Effects of antiserum against rUBE2F during E. acervulina challenge on different parameters.
|Groups||Average body weight gains (g)||Mean lesion scores||Oocyst output (Ig)|
|Unchallenged control||90.46 ± 7.97A||0.00 ± 0.00A||–A|
|Anti-pET32a protein control||19.36 ± 3.96C||2.35 ± 0.93C||6.30 ± 0.23B|
|Negative serum control||21.43 ± 4.33C||2.31 ± 0.81C||6.30 ± 0.33B|
|Anti-rUBE2F||39.40 ± 11.86B||1.37 ± 0.83B||6.13 ± 0.24B|
|Challenged control||18.21 ± 9.29C||2.74 ± 0.93C||6.28 ± 0.35B|
Significant difference (p < 0.01) between means and ranks with different letters, and no significant difference (p > 0.05) between means and ranks with the same letter; the oocyst output was zero (designated as “–”) in the unchallenged control group.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.