Open Access
Research Article
Volume 23, 2016
Article Number 34
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 26 August 2016

© N. Papa Mze et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2016

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Malaria is a disease caused by a parasite that belongs to the genus Plasmodium. It is responsible for about 627,000 deaths worldwide annually with about 90% occurring in sub-Saharan Africa [19]. In the Union of Comoros (consisting of three islands: Grande Comore, Moheli and Anjouan), located in the Indian Ocean between Madagascar and the African coast, malaria is one of the major public health concerns, with Plasmodium falciparum being the most prevalent species in this region [17]. Therefore, three major strategies were implemented in 2004, comprising the use of insecticide-treated bed nets, introduction of Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT) in pregnant women, and the treatment of patients with artemisinin-based combination therapy. These strategies have resulted in a significant decrease in malaria transmission. The prevalence of malaria among pregnant women decreased from 30.4% to 8% between 2004 and 2008, and the hospital case fatality rate among children under 5 years dropped from 0.36% to 0.12% between 2005 and 2008 (PNLP 2004–2009, unpublished data). This decline allowed the National Malaria Control Program to bring into focus strategies for malaria eradication in the Union of Comoros, which was introduced for the first time in 2007 on Moheli Island. The population of the island was given mass drug administration using Artequick® (artemisinin-piperaquine) and primaquine. The program was later introduced in 2012 on the island of Anjouan and in late 2013 on Grande Comore. The results are encouraging: no deaths were recorded in the first quarter of 2014 (PNLP 2014, unpublished data).

The significant decrease of malaria may also induce a change in the distribution of Plasmodium species in the Union of Comoros. For better treatment and intervention for malaria elimination, it is necessary to know the current distribution of Plasmodium species. This will also enable us to assess the existing approach against malaria in the Union of Comoros.

A study on the distribution of Plasmodium species by microscopy conducted in the Union of Comoros showed that P. falciparum is the most prevalent species [17]. Microscopy analysis remains the standard method for the diagnosis of malaria. However, it requires expertise particularly when the parasitemia is low but also in case of mixed infections [20]. In developing countries, microscopists are not sufficiently trained and this can lead to misidentification of the Plasmodium species [9]. The use of PCR methods can help to fill this gap.

The study’s goal was to reassess the distribution of the Plasmodium species using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) DNA by PCR, in areas where malaria is hypoendemic (Moroni), mesoendemic (Mitsamiouli), and meso to hyperendemic (Mbeni) [16] (PNLP 2004–2009, unpublished data).

Materials and methods

Study population

Positive and negative rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) performed in febrile patients (Malaria pLDH/HRP2 Combo: Access Bio, PBX-KM30003 and SD Bioline Malaria Ag Pf/Pan: SD Bioline, 05FK60) for malaria diagnosis were collected in Grande Comore, at the National Malaria Control Program in the capital city Moroni and at two hospitals of two regions of Grande Comore: Mitsamiouli and Mbeni from 2012 to 2013. These RDTs detect the presence of both the HRP2 protein, specific to P. falciparum, and the pLDH protein, common to P. falciparum and the other three species: Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium vivax, and Plasmodium ovale. Only the RDTs with a valid control band were included in this study.

Two hundred eleven RDTs were used, including 158 positive RDTs (14 for the kit SD Bioline Malaria Ag Pf/Pan Malaria and 144 pLDH/HRP2 Combo kit), and 53 negative RDTs (all done with the Combo Kit). Among the 158 positive samples, 22 were positive only for HRP2, 133 were positive for HRP2 and pLDH, and 3 were positive only for pLDH. Among the positive ones, 29 came from Moroni, 52 from Mitsamiouli, and 77 from Mbeni.

DNA extraction

Parasite DNA was extracted from RDTs using a proximal part of the nitrocellulose membrane (1/3 NC) as previously described by Cnops et al. [6]. DNA was extracted with the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations for filter paper.

