Table 2
Summary of the nBLAST search for representative sequences of ITS regions (in bold) and 18S rDNA for available Gyrodactylus species related to Gyrodactylus species reported in the present study. Gyrodactylus species lacking DNA sequences or hits below 98% identity are not shown. For all species, the E-value was 0.0. GB AN: GenBank accession number.
| Gyrodactylus spp. | Fish host in this study | Query cover | % Identity | Hits (by name) | Hits (by fish host) | Hits (by GB AN) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. atratuli | R. cataractae | 97% | 100% | G. colemanensis | S. fontinalis | JF836090 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) |
| 97% | 100% | Gyrodactylus sp. | N. crysoleucas | KT149284 | (Leis et al. 2016) | ||
| G. colemanensis | C. commersonii | 97% | 99.6% | G. colemanensis | S. fontinalis | JF836142 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) |
| 100% | 100% | G. colemanensis | S. fontinalis | JF836090 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) | ||
| 98% | 100% | Gyrodactylus sp. | N. crysoleucas | KT149284 | (Leis et al. 2016) | ||
| G. ellae n. sp. | C. commersonii | 100% | 98.6% | G. laevisoides | C. eos | KF263526 | (King et al. 2013) |
| G. hanseni n. sp. | L. chrysocephalus | 96% | 98.8% | Gyrodactylus sp. | N. crysoleucas | KT149288 | (Leis et al. 2016) |
| 100% | 100% | G. colemanensis | S. fontinalis | JF836090 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) | ||
| 98% | 100% | Gyrodactylus sp. | N. crysoleucas | KT149284 | (Leis et al. 2016) | ||
| S.atromaculatus | 96% | 99% | Gyrodactylus sp. | N. crysoleucas | KT149288 | (Leis et al. 2016) | |
| 100% | 100% | G. colemanensis | S. fontinalis | JF836090 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) | ||
| 98% | 100% | Gyrodactylus sp. | N. crysoleucas | KT149284 | (Leis et al. 2016) | ||
| G. huyseae n. sp. | L. chrysocephalus | 100% | 98.6% | G. sedelnikowi | B. barbatula | AJ566378 | (Matějusová et al. 2003) |
| 100% | 98.4% | G. carassii | A. alburnus | AJ566377 | (Matějusová et al. 2003) | ||
| N. hudsonius | 100% | 98.8% | G. sedelnikowi | B. barbatula | AJ566378 | (Matějusová et al. 2003) | |
| 100% | 98.2% | G. carassii | A. alburnus | AJ566377 | (Matějusová et al. 2003) | ||
| G. kuchtai n. sp. | C. neogaeus | 100% | 99.5% | G. laevisoides | C. eos | KF263526 | (King et al. 2013) |
| G. prikrylovae n. sp. | P. promelas | 47% | 99.6% | Gyrodactylus sp. | P. promelas | AY099507 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) |
| 98% | 98.1% | Gyrodactylus sp. | N. crysoleucas | KT149284 | (Leis et al. 2016) | ||
| G. scholzi n. sp. | P. promelas | 46% | 99.3% | Gyrodactylus sp. | P. promelas | AY099507 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) |
| 98% | 98.1% | Gyrodactylus sp. | N. crysoleucas | KT149284 | (Leis et al. 2016) | ||
| G. sp. “C. neogaeus” | C. neogaeus | 100% | 98.2% | G. laevisoides | C. eos | KF263526 | (King et al. 2013) |
| G. sp. “H. nuchalis” | H. nuchalis | 100% | 98.8% | G. colemanensis | S. fontinalis | JF836090 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) |
| G. sp. 1 “R. atratulus” | R. atratulus | 100% | 100% | G. colemanensis | S. fontinalis | JF836090 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) |
| 98% | 100% | Gyrodactylus sp. | N. crysoleucas | KT149284 | (Leis et al. 2016) | ||
| G. sp. 2 “R. atratulus” | R. atratulus | 100% | 100% | G. colemanensis | S. fontinalis | JF836090 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) |
| 98% | 100% | Gyrodactylus sp. | N. crysoleucas | KT149284 | (Leis et al. 2016) | ||
| G. spathulatus | C. commersonii | 46% | 99.6% | G. spathulatus | C. commersonii | JF836152 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) |
| 100% | 99.7% | G. spathulatus | C. commersonii | JF836098 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) | ||
| G. stunkardi | R. atratulus | 86% | 98.4% | Gyrodactylus sp. | R. osculus | AY099508 | (Boeger and Kritsky 2003) |
| 100% | 99.8% | G. spathulatus | C. commersonii | JF836098 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) | ||
| G. variabilis | N. crysoleucas | 98% | 99.6% | Gyrodactylus sp. | N. crysoleucas | KT149288 | (Leis et al. 2016) |
| 97% | 100% | G. colemanensis | S. fontinalis | JF836090 | (Gilmore et al. 2012) | ||
| 96% | 100% | Gyrodactylus sp. | N. crysoleucas | KT149284 | (Leis et al. 2016) |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.