Open Access
Research note
Issue
Parasite
Volume 19, Number 1, February 2012
Page(s) 71 - 75
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2012191071
Published online 15 February 2012

© PRINCEPS Editions, Paris, 2012, transferred to Société Française de Parasitologie

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Cryptosporidium species belong to the Apicomplexa phylum of parasites and have been detected in a wide range of hosts, including 155 mammalian species from many geographical regions of the world (Fayer & Ungar, 1986; Fayer, 2004). Infected human cases with Cryptosporidium spp. had a history of being in close contact with different species of domestic animals like camels. Some of the zoonotic Cryptosporidium species (C. parvum, C. meleagridis, C. canis) usually causes self-limiting diarrhoea in human and animals and could be a great public health concern worldwide (Minas et al., 1994; de Graaf et al., 1999; Castro-Hermida et al., 2002; Causapé et al., 2002; Graczyk et al., 2003; Joachim, 2004; Caccio, 2005; Wang et al., 2008) and Iran (Mirzaei, 2007; Nahrevanian et al., 2007; Yakhchali & Gholami, 2008; Razavi et al., 2009).

The Camelidae family under the suborder Tylopoda is broken down into the Lama genus (New World Camelids) and the Camelus genus (Old World Camelids) including: Camelus bactriamus (Linnaeus, 1758; Asiatic or two-humped camel) otherwise known as the Bactrian camel and Camelus dromedarius (Linnaeus, 1758; Arabian or one-humped camel) or simply the camel (Wernery & Kdaden 2002; Yakhchali & Chraghi, 2007). There are about 20 million camels in North and East Africa countries, and Middle and Far East countries (Yakhchali & Athari, 2010). In Iran, one-humped camels are important multipurpose animal. The camels are the most suitable species of domestic mammals to be used under extremely arid conditions due to physiological attributes (Oryan et al., 2008).

So far, 20 valid species of Cryptosporidium have been reported which 12 of them infecting mammals (Fayer, 2010) and over 40 genotypes with no species names described (Xiao et al., 2004). Livestock cryptosporidiosis may have an important economic impact because of high morbidity and sometimes high mortality rates among animals (Sunnotel et al., 2006). Despite its wide distribution and obvious relevance to animal health, Cryptosporidium prevalence in camels of northwestern Iran has not been yet reported and this is the first extensive and quantitative investigation on the dromedary camels’ cryptosporidiosis. For this purpose, the present study was carried out to determine the prelevance of Cryptosporidium infection in one-humped camels of Iranian farms.

Materials and Methods

Field Study Area

The Miandoab region is located in the southeast of West Azerbaijan province between latitude 36° 57’ N and longitude 46° 06’ E (Fig. 1). An average population of more than 200,000 dromedary camels is distributed over vast camel-raising areas in the arid and semiarid deserts of the country (Razavi et al., 2009). Approximately 0.3% of this population exist in northwestern Iran, especially in Miandoab suburban (Yakhchali & Athari, 2010).

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Geographical location of farms where animals sampled in northwestern Iran (M: Miandoab suburban; WAP: West Azerbaijan province).

Sampling Procedure

The study was undertaken in the Miandoab suburban from November 2009 to July 2010. In the course of the study, a total number of 170 camels (85 males and 85 females) were randomly selected from camel farms using table of random numbers. Sample size was calculated according to Thrusfield (1997). The examined camels were crossbred and indigenous which reared traditionally. For each animal, age and sex were recorded. The age was determined on the basis of eruption of permanent incisor teeth (Smallwood, 1992). The animals were divided into four groups, namely young camel calves (less than one year old), immature (two-three years old), adult (four-five years old) and old (more than five years old). The animals subjected to a clinical examination including general body condition, heart and respiratory rates and signs of diarrhoea.

In each farm, fecal sample was collected directly from the rectum using sterile plastic gloves. The samples were transported to the laboratory in a cool box and then stored for a maximum of 24 h before analysis. The feces were classified according to their consistency as diarrhoeic (D) and non-diarrhoeic (ND).

