Methods for parasitic protozoans detection in the environmental samples
Parasite, 16 3 (2009) 183-190
Published online: 2009-09-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
59 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-34272-1.00004-5
Overview of waterborne protozoa in Latin American water samples, detection methods and water treatment
Natália de Melo Nasser Fava, Maria Júlia Rodrigues da Cunha, Lucas Ariel Totaro Garcia, Paulo Marcos Faria Maciel, Fernando Lindo Silva, Vanessa Colombo-Corbi, William John Snelling, James Stephen Gerard Dooley and Lyda Patricia Sabogal-PazThe Microbe 10 100650 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microb.2025.100650
1137 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9859-9_55
Parasitic protozoa: Biosystematics, identification, pathogenicity, causes and remedial measures
Gourav Mishra, Razia Kausar and Tushar YadavMicrobial Pathogenesis 207 107867 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107867
Real-Time Protozoa Detection from Microscopic Imaging Using YOLOv4 Algorithm
İdris Kahraman, İsmail Rakıp Karaş and Muhammed Kamil TuranApplied Sciences 14 (2) 607 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020607
Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: a review of water resources in Iran – an update 2020
Edris Hoseinzadeh, Atena Rostamian, Mahta Razaghi and Chiang WeiDesalination and Water Treatment 213 91 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2021.26678
A review on application of next-generation sequencing methods for profiling of protozoan parasites in water: Current methodologies, challenges, and perspectives
N.P. Mthethwa, I.D. Amoah, P. Reddy, F. Bux and S. KumariJournal of Microbiological Methods 187 106269 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106269
Mining Public Metagenomes for Environmental Surveillance of Parasites: A Proof of Principle
Frits F. J. Franssen, Ingmar Janse, Dennis Janssen, et al.Frontiers in Microbiology 12 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.622356
Current and emerging tools for detecting protozoan cysts and oocysts in water
Sona Jain, Thyago Gois Costa Melo, Silvio Santana Dolabella and Juewen LiuTrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 121 115695 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.115695
127 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119238102.ch9
Development and evaluation of molecular methods for detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in human clinical samples
Shehla Khalil, Bijay Ranjan Mirdha, Jaishree Paul, et al.Experimental Parasitology 170 207 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2016.10.001
Enhancing Cryptosporidium parvum recovery rates for improved water monitoring
Pagona Pavli, Sesha Venkateswaran, Mark Bradley and Helen BridleChemosphere 143 57 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.021
Detection of parasitic particles in domestic and urban wastewaters and assessment of removal efficiency of treatment plants in Tehran, Iran
Kareem Hatam-Nahavandi, Amir Hossein Mahvi, Mehdi Mohebali, et al.Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering 13 (1) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-015-0155-5
Assessment of molecular methods as a tool for detecting pathogenic protozoa isolated from water bodies
B. Skotarczak, L. Kolodziejczyk, M. Sawczuk and M. AdamskaJournal of Water and Health 13 (4) 953 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2015.077
Development of a Rapid, Simple Method for Detecting Naegleria fowleri Visually in Water Samples by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP)
Aongart Mahittikorn, Hirotake Mori, Supaluk Popruk, et al.PLOS ONE 10 (3) e0120997 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120997
Thermophilic potentially pathogenic amoebae isolated from natural water bodies in Poland and their molecular characterization
Malgorzata Adamska, Agata Leonska-Duniec, Natalia Lanocha and Bogumila SkotarczakActa Parasitologica 59 (3) 433 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-014-0266-7
Comparison of nested PCR and microscopy for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovine calves
S. A. Bhat, M. Dixit, P. D. Juyal and N. K. SinghJournal of Parasitic Diseases 38 (1) 101 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-012-0201-5
Comparison of next-generation droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) with quantitative PCR (qPCR) for enumeration of Cryptosporidium oocysts in faecal samples
Rongchang Yang, Andrea Paparini, Paul Monis and Una RyanInternational Journal for Parasitology 44 (14) 1105 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.08.004
Development of an immunomagnetic bead separation-coupled quantitative PCR method for rapid and sensitive detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in calf feces
Shanshan Gao, Min Zhang, Said Amer, et al.Parasitology Research 113 (6) 2069 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-3856-2
Specific and quantitative detection and identification of Cryptosporidium hominis andC. parvum in clinical and environmental samples
Rongchang Yang, Cain Murphy, Yong Song, et al.Experimental Parasitology 135 (1) 142 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2013.06.014
Recovery of Cryptosporidium from spiked water and stool samples measured by PCR and real time PCR
M. Adamska, A. Leonska-Duniec, M. Sawczuk, A. Maciejewska and B. SkotarczakVeterinární medicína 57 (5) 224 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.17221/5952-VETMED
Potential molecular tools for assessing the public health risk associated with waterborne Cryptosporidium oocysts
Rajendra J. KothavadeJournal of Medical Microbiology 61 (8) 1039 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.043158-0
Comparative efficacy of conventional primer sets in detection of Cryptosporidium parvum for diagnostic use
Sirri Kar, Arwid Daugschies and Berit BangouraParasitology Research 106 (3) 683 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1737-x