Open Access
Review Article

Table 6.

Tick species collected from dromedaries according to their overall frequency in Iran.

Tick species Rank Reference
Hyalomma dromedarii Koch, 1844 1 [1, 2, 27, 44, 47, 75, 77, 95, 99, 101, 104, 114, 128, 139, 140]
Hyalomma anatolicum Koch, 1844 2 [2, 27, 44, 47, 75, 77, 95, 99, 101, 104, 128, 139]
Hyalomma schulzei Olenev, 1931 3 [2, 44, 47, 75, 77, 95, 114, 128]
Hyalomma marginatum Koch, 1844 4 [27, 44, 77, 101, 104, 114, 139]
Hyalomma asiaticum Schulze and Schlottke, 1930 5 [27, 47, 95, 101, 139]
Hyalomma scupense Schulze, 1919 5 [2, 75, 95, 128]
Hyalomma impeltatum Schulze and Schlottke, 1930 6 [2, 77, 95, 101]
Rhipicephalus turanicus (Pomerantsev et al., 1940) 7 [47, 75, 95]
Hyalomma excavatum Koch, 1844 7 [1, 47, 95]
Rhipicephalus bursa (Canestrini and Fanzago, 1878) 8 [101, 128]
Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806) 8 [47, 77]
Hyalomma lusitanicum Koch, 1844 9 [1]
Argas lahorensis Neumann, 1908 9 [128]

The rank of the tick species goes from 1 (the most frequent) to 9 (least frequent).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.