Sample Processing

One hundred and seventy stool samples were examined in the study. Each camel was numbered and subjected to a clinical examination. The collected fecal samples of each animal were examined by direct smear techniques. To determine oocysts shedding, the negative faecal samples by direct smear examination were concentrated by centrifugal sedimentation (2,500 rpm for 2 min) and Clayton-Lane flotation techniques using standard Sheather solution (sg 1.12) (Soulsby, 1982; Hendrix, 1998). The presence of Cryptosporidium-like oocysts in all samples was confirmed by modified Ziehl-Neelsen (MZN) staining (Henricksen & Polenz, 1981). The diameter of 100 Cryptosporidium-like oocysts of each infected camel was measured at 1,000 × magnification. Each positive sample was considered when at least one oocyst with the correct morphologic characters was observed (Cryptosporidium-like oocysts were 4-6 μm and spherical containing a residuum, sporozoites and usually within a clear halo, against a blue background) (Soulsby, 1982; Baxby et al., 1984).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical evaluation was undertaken to compare the prevalence among different age groups and gender with confidence interval of 95% using non-parametric Chi-square and t tests (SPSS for Windows). Probability value of < 0.05 was regarded statistically significant.

Results

The overall prevalence of Cryptosporidium species among the examined camels was 10% (17/170) (Table I). The parasite genus identification of the oocysts was confirmed by morphology. The oocysts were nearly spherical in shape and contained four sporozoites. The average size (± SD) of the oocysts was 5.70 (0.49) × 4.74 (0.3) μm (range 5.20-6.10 × 3.90-4.98 μm) with shape index (length/ width) of 1.19 (0.05, range 1.08-1.26). These morphological characters nearly fit with the description of Cryptosporidium-like oocysts (Fig. 2).

thumbnail Fig. 2.

Cryptosporidium-like oocysts stained by modified Ziehl-Neelsen (MZN) method (arrow head, 1,000 ×).

Table I.

The prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection, oocysts shedding and faecal consistency, in different age groups of naturally infected camels in Miandoab suburb, Iran (n = 170).

Camel calves (< one year old) had the highest prevalence, with an overall average of 20% in the course of study. The prevalence was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in camel calves compared to the other age groups (Table I). Some of the infected animals showed wasting, diarrhoea and debility. Older camels with shedding oocysts in faeces did not show symptoms of cryptosporidiosis. The highest prevalence of Cryptosporidium species in D animals was 16% in camel calves. While in ND cases, it was 10% for adult camels (Table I). The oldest animal shedding Cryptosporidium-like oocysts was 4.5 years old. No old camels were infected with Cryptosporidium species at any time during the study.

The prevalence of infection in male and female examined camels indicated that five (6%) male and 12 (14%) female had Cryptosporidium infection. Infection rate was highest in female camels (33%) with less than one year old. There was no significant difference in the prevalence between male and female camels in all age groups (p > 0.05).

Discussion

Cryptosporidium biology, distribution pattern, pathology and prevalence have been reported in many countries throughout the world. However, it is restricted to domestic ruminants (cattle, sheep and goats) and limited data is available in other herbivores including camels (Nouri, 2002; Razavi et al., 2009). The results of present study revealed that Cryptosporidium infection occurred also in one-humped camels of northwestern Iran with low prevalence. The prevalence in naturally infected camels of Iran was reported in north-east (1.9%) (Borji et al., 2009), south (37.9%) (Razavi et al., 2009) and Qeshm Island in Persian golf (16.9%) (Nazifi et al., 2010). Saleh & Mahran (2007), El Kelesh et al. (2009), Abdel-Wahab and Abdel-Maogood (2011) noted that camel Cryptosporidium infection rate in Egypt varied between 3.37-19.30%. These variations could be due to the difference in the environmental condition and hygienic measures.

In this study, age of examined camel calves had significant effect on prevalence compared to other age groups. According to Lorenzo et al. (1993), Scott et al. (1995) and Olson et al. (1997), young animals are much more susceptible to the infections than adult ones in other animals. These findings suggest that the age-related distribution of Cryptosporidium infection in this age group is not similar to that previously reported in camels (Soltane et al., 2007; Borji et al., 2009; Razavi et al., 2009). It seems that the adult camels (three-four years old) with low prevalence, having normal formed of faeces (ND) and no clinical symptoms of cryptosporidiosis served as carriers for young camels.