DNA amplification

Species-specific Plasmodium identification nested PCR was performed using the following primers [18]: 5′-CCT GTT GTT GCC TTA AAC TTC-3′, and 5′-TTA AAA TTG TTG CAG TTA AAA-3′. PCR was carried out using the following conditions: Initial 4-min denaturation at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles with 30-s at 94 °C, 1-min at 55 °C, and 4-min final extension at 72 °C. 1 μL of the nest-1 amplification products was used as DNA template for the nest-2 amplification.

The following primers specific to each species were used for the nest-2 PCR: 5′-TTA AAC TGG TTT GGG AAA ACC AAA TAT ATT-3′, 5′-ACA CAA TGA ACT CAA TCA TGA CTA CCC GTC-3′ for P. falciparum, 5′-CGC TTC TAG CTT AAT CCA CAT AAC TGA TAG-3′, 5′-ACT TCC AAG CCG AAG CAA AGA AAG TCC TTA-3′ for P. vivax, 5′-ATA ACA TAG TTG TAC GTT AAG AAT AAC CGC-3′, 5′-AAA ATT CCC ATG CAT AAA AAA TTA TAC AAA-3′ for P. malariae, and 5′-GGA AAA GGA CAC ATT AAT TGT ATC CTA GTG-3′, 5′-ATC TCT TTT GCT ATT TTT TAG TAT TGG AGA-3′ for P. ovale. PCR was carried out using the following conditions: Initial 4-min denaturation at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles with 30-s at 94 °C, 1-min at 58 °C, and 4-min final extension at 72 °C.

PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gel. The size of DNA bands obtained was analyzed by GeneRuler 100 bp DNA ladder marker (Quick Load®, 100pb Ladder DNA).

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed by EpiTools software (Z-test to compare sample proportion). The p-value was determined and the threshold of significance was estimated at 0.05 for all statistical tests.


In this study, 211 RDTs (158 positive and 53 negative) were successfully tested by nested PCR. Among the 158 positive RDTs, 2 (1.3%) were found negative by PCR; and among the 53 negative RDTs, 3 (5.7%) showed positive results for P. falciparum by PCR.

Among the 159 positive RDTs by nested PCR, 156 were positive for P. falciparum (98.11%), 2 for P. vivax (1.25%), and 1 for P. malariae (0.62%). All samples were negative for P. ovale. No mixed infections were identified. Among 22 RDTs that presented a positive result for HRP2, 20 were positive for P. falciparum by PCR and 2 were negative for all species. On the other hand, 133 RDTs that had a positive band for P. falciparum (HRP2 positive) or both P. falciparum and non-P. falciparum (HRP2 and pLDH positive) were P. falciparum positive by PCR. Among the 3 positive RDTs for the detection of pLDH, two were positive by PCR for P. vivax and one for P. malariae.

In the capital Moroni, 25 samples were positive for P. falciparum, 1 sample was positive for P. vivax, and 1 sample was positive for P. malariae. In Mbeni, 76 samples were positive for P. falciparum and 1 sample was positive for P. vivax. In Mitsamiouli, all species were positive for P. falciparum (Table 1).

Table 1.

The distribution of Plasmodium species in the three regions of the island of Grande Comore

We investigated whether there was an association between the distribution of species and the endemicity using the Z-test. A significant difference was found for the prevalence of P. falciparum between Moroni and Mitsamiouli (p = 0.041) and between Moroni and Mbeni (p = 0.0345), whereas no difference was observed between Mitsamiouli and Mbeni (p = 0.84). Concerning the prevalence of P. vivax, a significant difference was found between Moroni and Mbeni (p < 0.0001).


To contribute to malaria elimination in the Comoros, we evaluated the current distribution of Plasmodium species using DNA extracted from RDTs. In this study, nested PCR was used to determine the Plasmodium species, because current RDTs used in the Comoros can specify only P. falciparum; microscopy requires more expertise and can be less sensitive [7].

Two RDTs that were found to be positive for P. falciparum were negative by PCR. These false positive results could be due mostly to the persistence of HRP2 in recently cured P. falciparum infected patients [1, 14], but also to the presence of auto-antibodies [10] or anti-rheumatic factors [3, 12].

