EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 24 (2017) Parasite, 24 (2017) 1 Full HTML
Open Access
Review
Issue
Parasite
Volume 24, 2017
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2017001
Published online 18 January 2017

© C. Gong et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2017

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Diarrhea is a common clinical symptom of various conditions and is harmful to animals. The causative agents include bacteria such as enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), viruses such as rotavirus, and parasites or other possible factors [10, 19]. Cryptosporidium, as an important protozoan parasite, can cause parasitic diarrhea in animals. This parasite has a broad distribution range in both developing and developed countries and can infect various hosts, including humans, domestic animals, and wildlife [26]. Infection with Cryptosporidium in cattle results in clinical symptoms such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss; however, such infections are generally not lethal [43]. Cattle, as a major domestic animal, can be infected by Cryptosporidium. Currently, Cryptosporidium infections in cattle are usually associated with four main species, i.e., C. parvum, C. andersoni, C. ryanae, and C. bovis. However, other species, including C. suis, C. hominis, C. serpentis, C. xiaoi, C. ubiquitum, C. meleagridis, C. muris, and C. felis, have also been identified in cattle [1, 3, 5, 6, 12, 13, 42, 48, 49].

The infection sites for different Cryptosporidium species vary and include the stomach, intestines, and respiratory tissues [36]. In cattle, C. andersoni mainly causes mucosal damage in the abomasums, whereas C. parvum, C. ryanae, and C. bovis usually result in villus atrophy, microvillus shortening, and destruction in the intestine [10, 15, 35]. C. parvum commonly infects humans as well as cattle, while C. andersoni and C. bovis have occasionally been reported in humans [40, 41]. Therefore, infected cattle are considered potentially important reservoirs of Cryptosporidium for human infections. A recent study demonstrated that zoonotic transmission may occur between cattle and farm workers due to close contact between cattle and humans [11, 33].

Although several studies have reported infections of cattle with Cryptosporidium species, there are no effective treatments and vaccines available for Cryptosporidium infection in China. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, genotypes, and subtypes of Cryptosporidium in China, evaluate age and breed-related differences in the incidence of this infection, and assess differences in the geographic distributions of Cryptosporidium species in China by reviewing a number of available published sources and data.

Data sources and statistical analysis

We carried out a literature search without a language limitation in PubMed and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), covering all published papers until 2016, using a combination of the following keywords: Cryptosporidium, cattle, China. If an article in a language other than English was found, the abstract was screened, and the full text was reviewed to determine whether any additional information was included.

Chi-squared tests were used to compare Cryptosporidium infection rates, and differences with p values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle in different regions of China

In China, the first report of Cryptosporidium in cattle was published in 1986 in Lanzhou, which is located in Gansu Province [8]. According to the available published sources, Cryptosporidium species are distributed within 19 provinces in China, including northern China (Tianjin [31] and Inner Mongolia [52]), northeastern China (Heilongjiang [25, 55, 58]), eastern China (Shanghai [5, 59], Jiangsu [5], Anhui [5, 23, 51], Shandong [29], and Taiwan [46]), southern and central China (Henan [7, 16, 20, 24, 27, 29, 36, 44, 45], Hunan [29], Guangdong [47], and Guangxi [17, 50]), southwestern China (Sichuan [37] and Tibet [37]), and northwestern China (Gansu [37, 38, 56], Qinghai [2, 21, 28, 30, 32, 37, 54, 59], Ningxia [9, 18, 56], Xinjiang [14], and Shanxi [57]) (Tables 1 and 2). The overall infection rate was 11.9%, and infection rates varied significantly for different regions/provinces (p < 0.05). The regions with the highest infection rates were Taiwan, Inner Mongolia, Shandong, Hunan, and Qinghai. The regions with the lowest infection rates were Shanxi, Guangxi, Sichuan, Ningxia, and Gansu.

Table 1.

Infection rates with Cryptosporidium in cattle in different regions of China.

Table 2.

Species and subtypes of Cryptosporidium in cattle in different regions of China.

