Open Access
Research Article
Issue
Parasite
Volume 21, 2014
Article Number 32
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2014034
Published online 03 July 2014

© M. Caffara et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2014

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Clinostomidae are digenetic trematodes with a heteroxenous life cycle, involving both vertebrate and invertebrate hosts, and have a complex taxonomic history, having been continuously under revision based on both morphological and, more recently, molecular analysis.

Among the 14 Clinostomum species considered valid so far [3, 8, 11, 20], only a few are supported by a complete morphological description and most of them are reported only at the adult stage, while the metacercarial phase hosted by fish or amphibians and known as “yellow grub” is often poorly described. C. phalacrocoracis has been well described at the adult stage by Dubois [4] and Ukoli [26], but only Kabunda and Sommerville [10] provided a detailed morphological description of one metacercaria of Clinostomum sp. referable to C. phalacrocoracis. In this study, we redescribe metacercariae of C. phalacrocoracis from wild cichlids caught in Lake Kinneret (Israel), coupling the morphological description with molecular analysis.

Lake Kinneret (Sea of Galilee, Lake Tiberias) is the only freshwater lake in Israel, located in the central part of the Jordan rift valley [21], with greater fish abundance at the lake periphery than in its pelagic zone [13]. Three species of Clinostomum have been reported in fish from Lake Kinneret so far: (1) C. complanatum was found in the muscles of wild Cypriniformes (Barbus canis, Cyprinus carpio, Capoeta damascina) and in Oreochromis niloticus (formerly Tilapia nilotica) farmed in ponds on the lake shores [7, 15]. (2) C. cutaneum was detected in subcutaneous and muscle tissues of Tilapia zilli, Tristramella simonis, Oreochromis niloticus, Sarotherodon galilaeus and Astatotilapia flavijosephii [7, 16]. (3) C. tilapiae cysts were observed in the gill arches, muscles and in the internal part of the sclera of several cichlid species [7, 27]. Dzikowski et al. [6] confirmed the presence of C. complanatum by molecular analysis. In fact, the molecular approach has contributed to the understanding of the species distribution, but molecular data are available so far only for a limited number of Clinostomum species from a few biogeographic regions. Currently, analyses of mitochondrial and/or ribosomal DNA have confirmed the validity of five species: C. complanatum, C. marginatum, C. cutaneum, C. phalacrocoracis and C. tataxumui [3, 6, 8, 20].

This research reports for the first time the presence of metacercariae of Clinostomum phalacrocoracis in wild cichlids collected off the shores of Lake Kinneret during 2012, providing a morphological description and molecular data.

Materials and methods

Sampling sites

Eight different sites along the Lake Kinneret shores (between 32°42′15″ N, 32°53′44″ N and 35°30′52″ E, 35°38′55″ E) were sampled in 2012: Amnun and Zaki (north), Ein-Gev, Gofra and Sheizaf (east), Ginosar and Mekorot (north-west) and Zinbari (south-west) (Fig. 1). Samples were collected from the littoral zone of the lake (less than 10 m depth).

thumbnail Figure 1.

Lake Kinneret map: sampling sites.

A total of 262 cichlids were caught: 185 adults (113 Sarotherodon galilaeus, 32 Oreochromis aureus, 40 Tilapia zillii) and 77 cichlid fingerlings, unidentifiable to the species level. The fish, collected by a scuba diver and traps of 40 mm × 40 mm plastic mesh, were kept alive until examination at the laboratory where weight, total length and visual inspection to detect macroscopically visible parasites were carried out. Wet preparations of the gills, brain, eyes, kidney, liver, intestine, spleen, fins and gonads were examined under a dissecting and light microscope. All parasites were preserved in 70% ethanol for both morphological and molecular analysis.

Morphological study

Morphological studies were performed on 13 metacercariae; whole mounts were prepared by clarifying the parasites in Amman’s lactophenol and two specimens were also stained by Malzacher’s method [19]. Line drawings were made with the aid of a drawing tube, and measurements are given in micrometers unless otherwise stated. Measurements were taken following Matthews and Cribb [11]. For molecular analysis, a little piece of the posterior third was cut after measurement of total length and maximum width in 8 out of 13 metacercariae.

