Open Access
Short Note
Issue
Parasite
Volume 21, 2014
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 3
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2014008
Published online 03 March 2014

© M. Oi et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2014

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Cardiopulmonary dirofilariosis is a parasitic disease with a worldwide distribution caused by Dirofilaria immitis Leidy, 1856 [9], a nematode that is transmitted by mosquitoes. The adult worms are commonly found in the pulmonary arteries and right ventricle of dogs, and result in pathological damage, such as edema, ascites, arrhythmia, tachyarrhythmia, and even death of infected dogs [10]. The increasing temperatures caused by climate change and global warming can affect the distribution and density of mosquitoes, and consequently the transmission and spread of mosquito-borne diseases, such as dirofilariosis caused by D. immitis [3, 5]. Predictive models in Europe and Argentina have demonstrated an actual risk of spread of Dirofilaria spp. infections into areas previously free from the disease [4, 5, 11, 14].

In Japan, D. immitis infection of dogs has been considered to be prevalent since the earliest report on canine dirofilariosis in 1880 [1]. In the latest study, Nogami and Sato [12] reported a prevalence rate of 46.8% in shelter dogs tested at necropsy from 1989 to 1995. However, current epidemiological information on the prevalence of D. immitis infection is limited. The present study was conducted to determine the prevalence of D. immitis infection among shelter dogs in Tokyo, Japan, in order to evaluate the modifications in the prevalence between the present and a decade ago, and between urban and suburban areas.

Materials and methods

The present study was carried out in Tokyo, Japan (Figure 1). Canine serum samples were obtained from 200 adult shelter dogs kept in the Tokyo Metropolitan Animal Care and Consultation Center (Permission No. 22-2350). All sampling procedures were performed by shelter veterinarians in accordance with the Guidelines on research and survey using animals at Tokyo Metropolitan Animal Care and Consultation Center. This included samples from 100 dogs from April 1999 to March 2001, and 100 dogs from April 2009 to March 2011. A questionnaire including sex, estimated age, breed, and housing area (urban or suburban) was collected for each dog. Serum was stored at −30 °C until assay. All samples were tested for circulating D. immitis antigen using a specific commercialized immunochromatography kit (Solo Step® CH; Heska Co., Loveland, CO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

thumbnail Figure 1.

Urban and suburban areas: regions of origin of the shelter dogs tested for Dirofilaria immtis infection.

The data were analyzed to evaluate the differences between proportions of dogs infected with D. immitis using the chi-square test. In all analyses, P < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.

Results and discussion

The research area, sex and breed of distribution in dogs with D. immitis infection are shown in Table 1. The overall prevalence rates of D. immitis infection were 46.0% in 1999–2001 and 23.0% in 2009–2011 (P < 0.01). The prevalence rates of infection in urban areas were 46.0% in 1999–2001 and 18.2% in 2009–2011 (P < 0.01), and those in suburban areas were 46.0% and 28.9% (P > 0.05), respectively. There was no significant difference in prevalence between male and female dogs between the periods. The prevalence rates in mixed-breed dogs were 58.5% in 1999–2001 and 50.0% in 2009–2011, while those in purebred dogs were 22.9% and 10.3%, respectively. Significant differences (P < 0.01) in prevalence were observed between mixed-breed and purebred dogs in both periods.

Table 1.

Seroprevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infection in shelter dogs in April 1999 to March 2001 and April 2009 to March 2011 in Tokyo, Japan.

In the present study, a significant decrease from 46.0% to 23.0% was observed in the overall prevalence of D. immitis infection in Tokyo over the past decade. During the past decade, various types of macrocyclic lactones for D. immitis prevention have come into use worldwide, and the increased use of chemoprophylaxis is probably the major factor responsible for the decrease in prevalence of D. immitis infection in Tokyo. However, there are contrasting results in terms of breeds. The prevalence of infection in purebreds decreased by half over the past decade (22.9% in 1999–2001 and 10.3% in 2009–2011), while the infection in mixed breeds was still highly prevalent (58.5% in 1999–2001 and 50.0% in 2009–2011). This could reflect a higher rate of chemoprophylaxis in the purebred canine population than that in the mixed-breed canine population in Tokyo.