The sex of examined camels had no significant effect on prevalence. With respect to this finding, the current study is in concordance with other researches (Chalmers et al., 1997; Bull et al., 1998; Razavi et al., 2009). No infection in old camels (> five years old), even when camel calves were infected, suggests that immunity does develop in older animals (Fayer, 2004). It is therefore camels to be as healthy carriers and sources of Cryptosporidium infection for human beings and other animals. The infected animals can shed oocysts into the environment and remain as a source of infection to other animals and humans (Xiao et al., 1993). Hence, some of the Cryptosporidium species (C. parvum, C. meleagridis and C. canis) are of zoonotic concern and could be of great public health concern in the region (Graczyk et al., 2003).

Camel husbandry has been considered a sector of food supply for rural and sometimes urban people in this geographical region of Iran. Thus, their health status is important and epidemiological investigation on Cryptosporidium infections is useful to launch an all-round control programmed in this area. Therefore, further investigations will reveal more information about economic effects of this parasite and public health concern in the region.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. K. Badali from Parasitology Laboratory of Urmia Faculty of Veterinary Medicine for technical assistance and owners of the region for their cooperation in the field study.

References

  1. Abdel-Wahab A. & Abdel-Maogood S. Identification of Cryptosporidium species infecting camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Egypt. Journal of American Science, 2011, 7 (2), 609–612. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baxby D., Blundell N. & Hart C.A. The development and performance of a simple sensitive method for the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in faeces. Journal of Hygiene Cambridge, 1984, 99, 317–323. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borji H., Razmi G.H.,Movassaghi A.R., Naghibi A.G. & Maleki M. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium and Eimeria infections in dromedary (Camelus dromedarius) in abattoir of Mashhad, Iran. Journal of Camel Practice and Research, 2009, 16 (2), 167–170. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bull S.A., Chalmers R.M., Sturdee A.P. & Healing T.D. A survey of Cryptosporidium species in Skomer bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus skomerensis). Journal of Zoology, 1998, 244, 119–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caccio S.M. Molecular epidemiology of human cryptosporidiosis. Parassitologia, 2005, 47, 185–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Castro-Hermida J.A., Gonzalez-Losada Y.A. & Ares-Mazas E. Prevalence and risk factors involved in the spread of neonatal bovine cryptosporidiosis in Galicia (NW Spain). Veterinary Parasitology, 2002, 106, 1–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Causapé A.C., Quilez J., Sanchez-Acedo C., Del Cacho E. & Lopez-Bernad F. Prevalence and analysis of potential risk factors for Cryptosporidium parvum infection in lambs in Zaragoza (northeastern Spain). Veterinary Parasitology, 2002, 104, 287–298. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chalmers R.M., Sturdee A.P., Bull S.A., Miller A. & Wright S.E. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium parvum and C. muris in Mus domesticus, Apodemus sylvaticus and Clethrionomys glareolus in an agricultural system. Parasitology Research, 1997, 83, 478–482. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. de Graaf D.C., Vanopdenbosch E., Ortega-Mora L.M., Abbasi H. & Peeters J.E. A review of the importance of cryptosporidiosis in farm animals. International Journal for Parasitology, 1999, 29, 1269–1287. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. El Kelesh E.A., Abdel-Maogood S.Z. & Abdel-Wahab A.M. Comparative studies on some Cryptosporidium species infecting different animals. Egyptian Veterinary Medical Society of Parasitology Journal, 2009, 5, 19–36. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fayer R. & Ungar B.L.P. Cryptosporidium spp. and cryptosporidiosis. Microbiology Reviews, 1986, 50, 458–483. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fayer R. Cryptosporidium: a water-borne zoonotic parasite. Veterinary Parasitology, 2004, 126, 37–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fayer R. Taxonomy and species delimitation in Cryptosporidium. Experimental Parasitology, 2010, 124, 90–97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Graczyk T.K., Grimse B.H., Knight R., DaSilva A.J., Pieniazek N.J. & Veal D.A. Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia carried by synanthropic flies by combined fluorescent in situ hybridization and a monoclonal antibody. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2003, 68, 228–232. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hendrix C.M. Diagnostic Veterinary Medicine, 2nd edition. Mosby Publishers, St. Louis, 1998, 257–259. [Google Scholar]