Molecular analysis

Total DNA was extracted using a PureLink Genomic DNA Kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) rDNA was amplified as reported by Gustinelli et al. [8], while a fragment of cytochrome c oxidase I (COI mtDNA) was amplified with the protocol of Moszczynska et al. [12]. PCR products were resolved on a 1% agarose gel stained with SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain in 0.5X TBE (Molecular Probes – Life Technologies).

For sequencing of both ITS and COI, the bands were excised and purified by NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up (Mackerey-Nagel) and sequenced with an ABI 3730 DNA analyzer at StarSEQ GmbH (Mainz, Germany). Sequence assembly was carried out using Vector NTI AdvanceTM 11 software (Invitrogen) and multiple sequence alignments were constructed by BioEdit 7.2. Pairwise distances using the Kimura 2-parameter model and Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree (GTR, 1000 replicate) were calculated by MEGA 5.05 [24].

Results

The prevalence of Clinostomum spp. metacercariae in cichlid fingerlings was 23.4% (18/77). Infected fish originated from the Mekorot shore (15 fish out of 38 examined) and the Zaki shore (3 fish out of 6). Most of the Clinostomum spp. metacercariae were collected from the anterior part of the abdominal cavity (Fig. 2) and in a few cases from the muscles of the gill arches. The average number of parasites collected was 5.9 and the highest number of metacercariae collected from a single fish (weight 4.05 g and total length 5.5 cm) was 22. No Clinostomum spp. metacercariae were found in adult fish. All the Clinostomum metacercariae examined were identified as C. phalacrocoracis.

thumbnail Figure 2.

Clinostomum phalacrocoracis metacercariae in the body cavity of a cichlid fingerling.

Clinostomum phalacrocoracis Dubois, 1930 (Fig. 3)

The main morphological characters of the metacercariae were (min-max (mean ± SD) μm): body stout, slightly wider in gonadic region; 9500–15200 (12061 ± 1820) long, 1855–3967 (3075 ± 591.9) wide. Oral sucker, 410–533 (460.4 ± 35.03) long × 478–732 (576.1 ± 83.07) wide, smaller than acetabulum, 926–1253 (1094 ± 89.86) long × 1011–1346 (1193.3 ± 105.22) wide, surrounded by weakly developed oral collar. Pharynx evident; intestine bifurcates immediately posterior to pharynx. Intestinal caeca run laterally to ventral sucker and immature genital complex, with small diverticula more evident posteriorly to ventral sucker. Connection between intestinal caeca and excretory system not clearly visible. Testes arranged in tandem between middle and posterior third of body. Anterior testis, 677–1466 (1074.2 ± 255.29) long × 643–1469 (1063.7 ± 266.98) wide, in posterior part of middle third of body, fan-shaped, consists of four to eight blunt lobes, some of which are sub-lobed; sometimes, right lobe slightly displaced to left by uterus. Posterior testis, 606–1182 (957.2 ± 211.70) long × 695–1469 (1072 ± 195.71) wide, in anterior part of posterior third of body, fan-shaped with anterior margin concave and with two major lateral lobes and one posterior lobe, each of which is sub-lobed. Cirrus sac 389–717 (563.5 ± 117.67) long × 143–292 (253.2 ± 44.25) wide, bean-shaped, in dextral intertesticular space, anterior to ovary, with genital pore opening laterally at posterior margin of anterior testis between right and posterior lobe. Genital opening with evident small blunt tubercles along its internal edge. Ovary, 119–378 (278.7 ± 74.07) long × 121–363 (261.9 ± 69.85) wide, irregular, round, smaller than cirrus sac, located in dextral intertesticular space. Uterus runs straight from ventral sucker to anterior testis. Uteroduct runs around left margin of anterior testis and opens into uterine sac. Metraterm, straight and overlapping the right half of anterior testis, connects uterus to genital atrium. Vitellarium not evident. Tegumental surface covered by very thin papillae.

thumbnail Figure 3.

Line drawing of Clinostomum phalacrocoracis metacercaria. Scale bar = 1 mm.

