Open Access
Research note
Issue
Parasite
Volume 18, Number 4, November 2011
Page(s) 345 - 348
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2011184345
Published online 15 November 2011
  1. Arko-Mensah J., Bosompem K.M., Canacoo E.A., Wastling J.M. & Akanmori B.D. The seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in pigs in Ghana. Acta Trop,2000, 76, 27–31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aspinall T.V., Marlee D., Hyde J.E. & Sims P.F. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in commercial meat products as monitored by polymerase chain reaction-food for thought? Int J Parasitol, 2002, 32, 1193–1199. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Breurec S., Berlioz-Arthaid A., Baumann F., Miegeville M. & Billaud E. Evaluation of toxoplasmosis seroprevalence among 2,416 women of childbearing age followed at Pasteur Institute of New Caledonia. Bull Soc Pathol Exot, 2004, 97, 271–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cabannes A., Lucchese F., Pelse H., Biesel N., Eymonnot M., Appriou M. & Tribouley-Duret J.La. prévalence de la toxoplasmose chez les animaux familiers dans le Sud-Ouest de la France. Med Mal Infect, 1998, 28, 647–651. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cazein F., Lot F., Pillone J., Pinget R., Bousquet V., le Strat Y., le Vu S., Leclerc M., Benyelles L., Haguy H., Brunet S., Thierry D., Barin F. & Semaille C. Surveillance de l’infection à VIH-sida en France en 2009. BEH, 2010, 45–46, 467–472. [Google Scholar]
  6. Direction, Des Affaires Sanitaires Et Sociales – Dass. Mémento 2009: situation sanitaire en Nouvelle-Calédonie. Site de la DASS-NC. http://www.dass.gouv.nc. [Google Scholar]
  7. Direction, Des Affaires Vétérinaires, Alimentaires Et Rurales – Davar. L’élevage porcin calédonien : conjoncture 2009. Site de la DAVAR. http://www.davar.gouv.nc. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dubey J.P. Toxoplasmosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 1994, 205, 1593–1598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubey J.P., Venturini M.C., Venturini L., McKinney J. & Pecoraro M. Prevalence of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona, Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in horses from Argentina. Vet Parasitol, 1999a, 86, 59–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dubey J.P., Kerber C.E. & Granstrom D.E. Serologic prevalence of Sarcocystis neurona, Toxoplasma gondii, and Neospora caninum in horses in Brazil. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 1999b, 215, 970–972. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dubey J.P., Graham D.H., de Young R.W., Dahl E., Ebehard M.L., Nace E.K., Won K., Bishop H., Punkosdy G., Sreekumar C., Vianna M.C.B., Shen S.K., Kwok O.C.H., Sumners J.A., Demarais S., Humphreys J.G. & Lehmann T. Molecular and biologic characteristics of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from wildlife in the United States. J Parasitol, 2004, 90, 67–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dubey J.P. & Thulliez P. Persistence of tissue cysts in edible tissues of cattle fed Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. Am J Vet Res, 1993, 54, 270–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dubey J.P., Desmonts G., McDonald C. & Walls K.W. Serologic evaluation of cattle inoculated with Toxoplasma gondii: comparison of Sabin-Feldman dye test and other agglutination tests. Am J Vet Res, 1985, 46 (5), 1085–1088. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Esteban-Redondo I., Maley S.W., Thomson K., Nicoll S., Wright S., Buxton D. & Innes E.A. Detection of T. gondii in tissues of sheep and cattle following oral infection. Vet Parasitol, 1999, 86 (3), 155–171. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gargominy O., Bouchet P., Pascal M., Jaffré T. & Tourneur J.C. Conséquences des introductions d’espèces animales et végétales sur la biodiversité en Nouvelle-Calédonie.Rev Ecol, 1996, 51, 375–402. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gauss C.B.L., Dubey J.P., Vidal D., Cabezon O., Ruiz-Fons F., Vicente J., Marco I., Lavin S., Gortazar C. & Almeria S. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in red deer (Cervus elaphus) and other wild ruminants from spain. Vet Parasitol, 2006, 136, 193–200. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Halos L., Thébault A., Aubert D., Thomas M., Perret C., Geers R., Alliot A., Escotte-Binet S., Ajzenberg D., Dardé M.L., Durand B., Boireau P. & Villena I. An innovative survey underlining the significant level of contamination by Toxoplasma gondii of ovine meat consumed in France. Int J Parasitol, 2010, 40, 193–200. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hove T., Lind P. & Mukaratirwa S. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic pigs reared under different management systems in Zimbabwe. Onderstepoort J Vet Res, 2005, 72, 231–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nöckler K., Serrano F.J., Boireau P., Kapel C.M. & Pozio E. Experimental studies in pigs on Trichinella detection in different diagnostic matrices. Vet Parasitol, 2005, 132, 85–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ross R.D., Stec L.A., Werner J.C., Blumenkranz M.S., Glazer L. & Williams G.A. Presumed acquired ocular toxoplasmosis in deer hunters. Retina, 2001, 21, 226–229. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rouys S. & Theuerkauf J. Factors determining the distribution of introduced mammals in nature reserves of the southern province New Caledonia. Wildl Res, 2003, 30 (2), 187–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tenter A.M., Heckeroth A.R. & Weiss L.M. Toxoplasma gondii: from animals to humans. Int J Parasitol, 2000, 30, 1217–1258. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vanek J.A., Dubey J.P., Thulliez P., Riggs M.R. & Stromberg B.E. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in hunterkilled white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in four regions of Minnesota. J Parasitol, 1996, 82, 41–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Werre S.R., Jacobson R.H., Bowan D.D., Dubey J.P. & Mohammed H.O. Evaluation of kinetics and single-read enzyme-linked immunoassays for detection of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in sheep. J Vet Diagn Invest, 2002, 14 (3), 225–230. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.