More than 10 species of Cryptosporidium, including C. andersoni, C. bovis, C. parvum, C. ryanae, C. muris, C. ubiquitum, C. meleagridis, C. xiaoi, C. suis-like, mixed Cryptosporidium infection, and new Cryptosporidium genotypes, have been reported in cattle in China; the most common Cryptosporidium infections in cattle were caused by C. bovis, C. parvum, C. ryanae, and C. muris, whereas the other species were only found on occasion.

A variety of Cryptosporidium subtypes have been reported in China, including IIa subtypes (IIaA14G1R1, IIaA14G2R1, IIaA15G2R1, IIaA16G2R1, and IIaA16G3R1) and IId subtypes (IIdA14G1, IIdA15G1, IIdA18G1, and IIdA19G1) for C. parvum. Six C. andersoni subtypes were identified, including A5A4A4A1, A4A4A4A1, A4A4A2A1, A2A4A4A1, A2A4A2A1, and A1A4A4A1. The identified subtypes of C. meleagridis and C. ubiquitum were IIIeA22G2R1 and XIIa, respectively.

Distributions of Cryptosporidium species/subtypes in cattle of different age groups in China

Cattle can be classified into four groups according to age: preweaned, postweaned, juvenile, and adult. The average infection rates in cattle differed according to age, ranging from 4.94% in adult cattle to 9.0%, 12.69%, and 19.5% in postweaned cattle, juvenile cattle, and preweaned cattle, respectively (p < 0.05; Table 3). Significant differences in average infection rates were noted among all age groups (p < 0.05). Previous studies in the USA have indicated that C. parvum is responsible for about 85–97% of Cryptosporidium infections in preweaned calves but only 1–4% of Cryptosporidium infections in postweaned calves and heifers [22]. The highest infection rates in each age group were 27.4% in adults, 28.8% in postweaned cattle, 31.7% in juvenile cattle, and 80% in preweaned cattle.

Table 3.

Distribution of Cryptosporidium species/subtypes in cattle of different ages.

The prevalence of specific Cryptosporidium species/subtypes was also varied among the different age groups of cattle. In preweaned cattle, C. bovis and C. parvum were the dominant Cryptosporidium species, and subtypes of IIdA14G1 [1], IIdA15G1 [22, 50, 57], IIdA19G1 [47], and IIIeA22G2R1 [47] were relatively common, with IIdA15G1 being the most prevalent. C. andersoni [1, 16, 24, 28, 47, 50], C. ryanae [1, 16, 24, 47, 50, 57], C. meleagridis [47], and mixed infection [1, 22, 24, 43] were also occasionally identified in preweaned cattle. In postweaned cattle, C. andersoni [1, 3, 16, 24, 28, 42, 50] was the most abundant species, and C. bovis [1, 16, 24, 28, 42, 50, 57], C. parvum [28, 50, 57], C. ryanae [1, 3, 24, 50], and mixed infection with C. bovis and C. ryanae [1] were rarely detected. Four subtypes of C. andersoni [16], characterized as A4A4A4A1, A1A4A4A1, A2A4A4A1, and A2A4A2A1, were also detected, whereas only one subtype (IIdA15G1) was identified for C. parvum [50]. The latter two subtypes for C. andersoni were considered the most prevalent. Juvenile cattle were found to be infected with C. andersoni [25, 28, 29, 44, 56–58], C. bovis [28, 29, 32], C. parvum [32], C. ryanae [28, 29, 32], C. xiaoi [28], C. suis-like [29], and mixed infection with C. bovis and C. ryanae [32]. The following C. andersoni [57, 58] subtypes were identified: A5A4A4A1, A4A4A4A1, A4A4A2A1, A2A4A4A1, A2A4A2A1, and A1A4A4A1. Adult cattle could be infected with C. andersoni [18, 25, 28, 29, 44, 56, 57], C. bovis [28, 29, 56], C. ryanae [28, 29], C. ubiquitum [28], and new genotypes [28]. No mixed Cryptosporidium infections were found in adult cattle. C. andersoni [57] formed two subtypes, i.e., A4A4A4A1 and A1A4A4A1.