The ITS sequence was 1030 bp: 584 bp belonged to ITS1, 159 bp to 5.8S and 287 bp to ITS2 rRNA. The BLAST analysis gave 100% identity with C. phalacrocoracis (FJ609422-FJ609423 [8]), 98.8% with C. cutaneum (FJ609421-GQ339114 [8]), 97.2% with C. complanatum (JF718629, [3]), 94% with C. marginatum (JF718634, [3]) and 92.6% with C. tataxumui (JX631065 [20]). The multiple alignment of our ITS rDNA sequences together with the Clinostomum sequences retrieved from GenBank revealed distances ranging from 1.2% to 7.3% over 867 positions. The distance analysis of the eight COI mtDNA sequences (605 bp) obtained in this study showed that all were identical to each other except for one (sample eight) showing three transitions (1 A/G and 2 T/C). The pairwise distance, calculated by including the Clinostomum COI sequences retrieved from GenBank and BOLDSYSTEMS (www.barcodinglife.org), ranged from 0.2% to 22.8% over 444 positions. It was not possible to BLAST the COI sequences of our C. phalacrocoracis as only C. complanatum, C. marginatum and C. tataxumui COI sequences were available for comparison.

The ML trees, utilizing both molecular markers, display the same topology (ITS tree not reported) and show two clearly separate clades, one formed by the Palearctic species, C. complanatum, that clusters as a sister species to C. phalacrocoracis + C. cutaneum, and the other by C. marginatum and C. tataxumui, the Nearctic and Neotropical species, respectively (Fig. 4). All sequences obtained during this study are deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KJ786967-KJ786974 (COI) and KJ786975-KJ7869882 (ITS).

thumbnail Figure 4.

Phylogeny based on the Maximum Likelihood method using COI mtDNA sequences. The numbers correspond to the percentage of bootstrap support values derived from 1000 replicates. Samples 1–7 GB accession numbers KJ786967-KJ786969, KJ786971-KJ786974. Sample 8 GB accession number KJ786970.

Discussion

Three Clinostomum species have been reported so far in fish from Lake Kinneret, namely C. cutaneum [7, 15], C. complanatum [6, 15] and C. tilapiae [7, 27]. In this study, we describe metacercariae of C. phalacrocoracis for the first time from wild cichlids in Lake Kinneret. Dubois (1930) [4] originally described the adult stage of Clinostomum phalacrocoracis in Phalacrocorax levaillanti L. from Angola. Later, Ukoli [26] reported this species in African darter (Anhinga rufa rufa) in Ghana, Peirce and Din [18] reported it in Pelecanus spp. from Uganda, and Tendeiro et al. [25] in P. onocrotalus from Mozambique.

Kabunda and Sommerville [10] described metacercariae of Clinostomum sp. in tilapias (Oreochromis spp.) captured in Zaire showing morphological similarities to C. phalacrocoracis and C. giganticum. Based on our results we can state that the metacercaria described by Kabunda and Sommerville [10] and our specimens are C. phalacrocoracis.

The morphological characters of our specimens are consistent with the metacercaria of Kabunda and Sommerville [10] except the anterior testis, which we observed to be consistently fan-shaped, not saddle-shaped, as reported by these authors. This may be related to differences in metacercarial maturity, as stated by Ukoli [26], who reported less digitation in the testes of younger specimens. In 10 of 15 common metrics, including length, the specimens we collected were smaller than those of Kabunda and Sommerville [10], possibly due to different development or contraction of the body of our specimens.

These authors [10] also noted remarkable similarity between their metacercaria and C. giganticum described by Agarwal [1] in Ophiocephalus punctatus from India, but based on our observations the two species are different in the position of the genital pore, which is at the right posterior margin of the anterior testis between the lobes in C. phalacrocoracis, while it is at the level of the equator of the anterior testis in C. giganticum.

Concerning the other species described in Israel, at the metacercarial stage, the morphological characters observed in our specimens differ consistently from C. cutaneum, which has a unique Y-shaped uterus, the genital complex located in the middle part of the body and the genital pore opening close to the anterior margin of the anterior testis. Our specimens differ from C. tilapiae in the position of the genital complex, which is in the middle third of the body, the triangular testes, and the genital pore opening at the right posterior margin of the anterior testis, and from C. complanatum in the position of the genital pore and the shape of the testes.

In addition to the morphological characters, the molecular analysis carried out on the ITS rDNA region and COI mtDNA gene confirmed that our specimens belong to the species C. phalacrocoracis, displaying 100% identity in the ITS rDNA and the same nucleotide composition in COI (except sample eight with three nucleotide differences), as the same species collected by Gustinelli et al. [8] in tilapias and herons from Kenya.

