Open Access

Table 2

Seropositivity percentage and univariate analysis results across farm level variables.

Variable Level N Positive Percentage 95% CI OR (95% CI) p value
Hospital KPS (0) 21 6 22.22% (11.11–39.32%) Ref.
NP (1) 30 9 23.07% (12.82–37.28%) 1.07 (0.32–3.80) >0.9
District Kamphangsean(1) 11 3 27.27% (9.09–55.00%) Ref.
Thamaka (2) 11 3 27.27% (9.09–55.00%) 1.00 (0.14–6.92) >0.9
Banpong (3) 13 5 38.46% (15.38–62.23%) 1.67 (0.30–10.5) 0.6
Tha Muang (4) 6 3 50.00% (33.33–98.55%) 2.67 (0.33–23.8) 0.4
Ban Pong (5) 10 1 10.00% (0.00–26.53%) 0.30 (0.01–2.86) 0.3
Province Nakhonpathom(1) 11 3 27.27% (9.09–55.00%) Ref
Kanchanaburi (2) 17 6 35.29% (17.64–59.71%) 1.45 (0.29–8.58) 0.7
Ratchaburi (3) 23 6 26.08% (13.04–45.68%) 0.94 (0.19–5.36) >0.9
Farming period Continuous variable 51 15 Mean 16.5 SD=9.2 1 (0.93–1.07) >0.9
Cooperative Nakhonpathom (1) 8 2 25.00% (12.50–60.17%) Ref.
Sirichok (2) 8 3 37.50% (12.50–70.93%) 1.80 (0.21–18.3) 0.6
Thamuang (3) 7 3 42.85% (14.28–76.44%) 2.25 (0.26–24.0) 0.5
Nong Pho (4) 28 7 25.00% (10.71–39.73%) 1.00 (0.18–7.89) >0.9
Farm standard No (0) 15 4 26.67% (13.33–52.19%) Ref.
Yes (1) 36 11 30.56% (16.67–44.96%) 1.21 (0.33–5.12) 0.8
Total cattle Continuous variable 51 15 Mean 52.3 SD=21.4 1 (0.98–1.01) 0.7
Farm type Free stall (0) 36 10 27.78% (16.67–43.95%) Ref.
Tie stall (1) 15 5 33.33% (13.33–56.33%) 1.30 (0.34–4.70) 0.7
Presence of companion cat No (0) 24 7 29.17% (16.67–49.71%) Ref.
Yes (1) 27 8 29.62% (14.81–46.89%) 1.02 (0.30–3.49) >0.9
Total companion cat Continuous variable Mean 3.9 SD=7.8 1.12 (0.98–1.38) 0.2*
Presence of stray cat No (0) 24 4 16.67% (4.17–29.38%) Ref.
Yes (1) 27 11 40.74% (25.93–61.32%) 3.44 (0.97–14.3) 0.067*
Feed pile No 31 9 29.03% (16.13–46.10%) Ref.
Yes 20 6 30.00% (15.00–51.86%) 1.05 (0.29–3.57) >0.9
Feed fresh grass No (0) 17 5 29.41% (11.76–50.90%) Ref.
Yes (1) 34 10 29.41% (17.64–46.33%) 1.00 (0.28–3.81) >0.9
Pasture No 49 15 30.61% (18.37–42.96%) Ref.
Yes 2 0 0.00% (0.00–85.62%) 0 >0.9
Type of drinking water Tap (0) 10 2 20.00% (10.00–48.74%) Ref.
Ground (1) 41 13 31.71% (19.51–46.81%) 1.86 (0.39–13.5) 0.5
Presence of tank No (0) 38 11 28.95% (15.79–42.91%) Ref.
Yes (1) 13 4 30.77% (15.38–59.46%) 1.09 (0.25–4.16) >0.9
Feeding area High (0) 35 11 31.43% (17.14–46.04%) Ref.
Ground (1) 16 4 25.00% (12.50–49.15%) 0.73 (0.17–2.65) 0.6
Type of floor Only concrete 13 3 23.08% (7.69–47.32%) Ref.
Concrete with Soil 3 1 33.33% (0.00–68.67%) 1.67 (0.06–24.9) 0.7
Concrete with soil and rubber 4 1 25.00% (0.00–60.10%) 1.11 (0.005–13.4) >0.9
Concrete with rubber 28 10 35.71% (21.43–55.13%) 1.85 (0.44–9.70) 0.4
Concrete with sand 3 0 0.0% (0.00–56.07%) 0 >0.9
Cleaning frequency/Day Continuous variable Mean 2.9 SD=1.0 3.37 (1.52–9.71) 0.008*
Introduce new cow (last year) No (0) 33 10 30.30% 18.18–47.61% Ref.
Yes (1) 18 5 27.78% 11.11–48.47% 0.88 (0.23–3.08) 0.9
Presence of soil or sand in resting area No 40 12 30.00% (17.50–44.54%) Ref.
Yes 11 3 27.27% 9.09–55.00% 0.88 (0.17–3.64) 0.9

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.