In summary, C. andersoni, C. bovis, C. ryanae, and C. parvum were the most common Cryptosporidium species in cattle in China. C. andersoni was commonly found in postweaned, juvenile, and adult cattle, but had a relatively low prevalence in preweaned cattle. In contrast, C. bovis was mostly found in preweaned cattle. C. ryanae was more common in preweaned cattle than in cattle of other ages. C. parvum was mostly distributed in preweaned cattle.

Distribution of Cryptosporidium species/subtypes in different cattle breeds in China

There are four main domesticated ungulate species in China, namely, dairy cattle, beef cattle, buffalo, and yaks. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium in different cattle breeds varied from 8.09% in beef cattle to 23.8% in buffalo (Table 4). The prevalence of Cryptosporidium in dairy cattle ranged from 1.68% to 47.68%, with an average infection rate of 10.44%. In yaks, the prevalence rate of Cryptosporidium infection ranged from 4% to 39.74%, with an average of 18.13%. In contrast, that in beef cattle ranged from 4.49% to 26.5%, with an average of 8.09%. The results of Chi-square tests showed that the prevalence differed significantly among the breed groups (p < 0.05). Moreover, the infection rates of dairy cattle were significantly different from those of beef cattle, buffalo, and yaks, with Chi-square values of 5.590, 33.347, and 108.509, respectively (p < 0.05). The differences between beef cattle and yaks, and between beef cattle and buffalo, were also statistically significant (p < 0.05). Several Cryptosporidium species, including C. andersoni, C. bovis, C. parvum, C. ryanae, C. meleagridis, C. suis-like, C. parvum (“mouse” genotype), C. hominis, C. serpentis, and mixed infection, have been reported in dairy cattle in China. C. andersoni was the dominant species in dairy cattle, and other species showed low infection rates. In dairy cattle, subtypes A4A4A4A1, A1A4A4A1, IIdA15G1, IIdA19G1, IIdA14G1, and IIIeA22G2R1 have been identified in China. Moreover, IIdA15G1 was the most common subtype of C. parvum, and A1A4A4A1 was the most common subtype of C. andersoni. In beef cattle, C. andersoni, C. bovis, C. ryanae, and mixed infection with C. ryanae and C. bovis were identified, with C. andersoni as the most prevalent species. In buffalo, C. bovis and C. ryanae infections have been reported. In yaks, C. andersoni, C. bovis, C. parvum, C. ryanae, C. ubiquitum, C. xiaoi, new Cryptosporidium genotypes, and mixed infection were found, with C. bovis having the highest prevalence, followed by C. ryanae and C. parvum. IIaA15G2R1 was the most endemic subtype, and IIaA14G1R1, IIaA14G2R1, IIaA16G2R1, IIaA16G3R1, IIdA15G1, IIdA18G1, IIdA19G1, and XIIa were also detected.

Table 4.

Distribution of Cryptosporidium species/subtypes in dairy cattle, beef cattle, buffalo, and yaks.

In summary, C. andersoni was the most common species of Cryptosporidium in beef cattle. C. bovis was identified as the predominant species responsible for yak infection, whereas C. ryanae was considered as the most prevalent in buffalo. C. parvum was more infectious to dairy cattle and yaks in China.

Prevention and treatment

In developing countries, a major obstacle for disease control is the lack of effective methods to control Cryptosporidium infection and to decrease environmental contamination with oocysts [4]. In China, preventive hygiene measures and good management should be carried out to prevent the infection of cattle with Cryptosporidium spp. In calves, timely colostrum feeding is the simplest and most effective method to prevent diarrhea. For postweaned calves, the use of straw in pens and high-pressure cleaning has been shown to have preventive effects against contamination by Cryptosporidium oocysts [53].