Three samples were negative by RDTs, but were positive for P. falciparum by PCR. These false negative results could be due to low parasitemia [13] or HRP2 deletion in some isolates of P. falciparum [11]. Another explanation could be the presence of anti-antibodies in serum to HRP2 [5], or the presence of an inhibitor in the blood, preventing the occurrence of the P. falciparum control band [8]. Therefore, in these three cases only the HRP2 band should be present. The false negative results for P. falciparum found in this study were also found in previous studies using the Malaria pLDH/HRP2 Combo test [4, 21]. However, we did not obtain false negatives for species other than P. falciparum, unlike previous studies [4, 21], perhaps because the negative RDTs used in our study were moderate in number.

It is therefore important to better monitor false positives and false negatives for better calculation of the prevalence of malaria. Misidentification of the Plasmodium agent can delay malaria treatment and may also lead to complications or increase the risk of antimalarial resistance [2].

A total of 133 RDTs had a positive band for P. falciparum and a positive band for Plasmodium spp. This result suggests that these samples could be positive for only P. falciparum, or they could be mixed Plasmodium species infections (P. falciparum plus other species). However after PCR, we found that all RDTs were positive only for P. falciparum. This result confirms that the presence of mixed species is not common in the Comoros [15, 17].

We also determined the Plasmodium species distribution by PCR and have shown a prevalence of 98.11%, 1.3%, and 0.6%, respectively, for P. falciparum, P. vivax, and P. malariae. However, Ouledi in 1995 found prevalence rates of 90% for P. falciparum, 8% for P. malariae, and 1.5% for P. vivax [15]. A significant decrease of the prevalence of P. malariae (p = 0.010) and a significant increase of the prevalence of P. falciparum (p = 0.0172) have been found between our results and the results reported by Ouledi. A study conducted in 2011 [17] found a prevalence of 96% for P. falciparum, 2% for P. malaria, and 1.5% for P. vivax. For this study, no significant difference was observed for the prevalence of P. falciparum (p = 0.3802), P. vivax (p = 0.879), and P. malariae (p = 0.309).

We found that the prevalence of P. falciparum in Mitsamiouli and Mbeni was higher than in Moroni. This difference can be explained by the fact that Mitsamiouli and Mbeni are areas where malaria is mesoendemic and meso to hyperendemic, respectively, while in Moroni malaria is hypoendemic.

P. ovale was not found in this study, whereas in the previous results it was observed at a prevalence of 0.5% [15, 17]. The absence of P. ovale species may be explained by the fact that in this study, we collected samples only from Grande Comore, whereas the two previous studies were carried out on the three islands of the Union of Comoros. The presence of non-P. falciparum species in our study and previous studies is important information to use for malaria diagnosis on the island. These results show that it is important to regularly monitor the prevalence of the different Plasmodium species using more sensitive tools such as PCR in the Comoros Islands.


This study, which determined the prevalence of Plasmodium species using PCR performed from DNA extracted from RDTs, confirms the strong predominance of P. falciparum in the Comoros. The use of more sensitive tools such as PCR, with a large number of samples for the detection of Plasmodium species on the Comoros Islands, will provide more information for malaria elimination on the islands.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in relation with this paper.


We thank the sample collection team in Comoros (Fazul A, M.A. Maamoune, Mohamed A). We also thank Guillaume A.B, Iguosadolo Nosamiefan, Baba Dieye, Dior Diop, Abdoulay AH, Gora Diop, Kevin Ma, and Benedicta Mensah for critical reading of the manuscript.


