Table 1
Monogeneans of invasive tilapias with mean abundance in south China.
Sites | Abbr. | Waters | Host species | No. | Cci | Cha | Csc | Cth | Cti | Slo | Eco | Ema |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baise | BS | River | C. zillii | 30 | 0.3 | 0.1 | × | × | 0.8 | × | 0.3 | × |
S. galilaeus | 30 | × | <0.1 | 0.6 | × | 11.4 | × | × | × | |||
O. niloticus | 30 | 2 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 1.6 | 12.9 | 3.4 | × | 0.1 | |||
Changjiang | CJ | Reservoir | C. zillii | 20 | 0.9 | 0.1 | × | × | 3.4 | 1.3 | × | × |
O. niloticus | 22 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 42.7 | 0.9 | × | × | |||
Chengmai | CM | Reservoir | C. zillii | 128 | 0.9 | 0.2 | × | <0.1 | 5.1 | <0.1 | × | × |
O. niloticus | 39 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 3 | 9.8 | 6.1 | × | <0.1 | |||
Chaozhou | CZ | River | C. zillii | 108 | 0.1 | × | <0.1 | × | 0.4 | <0.1 | × | × |
S. galilaeus | 13 | × | × | 0.4 | × | 6.5 | × | × | 0.2 | |||
O. niloticus | 26 | 0.3 | × | 1.2 | × | 7.1 | 1.3 | × | 0.1 | |||
Danzhou | DZ | Reservoir | C. zillii | 23 | × | × | × | × | 0.4 | × | × | × |
O. mossambicus | 15 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 8.9 | 0.4 | 5.5 | 1.3 | × | 1.6 | |||
O. niloticus | 492 | 5.2 | 7.7 | 3.7 | 7.5 | 11.9 | 6.9 | × | 1.6 | |||
Fuzhou | FZ | River | C. zillii | 25 | × | × | × | × | 1 | × | – | – |
S. galilaeus | 13 | × | × | 0.2 | × | 1.5 | × | – | – | |||
O. niloticus | 17 | × | × | 0.1 | × | 0.6 | × | – | – | |||
Gengma | GM | Reservoir | O. niloticus | 31 | 0.6 | × | 1.3 | × | 5.9 | 2.9 | × | × |
Guangzhou | GZ | Captivity | O. niloticus | >50 | × | × | √ | √ | √ | √ | × | √ |
Haikou | HK | Estuary | C. zillii | 10 | × | × | × | × | 4.8 | × | × | × |
O. mossambicus | 32 | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | |||
O. niloticus | 32 | × | × | × | × | 1 | × | × | × | |||
Heyuan | HY | Reservoir | C. zillii | 29 | <0.1 | × | × | × | 3.7 | × | 0.2 | × |
S. galilaeus | 6 | × | × | × | × | 6.3 | × | × | × | |||
O. niloticus | 7 | 2 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 26.9 | 2.1 | × | × | |||
Hualien | HL | Captivity | O. niloticus | 1 | 1 | × | × | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – |
Liuzhou | LZ | River | C. zillii | 40 | × | × | × | × | 0.3 | × | 1.8 | × |
O. niloticus | 13 | × | 0.3 | 1.4 | × | 4.1 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | |||
Macau | AM | Estuary | C. zillii | 6 | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × |
O. niloticus | 6 | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | |||
Maoming | MM | Reservoir | C. zillii | 553 | 0.6 | 0.3 | <0.1 | 0.1 | 4 | 0.1 | 0.8 | <0.1 |
O. niloticus | 599 | 2.5 | 5 | 1 | 4.6 | 15.6 | 5 | × | 0.3 | |||
Nanning | NN | River | C. zillii | 30 | <0.1 | 0.1 | × | × | 5.1 | × | 0.1 | × |
S. galilaeus | 6 | × | × | 0.3 | × | 14.2 | × | × | × | |||
O. niloticus | 32 | 0.4 | 6 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 19.6 | 10.4 | × | 0.1 | |||
Quannei | QN | River | C. zillii | 34 | 0.7 | × | × | × | 3.8 | 0.1 | 3 | × |
O. niloticus | 30 | 2.2 | × | 1.2 | 0.8 | 9.5 | 3.8 | × | 1 | |||
Quanzhou | QZ | River | C. zillii | 42 | × | × | <0.1 | × | 0.3 | × | <0.1 | × |
S. galilaeus | 26 | × | × | 0.7 | × | 7.1 | × | × | × | |||
O. niloticus | 31 | 0.1 | × | 2.7 | 0.3 | 4.5 | 1.1 | × | 0.2 | |||
Shaoguan | SG | Reservoir | C. zillii | 683 | <0.1 | × | × | <0.1 | 1 | × | 1.8 | × |
Xiamen | XM | River | C. zillii | 5 | × | × | × | × | 2 | × | – | – |
S. galilaeus | 19 | × | × | 0.1 | × | 0.6 | × | – | – | |||
O. niloticus | 28 | × | × | 1.5 | 0.6 | 5 | 1.2 | – | – | |||
Xishuangbanna | BN | River | C. zillii | 23 | × | × | × | × | 0.2 | <0.1 | 1 | × |
O. niloticus | 42 | 0.1 | 5.6 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 2 | 1.5 | × | 0.1 |
Abbr., abbreviation of sites; No., sampling number; Cti, Cichlidogyrus tilapiae; Cci, C. cirratus; Cth, C. thurstonae; Csc, C. sclerosus; Cha, C. halli; Slo, Scutogyrus longicornis; Eco, E. coronatus; Ema, E. malmbergi. √, sampled, but data not recorded; ×, not sampled; –, not examined. There were twelve G. cichlidarum sampled, including two G. cichlidarum collected from Gaozhou reservoir, Maoming (MM) and Songtao reservoir, Danzhou (DZ), respectively, and eight collected from laboratory reared O. niloticus in Guangzhou (GZ). Only one Gyrodactylus sp1. collected from Songtao reservoir, Danzhou.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.