The drugs used for the treatment of cryptosporidiosis include sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, quinacrine, pentamidine, bleomycin, elliptinium, alpha-difluoro-methylornithine, daunorubicin, and diclazuril. However, in an immunosuppressed rat model, none of these drugs were able to completely cure the disease [22]. Paromomycin and nitazoxanide are the only two drugs that have been analyzed in well-controlled clinical trials and have been shown to have some degree of efficacy [39]. More studies are needed to identify appropriate approaches to control Cryptosporidium infection and decrease contamination by oocysts in cattle farms.

Conclusion

Cryptosporidium is widely distributed in cattle in China. Ten species have been identified and C. andersoni, C. bovis, C. parvum, and C. ryanae are the most common. Epidemiological analysis showed that there were significant differences in infection rates and species according to geography, age, and breed. In China, the highest infection rate was observed in preweaned cattle, the regions with high rates of infection were in eastern and northern China, while the most common Cryptosporidium species in cattle were C. andersoni, C. bovis, C. ryanae, and C. parvum. In addition, other factors, including examination methods and sample sizes (affecting the sensitivity and accuracy of the results), sanitation conditions (affecting the existence of Cryptosporidium), rearing conditions (influencing the health and immune status of cattle), and climate (influencing the survival of Cryptosporidium oocysts), may contribute to the occurrence of cryptosporidiosis. There are no effective treatments currently approved for this parasite, and preventive measures are difficult. For example, cattle owners should improve management, sanitation, and disinfection protocols and attempt to keep breeding houses clean and dry. Cattle should not be grazed in areas with a high occurrence of Cryptosporidium. Additionally, nutritional conditions should be optimized, and the government should aim to create awareness of the importance of hygiene promotion and reinforce support of Cryptosporidium research. The development of vaccines for this parasite may substantially improve outlooks.

Importantly, C. parvum and C. hominis in cattle may have zoonotic potential. People in affected areas should pay careful attention to hygiene. Additionally, more studies should be conducted to fully elucidate the pathogenesis and epidemiology of bovine Cryptosporidiosis. The findings of this study, which represent the first comprehensive analysis of Cryptosporidium prevalence in cattle in China, may contribute to a better understanding of the epidemiological features of Cryptosporidium in cattle.

