs raised in confinement. Parasitology Research, 112(6), 2403–2407. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Piergili Fioretti D, Moretti A, Polidori GA, Taddei G. 1985. Saggi su alcune infezioni zoonosiche nei cinghiali della regione umbra. Praxis, 4, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ragni B. 2002. Atlante dei mammiferi dell’Umbria. Petruzzi: Città di Castello, Perugia, Italy. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ranucci D, Veronesi F, Branciari R, Miraglia D, Moretta I, Piergili Fioretti D. 2012. Evaluation of an immunofluorescence antibody assay for the detection of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii in meat juice samples from finishing pigs. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 9, 75–78. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Richomme C, Aubert D, Gilot-Fromont E, Ajzenberg D, Mercier A, Ducrot C, Ferté H, Delorme D, Villena I. 2009. Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from wild boar (Sus scrofa) in France. Veterinary Parasitology, 164(2–4), 296–300. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Richomme C, Afonso E, Tolon V, Ducrot C, Halos L, Alliot A, Perret C, Thomas M, Boireau P, Gilot-Fromont E. 2010. Seroprevalence and factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection in wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean island. Epidemiology and Infection, 138(9), 1257–1266. [Google Scholar]
  22. Veronesi F, Ranucci D, Branciari R, Miraglia D, Mammoli R, Piergili Fioretti D. 2011. Seroprevalence and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection on finishing swine reared in the Umbria Region, Central Italy. Zoonoses and Public Health, 58, 178–184. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.