  1. Abba K, Deeks JJ, Olliaro P, Naing CM, Jackson SM, Takwoingi Y, Donegan S, Garner P. 2011. Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in endemic countries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD008122. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayalew F, Tilahun B, Taye B. 2014. Performance evaluation of laboratory professionals on malaria microscopy in Hawassa Town, Southern Ethiopia. BioMed Central Research Notes, 7, 839. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartoloni A, Sabatinelli G, Benucci M. 1998. Performance of two rapid tests for Plasmodium falciparum malaria in patients with rheumatoid factors. New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 1075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bharti PK, Silawat N, Singh PP, Singh MP, Shukla M, Chand G, Dash AP, Singh N. 2008. The usefulness of a new rapid diagnostic test, the First Response Malaria Combo (pLDH/HRP2) card test, for malaria diagnosis in the forested belt of central. Malaria Journal, 7, 126. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Biswas S, Tomar D, Rao DN. 2005. Investigation of the kinetics of histidine-rich protein 2 and of the antibody responses to this antigen, in a group of malaria patients from India. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 99, 553–562. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cnops L, Boderie M, Gillet P, Van Esbroeck M, Jacobs J. 2011. Rapid diagnostic tests as a source of DNA for Plasmodium species-specific real-time PCR. Malaria Journal, 10, 67. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Doctor SM, Liu Y, Whitesell A, Thwai KL, Taylor SM, Janko M, Emch M, Kashamuka M, Muwonga J, Tshefu A, Meshnick SR. 2016. Malaria surveillance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: comparison of microscopy, PCR, and rapid diagnostic test. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 85(1), 16–18. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Durand F, Faure O, Brion JP, Pelloux H. 2005. Invalid result of Plasmodium falciparum malaria detection with the Binax-NOW Malaria rapid diagnostic test. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 54, 1115. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gomes LT, Tada MS, Katsuragawa TH, Povoa MM, Viana GM, Alecrim M, De Santana-Filho FS, Arcanjo AR, Couto AA, Calvosa VS, Nery AF, Fontes CJ. 2013. Low sensitivity of malaria rapid diagnostic tests stored at room temperature in the Brazilian Amazon Region. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 7, 243–252. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Iqbal J, Sher A, Rab A. 2000. A Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2-based immunocapture diagnostic assay for malaria: cross-reactivity with rheumatoid factors. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 38, 1184–1186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koita OA, Doumbo OK, Ouattara A, Tall LK, Konare A, Diakite M, Diallo M, Sagara I, Masinde GL, Doumbo SN, Dolo A, Tounkara A, Traoré I, Krogstad DJ. 2012. False-negative rapid diagnostic tests for malaria and deletion of the histidine-rich repeat region of the hrp2 gene. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 86, 194–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Laferl H, Kandel K, Pichler H. 1997. False positive dipstick test for malaria. New England Journal of Medicine, 337, 1635–1636. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Murray CK, Bell D, Gasser RA, Wongsrichanalai C. 2003. Rapid diagnostic testing for malaria. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 8, 876–883. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murray CK, Gasser RA, Magill AJ, Miller RS. 2008. Update on rapid diagnostic testing for malaria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 21, 97–110. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ouledi A. 1995. Épidémiologie et prévention du paludisme dans les îles du sud-ouest de l’Océan Indien. Santé, 5, 368–371. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rebaudet S, Bogreau H, Silaï R, Lepere JF, Bertaux L, Pradines B, Delmont J, Gautret P, Parola P, Rogier C. 2010. Genetic structure of Plasmodium falciparum and elimination of Malaria, Comoros Archipelago. Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal, 16, 1686–1694. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Revue de la Performance du Paludisme (RPP) dans l’Union des Comores, rapport 2011. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  18. Singh B, Bobogare A, Cox-Singh J, Snounou G, Abdullah MS, Rahman HA. 1999. A genus- and species-specific nested polymerase chain reaction malaria detection assay for epidemiologic studies. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 60, 687–692. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. WHO. 2013. World Malaria Report. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  20. World Health Organization. 2009. WHO Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Performance – Results of WHO Product Testing of Malaria RDTs: Round 2. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  21. Xiaodong S, Tambo E, Chun W, Zhibin C, Yan D, Jian W, Jiazhi W, Xiaonong Z. 2013. Diagnostic performance of CareStart malaria HRP2/pLDH (Pf/pan) combo test versus standard microscopy on falciparum and vivax malaria between China-Myanmar endemic borders. Malaria Journal, 12, 6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Papa Mze N, Ahouidi AD, Diedhiou CK, Silai R, Diallo M, Ndiaye D, Sembene M & Mboup S: Distribution of Plasmodium species on the island of Grande Comore on the basis of DNA extracted from rapid diagnostic tests. Parasite, 2016, 23, 34.

All Tables

Table 1.

The distribution of Plasmodium species in the three regions of the island of Grande Comore

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.