References

  1. Azami M, Moghaddam DD, Salehi R, Salehi M. 2007. The identification of Cryptosporidium species (Protozoa) in Ifsahan, Iran by PCR-RFLP analysis of the 18S rRNA gene. Molecular Biology, 41(5), 851–856. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bai YH, Jia GY, Xing JS. 2001. Investigation of cryptosporidiosis of yak calves in Tongde County. Sichuan Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 28(7), 22–22. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bornayllinares FJ, Da SA, Moura IN, Myjak P, Pietkiewicz H, Kruminislozowska W, Graczyk TK, Pieniazek NJ. 1999. Identification of Cryptosporidium felis in a cow by morphologic and molecular methods. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 65(4), 1455–1458. [Google Scholar]
  4. Carey CM, Lee H, Trevors JT. 2004. Biology, persistence and detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis oocyst. Water Research, 38(4), 818–862. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen F, Huang K. 2012. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle from farms in China. Journal of Veterinary Science, 13(1), 15–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen F, Qiu H. 2012. Identification and characterization of a Chinese isolate of Cryptosporidium serpentis from dairy cattle. Parasitology Research, 111(4), 1785–1791. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen GY, Li AX, Li L, Pei SL, Zhou M. 2015. Epidemiological Investigation and Molecular Characteristics of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in Zhongmou County, Henan. Dairy Health, 4(5), 35–38. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen YM, Li GD. 1986. Calf cryptosporidiosis in Lanzhou. Chinese Veterinary Science, 12(12), 41–42. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cui Z, Wang R, Huang J, Wang H, Zhao J, Luo N, Li J, Zhang Z, Zhang L. 2014. Cryptosporidiosis caused by Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIdA15G1 at a dairy farm in Northwestern China. Proceedings of the thirteenth Symposium of Veterinary Medicine of the Chinese Academy of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 7(1), 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  10. De-Graaf DC, Vanopdenbosch E, Ortega-Mora LM, Abbassi H, Peeters JE. 1999. A review of the importance of cryptosporidiosis in farm animals. International Journal for Parasitology, 29(8), 1269–1287. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ehsan AM, Geurden T, Casaert S, Parvin SM, Islam TM, Ahmed UM, Levecke B, Vercruysse J, Claerebout E. 2015. Assessment of zoonotic transmission of Giardia and Cryptosporidium between cattle and humans in rural villages in Bangladesh. PLoS One, 10(2), 1–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Feltus DC, Giddings CW, Khaitsa ML, Mcevoy JM. 2008. High prevalence of Cryptosporidium bovis and the deer-like genotype in calves compared to mature cows in beef cow-calf operations. Veterinary Parasitology, 151(2–4), 191–195. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Geurden T, Goma FY, Siwila J, Phiri IG, Mwanza AM, Gabriel S, Claerebout E, Vercruysse J. 2006. Prevalence and genotyping of Cryptosporidium in three cattle husbandry systems in Zambia. Veterinary Parasitology, 138(3–4), 217–222. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grinberg A, Pomroy WE, Weston JF, Ayanegui-Alcerreca A, Knight D. 2005. The occurrence of Cryptosporidium parvum, Campylobacter and Salmonella in newborn dairy calves in the Manawatu region of New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 53(5), 315–320. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guselle NJ, Appelbee AJ, Olson ME. 2003. Biology of Cryptosporidium parvum in pigs: from weaning to market. Veterinary Parasitology, 113(1), 7–18. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. He H. 2001. The investigation of cow cryptosporidial infection in Xinxiang district of Henan. China Dairy Cattle, 22(2), 22–22. [Google Scholar]
  17. He J, Hong MZ, Dan L. 2008. Investigation on cow infection with Cryptosporidium parvum in south areas of Guangxi. China Tropical Medicine, 8(12), 2210–2211. [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang J, Yue D, Meng Q, Wang R, Zhao J, Li J, Shi K, Wang M, Zhang L. 2014. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle in Ningxia, northwestern China. BMC Veterinary Research, 10(1), 1–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ichikawa-Seki M, Aita J, Masatani T, Suzuki M, Nitta Y, Tamayose G, Iso T, Suganuma K, Fujiwara T, Matsuyama K. 2015. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium parvum from two different Japanese prefectures, Okinawa and Hokkaido. Parasitology International, 64(2), 161–166. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jian F, Sun M, Yan W, Liang N, Li M, Zhang L, Ning C, Shao Z, Shi T. 2005. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in cows and artificial infection of Cryptosporidium parvum in neonatal calves. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 41(8), 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  21. Karanis P, Plutzer J, Halim NA, Igori K, Nagasawa H, Ongerth J, Ma L. 2007. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium from animal sources in Qinghai province of China. Parasitology Research, 101(6), 1575–1580. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lemeteil D, Roussel F, Favennec L, Ballet JJ, Brasseur P. 1993. Assessment of candidate anticryptosporidial agents in an immunosuppressed rat model. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 167(3), 766–768. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li PY, Liao SF, Lu FL, Liu SX, Wang XY. 1999. Cryptosporidial infection of cow and its regional distribution in Anhui Province. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science, 19(3), 275–277. [Google Scholar]
  24. Liang N, Jian FC, Li JC, Qiu SX, Zhang LX. 2009. Species identification of cryptosporidia isolated from dairy cattle by PCR-RFLP and phylogenetic analysis. Chinese Veterinary Science, 39(1), 22–28. [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu A, Wang R, Li Y, Zhang L, Shu J, Zhang W, Feng Y, Xiao L, Ling H. 2009. Prevalence and distribution of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in Heilongjiang Province, China. Parasitology Research, 105(3), 797–802. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu H, Shen Y, Yin J, Yuan Z, Jiang Y, Xu Y, Pan W, Hu Y, Cao J. 2014. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium, Enterocytozoon, Giardia and Cyclospora in diarrheal outpatients in China. BMC Infectious Diseases, 14(1), 290–292. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lu QB, Qiu SX, Ru BR, Liu W, Wang SM, Miao T, Wang Y, Duan ZX, Ning CS, Zhang LX. 2008. Epidemiological investigation of cryptosporidiosis in dairy calves in some prefectures of Henan Province. Chinese Veterinary Science, 38(3), 261–267. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ma J, Cai J, Ma J, Feng Y, Xiao L. 2014. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in yaks (Bos grunniens) in China. Veterinary Parasitology, 202(3–4), 113–118. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ma J, Li P, Zhao X, Xu H, Wu W, Wang Y, Guo Y, Wang L, Feng Y, Xiao L. 2015. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dairy cattle, beef cattle and water buffaloes in China. Veterinary Parasitology, 207(3–4), 220–227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ma LQ. 2013. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium from animal sources in Qinghai province. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal & Veterinary Sciences, 101(6), 1575–1580. [Google Scholar]
  31. Meng R, Wang X, Dong M, Zhang ZT, Liu JY, Wei-Hua JI, Yang XZ. 2007. Investigation on Cryptosporidium infection among dairy cattle in Tianjin area, China. Journal of Pathogen Biology, 2(3), 225–227. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mi R, Wang X, Li C, Huang Y, Zhou P, Li Z, Lei M, Cai J, Chen Z. 2013. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium in yaks in Qinghai Province of China. PLoS One, 8(9), e74985–e74985. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ng JSY, Eastwood K, Walker B, Durrheim DN, Massey PD, Porigneaux P, Kemp R, Mckinnon B, Laurie K, Miller D. 2012. Evidence of Cryptosporidium transmission between cattle and humans in northern New South Wales. Experimental Parasitology, 130(4), 437–441. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ning C. 1997. Pathological Investigation on prevalence of cryptosporidiosis of dairy cattle in Henan Province and experiment on the artificial infection with dairy cattle original oocysts. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Henanensis, 31(3), 292–295. [Google Scholar]
  35. Olson ME, Guselle NJ, O’Handley RM, Swift ML, Mcallister TA, Jelinski MD, Morck DW. 1997. Giardia and Cryptosporidium in dairy calves in British Columbia. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 38(11), 703–705. [Google Scholar]
  36. Plutzer J, Karanis P. 2009. Genetic polymorphism in Cryptosporidium species: an update. Veterinary Parasitology, 165(3–4), 187–199. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Qi M, Cai J, Wang R, Li J, Jian F, Huang J, Zhou H, Zhang L. 2015. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis from yaks in the central western region of China. BMC Microbiology, 15(1), 1–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Qin SY, Zhang XX, Zhao GH, Zhou DH, Yin MY, Zhao Q, Zhu XQ. 2014. First report of Cryptosporidium spp. in white yaks in China. Parasites & Vectors, 7(1), 1–3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rossignol JF, Ryan U, Power M, Xiao LH. 2010. Cryptosporidium and Giardia: treatment options and prospects for new drugs. Experimental Parasitology, 124(1), 45–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ryan U, Fayer R, Xiao L. 2014. Cryptosporidium species in humans and animals: current understanding and research needs. Parasitology, 141(13), 1667–1685. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ryan U, Hijjawi N. 2015. New developments in Cryptosporidium research. International Journal for Parasitology, 304(6), 367–373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Santín M, Trout JM, Fayer R. 2008. A longitudinal study of cryptosporidiosis in dairy cattle from birth to 2 years of age. Veterinary Parasitology, 155(155), 15–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Santín M, Trout JM, Xiao L, Zhou L, Greiner E, Fayer R. 2004. Prevalence and age-related variation of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in dairy calves. Veterinary Parasitology, 122(2), 103–117. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang R, Ma G, Zhao J, Lu Q, Wang H, Zhang L, Jian F, Ning C, Xiao L. 2011. Cryptosporidium andersoni is the predominant species in post-weaned and adult dairy cattle in China. Parasitology International, 60(1), 1–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang R, Wang H, Sun Y, Zhang L, Jian F, Qi M, Ning C, Xiao L. 2011. Characteristics of Cryptosporidium transmission in preweaned dairy cattle in Henan, China. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 49(3), 1077–1082. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Watanabe Y, Yang CH, Ooi HK. 2005. Cryptosporidium infection in livestock and first identification of Cryptosporidium parvum genotype in cattle feces in Taiwan. Parasitology Research, 97(3), 238–241. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Xiang FY, Li GQ, Xiao SM, Chen HL, Xie DH. 2004. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in cows in Guangdong. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology, 34(1), 32–36. [Google Scholar]
  48. Xiao L. 2009. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Experimental Parasitology, 124(1), 80–89. [Google Scholar]
  49. Xiao L, Feng Y. 2008. Zoonotic cryptosporidiosis. Pathogens and Disease, 52(3), 309–323. [Google Scholar]
  50. Xie YP, Wei XR, Jun LI, Tao L, Bi BF, Wei ZF, Peng H, Chen ZX, Yang W, Wang XL. 2013. Investigation of Cryptosporidium Infection in milk buffalo in Guangxi. Progress in Veterinary Medicine, 34(6), 88–91. [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu WL, Li PY, Gu YF, Xu QM, Zhao CC, Liu QS, Zhang LY, Huang H. 2007. Epidemiological survey of cow cryptosporidiosis in Anhui Province. Journal of Anhui Science and Technology University, 21(6), 9–11. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang X, Liu Z. 2004. Preliminary investigation of bovine Cyptosporidium infestation in Huhhot Region of Inner Mongolia, China. Neimenggu Nongye Daxue Xuebao, 25(1), 40–42. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang CY, Lin MM, Gong YC. 2013. Calf cryptosporidiosis pathogen isolation and identification and prevention measures. Jilin Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 34(5), 17–18. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang JF, Xu JF, Shen XY. 2007. Investigation of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle in Qinghai Province. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 43(3), 36–36. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang W, Wang R, Yang F, Zhang L, Cao J, Zhang X, Ling H, Liu A, Shen Y. 2012. Distribution and genetic characterizations of Cryptosporidium spp. in pre-weaned dairy calves in Northeastern China’s Heilongjiang Province. PLoS One, 8(1), e54857–e54857. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang XX, Tan QD, Zhou DH, Ni XT, Liu GX, Yang YC, Zhu XQ. 2015. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle, northwest China. Parasitology Research, 114(7), 2781–2787. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhao GH, Ren WX, Gao M, Bian QQ, Hu B, Cong MM, Lin Q, Wang RJ, Qi M, Qi MZ. 2013. Genotyping Cryptosporidium andersoni in cattle in Shanxi Province, Northwestern China. PLoS One, 8(4), e60112–e60112. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhao W, Wang R, Zhang W, Liu A, Cao J, Shen Y, Yang F, Zhang L. 2014. MLST subtypes and population genetic structure of Cryptosporidium andersoni from dairy cattle and beef cattle in northeastern China’s Heilongjiang Province. PLoS One, 9(7), e102006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhou CX, He GS, Zhang LX. 2009. Investigation on the Cryptosporidium infection in yaks. Chinese Journal of Zoonoses, 25(4), 389–390. [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Gong C, Cao X-F, Deng L, Li W, Huang X-M, Lan J-C, Xiao Q-C, Zhong Z-J, Feng F, Zhang Y, Wang W-B, Guo P, Wu K-J & Peng G-N: Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle in China: a review. Parasite, 2017, 24, 1.

All Tables

Table 1.

Infection rates with Cryptosporidium in cattle in different regions of China.

In the text
Table 2.

Species and subtypes of Cryptosporidium in cattle in different regions of China.

In the text
Table 3.

Distribution of Cryptosporidium species/subtypes in cattle of different ages.

In the text
Table 4.

Distribution of Cryptosporidium species/subtypes in dairy cattle, beef cattle, buffalo, and yaks.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.