The few detailed morphological descriptions of C. phalacrocoracis are from the African continent [4, 10, 23, 25, 26] together with a SEM description by Shaheen et al. [22]. Furthermore, several papers published afterward in Africa reported unidentified metacercariae of Clinostomum in different tilapia species [e.g. 2, 28, 29] but in all cases without any morphological and/or molecular description.

In addition to the presence of the fish second intermediate hosts, the completion of the life cycle of C. phalacrocoracis in the Lake Kinneret environment is reliant on the presence of its other hosts. Two snail species have been described in this area as the first intermediate host of Clinostomum spp., i.e. Bulinus truncatus and Lymnaea auricularia [7, 14, 17, 27]. However, in recent years these two species have not been reported in the lake, probably because of a decline in the lake water level [5]; we can speculate that the changes in snail populations influenced the disappearance of the Clinostomum species previously recorded and the emergence of C. phalacrocoracis in fish of Lake Kinneret, due to the involvement of other mollusc species in its life cycle [9]. Concerning the definitive host, the newly established dense vegetation in the drained area and waterfront has helped to increase the numbers of piscivorous birds [5, 14, 17]. Moreover, Lake Kinneret is located in the Rift Valley, a major seasonal bird migration route between northern Europe and Africa [5].

This description represents the second report of a Clinostomum species recorded in both Africa and Israel, after C. cutaneum [8, 15]. Moreover, Paperna [14] stated that water bodies in the Jordan River system throughout the Nile to Rift Valley lakes shared snail species and hosted similar fish.

In this study, we report for the first time C. phalacrocoracis metacercariae from cichlid fingerlings caught in Lake Kinneret, Israel, providing a morphological redescription of the metacercarial stage together with molecular data supporting its identification to the species level.

