EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 18 / No 3 (August 2011) Parasite, 18 3 (2011) 277-280 Full HTML
Open Access
Issue
Parasite
Volume 18, Number 3, August 2011
Page(s) 277 - 280
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2011183277
Published online 15 August 2011

© PRINCEPS Editions, Paris, 2011, transferred to Société Française de Parasitologie

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Dengue is currently one of the most important human arbovirus infections worldwide. The only prevention tool for dengue is vector control as there is no vaccine, nor any efficient drugs available. Dengue, which is transmitted by Aedes aegypti, has been in constant expansion since the end of the 1980s in Bolivia. Ae. aegypti has re-established itself in the city of Santa Cruz de la Sierra recently and the presence of dengue in Bolivia has been documented from 1987. Four very well documented epidemics took place since 1999, where at least one serotype was isolated every year (Roca et al., 2009). Although vertical transmission of the dengue virus from mosquito females to their progeny has been suggested since the 1970s, it was only demonstrated in nature recently (Hull et al., 1984). The first evidence came from the laboratory (Rosen et al., 1983). In natural conditions, attempts to isolate the virus from immature stages in South America were either negative (e.g. in Colombia, Romero-Vivas et al., 1998) or positive (e.g. in Guyana, Fouque & Carinci, 1996). In this study we investigated the occurrence and prevalence of vertical transmission and maintenance of the virus in the city of Santa Cruz, Bolivia.

Materials and methods

In January 2007, higher number of consultations was recorded in the city of Santa Cruz and numerous cases of dengue were immunologically confirmed. Entomological study was performed in February 2007 in houses having indicated cases of dengue within the last ten days. 11 houses distributed mainly in the city centre were prospected for larvae and pupae and followed-up using ovitraps. A survey was performed in May 2007 with 100 groups of five to 12 houses randomly selected in the whole city of Santa Cruz. Oviposition traps consisted of black plastic cans partially filled with water. Two hardboard paddles were placed in each ovipot for oviposition. In each house, four ovitraps were placed in sheltered areas (two inside and two outside the buildings) and examined weekly. Larvae and pupae were collected from the water of all containers by passing out the water through a sieve. Hatching larvae from egg paddles and field collected larvae of Ae. aegypti were reared separately. Adult mosquitoes (one to seven days after emergence) were separated by sex, pooled in vials and stored at - 70 °C. Pools ranging from three to 15 mosquitoes were ground in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (mean ± standard deviation of individuals = 14.3 ± 2.0). Total RNA extracted from mosquitoes was converted in cDNA (RT) and following by a semi-nested PCR (Harris et al., 1998). Sterile water was used as a negative PCR control. In any case, the negative control samples that were coamplified in each PCR procedure did not yield any product. The positivity of a pool of mosquitoes was confirmed by amplifying a product PCR. The amplification products were identified by their molecular weights: 482, 119, 290 and 389 bp for dengue serotype 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively.

The minimum infection rate (MIR) was defined as the ratio of the number of positive pools to the total number of mosquitoes. MIR assumes that only one infected individual is present in a positive pool. Consequently, we also used the true infection rate (TIR) defined as the estimated percentage of infected mosquitoes. Because TIR was calculated from pools of different sizes, we applied the maximum likehihood procedure developed by Katholi et al. (1995) using available algorithms that consider variations in pool size (Gu et al., 2004).

Results

A total of 46 pools of males and 51 pools of females of Ae. aegypti, representing respectively 635 males and 748 females of mosquito, were tested by PCR to reveal the presence of the serotypes of dengue RNA. Fourteen pools of mosquitoes, 11 pools of males and three of females revealed the presence of at least one dengue virus, serotype 1 or serotype 3 (Table I). No double infection was observed. The TIR and the MIR were estimated at 1.08 % (95 % confidence interval: 0.56-1.86 %) and 1.01 %, respectively. The specific TIR were estimated at 0.37 % (0.11-0.87 %) for dengue 1 and 0.68 % (0.29- 1.31 %) for dengue 3. In February 2007, the serotype 3 alone was observed among four pools of males. One from a pool of mosquitoes emerged from 20 positive breeding sites collected in seven positive houses and three among eggs collected by ovitraps. The survey in May 2007 collected larvae and/or pupae of Ae. aegypti in 1,057 positive breeding sites distributed in 421 houses. Two serotypes of dengue were observed in equal parts, as well as in pools of males or females: five pools of DEN-1 and five pools of DEN-3. Interestingly, some differences were observed according to the sex of the studied individuals. Globally, the MIR for males and females were 1.73 % and 0.40 % (p < 0.05), respectively. Similarly, in May, the MIRs were estimated at 4.02 % and 1.05 % (p < 0.05), respectively, for males and females. On the other hand, in the city centre in February 2007, the difference between males and females (0.87 % and 0.00 %, respectively) was not significant (p = 0.07).

Table I.

Numbers of mosquitoes, pools tested and dengue isolates in 2007 in the city of Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.

