Table 3

Parasite counts and efficacy.

Parasite Study/treatment groups Number of positive cats/number of cats in group Geometric mean parasite count (range) Efficacy1 (%) p-value2
Adult Toxocara cati Study 1, induced infection (Tennessee, USA)
 Placebo (control)3 10/10 29.5 (14–57) 100 <0.0001
 Treated4 0/10 0
Study 2, natural infection (Albania)
 Placebo (control) 10/10 12.1 (2–32) 98.8 <0.0001
 Treated 1/10 0.1 (0–3)
Dipylidium caninum Study 3, induced infection (South Africa)
 Placebo (control) 7/8 28.9 (8–267) 98.0 0.0018
 Treated 2/8 0.6 (3–9)
Study 4, natural infection (Albania)
 Placebo (control) 9/10 23.1 (3–143) 98.3 0.0001
 Treated 2/10 0.4 (1–12)
Study 5, natural infection (Mexico)
 Placebo (control) 7/10 5.6 (1–370) 93.2 0.0052
 Treated 1/10 0.4 (24)
1

Percent efficacy = 100[(C − T)/C], where C was the geometric mean among placebo controls and T was the geometric mean among the treated animals.

2

Two-sided probability value from analysis of variance on log-counts of the treated group and the placebo control group.

3

Mineral oil at 0.12 mL per kg bodyweight spot-on, once.

4

NexGard® Combo at 0.12 mL per kg bodyweight spot-on, once.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.