Decreases in prevalence of D. immitis infection were observed in both urban and suburban areas. These findings suggest that the prevalence of infection is markedly affected by veterinary care. The decreased prevalence, particularly in urban areas, has been conspicuous compared with that in suburban areas. This is because the rate of purebred populations in the urban areas increased and most of these dogs probably received chemoprophylaxis. Alternatively, urban areas with less parks may be more susceptible to changes in the environment than suburban areas.

The results of the present study were compared with those of other studies performed in different countries on approximately the same latitude as Japan. The prevalence of D. immitis infection in dogs in these countries varied markedly: 6.9%–20.9% in Korea [7, 13], 0.33%–3.33% in China [15], 3.6%–8.9% in Portugal [2], 34.13% in Greece [6], and 1%–12.5% in the United States [8]. The present study demonstrated that D. immitis infection is endemic in Japan. The differences in prevalence among countries may be due to the differences in density of vectors, density of the parasite reservoir, and rate of prevention in dogs. This is the first study to evaluate changes in the seroprevalence of D. immitis infection in a metropolitan city over the past decade.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff of the Tokyo Metropolitan Animal Care and Consultation Center for their help with sampling of the dogs included in this study. This work was financially supported in part by the Research and Development Program for New Bioindustry Initiatives, the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Japan, and the Academic Frontier Project for Private Universities from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

References

  1. Aoyama K. 1880. Parasite of the canine heart. The Iji-Shimbun, 29, 23. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cardoso L, Mendao C, de Carvalho LM. 2012. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis, Ehrlichia canis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma spp. and Leishmania infantum in apparently healthy and CVBD-suspect dogs in Portugal. Parasites and Vectors, 5, 62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Genchi C, Mortarino M, Rinaldi L, Cringoli G, Traldi G, Genchi M. 2011. Changing climate and changing vector-borne disease distribution, the example of Dirofilaria in Europe. Veterinary Parasitology, 176(4), 295–299. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Cascone C, Mortarino M, Cringoli G. 2005. Is heartworm really spreading in Europe? Veterinary Parasitology, 133(2–3), 137–148. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Mortarino M, Genchi M, Cringoli G. 2009. Climate and Dirofilaria infection in Europe. Veterinary Parasitology, 163(4), 286–292. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Founta A, Theodoridis Y, Frydas S, Chliounakis S. 1999. The presence of filarial parasites of dogs in Serrae Province. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, 50(4), 315–320. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jung BY, Gebeyehu EB, Seo MG, Byun JW, Kim HY, Kwak D. 2012. Prevalence of vector-borne diseases in shelter dogs in Korea. Veterinary Record, 171(10), 249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee ACY, Montgomery SP, Theis JH, Blagburn BL, Eberhard ML. 2010. Public health issues concerning the widespread distribution of canine heartworm disease. Trends in Parasitology, 26(4), 168–173. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leidy J. 1856. A synopsis of entozoa and some of their ecto-congeners observed by the author. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8, 42–58. [Google Scholar]
  10. McCall JW, Genchi C, Kramer LH, Guerrero J, Venco L. 2008. Heartworm disease in animals and humans. Advances in Parasitology, 66, 193–285. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Medlock JM, Barrass I, Kerrod E, Taylor MA, Leach S. 2007. Analysis of climatic predictions for extrinsic incubation of Dirofilaria in the United Kingdom. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 7(1), 4–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nogami S, Sato T. 1997. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infection in cats in Saitama, Japan. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 59(10), 869–871. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Song KH, Park JE, Lee DH, Lee SH, Shin HJ. 2010. Serological update and molecular characterization of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs, South Korea. Research in Veterinary Science, 88(3), 467–469. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vezzani D, Carbajo AE. 2006. Spatial and temporal transmission risk of Dirofilaria immitis in Argentina. International Journal for Parasitology, 36(14), 1463–1472. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Xia Z, Yu D, Mao J, Zhang Z, Yu J. 2011. The occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma phagocytophium in dogs in China. Journal of Helminthology, 86(2), 185–189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Oi M, Yoshikawa S, Ichikawa Y, Nakagaki K, Matsumoto J & Nogami S: Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis among shelter dogs in Tokyo, Japan, after a decade: comparison of 1999–2001 and 2009–2011. Parasite, 2014, 21, 10.

All Tables

Table 1.

Seroprevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infection in shelter dogs in April 1999 to March 2001 and April 2009 to March 2011 in Tokyo, Japan.

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1.

Urban and suburban areas: regions of origin of the shelter dogs tested for Dirofilaria immtis infection.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.