| Issue |
Parasite
Volume 27, 2020
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 15 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2020012 | |
| Published online | 13 March 2020 | |
Supplementary materials
Supplementary Table 1. Percentages of identity between the 28S sequences used in the present study. Values were estimated based on aligned sequences using the SeqinR package (Charif and Lobry 2007, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-35306-5_10).
Supplementary Table 2. Percentages of identity between the COI sequences used in the present study. Values were estimated based on aligned sequences using the SeqinR package (Charif and Lobry 2007, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-35306-5_10).
Supplementary Table 3. Percentages of identity between the COI + 28S supergene alignment sequences used in the present study. GenBank accession numbers refer respectively to 28S and COI sequences. Values were estimated based on aligned sequences using the SeqinR package (Charif and Lobry 2007, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-35306-5_10).
(Access here)© C. Gérard et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2020
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.