References

  1. Agarwal SM. 1959. Studies on the morphology, systematics and life history of Clinostomum giganticum n. sp. (Trematoda: Clinostomatidea). Indian Journal of Helminthology, 11, 75–115. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aloo PA. 2002. A comparative study of helminth parasites from the fish Tilapia zillii and Oreochromis leucosticus in Lake Naivasha and Oloidien Bay, Kenya. Journal of Helminthology, 76, 95–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caffara M, Locke SA, Gustinelli A, Marcogliese DJ, Fioravanti ML. 2011. Morphological and molecular differentiation of Clinostomum complanatum and Clinostomum marginatum (Digenea: Clinostomidae) metacercariae and adults. Journal of Parasitology, 97, 884–891. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dubois G. 1930. Trematoda. Matériaux de la mission scientifique Suisse en Angola. Bulletin de la Société Neuchâteloise des Sciences Naturelles, 54, 61–72. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dzikowski R, Diamant A, Paperna I. 2003. Trematode metacercariae of fish as sentinels for a changing limnological environment. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 55, 145–150. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dzikowski R, Levy MG, Poore MF, Flowers JR, Paperna I. 2004. Clinostomum complanatum and Clinostomum marginatum (Rudolphi, 1819) (Digenea: Clinostomidae) are separate species based on differences in ribosomal DNA. Journal of Parasitology, 90, 413–414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Finkelman S. 1988. Infections of Clinostomatidea in the Sea of Galilee fish. M.Sc Thesis. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel, p. 62 (In Hebrew, English summary). [Google Scholar]
  8. Gustinelli A, Caffara M, Florio D, Otachi EO, Wathuta EM, Fioravanti ML. 2010. First description of the adult stage of Clinostomum cutaneum Paperna, 1964 (Digenea: Clinostomidae) from grey herons Ardea cinerea L. and a redescription of the metacercaria from the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus niloticus (L.) in Kenya. Systematic Parasitology, 76, 39–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heller J, Dolev A, Zohary T, Gal G. 2014. Invasion dynamics of the snail Pseudoplotia scabra in Lake Kinneret. Biological Invasions, 16, 7–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kabunda MY, Sommerville C. 1984. Parasitic worm causing the rejection of tilapia (Oreochromis species) in Zaire. British Veterinary Journal, 140, 263–268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Matthews D, Cribb TH. 1998. Digenetic trematodes of the genus Clinostomum Leidy, 1856 (Digenea: Clinostomidae) from birds of Queensland, Australia, including C. wilsoni n. sp. from Egretta intermedia. Systematic Parasitology, 39, 199–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moszczynska A, Locke SA, McLaughlin JD, Marcogliese DJ, Crease TJ. 2009. Development of primers for the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I gene in digenetic trematodes illustrates the challenge of barcoding parasitic helminths. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 75–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ostrovsky I, Yacobi YZ, Walline P, Kalikhman I. 1996. Seiche-induced mixing: its impact on lake productivity. Limnology and Oceanography, 41, 323–332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Paperna I. 1996. Parasites, infections and diseases of fishes in Africa – An update. CIFA Technical paper No. 31. Rome, FAO. [Google Scholar]
  15. Paperna I. 1964a. Parasitic helminths of inland-water fishes in Israel. Israel Journal of Zoology, 13, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  16. Paperna I. 1964b. The metazoan parasite fauna of Israel inland water fishes. Bamidgeh, 16, 3–66. [Google Scholar]
  17. Paperna I, Lengy J. 1963. Notes on a new subspecies of Bolbophorus confuses (Krause, 1914) Dubois, 1935 (Trematoda, Diplostomatidae), a fish-transmitted bird parasite. Israel Journal of Zoology, 12, 171–182. [Google Scholar]
  18. Peirce MA, Din NA. 1970. Two new hosts for Clinostomum phalacrocoracis Dubois, 1930 (Trematoda), from Uganda. Journal of Parasitology, 56, 489. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pritchard MH, Kruse G. 1982. The collection and preservation of animal parasites. University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln, Nebraska. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sereno-Uribe AL, Pinacho-Pinacho CD, García-Varela M, Pérez-Ponce de León G. 2013. Using mitochondrial and ribosomal DNA sequences to test the taxonomic validity of Clinostomum complanatum Rudolphi, 1814 in fish-eating birds and freshwater fishes in Mexico, with the description of a new species. Parasitology Research, 112, 2855–2870. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Serruya C. 1978. Lake Kinneret, Monographiae Biologicae, W. Junk Publisher: The Hague, Boston-London, vol. 32, p. 7–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shaheen MSI, Arafa MI, Abd-ElRhman SM, Shatat MA. 2006. Scanning electron microscopical studies on some metacercariae of family Clinostomatidae. Assiut Medical Journal, 30, 131–144. [Google Scholar]
  23. Taher GA. 2009. Some studies on metacercarial infection in Oreochromis niloticus in Assiut Governorate and their role in transmission of some trematodes to dogs. Assiut University Bulletin for Environmental Researches, 12, 63–79. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28, 2731–2739. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tendeiro J, Travassos Santos Dias JA, Fazendeiro do Carmo Martins MI. 1974. Sobre dois clinostomideos (Trematoda, Digenea) parasitas do pelicano, Pelecanus onocrotalus L. com descricao de uma especie nova. Revista de Ciências Veterinárias. Universidade de Lourenço Marques (Ser A), 7, 45–71. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ukoli FMA. 1966. On Clinostomum tilapiae n. sp., and C. phalacrocoracis Dubois, 1931 from Ghana, and a discussion of the systematics of the Genus Clinostomum Leidy, 1856. Journal of Helminthology, 40, 187–214. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Yekutiel D. 1985. Metacercaria infections of cichlid fry in Lake Kinneret. M.Sc Thesis. Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Hebrew text, English summary). [Google Scholar]
  28. Yimer E. 2000. Preliminary survey of parasites and bacterial pathogens of fish at Lake Ziway. Ethiopian Journal of Science, 23, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yimer E, Enyew M. 2003. Parasites of fish at Lake Tana, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Science, 26, 31–36. [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Caffara M, Davidovich N, Falk R, Smirnov M, Ofek T, Cummings D, Gustinelli A & Fioravanti M: Redescription of Clinostomum phalacrocoracis metacercariae (Digenea: Clinostomidae) in cichlids from Lake Kinneret, Israel. Parasite, 2014, 21, 32.

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1.

Lake Kinneret map: sampling sites.

In the text
thumbnail Figure 2.

Clinostomum phalacrocoracis metacercariae in the body cavity of a cichlid fingerling.

In the text
thumbnail Figure 3.

Line drawing of Clinostomum phalacrocoracis metacercaria. Scale bar = 1 mm.

In the text
thumbnail Figure 4.

Phylogeny based on the Maximum Likelihood method using COI mtDNA sequences. The numbers correspond to the percentage of bootstrap support values derived from 1000 replicates. Samples 1–7 GB accession numbers KJ786967-KJ786969, KJ786971-KJ786974. Sample 8 GB accession number KJ786970.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.