  16. Henricksen S.A. & Polenz J.F. Staining of Cryptosporidia by modified Ziehl-Neelsen technique. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 1981, 22, 594–596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Joachim A. Human cryptosporidiosis: an update with special emphasis on the situation in Europe. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. B, Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health, 2004, 51, 251–259. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Minas A., Koutsoukou-Hartona W. & Papasavvas M. Epidemiological survey of diarrhoeic faeces of lambs and kids for cryptosporidial oocysts in the Larissa region. Bulletin of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, 1994, 44, 112–114. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mirzaei M. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium sp. infection in diarrhoeic humans in Iran. The Korean Journal of Parasitology, 2007, 45, 133–137. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nahrevanian H., Assmar M. & Ghorbani Samin M. Cryptosporidiosis among immunocompetent patients with gastroenteritis in Iran: a comparison with other enteropathogenic parasites. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 2007, 40, 154–156. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nazifi S., Behzadi M.A., Haddadi S.H., Raayat Jahromi A., Mehrshad S. & Amadon A. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium isolated from dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Qeshm Island, Southern Iran. Comparative Clinical Pathology, 2010, 19, 311–314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nouri M.A. Cryptosporidium muris like parasite in cattle and camels in Iran. Indian Veterinary Journal, 2002, 79, 558–559. [Google Scholar]
  23. Oryan A., Valinezhad A. & Bahrami S. Prevalence and pathology of camel filariasis in Iran. Parasitology Research, 2008, 103, 1125–1131. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Razavi S.M., Oryan A., Bahrami S., Mohammadalipour A. & Gowhari M. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in camels (Camelus dromedarius) in a slaughterhouse in Iran. Tropical Biomedicine, 2009, 26 (3), 267–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Saleh M.A. & Mahran O.M. A preliminary study on cryptosporidiosis in dromedary camels at Shalatin Area, Egypt. Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal, 2007, 53 (112), 195–208. [Google Scholar]
  26. Smallwood J.E. A guided tour of veterinary anatomy. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1992, 322–323. [Google Scholar]
  27. Soltane R., Guyot K., Dei-Cas E. & Ayadi A. Cryptosporidium parvum (Eucoccidiorida: Cryptosporiidae) in calves: results of a longitudinal study in a dairy farm in Tunisia. Parasite, 2007, 14, 309–312. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Soulsby E.J.L. Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of domesticated animals, 7th edition. Bailliere Tindall, London, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sunnotel O., Lowery C.J., Moore J.E., Dooley J.S.G., Xiao L. & Millar B.C. Cryptosporidium. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2006, 43, 7–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Thrusfield M. Veterinary Epidemiology, 2nd edition. Blackwell Sciences, Oxford, 1997, 182. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang R., Zhang L., Ning C., Feng Y., Jian F., Xiao L., Lu B., Ai W. & Dong H. Multilocus phylogenetic analysis of Cryptosporidium andersoni (Apicomplexa) isolated from a Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) in China. Parasitology Research, 2008, 102, 915–920. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wernery U. & Kdaden O.R. Infectious diseases in camelids. Blackwell Sciences, Oxford, 2002, 3–17. [Google Scholar]
  33. Xiao L., Herd R.P. & Rings D.M. Diagnosis of Cryptosporidium on a sheep farm with neonatal diarrhoea by immunofluorescense assays. Veterinary Parasitology, 1993, 47, 17–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Xiao L.H., Fayer R., Ryan U. & Upton S.J. Cryptosporidium taxonomy: recent advances and implications for public health. Clinical Microbiology, 2004, 17, 72–97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yakhchali M. & Chraghi E. Eimeriosis in bacterian and dromedary camels in the Miandoab region Iran. Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), 2007, 57 (5–6), 545–552. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yakhchali M. & Gholami E. Prevalence of Eimeria and Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle of Sanandaj city (Kurdistan province), Iran. Journal of Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 2008, 87, 81–87 (in Persian with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  37. Yakhchali M. & Athari SH. A study on prevalence of Eimeria spp. infection in camels of Tabriz region. Archives of Razi Institute, 2010, 65 (2), 111–115. [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table I.

The prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection, oocysts shedding and faecal consistency, in different age groups of naturally infected camels in Miandoab suburb, Iran (n = 170).

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Geographical location of farms where animals sampled in northwestern Iran (M: Miandoab suburban; WAP: West Azerbaijan province).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

Cryptosporidium-like oocysts stained by modified Ziehl-Neelsen (MZN) method (arrow head, 1,000 ×).

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.