Discussion and conclusion

The efficiency of vertical transmission of serotypes of dengue was demonstrated in populations of vectors in Santa Cruz de la Sierra. This general term indicates that the infection is transmitted to the progeny of mosquitoes, and demonstrates that mosquitoes play not only the role of vectors but also a reservoir of virus (Fontenille et al., 1997; Ibáñez-Bernal et al., 1997). Our understanding of the epidemiology of arboviruses is not complete and in particular as to how the dengue virus persists in unfavourable conditions. Numerous hypotheses have been proposed, but the only one demonstrated is the existence of vertical virus transmission in their vector mosquitoes. Vertical transmission in nature has been estimated occasionally, but this mode of transmission could be more important than usually considered. For detecting vertical transmission, the previous studies using immunofluorescence method detected lower infection rate than in our study (Khin & Than, 1983; Hull et al., 1984; Arunachalam et al., 2008). In Santa Cruz we observed about 1 % of infected vectors in epidemic period. This result was similar to other recent studies in Asia and in America using RT-PCR molecular method (Kow et al., 2001; Ratanasetyuth, 2004; Günther et al., 2007; Cecílio et al., 2009). The molecular detection of the viruses in vectors could be a useful additional tool to detect the presence of a new serotype, possibly at the origin of a new epidemic (Chow et al., 1998). More surprising is the detection of the serotype DEN-1 as early as May 2007 among vectors while this serotype was revealed in patients from Santa Cruz in April 2008, i.e. 11 months later (Roca et al., 2009). Even if the period of time between the detection of dengue viral RNA in mosquito and the first human cases is not well quantified, we know it generally occurs within a few weeks (Lee & Rohani, 2005). In the case of our study the first human cases of the disease were declared and/or identified only in the next season of transmission, almost one year after its presence was established in the vector. This example demonstrates that vertical transmission of the dengue is underestimated in epidemics, as well as modelling developed to describe the appearance of dengue among virgin populations.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the French national research agency (Project ANR 05 SEST 010 01-EPIDENGUE), by CENETROP and IRD. We thank our colleagues of the IRD of Montpellier for their help in the preparation of our manuscript: Didier Fontenille and Vincent Robert for critical review and comments, Frédéric Lardeux for suggestions in calculating statistical tests and Philip Agnew to have revised the translation in English.

References

  1. Arunachalam N., Tewari S.C., Thenmozhi V., Rajendran R., Paramasivan R., Manavalan R., Ayanar K. & Tyagi B.K. Natural vertical transmission of dengue viruses by Aedes aegypti in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. The Indian Journal of Medical Research, 2008, 127, 395–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cecílio A.B., Campanelli E.S., Souza K.P.R., Figueiredo L.B. & Resende M.C. Natural vertical transmission by Stegomyia albopicta as dengue vector in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 2009, 69, 123–127. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chow V.T., Chan Y.C., Yong R., Lee K.M., Lim L.K., Chung Y.K., Lam-Phua S.G. & Tan B.T. Monitoring of dengue viruses in field-caught Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes by a type-specific polymerase chain reaction and cycle sequencing. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1998, 58, 578–586. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fontenille D., Diallo M., Mondo M., Ndiaye M. & Thonnon J. First evidence of natural vertical transmission of yellow fever virus in Aedes aegypti, its epidemic vector. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1997, 91, 533–535. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fouque F. & Carinci R. Aedes aegypti en Guyane française : quelques aspects de l’histoire, de l’écologie générale et de la transmission verticale des virus de la dengue. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique, 1996, 89, 115–119. [Google Scholar]
  6. Günther J., Martínez-Muñoz J.P., Pérez-Ishiwara D.G. & Salas-Benito J. Evidence of vertical transmission of dengue virus in two endemic localities in the state of Oaxaca Mexico. Intervirology, 2007, 50, 347–352. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gu W., Lampman R. & Novak R.J. Assessment of arbovirus vector infection rates using variable size pooling. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 2004, 18, 200–204. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris E., Roberts T.G., Smith L., Selle J., Kramer L.D., Valle S., Sandoval E. & Balmaseda A. Typing of dengue viruses in clinical specimens and mosquitoes by single-tube multiplex reverse transcriptase PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1998, 36, 2634–2639. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hull B., Tikasingh E., de Souza M. & Martinez R. Natural transovarial transmission of dengue 4 virus in Aedes aegypti in Trinidad. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1984, 33, 1248–1250. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ibáñez-Bernal S., Briseño B., Mutebi J.P., Argot E., Rodríguez G., Martínez-Campos C., Paz R., de la Fuente-San Román P., Tapia-Conyer R. & Flisser A. First record in America of Aedes albopictus naturally infected with dengue virus during the 1995 outbreak at Reynosa, Mexico. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 1997, 11, 305–309. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Katholi C.R., Toé L., Merriweather A. & Unnasch T.R. Determining the prevalence of Onchocerca volvulus infection in vector populations by polymerase chain reaction screening of pools of black flies. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1995, 172, 1414–1417. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Khin M.M. & Than K.A. Transovarial transmission of dengue 2 virus by Aedes aegypti in nature. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1983, 32, 590–594. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kow C.Y., Koon L.L. & Yin P.F. Detection of dengue viruses in field caught male Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Singapore by type-specific PCR. Journal of Medical Entomology, 2001, 38, 475–479. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee H.L. & Rohani A. Transovarial transmission of dengue virus in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in relation to dengue outbreak in an urban area in Malaysia. Dengue Bulletin, 2005, 29, 106–111. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ratanasetyuth. N. Detection of dengue viral RNA in mosquitoes (Aedes sp.) by nucleic acid sequenced based amplification (NASBA) and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). MSc thesis, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  16. Roca Y., Baronti C., Revollo R.J., Cook S., Loayza R., Ninove L., Torrez Fernandez R.,Vargas Flores J., Herve J.P. & De Lamballerie X. Molecular epidemiological analysis of dengue fever in Bolivia from 1998 to 2008. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 2009, 9, 337–344. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Romero-Vivas C.M., Leake C.J. & Falconar A.K. Determination of dengue virus serotypes in individual Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in Colombia. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 1998, 12, 284–288. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosen L., Shroyer D.A., Tesh R.B., Freier J.E. & Lien J.C. Transovarial transmission of dengue viruses by mosquitoes: Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1983, 32, 1108–1119. [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table I.

Numbers of mosquitoes, pools tested and dengue isolates in 2007 in the city of Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.