Open Access
Volume 19, Number 2, May 2012
Page(s) 159 - 164
Published online 15 May 2012
  1. Abbott W.S. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1925, 18, 265–267. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradford R.A. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of proteins utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 1976, 72, 248. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chandre F., Darriet F., Manguin S., Brengues C., Carnevale P. & Guillet P. Pyrethroid cross resistance spectrum among populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s. from Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association, 1999, 15, 53–59. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dakotto D. & Nacro S. Chemical control of rice gall midge (GM) Orseolia oryzivora. International Rice Research Newletters, 1987, 12, 38. [Google Scholar]
  5. Darriet F., Guillet P., Chandre F., N’guessan R., Doannio J.M.C.Rivière F. & Carnevale P. Présence et évolution de la résistance aux pyréthrinoïdes et au DDT chez deux populations d’Anopheles gambiae s.s. d’Afrique de l’Ouest. Document WHO/CTD/VBC/97.1001; WHO/MAL/97.1081. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  6. Darriet F. Moustiquaires imprégnées et résistance des moustiques aux insecticidesm. IRD Éditions, collection Didactiques, Paris, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  7. Darriet F. & Corbel V. Influence des engrais de type NPK sur l’oviposition d’Aedes aegypti. Parasite, 2008a, 15, 89–92. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Darriet F. & Corbel V. Propriétés attractives et modifications physicochimiques des eaux de gîtes colonisées par des larves de Aedes aegypti (Diptera : Culicidae). Comptes rendus Biologies, 2008b, 331, 617–622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Darriet F., Zumbo B., Corbel V. & Chandre F. Influence des matières végétales et des engrais NPK sur la biologie de Aedes aegypti (Diptera : Culicidae). Parasite, 2010a, 17, 149–154. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Darriet F., Marcombe S., Étienne M., Yebakima A., Agnew P., Yp-Tcha M.M. & Corbel V. Field evaluation of pyriproxyfen and spinosad mixture for the control of insecticide resistant Aedes aegypti in Martinique (French West Indies). Parasites & Vectors, 2010b, 3, 88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Darriet F. & Chandre F. Combining piperonyl butoxide and dinotefuran restores the efficacy of deltamethrin mosquito nets against resistant Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 2011, 48, 952–955. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Diabate A., Baldet T., Chandre F., Akogbeto M., Guiguemde T.R., Darriet F., Brengues C., Guillet P., Hemingway J., Small G.J. & Hougard J.M. The role of agricultural use of insecticides in resistance to pyrethroids in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Burkina-Faso. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene,, 2002, 67, 617–622. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gilbert L.I. & Chino H. Transport of lipids in Insects. Journal of Lipid Research, 1974, 15, 439–456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harris C.R., Chapman R.A. & Harris C. Laboratory studies on the persistence and behaviour in soil of four pyrethroids insecticides. Canadian Entomologist, 1981, 11, 685–694. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mwangangi J., Shililu J., Muturi E., Gu W., Mbogo C., Kabiru E., Jacob B., Githure J. & Novak R. Dynamics of immature stages of Anopheles arabiensis and other mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) in relation to rice cropping in a rice agro-ecosystem in Kenya. Journal of Vector Ecology, 2006, 3, 245–251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Magigan M. & Martinko J. Biologie des micro-organismes. 11ème édition. Pearson Éducation Éditions, Paris, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. N’guessan R., Darriet F., Guillet P., Carnevale P., Traore-Lamizana M., Corbel V., Koffi A.A. & Chandre F. Resistance to carbosulfan in Anopheles gambiae from Ivory Coast, based on reduced sensitivity of acetylcholinesterase. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 2003, 17, 1–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ranson H., N’guessan R., Lines J., Moiroux N., Nkuni Z. & Corbel V. Pyrethroid resistance in African anopheline mosquitoes: what are the implications for malaria control? Trends in Parasitology, 2011, 27, 91–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ridsdill-Smith J. Competition in dung-breeding insects, in: Reproductive behaviour of insects. Bailey W.J. & Ridsdill-Smith J. (eds), Chapman and Hall, London, 1991, 264–292. [Google Scholar]
  20. Scriber J.M. & Slansky F. The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 1989, 26, 183–211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Statsoft. Statistica. Logiciel Windows d’analyse de données, version 6, Statsoft France, Maisons-Alfort, 2001, (www. [Google Scholar]
  22. Victor T.J. & Reuben R. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on mosquito populations in rice fields of southern India. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 2000, 14, 361–368. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vollset S.E. Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion. Statistics in Medicine, 1993, 121, 809–824. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. World Health Organization – WHO. Guidelines for testing mosquito adulticides for indoor residual spraying and treatment of mosquito nets.. Document WHO/CDS/ WHOPES/GCDPP/2005.11, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  25. World Health Organization – WHO. World malaria report 2009. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yadouleton A., Martin T., Padonou G., Chandre F., Asidi A., Djogbenou L., Dabiré R., Aïkpon R., Boko M., Glitho I. & Akogbeto M.. Cotton pest management practices and the selection of pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae population in Northern Benin. Parasites & Vectors, 2011, 4, 60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.